Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “AFC, ATF”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

14 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Thermal-hydraulic and Fuel Performance Scoping Studies of a Flowing Water Capsule in TREAT

The restart of the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility has provided a much needed capability for integral transient testing of nuclear fuel. This testing is necessary to qualify new fuel concepts such as those developed under the Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) program, increasing the burnup limit of light water reactor (LWR) fuels, or a variety of other programs under the Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC). The ATF campaign has been the main driver behind the development and implementation of a variety of capsules for TREAT experiments. The Separate-Effect Test Holder (SETH) was a dry capsule that enabled testing of ATF concepts under reactivity-initiated accident (RIA) heating conditions. Following SETH, the Static Environment Rodlet Transient Test Apparatus (SERTTA) was developed to enable RIA testing in a static water environment. In efforts to support the need for future Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) tests, the Transient Water Irradiation System for TREAT (TWIST) capsule has been developed that allows for water to drain from around the fuel rod and lower the pressure to simulate LOCA conditions. All these capsules that have been developed for LWR fuel testing all lack the capability for forced convective cooling which in some applications may limit their ability to test under prototypic conditions. A design and modeling effort has been started to modify the TWIST capsule by adding a flow tube and impeller that can create flowing coolant conditions for the fuel rod. RELAP5-3D and BISON models are being used to study the differences between RIA, LOCA, Anticipated Operational Occurrences (AOO), LWR power cycling, and other transient scenarios under flowing conditions capable in the flowing capsule and the current stagnant water capsules (SERTTA and TWIST). The scoping study will provide guidance on the needed capabilities for the flowing capsule and the limitations of the currently developed capsule for LWR testing in TREAT.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Post-Irradiation Examinations of the ATF Experiments - 2020 Status

This report contains the results of post-irradiation examination (PIE) of both Accident Tolerant Fuels-1 (ATF-1) rodlets and ATF-2 rodlets irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). The experiment is part of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Technology Research and Development (NTRD) program’s Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC). The ATF-1 PIE focused on the continuation of the analyses of five rodlets, one containing U 3 Si 2 fuel, two containing UN-U 3 Si 5 composites, and two with UN-U 3 Si 2 composites. The non-destructive examinations of the U 3 Si 2 rodlet showed results comparable to the previously investigated rodlets. The profilometry of the UN-U 3 Si 2 composites highlighted permanent deformation of the cladding at the pellet-pellet interface, suggesting that hourglassing of the composite pellet occurred during irradiation, causing increased localized stresses on the Zirlo cladding tube due to Pellet-Cladding Mechanical Interaction (PCMI). The UN-U 3 Si 5 rodlets, which were contained in Kanthal cladding, did not show enhanced cladding deformation at the pellet interfaces; however, it is to be noted that the initial gap of these two rodlets was larger than typical light water reactor (LWR) gaps. The larger gap might have been sufficient to accommodate the fuel swelling without having contact between the fuel and cladding, explaining the absence of PCMI. Regarding the fission products, no axial redistribution of the major gamma emitters was observed in any of the composite rodlets. Fission gas measurements on the UN-U 3 Si 5 rodlets also has been performed. The estimated fission gas release, based on the calculated fission product inventory, remains limited, with a higher fission gas release for the rodlet that experienced a higher power.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Boiling-Water Reactor Testing Capability in the Advanced Test Reactor

