Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “THERMOCOUPLES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,711 records · Page 95

Diversity of Energy Generation and Storage Methods on the Lunar Surface

Solar light, solar wind, differences between temperatures of the lunar surface, solar photosphere, and deep space, as well as noticeable changes of surface temperature in the absence of atmosphere provide opportunities for energy production and storage on the Moon using generators ranging from solar panels and thermocouples to devices using phase transitions or magnetism. There are multiple and diverse possibilities for energy generation and storage. Compositions of the relevant materials can be compared to abundances of chemical elements in lunar regolith.

Energy↗

Validating Arc-jet Condition Targets Using Inverse 1D Material Response Models

Experiments were conducted using both the Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) and Aerodynamic Heating Facility (AHF), two hypersonic arc-jet facilities at NASA Ames. These tests were run to understand the material response of ablative thermal protection system materials by exposing them to high-enthalpy flows. Using thermocouple data from the materials, test conditions were inversely determined and compared with expected results from a one-dimensional model using facility target conditions; this allowed an approximate environmental scale factor to be determined and applied to more accurately predict material response in additional tests.

material response↗

Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation 2 Trajectory, Aerodynamics, and Atmosphere Reconstruction

On February 18th, 2021, the Mars 2020 entry system successfully delivered the Perseverance rover to the surface of Mars at Jezero Crater. The entry capsule carried a set of instrumentation installed on the heat shield and backshell, named the Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation 2. The instruments include pressure transducers, thermocouples, heat flux gauges, and radiometers to measure the aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic performance of the entry vehicle. This paper describes the trajectory and atmosphere reconstruction results based on the pressure sensor measurements. The process uses a Kalman filter approach to estimate the freestream atmospheric properties from the pressure measurements combined with a model of the pressure distribution of the heatshield and other sensor inputs, including an inertial measurement unit and other on-board navigation sensors, and several external atmospheric observations. The results indicate upper altitude density was up to 150% higher than nominal, which is consistent with the observed early entry guidance start time. The density below 40 km was within 12% the pre-flight predictions. The reconstructed axial force coefficient was approximately 2% lower than the pre-flight prediction across the flight range.

Christopher D Karlgaard↗

Mars 2020 Reconstructed Aerothermal Environments and Design Margins

The Mars 2020 aeroshell's thermal protection system was nearly identical to the Mars Science Laboratory system that successfully completed its mission for the Curiosity rover's landing in 2012. It was predicted that, like Mars Science Laboratory, the Mars 2020 heatshield would experience boundary layer transition and that the thermal protection system would provide sufficient material thickness margins against the aerothermal environments, even after adding radiative heating that was not included for Mars Science Laboratory. The Mars 2020 flight instrumentation suite included heatshield sensors similar to Mars Science Laboratory and new backshell measurements. A full set of surface pressure and in-depth temperature data were collected during atmospheric entry. This paper provides an initial analysis of the flight data and focuses on the reconstructed total surface heat flux inferred from the measured temperatures. Turbulent boundary layer conditions again were observed on the Mars 2020 heatshield, and the temperatures at all eleven heatshield and six backshell thermocouple in-depth sensor locations were well within system capabilities due to favorable entry conditions and conservative uncertainties. New computational fluid dynamics results on the reconstructed entry trajectory are compared to the measured surface pressures and reconstructed total heat fluxes. The predicted heatshield surface pressures at six locations match the data qualitatively and quantitatively well, as expected. Smooth-wall laminar heating predictions prior to boundary layer transition fall above the reconstructed heating on the heatshield. After the observed boundary layer transition time, total heat flux based on algebraic turbulence model calculations generally match the heat flux trends relative to one another. The convective heat flux was predicted to constitute the majority of the total heating. On the backshell, smooth-wall laminar total heat flux predictions generally exceed the reconstructed total heating at six locations. At each of these locations, it is estimated that radiative heating provided almost all of the total heating. The Mars 2020 as-flown aerothermal environments were well below the design levels for all measurement locations due to conservative design assumptions and a stressing design trajectory.

