Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,783 records · Page 99
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Chemical Challenge Tests on ISS Fire Cartridges

Following a confirmed combustion event onboard the International Space Station (ISS), crew members will don Emergency Masks, each fitted with 2 ISS fire cartridge filters. As the crew member breathes through the filters, combustion products in the cabin air are either filtered or catalyzed by the fire cartridge media to minimize crew exposure to harmful levels of contaminants. Rigorous certification, acceptance, and surveillance programs for the fire cartridges ensure that each lot meets stringent performance requirements throughout the service life of the cartridges. In accordance with the Quality/Acceptance Test Plan, multiple fire cartridges from each lot undergo chemical challenge tests involving one or more chemicals at specified concentrations. These tests are conducted at specific temperatures, humidity levels, and gas flow rates intended to mimic the worst-case conditions for fire cartridge performance. These challenge tests are conducted by the Environmental Chemistry- Laboratory at the NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center. Many of the challenge tests focus on carbon monoxide (CO), but other gases include hydrogen cyanide (HCN), hydrogen chloride (HCl), cyclohexane, acrolein, ammonia (NH3), and acetaldehyde. A fire cartridge is exposed to the test gas in a chamber at the specified conditions, and the outlet is monitored for breakthrough during the 2.5-hour test. This paper will briefly introduce fire cartridges and how they work and will then discuss details of the challenge gas delivery and exposure system, breakthrough monitoring methods, and discussion of issues that have arisen during the course of the test program. Although the focus of this paper will be on the challenge tests, a general summary of the performance of the fire cartridges will also be provided.

Cristina M. Muko↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Initial Testing of the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) in Lunar Environment Simulation at the Neutral Buoyancy Lab (NBL) in 2022

Understanding how to effectively train for Extravehicular Activities (EVAs) for Artemis missions is critical. Tasked by the new Extravehicular Activity and Human Surface Mobility Program(EHP), a team of stakeholders from engineering and flight operations worked together to test the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility (xEMU) in the Neutral Buoyancy Lab(NBL) simulating the lunar environment. The NBL is a pool in which astronauts are typically trained to complete simulated International Space Station (ISS) EVA tasks in a neutral weigh-out. The overall focus for this test series was evaluating how well the NBL could be used as an effective simulated environment for Artemis lunar EVAs. New NBL support hardware was manufactured to support this test series and update the interfaces to be more representative of xEMU hardware such as a new NBL Portable Life Support System(PLSS)mock-up and umbilical, lights and cameras, and display and control unit (DCU).To simulate the 1/6th-gravity (1/6-g) environment, extra weights were added around the suit to create an accurate center of gravity representation. The Partial Gravity Weigh-out Stand (PGWS) predicted where and how much weight would be required for the 1/6th-G simulation and predicted the center of gravity placement. After the weigh-out attempt was completed, the suited participant would complete a set of directed tasks such as kneeling, object pick-up, and walking to evaluate the weigh-out. To create the lunar environment, sand, boulders, and ramps were added to the pool floor. If time allowed after weigh-out was determined acceptable, the flight operations team would direct the suited participants to complete simulated Artemis EVA tasks using flight-like tools and tool cart. The team also evaluated turning out the overhead lights in the NBL for a portion of some of the test runs and using a solar simulator to create amore realistic lunar south pole lighting environment. The test series completed one unmanned test and nine manned tests. With four of the tests, dual xEMU suited operations were completed with subjects in both the small and large xEMU sizes. Overall, the NBL was able to create an acceptable lunar landscape and ability to have two subjects work side by side in pressurized xEMUs which currently cannot be achieved in other test environments. Achieving a stable 1/6th-G lunar weigh-out and clear, consistent dual suit communications was a challenge for this series. Future work is planned to continue to improve this simulation environment.

