Impact of Detonations. Comparison of Conventional and Nuclear Explosive Detonations.
No abstract provided.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
No abstract provided.
A validation study is performed using the hydrodynamics code PAGOSA to assess the accuracy of reflected shock, burn front propagation, and Photon Doppler Velocimetry (PDV) predictions using several burn models and strength models. Experimental data collected from proton radiography (pRad) is compared to burn front propagation times and reflected shock patterns. Burn front isochrones are computed and the lag time for the burn front is quantified for a given burn model. The effect of strength models and damage are assessed by comparison of simulations to experimental PDV data.
Abstract not provided.
No abstract provided.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
No abstract provided
Assessing impact of high-altitude electromagnetic pulses (HEMP) resulting from the effects of nuclear weapons is a problem of great concern. Some previous studies have estimated the extent and duration of an outage to be severe. In this report, we quantify the extent and duration of an outage resulting from HEMP E1 to the best of our ability given existing knowledge and tools. Our analysis focuses on the impact to civilian consumer of electricity as opposed to the impact on military responsiveness.
Abstract not provided.
Information provided for OIG audit.
SURF is an acronym for Scaled-Unified-Reactive-Front, invented by R. Menikoff and S. Shaw. What follows is a brief synopsis of this model as used for the validation study discussed here. For more details see the xrage user manual and the references cited there.
GW170817 demonstrated the potential of GW+EM observations of NS mergers: most direct observation of r-process production to date. But what can we really learn from the observations. Getting from the observations to constraining properties of the merger ejecta requires multiple aspects of simulation (merger, disk calculations, and radiation flow) and physics (atomic, nuclear cross-section, dense nuclear matter, neutrino, …). Can we maximize what we can do with observations.
With a brilliant hot flash and a loud boom, the giant mushroom cloud with its fiery core filled the predawn sky above the New Mexico desert. The nuclear age had begun. It was 75 years ago on July 16, 1945, that Los Alamos scientists changed the world with the successful detonation of “the Gadget” – the device created to test the Fat Man implosion-type plutonium weapon before it was taken into combat. However, the road to Trinity, as the test was named by J. Robert Oppenheimer, who is thought to have been inspired by a line in a John Donne poem, was a difficult one.
Advanced reactive burn models enable phenomena to be modeled that aren’t possible with programmed burn. Programmed burn propagates a burn front at a prescribed speed from a prescribed initiation point. Reactive burn uses the hydro variables (pressure, temperature, etc.) to determine when, how rapidly, and to what extent a zone detonates. This enables a completely new set of problems to be simulated. Our goal in this milestone has been to improve the usability of reactive burn modes. Thus, the closure criteria are: 1. Perform code and solution verification of the reactive burn models using appropriate solutions and simplified HE setups. 2. Perform validation assessments using small-scale experiments. 3. Evaluate sensitivities and quantify uncertainties due to model form variations and mesh dependencies.
On June 30, 2020, a 0.87 gram PETN charge being pressed in the Rapid Prototyping Facility (RPF), unexpectedly initiated, resulting in destruction of the pressing fixture but no injuries or facility damage. In response, the Safety Review Board (SRB) met on Aug. 13, 2020 and Oct. 1, 2020 to review information collected following the incident, consider likely direct causes, and form recommendations.
Abstract not provided.
These lightning strikes can be more dangerous than “normal” lightning associated with a regular thunderstorm in that the “bolts from the blue” often occur well away from where the precipitation is occurring at the surface. “Bolts from the blue” occurred at a measured distance of 33 miles and an estimated 35 to 50 miles away from where the precipitation was occurring with this storm.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not required.