Mars 2020↗

Mars 2020 Reconstructed Aerothermal Environments and Design Margins

The Mars 2020 aeroshell's thermal protection system was nearly identical to the Mars Science Laboratory system that successfully completed its mission for the Curiosity rover's landing in 2012. It was predicted that, like Mars Science Laboratory, the Mars 2020 heatshield would experience boundary layer transition and that the thermal protection system would provide sufficient material thickness margins against the aerothermal environments, even after adding radiative heating that was not included for Mars Science Laboratory. The Mars 2020 flight instrumentation suite included heatshield sensors similar to Mars Science Laboratory and new backshell measurements. A full set of surface pressure and in-depth temperature data were collected during atmospheric entry. This paper provides an initial analysis of the flight data and focuses on the reconstructed total surface heat flux inferred from the measured temperatures. Turbulent boundary layer conditions again were observed on the Mars 2020 heatshield, and the temperatures at all eleven heatshield and six backshell thermocouple in-depth sensor locations were well within system capabilities due to favorable entry conditions and conservative uncertainties. New computational fluid dynamics results on the reconstructed entry trajectory are compared to the measured surface pressures and reconstructed total heat fluxes. The predicted heatshield surface pressures at six locations match the data qualitatively and quantitatively well, as expected. Smooth-wall laminar heating predictions prior to boundary layer transition fall above the reconstructed heating on the heatshield. After the observed boundary layer transition time, total heat flux based on algebraic turbulence model calculations generally match the heat flux trends relative to one another. The convective heat flux was predicted to constitute the majority of the total heating. On the backshell, smooth-wall laminar total heat flux predictions generally exceed the reconstructed total heating at six locations. At each of these locations, it is estimated that radiative heating provided almost all of the total heating. The Mars 2020 as-flown aerothermal environments were well below the design levels for all measurement locations due to conservative design assumptions and a stressing design trajectory.

Mars 2020↗

Mars Entry Instrumentation Flight Data and Mars 2020 Entry Environments

On February 18th, 2021, the Mars 2020 entry vehicle delivered the Perseverance rover to the surface of Mars. The entry vehicle carried a set of instrumentation installed on the heatshield and backshell to measure aerodynamic and aerothermal performance, named the Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation 2. This set of instrumentation included pressure transducers, thermocouples, heatflux sensors, and a radiometer, as well as a dedicated sensor support electronics system. All MEDLI2 hardware operated as expected during cruise and entry. MEDLI2 sensors gathered accurate pressure measurements in hypersonic through supersonic regimes to reconstruct vehicle attitude and atmospheric profiles. MEDLI2 on the heatshield sensors indicated that surface temperatures, caused by turbulent heating beginning 70 seconds after entry, remained at or below 1430 °C, while heatshield bondline temperatures rose less than 45 °C. Backshell surface TPS temperatures peaked at 630 °C, which was caused primarily by radiative heating measured by several separate sensors. The MEDLI2 temperature and pressure measurements enabled further detailed characterization of the Mars 2020 entry performance, and the flight dataset will provide a wealth of information for the EDL community and future mission designers.

thermal protection system↗

Mars Entry Instrumentation Flight Data and Mars 2020 Entry Environments

On February 18th, 2021, the Mars 2020 entry vehicle delivered the Perseverance rover to the surface of Mars. The entry vehicle carried a set of instrumentation installed on the heatshield and backshell to measure aerodynamic and aerothermal performance, named the Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation 2. This set of instrumentation included pressure transducers, thermocouples, heatflux sensors, and a radiometer, as well as a dedicated sensor support electronics system. All MEDLI2 hardware operated as expected during cruise and entry. MEDLI2 sensors gathered accurate pressure measurements in hypersonic through supersonic regimes to reconstruct vehicle attitude and atmospheric profiles. MEDLI2 on the heatshield sensors indicated that surface temperatures, caused by turbulent heating beginning 70 seconds after entry, remained at or below 1430 °C, while heatshield bondline temperatures rose less than 45 °C. Backshell surface TPS temperatures peaked at 630 °C, which was caused primarily by radiative heating measured by several separate sensors. The MEDLI2 temperature and pressure measurements enabled further detailed characterization of the Mars 2020 entry performance, and the flight dataset will provide a wealth of information for the EDL community and future mission designers.