I-Loop is an irradiation facility that is currently being installed at the Advanced Test Reactor. It is a two-loop test facility capable of performing Light Water Reactor (LWR) irradiations in prototypic coolant conditions. The two loops are being installed to be capable of both Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) pressure, temperature, and chemistry environments. Each loop is nominally dedicated as a BWR or PWR for simplicity of operations. In-reactor water loop testing that an I-Loop provides is key to the deployment of new accident tolerant fuel technologies and other advanced LWR fuel concepts. Currently, pressurized water loops are the only testing facilities available to test BWR fuel concepts. Their test environments are non-prototypic at higher pressure/temperature and at single-phase fluid flow conditions. This void in the LWR test bed capabilities is one that the I-Loop is uniquely situated to provide. This report discusses the mechanical design, thermal hydraulic calculations, and neutronic calculations of a proposed standard experiment of accident tolerant BWR fuel concepts. Mechanical design examines the geometry and features of the main components. Thermal hydraulic calculations examine the modeling and results of the two-phase flow options available. Lastly, neutronic calculations examine the Monte Carlo analysis of enrichment, heat rates, and flux spectrum.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain (NFCSC) Technical Monthly September FY-24

AFC hosted the Light Water Reactor (LWR) Fuels Research Workshop and Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Collaborative Research on Advanced Fuel Technologies (CRAFT) Meeting September 9-13, 2024. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) program is pivotal in advancing clean energy through collaborative innovation in fuel technology for light water reactors (LWRs). For over a decade, AFC has engaged a wide array of stakeholders—researchers, industry participants, and regulatory bodies—both within the U.S. and internationally to develop ATF technology. This initiative aims to enhance the safety and economic performance of both Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) and LWRs. To foster community relationships and disseminate research, AFC initiated annual LWR Fuel workshops in 2024, supplementing ongoing industry-led CRAFT workshops.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

FY21 burst activities with coated Zircaloy-4 under accident conditions

This report summarizes the results of Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) burst activities. Nuclear service grade Zry-4 was procured and coated with a 7-micron thick Cr coating. The coating quality was investigated, and there were several defects at the Cr/Zry-4 interface due to the surface roughness of the as received Zry-4 tubing. To provide insight into the effect of coating defects on the cladding performance under accident scenarios, the unirradiated uncoated and coated material was tested under loss of coolant accident (LOCA) and pellet cladding mechanical interaction (PCMI) reactivity insertion accident (RIA) conditions. The defected coating appeared to have no impact on the cladding performance under these scenarios when compared to the as-received cladding material.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

DISCOVARY PROJECT: Material Background Report

UC/UO 2 composites have been proposed as a next generation fuel for light water reactors (LWRs). Accident tolerant fuels (ATF) have been a focus in the Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) to improve the safety and performance of LWRs and includes research and development efforts on the cladding and fuel. The 10 wt.% UC/UO 2 composite fuel was selected as a result of an extensive literature review and was selected due to the improvement of the fuel cycle cost. The inclusion of a UC phase in the composite material improves on the properties of standard UO 2 by increasing the uranium density of the fuel and increasing the thermal conductivity. Significant development has been carried out to refine the processing and sintering parameters and has led to a dense composite without ternary phases present. Characterization of the chemistry and microstructure has been carried out to send ahead of neutron irradiations in the Belgium Research Reactor (BR2) at SCK-CEN.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Fission Accelerated Steady-state Testing (FAST)

In an effort to accelerate the irradiation time for advanced reactor fuels, a revised capsule design has been analyzed and developed for the Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC). This design incorporates a highly enriched, reduced diameter fuel pin that is doubly encapsulated by two steel capsules. This design alloys accelerated irradiations and reduced sensitivity to fabrication variances and eccentricities. The capsule designs utilize existing experiment baskets from the AFC capsules in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) outer A position (FAST-OA) and the ATF-1 capsules in the small I position (FAST-SI).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Advanced Fuels Campaign Execution Plan

The Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) Execution Plan details the strategy, mission, scope, and goals—both near-term and long-term—along with the structure and organization of nuclear fuels and materials research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) activities within the Fuel Cycle Technologies (FCT) program. The FCT program, tasked by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), employs a science-based approach to advance fuel technologies. This approach integrates theory, experiments, and multi-scale modeling and simulation (M&S) to develop a predictive understanding of fuel fabrication processes and fuel/cladding performance under irradiation, moving beyond traditional empirical methods. The long-term goals of the AFC are guided by the AFC Strategic Plan and align with the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) Roadmap [1], which outlines a multi-decade vision for demonstrating and qualifying advanced fuel forms to support diverse fuel cycle options. Near-term goals focus on enhancing accident tolerant fuels (ATF) for Light Water Reactors (LWR), a significant challenge that demands balancing immediate objectives with ongoing progress toward advanced reactor missions. Accelerating the traditional fuel qualification process to meet ATF objectives is another critical challenge. A detailed set of 5-year goals, summarized below, has been developed in line with the overarching science-based fuel development approach: • Advanced LWR Fuel Technologies: By 2027, support the development of advanced LWR fuel technologies with improved performance and enhanced accident tolerance. This includes high burnup (HBu), low enriched uranium (LEU)+, coated cladding, and doped fuel, aimed at complementing industry-led significant LWR uprates and plant refurbishments. • Tristructural Isotropic (TRISO) Fuel: Achieve qualification by 2028 and develop improved designs for emerging markets. • Metal Fuel: Achieve qualification by 2028 and develop improved designs for emerging markets. • Molten Salt Fuel: By 2027, deploy a robust program that enables fuel salt qualification technologies needed to support fuel salt research and development (R&D), focusing on emergent needs to derisk fuel salt production and utilization in advanced reactors. • Long-Term ATF: Develop fuel technologies that enable significant power uprates (~50%) in refurbished or new LWRs while optimizing fissile material utilization and waste disposal. The 5-year milestones in the AFC Execution Plan are contingent on an assumed budget. This Execution Plan will be updated annually to reflect actual funding profiles as budget guidance becomes available, ensuring milestones are adjusted accordingly. In summary, the AFC Execution Plan presents a comprehensive strategy to advance nuclear fuel technologies through a science-based approach, addressing both near-term and long-term goals while adapting to funding realities.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Fracture Toughness Characterization of Generation II FeCrAl Alloys after ~18 dpa Irradiation

FeCrAl alloys are promising candidate materials for the accident tolerant fuel (ATF) cladding applications due to their excellent corrosion resistance to the elevated temperature steam environment. Currently, the handbook on FeCrAl material properties contains only limited data regarding the fracture toughness properties of any FeCrAl alloy. This includes alloys currently under investigation within the Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). In this project, a series of irradiation capsules have been irradiated in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at ORNL with two Generation II FeCrAl candidate alloys, i.e., C06M and C36M, to assess the fracture response of these alloys after neutron irradiation. These alloys represent the “book-end” compositions for C26M, the alloy currently being developed as the leading candidate for LWR cladding. A total of six irradiation capsules were irradiated in HFIR at target temperatures of 200°C, 330°C, and 500°C up to target damage doses of 8 displacements per atom (dpa) and 16 dpa. These damage doses represent the expected middle and end of life damage levels for typical LWR cladding while the irradiation temperature regimes will provide insight into the role of varying microstructural features on the fracture toughness properties of neutron irradiated FeCrAl alloys. To date, irradiation of all capsules has been completed in HFIR. This report summarizes the latest results of microhardness and fracture toughness PIE for the 16 dpa capsules (FCAB2, FCAB4, and FCAB6), for which the measured irradiation conditions were: 204°C/17.6dpa, 343°C/18.3dpa, and 507°C/18.6dpa. The main conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows: 1) After the 204°C/17.6dpa irradiation, both C06M and C36M exhibited significant irradiation hardening and embrittlement 2) After the 343°C/18.3dpa irradiation, both C06M and C36M exhibited small irradiation hardening without irradiation embrittlement 3) After the 507°C/18.6dpa irradiation, both C06M and C36M exhibited irradiation softening without irradiation embrittlement 4) Comparing the microhardness and Master Curve reference temperature T 0q before and after neutron irradiation, we did not observe a linear correlation between the two parameters for both C06M and C36M. This should be mainly due to a flat response of the Master Curve reference temperature T 0q to the irradiations at 166-204°C and 315-343°C ranges 5) C06M showed a lower T 0q , meaning better toughness, than C36M at the unirradiated condition and such trend was kept even after neutron irradiation except for the 166-204°C irradiation where both materials had similar T 0q . 6) In terms of hardening and embrittlement, the irradiation effect on both C06M and C36M appeared to saturate after an irradiation dose of 7 dpa.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Post-Irradiation Fracture Toughness Characterization of Generation II FeCrAl Alloys

