Accelerating Unstructured-grid CFD Algorithms on NVIDIA and AMD GPUs
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
GPU↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “AMD GPUs”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
A Multi-Architecture Approach for Implicit Computational Fluid Dynamics on Unstructured Grids
High-performance computing (HPC) architectures are trending toward manycore paradigms such as graphics processing units (GPUs). Approximately half of the top 100 publicly disclosed supercomputers in the world utilize GPU accelerators for performance. This is in contrast to a decade ago, where there were only a few such machines in the top 100. It is not currently possible to compile and run legacy central processing unit (CPU) software efficiently on GPUs without significant refactoring. Though a number of frameworks offering performance portability exist, none offer a standardized specification that is supported by all major hardware vendors. Additionally, experiences show that obtaining a high percentage of peak performance often requires architecture-specific code. This work details a pragmatic multi-architecture computational fluid dynamics library focused on aerospace problems across the speed range from low subsonic to hypersonic flows involving thermochemical nonequilibrium. A thin abstraction layer above NVIDIA CUDA C++ is utilized, which enables primarily single-source software currently capable of running efficiently on multicore CPUs, NVIDIA GPUs, AMD GPUs, and Intel GPUs. Results on various problems of interest across the speed range are presented and performance is compared between various architectures.
GPU↗
A Multi-Architecture Approach for Implicit Computational Fluid Dynamics on Unstructured Grids
High-performance computing (HPC) architectures are trending toward manycore paradigms such as graphics processing units (GPUs). Approximately half of the top 100 publicly disclosed supercomputers in the world utilize GPU accelerators for performance. This is in contrast to a decade ago, where there were only a few such machines in the top 100. It is not currently possible to compile and run legacy central processing unit (CPU) software efficiently on GPUs without significant refactoring. Though a number of frameworks offering performance portability exist, none offer a standardized specification that is supported by all major hardware vendors. Additionally, experiences show that obtaining a high percentage of peak performance often requires architecture-specific code. This work details a pragmatic multi-architecture computational fluid dynamics library focused on aerospace problems across the speed range from low subsonic to hypersonic flows involving thermochemical nonequilibrium. A thin abstraction layer above NVIDIA CUDA C++ is utilized, which enables primarily single-source software currently capable of running efficiently on multicore CPUs, NVIDIA GPUs, AMD GPUs, and Intel GPUs. Results on various problems of interest across the speed range are presented and performance is compared between various architectures.
GPU↗
Optimization of a Solver for Computational Materials and Structures Problems on NVIDIA Volta and AMD Instinct GPUs
The Scalable Implementation of Finite Elements by NASA (ScIFEN) is a software package developed to solve complex computational materials and structures problems using the finite element method (FEM). In this paper, we describe optimization techniques to speed up the linear solver computation that occurs within the ScIFEN application. We consider GPUs from two different vendors, NVIDIA and AMD as our target platforms for optimization and highlight differences in performance and optimization techniques. The NVIDIA GPU Volta V100 is used in the Summit system deployed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the new exascale system, Frontier, will be using AMD Radeon Instinct GPU. We evaluated the performance of various optimization techniques on test matrices, ranging in size from100K to 4M, that are representative of ScIFEN applications. The linear solver computation is memory-bound on both GPUs. Our experiments show that on the NVIDIA GPU we obtained up to79%of the theoretical peak bandwidth, while the AMD GPU achieved 59%. Overall, the NVIDIA V100 GPU outperforms the AMD MI 25 GPU1. We observed an overall speedup of up to37X on an NVIDIA V100 compared to an Intel Skylake 12-coremachine. The solver for a 4M degree of freedom system took under 2.5 seconds.
Mohammad Zubair↗
Performance and Portability of a Linear Solver Across Emerging Architectures
A linear solver algorithm used by a large-scale unstructured-grid computational fluid dynamics application is examined for a broad range of familiar and emerging architectures. Efficient implementation of a linear solver is challenging on recent CPUs offering vector architectures. Vector loads and stores are essential to effectively utilize available memory bandwidth on CPUs, and maintaining performance across different CPUs can be difficult in the face of varying vector lengths offered by each. A similar challenge occurs on GPU architectures, where it is essential to have coalesced memory accesses to utilize memory bandwidth effectively. In this work, we demonstrate that restructuring a computation, and possibly data layout, with regard to architecture is essential to achieve optimal performance by establishing a performance benchmark for each target architecture in a low level language such as vector intrinsics or CUDA. In doing so, we demonstrate how a linear solver kernel can be mapped to Intel® Xeon™ and Xeon Phi™, Marvell® ThunderX2®, NEC® SX-Aurora™ TSUBASA Vector Engine, and NVIDIA® and AMD® GPUs. We further demonstrate that the required code restructuring can be achieved in higher level programming environments such as OpenACC, OCCA, and Intel® OneAPI™/SYCL, and that each generally results in optimal performance on the target architecture. Relative performance metrics for all implementations are shown, and subjective ratings for ease of implementation and optimization are suggested.
Programming models↗
Performance Optimization Methods for a Memory-Bound, Unstructured-Grid CFD Application on Massively Parallel GPU Platforms
Computational performance of the FUN3D unstructured-grid computational fluid dynamics (CFD) application on massively parallel GPU environments is memory-bound and highly dependent upon efficient reads from and atomic updates to the irregular cell-, edge-, and node-based data structures. In this talk, we present recent efforts into optimizing select performance-critical kernels on NVIDIA Tesla V100 and A100 GPUs and AMD CDNA MI100 GPUs. A novel use of L2 cache residency controls and asynchronous loads into on-chip shared memory are explored on the A100 GPU for the sparse iterative solver, which is dominated by mixed-precision, sparse matrix vector multiplication. Demonstrations show that these methods improve global memory bandwidth utilization by 13.5% on the A100 GPU. Several techniques are also presented that use registers and/or shared memory to facilitate array transposition and aggregation which combine to reduce the frequency and increase the cache efficiency of floating-point atomic updates to the irregular data structures. These methods are demonstrated to improve the kernel throughput by nearly 500% on select kernels on the AMD MI100 over atomic updates directly to global memory. Overall, both V100 and A100 GPUs outperformed the MI100 GPU on kernels dominated by double-precision atomic updates; however, the techniques demonstrated here reduced the performance gap and improved the MI100 performance.
GPU CPU unstructured CFD memory↗
Utilizing GPUs to Accelerate Turbomachinery CFD Codes
GPU computing has established itself as a way to accelerate parallel codes in the high performance computing world. This work focuses on speeding up APNASA, a legacy CFD code used at NASA Glenn Research Center, while also drawing conclusions about the nature of GPU computing and the requirements to make GPGPU worthwhile on legacy codes. Rewriting and restructuring of the source code was avoided to limit the introduction of new bugs. The code was profiled and investigated for parallelization potential, then OpenACC directives were used to indicate parallel parts of the code. The use of OpenACC directives was not able to reduce the runtime of APNASA on either the NVIDIA Tesla discrete graphics card, or the AMD accelerated processing unit. Additionally, it was found that in order to justify the use of GPGPU, the amount of parallel work being done within a kernel would have to greatly exceed the work being done by any one portion of the APNASA code. It was determined that in order for an application like APNASA to be accelerated on the GPU, it should not be modular in nature, and the parallel portions of the code must contain a large portion of the code's computation time.
computer programming↗