thermal protection systems↗

Analysis of PICA-NuSil at the Hypersonic Materials Environmental Test System (HyMETS)

Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA) gained heritage during the stardust mission and is the baseline material for missions to Mars. The phenolic phase of PICA is friable, and therefore the surface is treated with a siloxane resin (NuSil) to mitigate the shedding of particulate matter. Historically, material response models have not accounted for the presence of this coating. Therefore, a test campaign was executed at the Hypersonic Materials Environmental Test System (HyMETS) to investigate the performance of NuSil under multiple heating rates and gas composition. Sphere-cone models were instrumented with thermocouples to measure the in-depth temperature response, and surface temperatures were monitored with a pyrometer. Furthermore, emission spectrometers were used to collect spectra from species emitting at the surface of the test article and the post-shock stagnation region. Post-test analysis suggests that the coating decomposes according to multiple stages. Inspection of silicon emission data reveals a rapid rise and decline in intensity within the first couple of seconds of testing, which is attributed to pyrolysis of NuSil. Pyrolysis is followed by a stagnation in silicon emission and surface temperature which are attributed to the formation of a thin layer of oxidation-resistant silicon oxycarbide. Moreover, the presence of the silicon oxycarbide layer significantly reduces the in-depth thermal response when compared to the baseline material. Eventually, the silicon oxycarbide layer decomposes via high-temperature reactions, which expose the underlying char layer to a highly reactive flow.

PICA-NuSil↗

In-Situ Consolidation Automated Fiber Placement of Thermoplastic Composites for High-Rate Aircraft Manufacturing

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) initiated the Hi-Rate Composites Aircraft Manufacturing (HiCAM) project in 2021 with the goal of significantly increasing composite structures manufacturing rate in the commercial aircraft industry. The technologies currently under investigation include resin infusion and automated fiber placement (AFP) of novel thermoset materials and thermoplastic composites. Thermoplastic composites offer attractive solutions to rapid manufacturing due to their ability to be formed and consolidated quickly. NASA is particularly focused on assessing composite structure manufacturing utilizing an in-situ consolidation AFP of thermoplastics (ICAT) process employing a recently developed laser heating system. Two semi-crystalline polyaryletherketone thermoplastic tape materials were characterized to ascertain the ICAT process parameters at AFP placement speeds approaching 423 mm/s. The required laser power settings were determined at Electroimpact, measuring material temperatures utilizing a forward looking infrared (FLIR) thermal imaging camera and thermocouples. The material temperature, tool temperature, and placement speed were varied for resulting consolidation quality assessment. The resulting temperature data were also utilized to calibrate thermal analysis models under development at NASA. The experimental temperature data confirmed analytical results. An overview of the HiCAM project as well as initial data from ICAT process characterizations are described.

thermoplastic composites↗

Dynamic fire and smoke detection and classification for flashover prediction

Flashover is a dangerous phenomenon caused by near-simultaneous ignition of exposed materials. It is one of the major causes of firefighter fatalities. Research has been done using CMOS vision cameras combined with thermal sensors to perform remote detection and dynamic classification of fire and smoke patterns. Tests and experiments have been done to detect fire and smoke remotely. The inexpensive visible and infrared sensors used in the tests corroborate and closely follow the detailed trends recorded by the more expensive (and less mobile) radiometers and thermocouples. Deep neural networks (DNN) have been used to detect, classify and track fire and smoke areas. Real-time segmentation is utilized to measure the fire and smoke boundaries. The segmentations are used to dynamically monitor fluctuations in temperature, fire size and smoke progression in the monitored areas. A fire and smoke progression curve has been drawn to predict the flashover point. In the paper, data analysis and preliminary results will be shown. Keywords: Flashover, fire, smoke, deep learning, visible and infrared vision