spacesuit↗
NASA NTRS2020

Preliminary Design, Testing, and Performance of the LOFTID Navigation System

The Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) involves the first orbital test of an inflatable decelerator. This test involves the LOFTID re-entry vehicle using an inflatable decelerator to re-enter the atmosphere after flying to orbit as a secondary payload. Due to system constraints, including spin stabilization, unknown time of day, a limited space available for antennas, and a heat shield which blocks magnetic fields, the navigation system includes only an inertial measurement unit and a single GPS receiver. As the vehicle is turned off for the first part of the mission and will not receive commands or data from the ground, the navigation system will not have accurate initialization, and will in-stead rely on pre-flight estimates or first measurement estimation. This could result in significant unknown error in the initial state, resulting in needing to initialize the state on-orbit and requires using the single GPS antenna for attitude updates. These design considerations led to using an Extended Kalman filter, modified to perform with these design constraints. A streamlined testing approach, including tests with flight-like rotations, is being used to limit the time and resources needed to test the navigation system while still fully testing the performance and robustness of the navigation system. This testing approach follows the NASA test-as-you-fly principle and allows for early detection of errors and changes that are needed in the software. This results in a navigation system that, even within the design constraints of the mission architecture, will provide the performance and robustness needed of the mission.

Joel Amert↗
NASA NTRS2023

Thermal Vacuum and Vibration Testing of the Differential Thermal Expansion Thermal Switch

The Extended Stroke, Reverse Operation, Differential Thermal Expansion (DTE) Thermal Switch (TS) for Extreme Variable Environments uses materials with both positive and negative coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) arranged in concentric cylinders so that the TS operates passively, opening a gap between interfaces to create a low thermal contact when cold, and closing the gap between interfaces to create a high thermal contact when hot. This paper details the testing of the TS at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) including the vibration (vibe) test, pre-vibe thermal vacuum (t-vac) cycle test, post-vibe t-vac cycle test, and long duration t-vac cycle test. The data collected from the pre- and post-vibe tests are compared to show the impact of the vibe test on performance. The data collected from the long duration test is used to calculate the total thermal contact conductance through the TS interfaces for both ‘on’ (TS closed, during hot plateau) and ‘off’ (TS open, during cold plateau) configurations, and the turndown ratio is also calculated. Challenges experienced throughout testing are also discussed.

Thermal control technology↗
NASA NTRS2023

Comparison of Liquefaction Testing with Liquid Nitrogen and Liquid Oxygen

Liquid nitrogen is often used as a substitute for oxygen testing due to safety concerns, and the general similarity between their fluid properties. During the Cryogenic Fluid In-situ Liquefaction for Landers (CryoFILL) testing, an opportunity arose to compare liquid nitrogen and liquid oxygen behavior using the same test hardware in similar test conditions. Comparative testing would verify whether the system response to nitrogen and oxygen would behave in a similar manner. Tests that were investigated include system boil-off heat load determination, autogenous pressurization, cryocooler loop initiation, and cryocooler loop operations. Results from testing are shown and compared to verify that liquid nitrogen and liquid oxygen tests yield similar system responses, and that nitrogen can be used as a substitute for oxygen in developmental tests at cryogenic temperatures.

Cryogenic Fluid Management↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Exploration Portable Life Support Subsystem (xPLSS) Thermal Modeling to Thermal Vacuum Testing

To support NASA’s goal to return to the Moon through the Artemis mission, the development of an exploration portable life support system (xPLSS) has been conducted at Johnson Space Center (JSC). As part of this development process, a large system level thermal/fluid model of the xPLSS was developed using Thermal Desktop and an in-house human model (METMAN). The xPLSS model was used throughout the design process to predict the performance and temperature of nearly all components within the xPLSS. In the fall of 2023, the design, verification, and testing (DVT) unit of the xPLSS was tested in a thermal vacuum (TVAC) chamber at JSC. This testing consisted of combining the xPLSS with an upper torso of the exploration pressure garment system (xPGS) and simulating five extravehicular activities (EVAs) in extreme thermal conditions (two cold EVAs and three hot EVAs). The data generated in this test series provided system level data of the xPLSS operating in vacuum and at flight-like environmental temperatures for the first time. This data was compared to results output by the xPLSS system model to assess the accuracy of previous analyses and improve the fidelity and accuracy of the xPLSS system model. The comparison between model and test hardware provides valuable insight that will help improve the design and fidelity of next generation space suits. In general, comparison between test data and model data generally showed slightly un-conservative values (model predicting colder temperatures than test in hot environments, and hotter temperatures than test in cold environments). Model assumptions and test assumptions were assessed to understand potential causes of some of these sources in error. Recommendations to improve the fidelity of the xPLSS model were also made based on the results presented in this paper.

