Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Lander”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,711 records · Page 95

Manual Crew Override of Vehicle Landings Following G-Transitions

BACKGROUND Manual control during exploration spaceflight consists of both planned automated supervisory control and unplanned crew override. This crew override capability is critical to enable overall mission success during landing contingencies. However, the introduction of manual override capabilities must be implemented to enable crews to mitigate risks introduced by human error. Adaptive changes in the sensorimotor system can manifest during g-transitions as spatial disorientation. While training and landing aids enable successful landing through disorientation, these adaptive changes may increase cognitive demand that needs to be accounted for in the manual control strategy. It is important to characterize these effects as soon as possible following the G-transition to develop appropriate countermeasures. METHODS In this study, we will examine operational piloting tasks following International Space Station (ISS) missions in a simulated lunar landing using a six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) motion base. The motion-based simulation will be implemented in our laboratory at the Johnson Space Center (JSC) and will be available within hours following the return from commercial crew landings. The primary goals of this study are (1) to understand the impact of spaceflight on crew ability to perform manual crew override tasks, (2) to examine how adaptive changes in vestibular and cognitive function relate to changes in manual crew override proficiency, and (3) compare performance during late “just-in-time” on-board training with early post-flight crew performance. The impact of spaceflight on piloting capability will be assessed from pre- versus post-flight changes in crewmembers assigned to either short duration (< 30 day) or long duration (~6- month) missions to the International Space Station (ISS). Individual differences in post-flight vestibular and cognitive changes include motion sickness reports, measures of tilt motion perception accuracy and precision, and dual-task tracking. During the 6DOF lunar simulation, the crew will manually takeover attitude and rate-of-descent to the nominal or re-designated landing aim point during the approach phase. The outcome measures for the lunar crew override tasks will be the percent time maintaining actual vehicle states, e.g., attitude and rate-of-descent, within recommended guidance during the landing approach, number and maximum deviation outside limits, and root mean square error (RMSE). Given that “just-in-time” (JIT) training is an operational expectation for the Human Landing System (HLS) program, all participants will perform late inflight JIT training for each manual crew override task in which they will participate. Crew proficiency will be captured inflight during JIT training that will be implemented on a laptop with hand controllers to allow the crewmember to practice the landing task procedures like the approach implemented for JIT training with Shuttle landing and ISS telerobotic tasks. COUNTERMEASURE UPDATES The lunar lander simulation has been implemented onto a two-laptop display system where subjects select from alternative landing points, based upon avoiding hazards that the on-board system identifies during the landing. The subject makes inputs using a rotational hand controller (i.e., joystick) and a translational hand controller, which are processed by simulated vehicle dynamics to update the vehicle attitude and rate of descent. Subjects will utilize a combination of flight, situation, and status displays to monitor the state of the simulated vehicle. The simulation exports tilt and translation movements to a 6DOF motion base synced to visual movements and provides representative vestibular cues to the subject while performing the task inside an enclosed cabin featuring a simulated lunar out-the-window view and a heads-down lander cockpit view. RELEVANCE This project will deliver an operational demonstration of crew override capability following spaceflight and identify potential deficits that may require remediation. Comparison of individual vestibular and cognitive changes with crew override performance will help better characterize the manual control risks associated with sensorimotor alterations. The inclusion of “just-in-time” on-board training will ensure we are characterizing changes in override proficiency with this expected countermeasure in place. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors acknowledge contributions from Draper, HLS Joint Test Panel, Crew HLS Interfaces for Piloting Working Group, and Dynamic Skills Trainer (DST) Lab toward the development of the lunar landing simulation. This project is funded by the Human Health Countermeasures Element.

Austin M Bollinger↗

Power Hibernation for Low-Cost Solar Powered Lunar Missions

Lunar Surface temperatures can span from equatorial highs near 400K and polar lows of 50K. The extreme cold combined with the 354-hour duration of the lunar night is particularly challenging for small robotic lander missions. NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) missions involve robotic landers intended to provide low-cost access to the lunar surface. Current CLPS Missions are solar powered and are only intended to survive a single lunar day. The ability to survive the night and continue operations over many lunar cycles would provide a dramatic increase in science productivity. The Power Hibernation approach relies on battery cells that can tolerate the extreme cold night and recover once temperatures return to normal. System recovery from hibernation depends on power electronics that can “cold start” at lunar dawn and operate on solar array output alone. Once battery and avionics systems are restored the spacecraft resumes daytime operations. The challenge is to achieve this capability with minimum impact to the spacecraft design and payload capacity. This talk will describe recent and ongoing investigations in battery and electronics technologies that will enable power hibernation and recovery.