Chow, Edward↗

Upgrades to the Single Stage Axial Compressor and Fan Facility For Low Pressure Ratio and Boundary Layer Ingesting Fan Research

Next generation aircraft engine efficiency goals will be met through high bypass ratio engines. To achieve these goals, a combination of small core and low pressure ratio fan technologies will be necessary. Additionally, advanced propulsion air-frame integration concepts, such as boundary layer propulsion, and distributed electrically driven fans with short inlets or wing integration strategies, are beginning to be investigated for their potential fuel burn savings. In order to realize the potential fuel savings from these technologies, it is necessary to have testing capabilities for the components. The NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) Single StageAxial Fan and Compressor Facility (also called the GRC W-8Facility) has recently undergone several significant upgrades in order to effectively test low pressure ratio fans and various inlet distortions. This paper will outline various challenges to testing low pressure ratio fans and the methods implemented to ensure that the W-8 facility is capable of performing these tests and acquiring high quality data. The upgrades include significant pip-ing upgrades to reduce pressure loss and turbulence, capability for inlet total pressure and swirl distortion, increased test section length including a longer shaft, a two component balance, an up-graded rotating data system, and a new temperature characterization to reduce uncertainties in thermocouple measurements

W-8 Facility↗

Description of Cloud Characterization and Icing Test for a 3D Heated Test Article at the NASA Icing Research Tunnel

This paper describes the cloud characterization and icing tests conducted with a 3D heated test article in Winter/Spring 2022 at the NASA Icing Research Tunnel. The intent is to present analyzed results from these recently conducted tests in a future technical paper. The test article, whose geometry is representative of an inter-compressor duct and strut region of a turbofan engine, has been designed and constructed to study the physics of supercooled water icing and ice crystal icing. The surfaces of the Simulated Inter-compressor Duct Research Model (SIDRM) can be heated to simulate the warm surfaces of the turbofan inter-compressor duct. The test article is instrumented with heaters, heat flux gauges, and thermocouples, while a 3D laser scanner, cameras, a scale to measure ice mass, and other instruments will aid in characterizing the icing behavior. The aim of these tests is to generate ice accretions on the SIDRM test article under well-characterized conditions. To that end, a suite of instruments was utilized to characterize the ice crystal clouds at the test section in a separate test series. The icing measurements collected during the SIDRM model tests will be used to develop and validate 3D computational engine icing tools, such as GlennICE, that predictively assess the onset and growth of ice. One of the goals of the sponsoring NASA project is to develop simulation models and tools that can assist in the design and certification of engines for flight in icing conditions in a cost effective way.

Ice crystal icing↗

Description of Cloud Characterization and Icing Tests for a 3D Heated Test Article at the NASA Icing Research Tunnel

This paper describes the cloud characterization and icing tests conducted with a 3D heated test article in Winter/Spring 2022 at the NASA Icing Research Tunnel. The intent is to present analyzed results from these recently conducted tests in a future technical paper. The test article, whose geometry is representative of an inter-compressor duct and strut region of a turbofan engine, has been designed and constructed to study the physics of supercooled water icing and ice crystal icing. The surfaces of the Simulated Inter-compressor Duct Research Model (SIDRM) can be heated to simulate the warm surfaces of the turbofan inter-compressor duct. The test article is instrumented with heaters, heat flux gauges, and thermocouples, while a 3D laser scanner, cameras, a scale to measure ice mass, and other instruments will aid in characterizing the icing behavior. The aim of these tests is to generate ice accretions on the SIDRM test article under well-characterized conditions. To that end, a suite of instruments was utilized to characterize the ice crystal clouds at the test section in a separate test series. The icing measurements collected during the SIDRM model tests will be used to develop and validate 3D computational engine icing tools, such as GlennICE, that predictively assess the onset and growth of ice. One of the goals of the sponsoring NASA project is to develop simulation models and tools that can assist in the design and certification of engines for flight in icing conditions in a cost effective way.