xPLSS↗
NASA NTRS2024

Short Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit Testing Setup: Evaluation Under Realistic Pressure and Thermal Conditions

The purpose of Short Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (SxEMU) thermal vacuum testing was to verify the functionality of the Design Verification Testing (DVT) prototype xEMU (SxEMU for this test) at vacuum pressures and extreme space and lunar surface temperature conditions. The SxEMU Thermal Vacuum Test was the culmination of the DVT xEMU project. This paper’s focus is on the pre-Extravehicular Activity (EVA) test setup, and general performance of the SxEMU Portable Life Support Subsystem (xPLSS), with focus on the performance of the Primary Oxygen Assembly (POA) and Secondary Oxygen Assembly (SOA), including Secondary Oxygen Regulator (SOR) takeover and the POA and SOA low-setpoint change inhibit. The initial pre-EVA test preparation included recharging the batteries and replenishing consumables, including test-system water, oxygen assemblies (with gaseous nitrogen), and the integrated thermal loops, including the Feedwater Supply Assemblies. xPLSS functionality testing included carbon dioxide (CO2) removal via the Rapid Cycle Amine swingbed system, thermal loop temperature control, and monitoring of suit ventilation loop pressure, temperature, and CO2 percentages. Testing evaluated automatic takeover of suit pressure control by the SOR after the primary oxygen supply is depleted. The Primary Oxygen Regulator and SOR low-setpoint change inhibit function prevents the crewmember from inadvertently setting the primary regulator to a low pressure setpoint during an EVA.

xPLSS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Fracture Mechanics Testing of Titanium 6AL-4V in LMP-103S Propellant

Propellant tank safe-life analysis is a spacecraft propulsion subsystem Launch Range processing requirement. The material property inputs for the safe-life analysis include the stress intensity factor for environment-assisted cracking (KEAC). The KEAC for titanium alloy Ti 6Al-4V in LMP-103S propellant was determined experimentally using an innovative test method following ASTM E1681, Standard Test Method for Determining Threshold Stress Intensity Factor for Environment-Assisted Cracking of Metallic Materials. This effort was a collaboration between NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and NASA Kennedy Space Center to expose the test specimens in the propellant, while loaded in the test fixtures, for 1000- hour (42 days) at 50°C. Two test rounds have been completed to date; 1) testing mechanically loaded specimens but without propellant and 2) testing mechanically loaded specimens wetted with LMP-103S propellant. The dry test was to evaluate the crack growth without exposure to the LMP-103S propellant, and further assess the un-wetted stress intensity factor for the full 1000-hour duration. The second round of testing included the propellant soak for the requisite 1000- hour at 50°C. Current results show that the threshold intensity factor for environment-assisted cracking (exposed to LMP103S) is 22.5 ksi√in for the bulk material and 36. 2 ksi√in for the weld material. A generic ‘candidate’ tank geometry and material thickness is developed for a damage tolerance of known surface cracks below the nondestructive inspection technique detection limit. Evaluations with and without the use of a threshold intensity factor for environment-assisted cracking is performed for the required 4x propellant tank service life using the software tool NASGRO. SP2024_00239

Green propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2024

Completion of Dragonfly PPF Testing in the NFAC 80x120-Foot Wind Tunnel

The Dragonfly entry, descent, and landing team (JHU-APL, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA Ames Research Center, Sikorsky Aircraft) recently completed testing in the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC) 80x120-Foot Wind Tunnel. The facility is located at NASA Ames Research Center and is operated by the U.S. Air Force's Arnold Engineering Development Complex. The test was designed to simulate conditions of Preparation for Powered (PPF), an approximately 10-minute period during which the Lander is posed in front of the Backshell at low subsonic airspeeds, all under the main parachute, and the rotors are used to null residual Lander yaw rates prior to release i. e. de-spin. The Lander (approximately 50% scale) that previously was tested in the NASA Langley 14x22 Wind Tunnel in 2023 was used for the NFAC test with a new Backshell designed and fabricated specifically for NFAC. This memorandum summarizes execution of the test: objective, facility and models, instrumentation and data products, test procedure, and completed test matrix. Other future documents will include a test report (JHU-APL) and documentation of data processing/analysis and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) comparisons to test data (Sikorsky).