Space Power↗

Power Hibernation for Low-Cost Solar Powered Lunar Missions

Lunar Surface temperatures can span from equatorial highs near 400K and polar lows of 50K. The extreme cold combined with the 354-hour duration of the lunar night is particularly challenging for small robotic lander missions. NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) missions involve robotic landers intended to provide low-cost access to the lunar surface. Current CLPS Missions are solar powered and are only intended to survive a single lunar day. The ability to survive the night and continue operations over many lunar cycles would provide a dramatic increase in science productivity. The Power Hibernation approach relies on battery cells that can tolerate the extreme cold night and recover once temperatures return to normal. System recovery from hibernation depends on power electronics that can “cold start” at lunar dawn and operate on solar array output alone. Once battery and avionics systems are restored the spacecraft resumes daytime operations. The challenge is to achieve this capability with minimum impact to the spacecraft design and payload capacity. This talk will describe recent and ongoing investigations in battery and electronics technologies that will enable power hibernation and recovery.

Space Power↗

Heat-Exchange Driven Aircraft for Low Altitude and Surface Exploration of Venus: Phase 1 Study Final Report

Exploration of Venus below its clouds has long been impaired by the planet’s massive CO2 atmosphere, corrosive trace gases, and high opacity. Except for a few narrow spectral windows, the 20 km thick global cloud cover blocks light over the entirety of the ultraviolet through thermal infrared spectrum, impeding orbital studies of the surface and lower portion of the atmosphere. In addition to the cloud opacity, Rayleigh scattering through 80 bars of CO 2 in the lower 40 km of the atmosphere results in a Rayleigh scattering depth between 25 and1 in the visible through near infrared portion of the spectrum. That optically thick scattering, combined with the uniform angular distribution of the illumination provided by the highly diffusing clouds overhead greatly reduces even very large surface albedo contrasts (Crisp, pers. Comm.). To date, the surface has only been mapped via synthetic aperture radar by the Magellan mission at scales of 120 to 300 m/pixel. In addition to contributing to the difficulty of performing studies of the surface from orbit, the extreme temperatures and pressures at the surface also create a challenging environment to utilize a lander for exploration. The longest-lived lander on Venus’ surface survived for 2 hours. Hence, limited access to observe the surface and lower atmosphere of Venus arguably puts the surface and lower atmosphere of Venus as one of the least explored regions of the inner Solar System.

NIAC Phase I↗

GEER (Glenn Extreme Environments Rig): Current Project Status

Venus is Earth’s closest planetary neighbor, and it is often considered as Earth’s twin for its size and density. However, the extreme Venus surface conditions (temperatures of ~ 460 o C, pressure of ~90 bars, and reactive atmospheric chemical species such as supercritical CO 2 , sulfuric acid, and other toxic elements) results in short duration of Venus lander missions to date to survive for only 127 minutes. It is essential to enable multiple longer-lived Venus surface missions to understand the planet’s origin, history, climate, and interior. A systematic approach for future Venus lander material selection is to characterize and study the reactivity of high potential materials by exposing materials to a simulated Venus surface conditions. Glenn Extreme Environments Rig (GEER) at NASA’s Glenn Research Center (GRC) has been the leading facility simulating the high-temperature and pressure extremes of Venus as well as reproducing conditions of the gas mixture expected at the Venus surface since 2015. Here, we report on GEER’s recent accomplishments in assessing risks for future potential Venus missions and ongoing testing process and capability enhancement in supporting other planetary science missions.