Ice crystal icing, heated test article, engine ici↗

Development and Sizing of the Mars 2020 Thermal Protection System

The Mars 2020 entry vehicle successfully delivered the Perseverance rover to the Martian surface on 18 February 2021. The entry vehicle aeroshell was shielded from aerodynamic heating with a thermal protection system (TPS) made of three different ablative materials. This paper provides an overview of the methodology and assumptions employed for the thermal sizing and design of the Mars 2020 aeroshell TPS. The sizing results demonstrate that the as-built thicknesses of the TPS materials were sufficient to withstand the predicted aerothermal environments without exceeding temperature limits of the underlying aeroshell structure. This paper also provides an overview of the ground testing performed in NASA arc jet facilities to verify the performance of flight lot TPS materials. Finally, temperature data returned by thermocouples embedded in the flight vehicle TPS are compared with predictions by the thermal response models used in pre-flight TPS sizing.

Mars2020↗

Upgrades to the Single Stage Axial Compressor and Fan Facility For Low Pressure Ratio and Boundary Layer Ingesting Fan Research

Next generation aircraft engine efficiency goals will be met through high bypass ratio engines. To achieve these goals, a combination of small core and low pressure ratio fan technologies will be necessary. Additionally, advanced propulsion airframe integration concepts, such as boundary layer propulsion, and distributed electrically driven fans with short inlets or wing integration strategies, are beginning to be investigated for their potential fuel burn savings. In order to realize the potential fuel savings from these technologies, it is necessary to have testing capabilities for the components. The NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) Single Stage Axial Fan and Compressor Facility (also called the GRC W-8 Facility) has recently undergone several significant upgrades in order to effectively test low pressure ratio fans and various inlet distortions. This paper will outline various challenges to testing low pressure ratio fans and the methods implemented to ensure that the W-8 facility is capable of performing these tests and acquiring high quality data. The upgrades include significant piping upgrades to reduce pressure loss and turbulence, capability for inlet total pressure and swirl distortion, increased test section length including a longer shaft, a two component balance, an upgraded rotating data system, and a new temperature characterization to reduce uncertainties in thermocouple measurements.

W-8 facitlity↗

Development and Sizing of the Mars 2020 Thermal Protection System

The Mars 2020 entry vehicle successfully delivered the Perseverance rover to the Martian surface on 18 February 2021. The entry vehicle aeroshell was shielded from aerodynamic heating with a thermal protection system (TPS) made of three different ablative materials. This paper provides an overview of the methodology and assumptions employed for the thermal sizing and design of the Mars 2020 aeroshell TPS. The sizing results demonstrate that the as-built thicknesses of the TPS materials were sufficient to withstand the predicted aerothermal environments without exceeding temperature limits of the underlying aeroshell structure. This paper also provides an overview of the ground testing performed in NASA arc jet facilities to verify the performance of flight lot TPS materials. Finally, temperature data returned by thermocouples embedded in the flight vehicle TPS are compared with predictions by the thermal response models used in pre-flight TPS sizing.

