Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ALGAL BIOFUELS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

An energy-limited model of algal biofuel production: Toward the next generation of advanced biofuels

Algal biofuels are increasingly important as a source of renewable energy. The absence of reliable thermodynamic and other property data, and the large amount of kinetic data that would normally be required have created a major barrier to simulation. Additionally, the absence of a generally accepted flowsheet for biofuel production means that detailed simulation of the wrong approach is a real possibility. This model of algal biofuel production estimates the necessary data and places it into a heuristic model using a commercial simulator that back-calculates the process structure required. Furthermore, complex kinetics can be obviated for now by putting the simulator into energy limitation and forcing it to solve for the missing design variables, such as bioreactor surface area, productivity, and oil content. The model does not attempt to prescribe a particular approach, but provides a guide towards a sound engineering approach to this challenging and important problem.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Process Design and Economics for the Conversion of Algal Biomass to Biofuels: Algal Biomass Fractionation to Lipid-and Carbohydrate-Derived Fuel Products

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) promotes the production of a range of liquid fuels and fuel blendstocks from biomass feedstocks by funding fundamental and applied research that advances the state of technology in biomass production, conversion, and sustainability. As part of its involvement in this program, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) investigates the conceptual production economics of these fuels. This includes fuel pathways from lignocellulosic (terrestrial) biomass, as well as from algal (aquatic) biomass systems.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Process Design and Economics for the Conversion of Algal Biomass to Biofuels: Algal Biomass Fractionation to Lipid- and Carbohydrate-Derived Fuel Products

Beginning in 2013, NREL began transitioning from the singular focus on ethanol to a broad slate of products and conversion pathways, ultimately to establish similar benchmarking and targeting efforts. One of these pathways is the conversion of algal biomass to fuels via extraction of lipids (and potentially other components), termed the 'algal lipid upgrading' or ALU pathway. This report describes in detail one potential ALU approach based on a biochemical processing strategy to selectively recover and convert select algal biomass components to fuels, namely carbohydrates to ethanol and lipids to a renewable diesel blendstock (RDB) product. The overarching process design converts algal biomass delivered from upstream cultivation and dewatering (outside the present scope) to ethanol, RDB, and minor coproducts, using dilute-acid pretreatment, fermentation, lipid extraction, and hydrotreating.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Implications of pond reliability on the techno-economic and life cycle environmental impacts of algal biofuels

Despite extensive research on algal bioproducts, there is limited understanding of how pond contamination affects their economics and environmental impacts. This work compared the costs and environmental impacts of algal biofuels across different pond failure scenarios. Pond failure was simulated by a reliability model based on pond mean-time-to-failure (MTTF). The reliability model was integrated with a process model to analyze the impacts of pond failure on the operations of algal farms and biorefineries. Process model outputs were used for techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment to determine the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP), global warming potential (GWP), and freshwater consumption impacts of algal biofuels for five MTTF scenarios of 20, 54, 80,120, and 350 days, assuming an average mean-time-to-reset of 7 days. Results show that higher MTTFs reduce the cost and environmental impact of algal biofuels, but with diminishing returns. The average MFSPs for the 20-day, 54-day, and 350-day MTTF scenarios were $\$3.52$, $\$2.54$, and $\$2.10$ per liter of gasoline equivalent, respectively. The GWP for the same scenarios were 131, 96, and 83 g CO 2eq MJ –1 , respectively. This study highlights the significant impact of larger seed trains, required under low MTTFs, on the costs and greenhouse gas emissions of algal biofuels. Moreover, the work shows that algal biofuels fail to be cost-competitive with conventional fuels, even when productivities are increased from 17 to 35 g m –2 d –1 . Furthermore, this work is the first to explore the implications of pond failure on the sustainability of algal biofuels and provides valuable insights to algae farmers on how to reduce the costs and financial risks of algal cultivation through process design and pond management strategies.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Assessing the potential of polyculture to accelerate algal biofuel production

To date, the algal biofuel industry has focused on the cultivation of monocultures of highly productive algal strains, but scaling up production remains challenging. However, algal monocultures are difficult to maintain because they are easily contaminated by wild algal strains, grazers, and pathogens. In contrast, theory suggests that polycultures (multispecies assemblages) can promote both ecosystem stability and productivity. A greater understanding of species interactions and how communities change with time will need to be developed before polycultures can be successfully applied to large-scale algal production efforts. Here in this paper we review the agricultural and ecological literature to explore opportunities for increased annual biomass production through the use of algal polycultures. We discuss case studies where algal polycultures have been successfully maintained for industries other than the biofuel industry, as well as the few studies that have compared biomass production of algal polycultures to that of monocultures. Assemblages that include species with complementary traits are of particular promise. These assemblages have the potential not only to increase crop productivity and stability, but they may also be capable of utilizing natural resources (e.g. light, nutrients, water) more efficiently via tighter niche packing. Therefore, algal polycultures show promise for enhancing biomass productivity, enabling sustainable production and reducing overall production costs.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Managing weather- and market price-related financial risks in algal biofuel production