Dragonfly↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Exploration Portable Life Support Subsystem (xPLSS) Thermal Modeling to Thermal Vacuum Testing

To support NASA’s goal to return to the Moon through the Artemis Mission, the development of an Exploration Portable Life Support Subsystem (xPLSS) has been conducted at Johnson Space Center (JSC). As part of this development process, a large system level thermal/fluid model of the xPLSS was developed using Thermal Desktop and an in-house human model (METMAN). The xPLSS model was used throughout the design process to predict the performance and temperature of nearly all components within the xPLSS. In the fall of 2023, the Design, Verification, and Testing (DVT) unit of the xPLSS was tested in a thermal vacuum (TVAC) chamber at JSC. This testing consisted of combining the xPLSS with an upper torso of the Exploration Pressure Garment System (xPGS) and simulating five Extravehicular Activities (EVAs) in extreme thermal conditions (two cold EVAs and three hot EVAs). The data generated in this test series provided system level data of the xPLSS operating in vacuum and at flight-like environmental temperatures for the first time. These data were compared to results output by the xPLSS system model to assess the accuracy of previous analyses and improve the fidelity and accuracy of the xPLSS system model. The comparison between model and test hardware provides valuable insight that will help improve the design and fidelity of next generation space suits. In general, comparison between test data and model data generally showed slightly un-conservative values (model predicting colder temperatures than test in hot environments, and hotter temperatures than test in cold environments). Model assumptions and test assumptions were assessed to understand potential causes of some of these sources in error. Recommendations to improve the fidelity of the xPLSS model were also made based on the results presented in this paper.

xPLSS↗
NASA NTRS2025

Details of Adhering and Testing Artificial Ice Shapes to the High Lift Common Research Model in the National Transonic Facility

There is currently interest in conducting flight Reynolds number aerodynamic performance testing for iced airplane configurations. There has only been limited testing in the past, none of which has resulted in publicly available data. Consequently, there is virtually no documented knowledge for conducting icing related testing at flight Reynolds number where testing in cryogenic conditions is required. The National Transonic Facility (NTF) is a cryogenic wind tunnel at NASA Langley Research Center that is capable of achieving flight Reynolds numbers on subscale models. A large number of aerodynamic tests have been performed in this facility for uniced subscale model configurations. Through the collaborations associated with the High Lift Common Research Model, a test campaign was conducted to fill the existing research gaps with publicly available data. This resulted in a requirement that NASA develop a suitable level of competency for performing icing related tests in cryogenic environments. This document provides information about the challenges faced during the test campaign, how the issues were mitigated, and preserves the institutional knowledge gained by providing recommendations that will be used to reduce risk for future testing.

Iced Aerodynamics↗
NASA NTRS2026

xEMU Spacesuit Boot Lunar South Pole Thermal Vacuum Testing

The Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) spacesuit lunar boot was evaluated in the Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL) CITADEL thermal vacuum chamber at lunar South Pole conditions. The JPL CITADEL chamber provides a radiation environment and contact plate temperature of 48K, simulating the temperature of a lunar Permanently Shadowed Region (PSR) at the South Pole of the Moon. The main objectives of the test series are: to evaluate the risk lunar PSRs pose to advanced spacesuit boots, validate the xEMU lunar boot thermal model, and to develop a test methodology to evaluate lunar spacesuit boots. To simulate the thermal effects of a crewmember’s foot inside the boot, a thermal manikin foot was developed to inject heat into the spacesuit boot. Thermal data was collected through a variety of sensors including thermocouples, thermistors, heat flux sensors, and infrared cameras. A test matrix was developed to investigate the variables of foot contact force, simulated skin temperature, external contact plate temperature, and ventilation flowrate. The JPL CITADEL chamber includes a loadlock (airlock) that afforded the ability to simulate the transition of the boot from a thermally neutral IVA condition to a cold EVA condition within seconds. This paper will document the test design, test objectives, success criteria, test support equipment, spacesuit boot to chamber interfaces, and configuration of the test article. Additionally, this paper will document the high-level results of the testing. More detailed test results will be presented in a different paper.

