Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “30 Microfluidics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Dynamic separation of gases using microsieves

Separation of light weight molecules, such as nitrogen, argon, and oxygen, from heavier compounds can have significant impacts on energy capture, environmental monitoring, or isotopic applications. Large-scale gas separation techniques, like gas centrifugation and membrane mitigation, can be problematic as they impart tremendous energy and induce high mechanical stress onto the instrumentation. Microsieves, also known as micronozzles or microfunnels, are developed to create physical barriers to separate specific isotopes and gases. Separation is achieved using a converging and diverging micronozzle to impose supersonic gas flow around a curved wall, and it has been used for the separation of heavy actinide isotopes in low weight gas as well as separation of low weight gas compositions of nitrogen and argon back in 1900s. However, systematic reviews of this unique technology are lacking. The application of the Laval style nozzle, which has a converging/diverging entrance fundamental to the micronozzle, is included in this review due to its importance in industrial applications in uranium (U) isotope refinement. Using advanced computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations, the extent of gas separation can be modelled. Herein, we first examine the literature and survey recent advances on fabrication techniques for creating curved micronozzles, methods and separation principles used to design devices. Furthermore, we then follow with highlights of CFD simulations applied to evaluate the separation effects using microsieves. Finally, identification of the gap and recommendation for future development and applications are suggested for using intrinsic molecular features and fluidic dynamics in formulating separation strategies.

30 Microfluidics↗
DOE OSTI2026

Evaluating Polymer Properties with Different Additives for Carbon Capture and Other Applications

Anthropogenic climate change is one of this generation’s most pressing concerns, with the potential to completely alter the delicate balance we’ve struck with nature. Already, global temperatures have risen 1.29°C, leading to disrupted weather systems, extinctions, increased risks of wildfires, and sea level rise, to name a few effects. Carbon dioxide emission from the combustion of fossil fuels and other industrial activity is a large driver of this phenomenon, as it absorbs heat before it can be radiated away from Earth, trapping it. Carbon dioxide has reached unprecedented levels in our atmosphere, showing a 50% increase from preindustrial averages to a whopping 430 ppm. Thus, reducing the amount of carbon dioxide via carbon capture technology is an important endeavor that serves to benefit everyone. The Microencapsulated CO 2 Sorbent (MECS) team at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has turned to microencapsulation to approach this endeavor. Microcapsules provide an attractive approach to carbon capture, combining large surface areas for more efficient mass transfer, regenerative abilities, reduced solvent loss, and improved handling. Additionally, while existing carbon capture technology relies on industrial plants, capsules could present a modular approach to carbon capture, reducing the need for extensive physical infrastructure. The MECS team’s design consists of a polymer membrane that contains a liquid carbon sequestering sorbent, aqueous sodium carbonate. The carbon capturing reaction occurs in three distinct steps, the first of which is the dissolution of carbon dioxide into the sorbent solution and its conversion into carbonic acid (H 2 CO 3 ), shown in equations 1 and 2 respectively. Because this step hinges upon the ability of carbon dioxide to reach the solution inside the capsule, it is necessary that the microcapsule shell is permeable to carbon dioxide gas. The MECS team produces these microcapsules using the in-air droplet encapsulation apparatus (IDEA) shown in figure 1, which can produce uniform micron-scale droplets at speeds much faster than traditional single-dispersal microfluidic-based techniques. The IDEA Is 100 times faster than these current techniques and can reach up to 1000 times their speed when incorporating a multi-nozzle design. Additionally, because droplets are produced in-air via vibration, IDEA can decrease post-processing times and material waste by 99% and can fabricate microgels that are 10 to 100 times more viscous than can be produced via traditional microfluidics. While this design represents a breakthrough in the throughput, efficiency, and tunability of microcapsule production, it imposes a major constraint on the microcapsule curing process. Because microcapsule shells are crosslinked with UV light while falling 30 cm through the air, this gives them a reaction window of approximately 0.2 seconds. Thus, the system and shell formulations must be optimized such that the shells can be fully crosslinked within this very narrow window, prompting investigations into curing behavior.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

A Rapid Microfluidic Neptunium Extraction Using a Supported Liquid Membrane Module

Extraction of neptunium from acidic matrices is important for its quantification, but its complex redox chemistry can cause variable yields. This study develops a microfluidic redox extraction for rapidly separating neptunium from submilliliter samples, achieving up to 90% process yield in less than 10 min for samples as small as 100 μL, with over 97% steady-state yield achieved after 20 min. It uses a supported liquid membrane module loaded with 30 vol % tributyl phosphate in n-dodecane, which performs forward- and back-extractions in a single, continuous step. Neptunium is first oxidized to +6 for extraction and then reduced during stripping. Bromate was selected as an oxidant over permanganate for its greater compatibility with the organic phase, achieving complete oxidation in under 30 s. Ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide were both effective reductants. Finally, the system’s high yield and rapid kinetics make it promising for future separations from complex mixtures.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗
DOE OSTI2023

Rapid Quantification of 237 U Specific Activity for Nuclear Forensics

In the event of an unattributed nuclear explosion, rapid assessment of the short-lived uranium isotope activity and mass can provide valuable information for subsequent forensic analysis. Rapid analysis in the field is enabled by using microfluidic chemistry and deployable instrumentation. Here, this work presents a flow chemistry system, controlled in LabVIEW, that integrates three functionalities: (1) selective extraction of uranium from the sample matrix via a 3D-printed supported liquid membrane module; (2) UV–visible absorbance spectrophotometry to measure the total uranium concentration in the strip flow; and (3) a portable CdTe γ-ray spectrometer coupled to a 3D-printed flow cell to measure 237 U activity concentration in the strip solution. The system was calibrated using standard solutions, and its functionality was demonstrated using a solution of depleted uranium spiked with 237 U. Uranium concentrations of 40–5000 μg/mL were directly quantified online using a 100 mm optical flow cell, while concentrations of 0.5–10 μg/mL were quantified online using a colorimetric reagent. The mass concentration measurement takes approximately 60 min while the activity concentration via γ-ray spectrometry varies depending on the activity of 237 U, with 1 kBq/mL requiring about 30 min of acquisition time to obtain <10% uncertainty at 1σ. This platform provides a fieldable approach for quantifying uranium mass and radioactivity relevant to postdetonation nuclear debris.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