GEER↗

Mineralogical, Elemental, and Tomographic Reconnaissance Investigation for CLPS (METRIC): A Payload Designed for Exploration of Terrestrial Planetary Bodies

Geological materials (indeed, all solid objects) are characterized by their crystal structure, elemental composition, and morphology. The Mineralogical, Elemental, and Tomographic Reconnaissance Investigation for CLPS (METRIC) instrument suite quantifies all three. These measurements address fundamental science questions (e.g., the origin and evolution of planetary bodies) and support the human exploration of space (e.g., the characterization of regolith for ISRU and the constraint of its geotechnical properties). METRIC comprises an X-ray Diffraction/X-ray Fluorescence instrument (XRD: mineral structure and XRF: elemental composition), an X-ray micro-Computed Tomography instrument (XCT: 3D internal micromorphology), and a hyperspectral imaging infrared spectrometer (IRS) to provide local/regional mineralogic context for these measurements. METRIC XRD/F draws heritage from the highly successful Mars Science Laboratory CheMin instrument. The METRIC XRD/F employs two separate sample cells, one optimized for XRD and one for XRF, resulting in more rapid XRD analysis (tens of minutes vs. tens of hours for CheMin) and an orders-of-magnitude improvement in XRF detection. XCT has not been deployed in space, so the METRIC XCT represents a new capability for solar system exploration. The XCT uses the same basic high-TRL components as METRIC XRD/F, decreasing its development cost for flight. The METRIC IRS is a derivative of the NASA Earth Science Technology Office funded Hyperspectral Thermal Imager instrument and utilizes the NASA Technology Transfer Program to incorporate a commercial-of-the-shelf infrared camera ruggedized for space by NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. The IRS spectral range (8–14 µm) and resolution (10.8 cm -1 ) are tailored to quantify mineralogy in rocks using their characteristic Reststrahlen bands and to characterize mineralogy of soils using the position of the Christensen Feature. The METRIC payload is currently designed for deployment to the Moon on a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) mission, where the XRD/F and XCT would be located on a lander and the IRS would be on deployed on a companion rover to evaluate the mineralogical diversity of the landing site. A pneumatic drill designed by Honeybee Robotics would excavate regolith up to 50 cm below the lander and deliver multiple aliquots of regolith to the XRD/F and XCT. The METRIC payload could also be deployed on a rover. In this case, a sample handling system on a robotic arm could scoop regolith and/or drill rocks and deliver powder to the XRD/F and XCT located in the rover’s interior. Alternatively, METRIC instruments could be used singly or in combination on human space missions. The XRD/F and XCT could be used to characterize samples in a rover or in a science laboratory within a habitat. These data could help astronauts identify resource-enriched rocks and regolith and triage geologic samples to return samples of high interest for analysis in terrestrial laboratories. The IRS could be attached to a human-navigated rover to collect mineralogical data along a traverse and identify high-priority science samples.

E. B. Rampe↗

Cryogenically-Operable Electronics for Surviving the Lunar Night

Current solar-powered robotic lunar landers and rovers have not demonstrated survivability of the extreme cold temperatures seen during the 354-hour lunar night. To address this capability gap, we have been investigating the feasibility of a passive hibernation approach to enable low-cost solar- and battery-powered missions to operate over multiple lunar cycles. This strategy relies on isolating the batteries from the main bus during the lunar night and allowing cells to freeze as temperatures descend as low as 50K. The entire power architecture remains in a hibernation state with no electrical activity until lunar dawn. When the sun returns over the horizon, the now-illuminated solar arrays begin generating power. In order to manage the array power, architecture consisting of cryogenically-operable COTS electronics must be utilized. This architecture will distribute and control power to subsystems - importantly controlling heaters to bring the frozen lithium-ion battery cells to normal operating conditions. This alternative approach to lunar operations will enable low-cost commercial lunar landers and payloads to passively survive the night and continue to operate over multiple lunar cycles without a significant impact to cost or payload mass. Research last year focused on creating a power supply that was capable of operation at cryogenic temperatures. At the end of FY23, our team successfully designed and manufactured a Sequential Switching Shunt Regulator (S3R) that is operational in a cryogenic vacuum chamber. It is capable of full operation down to the coldest lunar night temperatures (~50K). Our presentation will provide an overview of the Lunar Hibernation strategy but will focus mainly on the technical details of this cryogenically-operable shunt regulator and test results.

Cryogenic↗

Design Study of Surface to Surface Laser Power Beaming on the Moon

Engineering design of a near-term laser surface-to-surface power beaming station to transmit power to users in shadowed regions or during the night. Input system requirements were to be able to provide 300 W of continuous usable power to users including landers and rovers, at distances up to 10 km, with a total system landed mass under 625 kg. Due to surface irregularities and the close horizon of the moon, to achieve 10-km transmission the laser must be elevated above the surface. The Vertical Solar Array Technology (VSAT) program is developing a solar array mounted on a 10-m tall mast, intended to fit on a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) lander, with target readiness date of 2028. At an optimum location near the south pole, the elevated array produces power for a majority of the lunar day.