FeCrAl alloys are promising candidate materials for the accident tolerant fuel (ATF) cladding application due to their exceptional resistance to oxidation in elevated temperature steam environments. Currently, limited fracture toughness data are available for the FeCrAl alloys, including the FeCrAl alloys newly developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) under the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) program. In this study, two Generation II candidate FeCrAl alloys, i.e., C06M (81.8Fe-10Cr-6Al-0.03Y-2Mo-0.2Si) and C36M (78.8Fe-13Cr-6Al-0.03Y-2Mo-0.2Si), were irradiated in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at ORNL to assess the fracture characteristics of these alloys after neutron irradiation. A total of six rabbit capsules were irradiated in HFIR at target temperatures of 200°C, 330°C, and 500°C up to target damage doses of 8 displacements per atom (dpa) and 16 dpa. Post-irradiation fracture toughness testing was performed following the Master Curve method in the ASTM E1921 standard. The main findings of this study are:1) Both the C06M and C36M alloys exhibited a similar response to irradiation concerning irradiation hardening and embrittlement.2) The irradiation temperature played different roles in terms of irradiation hardening and embrittlement for both C06M and C36M: after irradiation between 166°C and 204°C, both materials exhibited significant irradiation hardening and embrittlement; after irradiation between 315°C and 343°C, both materials showed small irradiation hardening without irradiation embrittlement. After irradiation between 501°C and 507°C, however, the irradiation softening without irradiation embrittlement was observed in both materials.3) Comparing the microhardness and Master Curve reference temperature T0q before and after neutron irradiation, we did not observe a linear correlation between the two parameters for both C06M and C36M steels. This should be mainly due to a flat response of the Master Curve reference temperature T0q to the irradiations at 166–204°C and 315–343°C ranges4) C06M showed a lower T0q, meaning better toughness, than C36M at the unirradiated condition, and such trend was kept even after neutron irradiation except for the 166–204°C irradiation after which both materials had similar T0q.5) In terms of hardening and embrittlement, the irradiation effect on both C06M and C36M appeared to saturate after an irradiation dose of 7 dpa.

Chen, Xiang↗
DOE OSTI2026

High Temperature High Vacuum Mechanical Property Assessment of Zirconium Nuclear Fuel Cladding

This report presents the mechanical characterization of a specific Zry-4 cladding batch serving as the foundation for a diverse range of fuel performance research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). This effort supports research needs for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), particularly regarding evaluating accident tolerant fuel (ATF) cladding coating concepts, expanding understanding of cladding response to loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCA) transients, refining post-critical heat flux (CHF) limits (t@T), and upcoming irradiation campaigns. The central objective was to define the baseline performance of the substrate Zircaloy-4 (Zry-4) material leveraged across ORNL Advanced Fuel Campaign (AFC) efforts through controlled high-temperature vacuum tensile testing. This work begins to address gaps in existing models where implementation based on nominal heat-treatment labels, such as stress relief annealed (SRA), often fail to capture the interplay of recovery, recrystallization, and grain growth. To quantify this, data was benchmarked against the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) stress strain model to determine where this material falls in comparison to assumed values for materials in the same heat treatment regime. Analysis of the tensile data revealed that this specific SRA batch exhibits a transitional microstructural state best described by an effective cold-work (CW) parameter of 0.09, diverging from the previous estimation of 0.5 for SRA materials. Additionally, comparative testing of Cr coated specimens demonstrated no distinct difference in axial strength relative to the bare substrate. This suggests that the strengthening benefits of Cr coatings observed in burst scenarios are driven by residual stress mechanisms acting solely in the hoop direction.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report: Module D1-1: Uranium-based Ceramic LWR Fuel Fabrication (Rev.2)