Large-scale algae production has garnered interest due to its potential as a biofuel feedstock. Previous research assessing the profitability of algae products has been mostly based on values averaged over time, but algae production and resulting financial returns exhibit significant variability due to weather and fluctuations in selling prices for algae-based products. In other sectors, producers often reduce weather- and market price-related financial risk with financial instruments such as insurance, but little research has been performed on the design of insurance products to protect algae producers. Furthermore, this study develops a novel index-based insurance instrument that pays-out during unfavorable weather and market conditions, then explores the instrument's effectiveness, combined with a cash reserve, in reducing revenue stream variability for an algae producer. Results indicate that a biophysically based index-insurance product tailored to the specific financial risks in algae production can reduce variability in net revenues and can do so at a lower cost than relying solely on cash reserves, the most common financial risk management tool. Assessing the performance of index-insurance in algae production is particularly timely given the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, which newly opens opportunities for the USDA to provide crop insurance to algae producers.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Life-cycle analysis of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and water consumption in the 2016 MYPP algal biofuel scenarios

The Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) Multi-year Program Plan (MYPP) describes the bioenergy objectives pursued by BETO, the strategies for achieving those objectives, the current state of technology (SOT), and a number of design cases that explore cost and operational performance required to advance the SOT towards middle and long term goals (MYPP, 2016). Two options for converting algae to biofuel intermediates were considered in the MYPP, namely algal biofuel production via lipid extraction and algal biofuel production by thermal processing. The first option, lipid extraction, is represented by the Combined Algae Processing (CAP) pathway in which algae are hydrolyzed in a weak acid pretreatment step. The treated slurry is fermented for ethanol production from sugars. The fermentation stillage contains most of the lipids from the original biomass, which are recovered through wet solvent extraction. The process residuals after lipid extraction, which contain much of the original mass of amino acids and proteins, are directed to anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas production and recycle of N and P nutrients. The second option, thermal processing, comprises direct hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of the wet biomass, separation of aqueous, gas, and oil phases, and treatment of the aqueous phase with catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) to produce biogas and to recover N and P nutrients. The present report describes a life cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the CAP and HTL options for the three scenarios just described. Water use is also reported. Water use during algal biofuel production comes from evaporation during cultivation, discharge to bleed streams to control pond salinity (“blowdown”), and from use during preprocessing and upgrading. For scenarios considered to date, most water use was from evaporation and, secondarily, from bleed streams. Other use was relatively small at the level of fidelity being modeled now.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Final Report: Scale-up of Algal Biofuel Production Using Waste Nutrients

Renewable fuels can be more environmentally friendly than conventional fuels and can be produced locally, supporting energy independence. Liquid renewable fuels are of special interest due to their high energy density. Algae are a promising prospective feedstock for low carbon intensity liquid biofuels, due to their high productivity and potential for high lipid or carbohydrate content. Their ability to grow on wastewater and waste nutrients and on non-arable land are cost and sustainability advantages. The organic matter content of wastewater promotes mixotrophic and/or heterotrophic growth of both algae and bacteria, boosting biomass productivity further. However, economic and technologic challenges persist that prevent the scale-up of algal biofuels to commercial relevance. These challenges include algal harvesting, drying, dewatering, and the conversion of algal biomass to usable fuels (Hannon et al 2010, Dunlap and Shaw 2009, Pienkos et al. 2009). The US Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) supports research to overcome these challenges and outlines the research and development goals for algal biofuels in their Multi-Year Program Plan (MYPP). The long-term goals of the MYPP for algal biofuels research are briefly as follows: develop the domestic ability to produce algal biofuels at a scale of 5 billion gallons per year (BGY) by 2030 and demonstrate technologies that produce biofuel intermediates from algae at a cost of $3/gallon of gasoline equivalent (GGE) by 2022 (BETO MYPP 2016). This research reported herein was funded to investigate methods of meeting an intermediate milestone of 2,500 gallons of biofuel intermediate per acre per year for a non-integrated process by improving algal productivity, harvesting efficiency, and conversion to biofuel intermediates. Use of wastewater and wastewater nutrients was a key distinguishing characteristic of this project. In pursuit of 2,500 gallons of biofuel intermediate (BFI) per acre per year, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) sought to develop the capability to produce biofuel intermediates from microalgae grown on municipal wastewater at a 20-acre algae-based wastewater treatment facility in Delhi, California (37.43° N), which includes 7 acres of raceway ponds. Coupling algal biofuel production with wastewater treatment capitalizes on the abundant waste nutrients and carbon present in wastewater and reduces use of clean water in algal biorefinery systems. In this research, the performance of the full-scale wastewater treatment plant was characterized by measuring productivity, wastewater treatment performance, hydraulic characteristics, and energy consumption. Nine 1,000-L pilot raceways with CO2 addition were used in experiments to maximize productivity. Low-cost, energy-efficient algae bioflocculation and settling were monitored. Population genetics were monitored in an attempt to correlate taxa with superior productivity and/or settling. Algae-bacterial biomass was converted to biofuel intermediates via bench-scale hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), and the resulting fuel quality was characterized. To develop rapid strain screening capabilities, a climate simulating photobioreactor (“LEAPS”) was developed and validated against outdoor raceways. A techno-economic analysis (TEA) and a lifecycle assessment (LCA) were performed to model process economics and sustainability. The major outcomes of this research included demonstration of 33 g/m2-day annual average algal-bacterial productivity in pilot raceways, and a biofuel intermediate yield of 0.35 g intermediate/g algae biomass via HTL, for a yield of 4,100 gallons BFI per acre per year, assuming a 90% harvest efficiency and ignoring other minor losses. This exceeded the project goal of 2,500 gallons of BFI per acre per year and nearly met the 2030 program goal, highlighting the promise of integrating wastewater treatment and biofuels production. The biocrude BFI produced by the process is refined to diesel and naphtha fuels. These fuels are normalized to the energy content of gasoline (gallons gasoline equivalent, GGE, for comparison to other fuels). Results from the TEA of the this complete “well-to-wheel” process demonstrated that, at a 400-ha scale, a minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of $12.55/GGE, which could be decreased 57% to $7.14/GGE when including revenue from coupling the biofuel production with the co-products of wastewater treatment services and low carbon fuel credits from California and Federal programs. Due mainly to the high capital costs of thickener centrifuges and hydrothermal processing equipment, the fuel cost is sensitive to scale, with significantly lower costs expected for larger farms. In this research project, significant advances were made in improving raceway algal productivity and fuel production from algae biomass, while also improving process economics. These outcomes brought the algal biofuel technology closer to being a sustainable and marketable process. The remainder of this executive summary is organized into the following six primary project tasks: (1) to optimize biomass productivity for a selected strain at Delhi, (2) to maximize algal productivity and harvesting efficiency in Delhi pilot ponds, (3) a full-scale raceway hydraulic characterization, (4) biomass processing to biofuel intermediates, and (5) scale-up engineering analysis, modeling, and planning.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