Vertical Solar Array Technologoy (VSAT)↗

Advanced Supersonic Parachute Inflation Research Experiment 2 (ASPIRE2) Flight Mechanics and Parachute Performance

The Advanced Supersonic Parachute Inflation Re-search Experiment-2 (ASPIRE2) program consists of a sounding rocket flight test to be launched at Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) in 2025. This effort seeks to qualify the supersonic parachute for the Sample Retrieval Lander (SRL) under the Mars Sample Return (MSR) program, building off the successes of its predecessor program, ASPIRE, which launched in both 2017 and 2018. The conops for the ASPIRE2 mission are shown in Figure 1 relative to its predecessor. While the ASPIRE pro-gram qualified a 21.5 m diameter disk-gap band parachute deployed at Mach 1.7, the SRL parachute will be increased to 24 m in diameter and target a Mach 2.1 parachute deployment condition, the largest diameter supersonic parachute deployed at the highest Mach number to date. These requirements are driven by the increased landing mass of the sample retrieval lander, which is roughly a 50% increase over that of the Mars2020 entry vehicle. These changes necessitate ASPIRE2 to certify the parachute performance under similar deployment conditions. This work will cover the 6-DoF para-chute model implementation and flight mechanics performance for the ASPIRE2 campaign and discuss how these results will impact the design of the test article. The ASPIRE2 trajectory is simulated using a multi-body flight dynamics tool, Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories II (POST2). This work will summarize both the flight mechanics and parachute modeling (from payload separation until splashdown) and performance for this mission. Various design trades will be assessed such as para-chute tuning parameters as well as vehicle center of gravity location.

Evan Roelke↗

Extravehicular Activity and Human Surface Mobility Program (EHP) Exploration EVA (xEVA) System Compatibility Standards

Extravehicular Activity (EVA) is a significant capability for Artemis Systems which includes Gateway Program (modules), Human Landing System (HLS) Program (Integrated Lander and Human Class Delivery Lander), Lunar Terrain Vehicle (LTV), Pressurized Rover (PR), Payloads, and any other future lunar surface assets that will be utilized for exploration or science. The EVA and Human Surface Mobility Program (EHP) will provide the following: Exploration EVA (xEVA) suits, xEVA tools and crew aids along with vehicle integration/support hardware, LTV, and PR. Being a distributed and dynamic capability (moving components), xEVA System hardware will interface with almost all elements of the Artemis architecture. As such, it is important to document a singular set of EVA compatibility standards at the programmatic level to articulate “how to interface with xEVA suit hardware” and “how to design hardware that EVA crewmembers will access and manipulate.”

Exploration↗

A Brief Overview of Silicon Carbide Based Smart Sensor System Technologies for Planetary and Aeronautics Applications

A range of aerospace application related to planetary exploration and aeronautic engine operations require Smart Sensor System technologies operational in harsh environments. A Smart Sensor System as described here implies the use of sensors combined with electronics and other supporting technologies. For example, missions to the surface of planets like Venus or Mercury are challenged by extreme temperatures and environments, e.g., extended Venus operation 465°C [1]. In response, NASA has been developing capabilities for a small lander that is designed to operate for months in the extreme temperatures. These capabilities span electronics, sensors, communications, and power. Such a lander would enable new revolutionary science. Similar game changing capabilities are enabled by the introduction of high temperature smart systems into aeronautic engine applications to enable distributed intelligence within the engine system [2]. Core to meeting these applications is operational harsh environment electronics, corresponding sensor systems, and their integration. This presentation concentrates on the status of Smart System technologies emphasizing the role of Silicon Carbide (SiC) electronics and sensors. For example, SiC integrated circuit (IC) electronics have matured to a state where a simple long-life scientific probe is feasible for extended Venus surface operations [1, 3]. Maturation of these high temperature electronics and other technologies has been part of NASA projects to provide an operational system for in situ exploration of the Venus surface for up to 60 days [1,3-4]. This is in parallel to work expanding the capabilities of the sensor technology to provide science measurements on the Venus surface. This technology development, as well as that for other planetary applications and intelligent high temperature engine operations, will be discussed.

engine monitoring↗

Mechanisms of Ejecta Streak Formation During Spacecraft Landings on the Moon

When landing on another planetary body, spacecraft most often employ retropropulsion to decelerate for a soft landing. This process generates a crater and ejects high-speed particles, which can destabilize the lander and pose risks to nearby infrastructure. From the Apollo missions in the 1960s to the recent Chang'E-5 mission, particles leave the impingement region as streak filaments, regardless of landing site, lander mass, or thrust. This study aims to uncover the mechanism behind the formation of these ejecta streaks.