Cost module on LWR fuel fabrication to accompany the Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report. In this update, we are adding detailed life cycle cost data and a calculated, levelized fabrication cost derived from a non-proprietary bottom-up estimate prepared in 1978 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) (Judkins and Olsen 1978a). In 2018, the 1978 ORNL estimate was escalated by SA&I authors to 2017 USD using factors that represent inflation, escalation above inflation typical of nuclear projects, and the effects of more stringent safety and environmental regulations. In this FY-21 document, the $/kgU results in 2017 USD from the unpublished 2018 interim study (Williams and Ganda 2018) can be escalated to 2020 USD using a factor of 1.052. The literature-based unit cost (or price) data from previous (2004–2017) AFC-CBRs are escalated to 2020 USD using factors from Chapter 8 of the main FY-21 AFC-CBR document. This data, in addition to the results of the updated bottom-up estimate, are used to define the “what-it-takes” (WIT) range for the unit fabrication costs for conventional ceramic UOX light-water reactor (LWR) fuel. This FY-23 document also includes calculated unit costs for accident-tolerant LWR fuels (ATFs) of three different types. Some of these fuels constitute a ceramic pelletized form with fuel meat uranium compounds other than UO2 (a.k.a.,. UOX), thus the change in the title of this module in which the word “UO2” is changed to “Uranium-based Ceramic.”

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Report on RIA Relevant Modified Burst Testing of ATF Cladding Materials

The mechanical performance of accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) cladding candidates in light-water reactors (LWRs) must be similar to or better than that of current conventional nuclear fuel claddings to reduce dose to the public and ensure a that the core coolable geometry is maintained during a postulated reactivity-initiated accident (RIA) in light-water reactors (LWRs). During an RIA event, the rapid thermal expansion of nuclear fuel can deform the cladding once the fuel–cladding gap closes. In some cases, the pellet–cladding mechanical interaction (PCMI) can induce mechanical failure in ATF candidates. Thus, the mechanical response of ATF cladding must be investigated by mimicking the conditions of RIA and potentially performing Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) experiments to establish or verify the safety envelope. The work presented in this report investigated the failure behavior of as-received, hydrided, and chromium-coated (Cr-coated) Zircaloy-4 (Zry-4) cladding tube under strain-driven mechanical conditions, mimicking postulated RIA loading conditions. Mechanical testing was performed at 300°C via modified burst test (MBT) equipment with pulse width control previously developed under the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Advanced Fuel Campaign (AFC). The mechanical strains were determined using 2D digital image correlation (DIC) techniques. The base Zry-4 acquired by Cameco Inc. was in stress-relieved annealed (SRA) condition. Because of the observed large deformation of the cladding tubes, the failure strain definition was updated for the MBT, which can also be applied to other tube tests where significant bulging (out-of-plane deformation) is present. The failure strain was determined to be affected by the speed of the test or the RIA event. As the RIA-like event duration decreased from 75 to 15 ms, the failure strain decreased 5, 7 and 1% for as-received, hydrided, and Cr-coated specimens, respectively. Fractography on the Cr-coated specimens indicated the presence of two failure mechanisms: (i) crenulation at the outer surface of the coating due to the tensile tractional forces along with coatings grain microstructure and (ii) formation of critical defect at the coating/cladding interface that initiated coating rupture after severe plastic deformation of the Zry- 4 substrate. Based on the MBT results and fractography observations, performing mechanical property testing at high strain rates—in particular on Cr-coated tubes—and semi-integral TREAT experiments are required future efforts to ensure ATF cladding performance during transients. The testing recommended would also inform the development of long-term generalized cladding technologies.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