NREL Algal Biofuels Projects and Partnerships

This fact sheet highlights several algal biofuels research and development projects focused on improving the economics of the algal biofuels production process. These projects should serve as a foundation for the research efforts toward algae as a source of fuels and other chemicals.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Consortium for Algal Biofuel Commercialization (CAB-COMM) Final Report

The Consortium for Algal Biofuel Commercialization (CAB-Comm) was established in 2010 to conduct research to enable commercial viability of alternative liquid fuels produced from algal biomass. The main objective of CAB-Comm was to dramatically improve the viability of algae as a source of liquid fuels to meet US energy needs, by addressing several significant barriers to economic viability. To achieve this goal, CAB-Comm took a diverse set of approaches on three key aspects of the algal biofuels value chain: crop protection; nutrient utilization and recycling; and the development of genetic tools. These projects have been undertaken as collaboration between six academic institutions and two industrial partners: University of California, San Diego; Scripps Institution of Oceanography; University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Rutgers University; University of California, Davis; Johns Hopkins University; Sapphire Energy; and Life Technologies.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Environmental indicators for sustainable production of algal biofuels

For analyzing sustainability of algal biofuels, we identify 16 environmental indicators that fall into six categories: soil quality, water quality and quantity, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, and productivity. Indicators are selected to be practical, widely applicable, predictable in response, anticipatory of future changes, independent of scale, and responsive to management. Major differences between algae and terrestrial plant feedstocks, as well as their supply chains for biofuel, are highlighted, for they influence the choice of appropriate sustainability indicators. Algae strain selection characteristics do not generally affect which indicators are selected. The use of water instead of soil as the growth medium for algae determines the higher priority of water- over soil-related indicators. The proposed set of environmental indicators provides an initial checklist for measures of biofuel sustainability but may need to be modified for particular contexts depending on data availability, goals of the stakeholders, and financial constraints. Ultimately, use of these indicators entails defining sustainability goals and targets in relation to stakeholder values in a particular context and can lead to improved management practices.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Life-Cycle Analysis of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Water Consumption in the 2016 MYPP Algal Biofuel Scenarios

The Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) Multi-year Program Plan (MYPP) describes the bioenergy objectives pursued by BETO, the strategies for achieving those objectives, the current state of technology (SOT), and a number of design cases that explore cost and operational performance required to advance the SOT towards middle and long term goals (MYPP, 2016). Two options for converting algae to biofuel intermediates were considered in the MYPP, namely algal biofuel production via lipid extraction and algal biofuel production by thermal processing. The first option, lipid extraction, is represented by the Combined Algae Processing (CAP) pathway in which algae are hydrolyzed in a weak acid pretreatment step. The treated slurry is fermented for ethanol production from sugars. The fermentation stillage contains most of the lipids from the original biomass, which are recovered through wet solvent extraction. The process residuals after lipid extraction, which contain much of the original mass of amino acids and proteins, are directed to anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas production and recycle of N and P nutrients. The second option, thermal processing, comprises direct hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of the wet biomass, separation of aqueous, gas, and oil phases, and treatment of the aqueous phase with catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) to produce biogas and to recover N and P nutrients.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