PSI↗

Gas Permeability of Lunar Regolith Simulants

Lunar lander descent engines produce plume-surface interactions (PSI) effect that can generate high-speed regolith ejecta which can pose a risk to surface and orbital assets. The physics of plume-surface interactions during the descent and landing of a lunar lander depends on the gas permeability of the lunar surface regolith. This presentation will discuss gas permeability measurements that have been performed at NASA Kennedy Space Center to help inform the development of plume-surface interaction models and large-scale PSI ground tests. Results will be presented of gas permeability measurements for lunar regolith simulants that were conducted under vacuum conditions as a function of the granular mineral material's mass density, compaction, and water content.

gas permeability↗

A Heritage BioSensor for Lunar Biology Experiments

Introduction: Automated biological experiments on small spacecraft missions have gained prominence over the past decade due to their simplicity, accessibility, and small mass, volume, and power needs. Most recently, the BioSensor microfluidic CubeSat payload aboard BioSentinel used an automated microfluidic cell culture system to study the effects of environmental stressors like deep space radiation and microgravity on yeast growth and metabolism. BioSentinel’s successor, the Lunar Explorer Instrument for space biology Applications (LEIA), will study the effects of lunar gravity and radiation using an improved version of the BioSensor microfluidic platform. The BioSensor payload has great adaptability to host a diverse range of biological experiments with single- and multi-celled organisms in both crewed and uncrewed missions, making it a compelling candidate for future space biology studies in a lunar surface environment. BioSensor Instrumentation on BioSentinel: The first spaceflight mission with the BioSensor, BioSentinel’s biology experiments occurred at three locations -- deep space, ISS and ground. The payload contained 18 microfluidic cards, each featuring 16 growth wells (a total of 288 growth wells). Each well was loaded before launch with desiccated yeast. In space, liquid culture medium (nutrients) was automatically introduced to batches of wells at a time to initiate a series of biology experiments. Temperature was maintained by thin film heaters on both sides of each card. Each well was equipped with three LEDs emitting at 570 nm, 630 nm, and 850 nm, paired with photodetectors to measure cell concentration and the alamarBlue (metabolic indicator dye) color transition from blue to pink. Phenotypic parameters like cell viability, metabolic rate, and generation time can be derived from these measurements. The sequence and timing of fluid fills, optical measurements, and thermal control were stored onboard, but could be updated asynchronously via ground communication. LEIA: LEIA is slated for launch no earlier than 2026 on a CLPS lander. BioSentinel’s BioSensor has been modified for use in LEIA. These improvements include: (a) storage for multiple culture medium types, (b) additional LED color (465 nm) for a new biological assay for antioxidant (carotenoid) production, (c) housing modifications for later biology load before launch, (d) improved isolation between electronic and fluidic components, and (e) improved humidity control for prolonged organism viability in case of post-load launch delay. Future Prospects: The consistent and successful demonstration of complex fluidics platforms alongside reliable instrument operations in a space environment is poised to create strong momentum for BioSensor-based biological experiment payloads. Planned future developments with the BioSensor include extending compatibility to a broader range of organisms and assays. Preliminary work has already demonstrated successful growth of Arabidopsis seedlings in fluidic cards. With a few modifications to the optical assembly, the setup could easily measure photosynthetic traits in plants and cyanobacteria. The addition of fluorescence measurements and generation of novel luminescent assays will elevate BioSensor’s functionality further. Beyond the BioSensor’s potential uses on free-flyer missions, ISS and Gateway, and CLPS landers, deploying the BioSensor to the lunar surface or in an artificial habitat on crewed missions could enable pioneering research on both how life responds to lunar conditions and future bioproduction capabilities making the BioSensor an indispensable tool for future space biology research.