Mars2020↗

MARS 2020 Backshell Radiative Heating Measurement and Shock Tube Verification

In February 2021, the Perseverance rover was brought to the surface of Mars by the Mars 2020 mission. A feature of the Mars 2020 capsule was instrumentation to measure its entry, descent and landing (EDL) with the so-called Mars EDL Instrumentation 2 (MEDLI2) [1]. The MEDLI2 introduced, among other things, backshell instrumentation, including a broadband radiometer. The radiometer was mounted on the leeside of the vehicle next to thermocouple plugs and a heat flux gauge. The data returned by the leeside MEDLI2 heat flux gauge is largely analogous to that measured by the COMARS gauge flown on the ExoMars Schiaparelli [2] entry in that it is measuring heat flux in an area that is entirely dominated by radiative heating. The COMARS measurement provided excellent validation of backshell radiative heating models for Mars entry, albeit at a limited number of points [3]. The MEDLI2 heat flux gauge measurement effectively confirmed the quality of the prediction, extended over the full trajectory, as will be presented in this paper. The MEDLI2 radiometer,however, was blocked by ablation products and suffered a loss of half of its signal. The second backshell heat flux gauge installed on the windside of the vehicle was also well predicted, although the heating had both radiative and convective contributions. It was desired to reproduce the conditions of the Mars 2020 entry via ground testing in the Electric Arc Shock Tube (EAST) at NASA Ames. Tests to verify stagnation line heating were previously reported in EAST, confirming the presence of shock layer radiation as the major discrepancy in heatshield temperature modelling [4]. Therefore, tests for stagnation line heating were not repeated. Instead, the shock tube informed bias method [5, 6] was used to identify test conditions that may produce similarity to streamlines that pass around the backside of the vehicle and are responsible for the radiation observed at the two heat flux gauge locations. This method was used to identify a range of velocities and densities in the shock tube that are relevant for confirming the radiative environment encountered. This paper reports the results obtained in the 10 cm diameter EAST shock tube, corresponding to later trajectory points at ambient pressures of 1.1-2.0 Torr and velocities from 1.2-3.5 km/s. The test series employed two primary diagnostics: emission spectroscopy and tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS). The emission spectroscopy performed broadband measurements of the radiative emission of the 4.3 and 2.7 m bands of CO2 at flight similar conditions, obtaining both spectral and spatial data corresponding to the relaxation behind the shock front. The TDLAS measured the absorption of several lines of CO and CO2 and obtains species number densities and temperatures as a function of time behind the shock front. This paper will review highlights of this test series and analyses of the emission and absorption data. While the datasets generally show good agreement with predictions, a few discrepancies and items for additional investigation are identified and will be discussed

Brett A Cruden↗

Passive Cooling in Aerogel-Based Insulation Systems for Liquid Hydrogen Upper Stage Launch Vehicle Tanks

Spray-On Foam Insulation (SOFI) is typically used to protect the windward-facing side of flight tanks for space launch vehicle liquid hydrogen (LH2) stages. SOFI is an excellent insulator in ambient pressure environments, however, its performance pales in comparison to reflective-type systems such as Multi-Layer Insulation in the thermal radiation dominated vacuum environment of space. If a windward insulation system employing radiation shields could be devised to replace or supplement SOFI, the on-orbit heat load could be drastically reduced, and the residual propellants could then be used to facilitate secondary missions. Such insulation systems, utilizing aerogel blanket insulation, have been explored by the Cryogenics Test Laboratory at NASA Kennedy Space Center. Owing to its nano-porous structure, aerogel is an excellent adsorbent as well as an insulator at cryogenic temperatures and will readily uptake condensable background gasses such as air when protecting a surface near LH2 temperatures. When an adsorbed blanket is rapidly exposed to a vacuum, such as during the ascent of a rocket, it will release the background gas, producing a passive cooling effect that could potentially reduce or eliminate the heat load on the propellant tank for a time. This work discusses the setup and results of a test program carried out to determine the effectiveness and impact of this cooling effect as it pertains to LH2 upper stage tanks. A vertical-cylindrical liquid nitrogen (LN2) calorimeter test instrument acted as the upper stage analog. The cold-mass was wrapped with two layers of 10 mm thick aerogel blanket material, with and without aluminum heat shields depending on the test, and interspersed with numerous thermocouple temperature sensors. Gaseous argon was used as a stand-in for air as the condensable background gas. The test procedure mimicked vehicle cryo-loading/stabilization, and ascent phases, with the ascent phase accomplished using parallel vacuum pumps. Results show that the desorption cooling effect was enough to not only eliminate the heat load on the LN2 cold-mass entirely, but further refrigerated the liquid below its boiling point.

A.M. Swanger↗