Ben Swartout↗
NASA NTRS2026

xEMU Spacesuit Boot Lunar South Pole Thermal Vacuum Testing

The Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) spacesuit lunar boot was evaluated in the Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL) CITADEL thermal vacuum chamber at lunar South Pole conditions. The JPL CITADEL chamber provides a radiation environment and contact plate temperature of 48K, simulating the temperature of a lunar Permanently Shadowed Region (PSR) at the South Pole of the Moon. The main objectives of the test series were: to evaluate the risk lunar PSRs pose to advanced spacesuit boots, validate the xEMU lunar boot thermal model, and develop a test methodology to evaluate lunar spacesuit boots. To simulate the thermal effects of a crewmember’s foot inside the boot, a thermal manikin foot was developed to inject heat into the spacesuit boot. Thermal data was collected through a variety of sensors including thermocouples, thermistors, heat flux sensors, and infrared cameras. A test matrix was developed to investigate the variables of foot contact force, simulated skin temperature, external contact plate temperature, and ventilation flowrate. The JPL CITADEL chamber includes a loadlock (airlock) that afforded the ability to simulate the transition of the boot from a thermally neutral IVA condition to a cold EVA condition within seconds. This paper will document the test design, test objectives, success criteria, test support equipment, spacesuit boot to chamber interfaces, and configuration of the test article. Additionally, this paper will document the high-level results of the testing. More detailed test results will be presented in a different paper.

TVAC↗
NASA NTRS2004

Mars Exploration Rover thermal test program overview

In January 2004, two Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) landed on the surface of Mars to begin their mission as robotic geologists. A year prior to these historic landings, both rovers and the spacecraft that delivered them to Mars, were completing a series of environmental tests in facilities at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This paper describes the test program undertaken to validate the thermal design and verify the workmanship integrity of both rovers and the spacecraft. The spacecraft, which contained the rover within the aeroshell, were tested in a 7.5 m diameter thermal vacuum chamber. Thermal balance was performed for the near earth (hot case) condition and for the near Mars (cold case) condition. A solar simulator was used to provide the solar boundary condition on the solar array. IR lamps were used to simulate the solar heat load on the aeroshell for the off-sun attitudes experienced by the spacecraft during its cruise to Mars. Each rover was tested separately in a 3.0 m diameter thermal vacuum chamber over conditions simulating the warmest and coldest expected Mars diurnal temperature cycles. The environmental tests were conducted in a quiescent nitrogen atmosphere at a pressure of 8 to 10 Torr. In addition to thermal balance testing, the science instruments on board the rovers were tested successfully in the extreme environmental conditions anticipated for the mission. A solar simulator was not used in these tests.

thermal vacuum test↗
NASA NTRS2020

Electric Six Degree of Freedom Installation Timelapse (Six Degree of Freedom Dynamic Test System)

The Six-degree-of-freedom Dynamic Test System (SDTS) is a short-range real-time motion based testing platform. Its primary use at NASA/JSC has been for development and qualification testing of docking systems, robotic assisted berthing mechanisms, and dynamic attachment systems. The SDTS is a closed-loop force feedback system that can simulate on-orbit contact dynamics between two vehicles utilizing the actual mechanical interfaces for testing. The facility is controlled by interconnected computers running real-time simulation software that takes measured contact forces, integrates the equations of motion in real time, and provide those states back into the motion table. This infrastructure can also be used for non-mating applications such as relative position sensor testing/evaluations. The SDTS facility provides a superstructure for mounting test articles, multiple test sensors, an intercom network for voice communications, and a synchronized timing system for data acquisition that includes HD video. This time-lapse video shows the buildup and testing of a modern electric actuation system created by Mikrolar, Inc. at the Johnson Space Center. This motion base will replace the current hydraulic actuator system, which is been in use since the 1970s, for all-future NASA testing. Once the system goes through customization to provide JSC’s unique closed-loop environment, the facility will help certify docking system and attach mechanisms on the ground before we send the first woman and the next man to the lunar surface