Chinmayee Govinda Raj↗

Mars Exploration: Mission and System Analysis of the Split Sprint Mission

The information presented in this report provides detailed mission and system analysis of the Split Sprint Mission to Mars. These data were generated from September 1987 through July 1988 and involved numerous individuals within Program Development. This mission derives its name from the fact that the total mission payload is split between two vehicles, a cargo vehicle, and a piloted vehicle. The cargo vehicle carries the Mars lander and propellant for the piloted vehicle return to Earth. Then approximately 1 1/2 years later, the piloted vehicle carries the crew on a higher energy "sprint” trajectory to Mars. The advantages of the Split Sprint Mission is that the payload for the piloted vehicle is minimized and the crew would be in space for only 14 months. Mission and system data are presented for a Sprint Mission in the year 2004. Many important aspects of the mission were studied in detail. These include orbital lighting and lifetime analysis, Mars parking orbit selection, Earth departure window analysis, lander descent and ascent performance, vehicle aerobraking requirements, mission orbital maneuvers, and many other analyses listed in the Table of Contents. Emphasis was placed on vehicle performance analysis which ranged from recovery of the Earth departure stages to aerocapture of the Earth Return Capsule. There is also a section describing the computer programs that were used for this study. These programs provide many useful tools for future studies of manned planetary missions. This introductory section will give an overall view of the Split Sprint Mission and describe the orbital operations and vehicles that were studied.

Mars Architecture Team↗

Validation Assessment of Loci/GGFS Gas Granular Flow Solver Predictions of Ejecta from Physics Focused Ground Test

NASA is preparing to return humans to the Moon to establish a sustained Lunar presence through the Artemis program. One area of concern for Lunar landers is the plume surface interaction (PSI) environment that poses several risks during a propulsive landing. Understanding the PSI environment caused by the landers is therefore important to designing successful landing missions. Towards this end, a two-phase, gas granular flow solver, Loci/GGFS, has been developed to predict the cratering and ejecta physics expected during a Lunar landing. The focus of this paper is on a validation assessment of Loci/GGFS predictions of ejecta with monodisperse glass beads (MGB). The validation assessment is performed with respect to the Physics Focused Ground Test 1 (PFGT1) conducted at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in 2021. It is found that Loci/GGFS predicts similar initial cratering and ejecta features, with predictions of average velocities that are within 25% of experimental values.

Plume Surface Interaction↗

Dragonfly Mission Entry and Descent Modeling and Simulation Overview

Dragonfly is a New Frontiers Program mission, led by The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, that will deliver a rotorcraft lander to Saturn’s moon, Titan. The focus of this work is to analyze the trajectory of the entry vehicle from cruise stage separation until lander separation. This analysis is done by the NASA Langley Research Center Entry, Descent, and Landing team using the Program to Optimize Trajectories II. This paper provides an overview of the current design and the robustness of the overall entry sequence using a Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis. The work presented in this study includes the updated design, models, and analysis completed since the Dragonfly Entry, Descent, and Landing Mission Preliminary Design Review.

Simulation↗

Flammability of Materials on the Moon

Lunar gravity has been found to increase the limits of flammability for some materials compared to Earth gravity, presenting a goldilocks zone of reduced convective heat loss, while generating enough buoyant flow to replenish fresh oxygen into the flame zone. Combined with the elevated oxygen concentrations of planned Space Exploration Atmospheres (Sea), a long duration fire experiment in Lunar gravity is important to help understand and mitigate the increased risk. Flammability of Materials on the Moon (FM2) is a robotic, self-contained, combustion chamber which will be sent to the surface of the Moon on a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) lander mission CP-21. The environmental control system can replicate and conduct fire experiments automatically in the expected atmospheres, specifically 21% oxygen at 14.7 psia, and 34% oxygen at 8.2 psia, which are of immediate interest to the Human Lander System (HLS) and Lunar Rover. The laboratory prototype became operational this summer. There are four samples currently planned; two SIBAL fabrics (cotton/fiberglass blend) which will be burned in air and two acrylic rods which will be burned in Normoxic Space Exploration Atmospheres (SEA). One of each fuel will be burned upward and downward. SIBAL fabric has been found to only burn downward in air in lunar gravity (via Lunar gravity centrifuge and parabolic flight) where on Earth’s gravity it extinguishes immediately after ignition.

Jennifer Zayac↗