DOE OSTI2015
Cleaning up legacy waste from 50 years of nuclear weapons production and energy research still remains a challenge for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The DOE environmental management program is currently forecasted to run through at least late 2060's with an estimated liability of $204 billion. Risks to human health of workers and the public, the ecological system, and nuclear safety of cleanup activities continue to drive the cost of DOE's cleanup programs. Currently, these risks are generally assessed and managed independently of each other. Except for DOE self-regulated on-site disposal activities of low-level radioactive waste, risks to human health and the environment are generally under the purview of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and State regulatory agencies, while nuclear safety risks are regulated by DOE with oversight from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board where appropriate. When managing health and environmental risks, the individual regulatory authorities often use an area-by-area (or unit-by-unit), contaminant-by-contaminant (chemical-by-chemical or radionuclide-by-radionuclide) approach, focusing on a single medium (soil, water, or air), a single source (e.g., a burial ground or a processing facility), and a single receptor (e.g, a groundwater well or a creek). This level of segregation in risk evaluations by risk category, geographical location, and operational unit, as well as the corresponding separation of regulatory authorities poses a significant challenge to reaching an optimal decision in prioritizing and managing cleanup activities. This management challenge adds another layer of complexity to large-scale cleanup effort at complex sites such as the Hanford site in eastern Washington. Therefore, to support a scientifically sound, operationally robust decision making process, there is a need for an integrated, holistic approach to risk assessment that addresses the combined effects of all major contributing factors. Previous studies have pointed out the need for integrated risk assessments that address multi-contaminant, multimedia, multi-pathway exposures, for the purposes of evaluating risks to human health and the environment. We believe that a comprehensive risk assessment should also take into nuclear safety risks that are associated with handling of nuclear material either retrieved from burial sites or to be decommissioned from nuclear facilities. Recent efforts, such as the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP)-led Hanford site-wide independent risk review that will categorize all types of risks at the Hanford site and the DOE complex-wide risk review mandated by the Fiscal Year 2014 Consolidated Appropriations Act ('Omnibus bill'), are beginning to more comprehensively address this need. This paper provides a categorization of various types of risks present at typical DOE sites, reviews the current risk assessment and management practices, and discusses the needs for integrating nuclear safety into performance and risk assessments for optimal cleanup decisions. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