hexapod↗
NASA NTRS2025

A Summary of Results from Vertical Drop Testing of Hybrid III and WIAMan ATDs

With the development and maturation of the Urban Air Mobility (UAM) market, many new types of electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) vehicles will be flying in the national airspace carrying goods, people or conducting operations for a variety of missions. These types of vehicles are unlike current aircraft due to their novel design and operational profile. Several considerations must be examined in areas including noise, comfort and safety in order for these vehicles to be utilized and accepted into the current airspace system. Researchers at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) have conducted sub-scale and full-scale tests on representative eVTOL airframes and seats under a variety of dynamic impact conditions. These tests were conducted to generate data necessary to inform the development of standards in the areas specific to crashworthiness of eVTOL vehicle systems and safety. The data in this report relates to occupant responses obtained during a test campaign utilizing various makes, models, and sizes of Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATD’s, a.k.a. crash test dummies) undergoing vertical impacts in a variety of seats. The data is intended to provide occupant behavior response and injury metrics for several anticipated impact scenarios that may occur in eVTOL operations. This report will present test data highlighting the effects of several variables on the test results. Discussions on the ATD sizes, along with comparisons between different ATD makes and types will be included. The performance of an in-house developed energy absorbing seat will be detailed, and discussions pertaining to the applicability in various loading conditions will be presented. Finally, a discussion as to the applicability of the tested results to eVTOL full-scale conditions will be included.

Dynamic Drop Testing↗
NASA NTRS1935

Strength Tests of Thin-walled Duralumin Cylinders of Elliptic Section

This report is the fifth of a series presenting the results of strength tests of thin-walled cylinders and truncated cones of circular and elliptic section; it includes the results obtained from torsion tests on 30 cylinders, pure bending tests on 30 cylinders, and combined transverse shear and bending tests on 60 cylinders. All the cylinders tested were elliptic section with the ends clamped to rigid bulkheads. In the pure bending and combined transverse shear and bending tests the loads were applied in the plane of the major axis. The results of the tests on elliptic cylinders are correlated with the results of corresponding tests on circular cylinders and are presented in charts suitable for use in design.

STRESSED SKIN - CYLINDERS, ELLIPTIC - STRENGTH↗
NASA NTRS2014

Overview of the 6 Meter HIAD Inflatable Structure and Flexible TPS Static Load Test Series

To support NASAs long term goal of landing humans on Mars, technologies which enable the landing of heavy payloads are being developed. Current entry, decent, and landing technologies are not practical for this class of payloads due to geometric constraints dictated by current launch vehicle fairing limitations. Therefore, past and present technologies are now being explored to provide a mass and volume efficient solution to atmospheric entry, including Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerators (HIADs). At the beginning of 2014, a 6m HIAD inflatable structure with an integrated flexible thermal protection system (TPS) was subjected to a static load test series to verify the designs structural performance. The 6m HIAD structure was constructed in a stacked toroid configuration using nine inflatable torus segments composed of fiber reinforced thin films, which were joined together using adhesives and high strength textile woven structural straps to help distribute the loads throughout the inflatable structure. The 6m flexible TPS was constructed using multiple layers of high performance materials to protect the inflatable structure from heat loads that would be seen during atmospheric entry. To perform the static load test series, a custom test fixture was constructed. The fixture consisted of a structural tub rim with enough height to allow for displacement of the inflatable structure as loads were applied. The bottom of the tub rim had an airtight seal with the floor. The centerbody of the inflatable structure was attached to a pedestal mount as seen in Figure 1. Using an impermeable membrane seal draped over the test article, partial vacuum was pulled beneath the HIAD, resulting in a uniform static pressure load applied to the outer surface. During the test series an extensive amount of instrumentation was used to provide many data sets including: deformed shape, shoulder deflection, strap loads, cord loads, inflation pressures, and applied static load.In this overview, the 6m HIAD static load test series will be discussed in detail, including the 6m HIAD inflatable structure and flexible TPS design, test setup and execution, and finally initial results and conclusions from the test series.

inflatable aerodynamic decelerator↗