Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “FACILITY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,711 records · Page 95
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility Operations Quarterly Report April 1-June 30, 2017

Individual datastreams from instrumentation at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility fixed and mobile research observatories (sites) are collected and routed to the ARM Data Center (ADC). The Data Management Facility (DMF), a component of the ADC, executes datastream processing in near-real time. Processed data are then delivered approximately daily to the ARM Data Archive, also a component of the ADC, where they are made freely available to the research community. For each instrument, ARM calculates the ratio of the actual number of processed data records received daily at the ARM Data Archive to the expected number of data records. DOE requires national user facilities to report time-based operating data. The requirements involve: Actual hours of operation (ACTUAL)—24 hours per day, 91 days or 2184 hours for this quarter Estimated maximum operation or uptime target (TARGET) Variance (VARIANCE), which is equal to (1–[ACTUAL/TARGET]) TARGET and VARIANCE numbers account for unplanned downtime. Differences in TARGET performance reflect the complexity of local logistics and the frequency of extreme weather events. It is impractical to measure TARGET for each instrument or datastream. Data availability reported here refers to the average of the individual, continuous datastreams received by the ARM Data Archive. Therefore, data availability is directly related to individual instrument uptime expressed in hours. Data not at the ARM Data Archive are caused by downtime (scheduled or unplanned) of the individual instruments. Missing data caused by scheduled downtime are not included in the metrics. Thus, the average percentage of data in the ARM Data Archive represents the average percentage of the time the instruments were operating for the quarter.

Aerosol↗
DOE OSTI2017

Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility Operations Quarterly Report January 1-March 31, 2017

Individual datastreams from instrumentation at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility fixed and mobile research observatories (sites) are collected and routed to the ARM Data Center (ADC). The Data Management Facility (DMF), a component of the ADC, executes datastream processing in near-real time. Processed data are then delivered approximately daily to the ARM Data Archive, also a component of the ADC, where they are made freely available to the research community. For each instrument, ARM calculates the ratio of the actual number of processed data records received daily at the ARM Data Archive to the expected number of data records. DOE requires national user facilities to report time-based operating data. The requirements involve: Actual hours of operation (ACTUAL)—24 hours per day, 90 days or 2160 hours for this quarter Estimated maximum operation or uptime target (TARGET) Variance (VARIANCE), which is equal to (1–[ACTUAL/TARGET]) TARGET and VARIANCE numbers account for unplanned downtime. Differences in TARGET performance reflect the complexity of local logistics and the frequency of extreme weather events. It is impractical to measure TARGET for each instrument or datastream. Data availability reported here refers to the average of the individual, continuous datastreams received by the ARM Data Archive. Therefore, data availability is directly related to individual instrument uptime expressed in hours. Data not at the ARM Data Archive are caused by downtime (scheduled or unplanned) of the individual instruments. Missing data caused by scheduled downtime are not included in the metrics. Thus, the average percentage of data in the ARM Data Archive represents the average percentage of the time the instruments were operating for the quarter.

Eastern North Atlantic, Southern Great Plains, Nor↗
DOE OSTI2017

Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility Operations Quarterly Report July 1-September 30, 2016

Individual datastreams from instrumentation at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility fixed and mobile research sites are collected and routed to the Data Management Facility (DMF) for processing in near-real time. Instrument and processed data are then delivered approximately daily to the ARM Data Archive, where they are made freely available to the research community. For each instrument, ARM calculates the ratio of the actual number of processed data records received daily at the ARM Data Archive to the expected number of data records. The results are tabulated by 1) individual datastream, site, and month for the current year, and 2) site and fiscal year dating back to 1998. The U.S. Department of Energy requires national user facilities to report time-based operating data. The requirements involve the: Actual hours of operation (ACTUAL) – 24 hours per day, 92 days or 2208 hours for this quarter Estimated maximum operation or uptime target (TARGET) Variance (VARIANCE), which is equal to (1 – [ACTUAL/TARGET]) TARGET and VARIANCE numbers account for unplanned downtime. Differences in TARGET performance reflect the complexity of local logistics and the frequency of extreme weather events. It is impractical to measure TARGET for each instrument or datastream. Data availability reported here refers to the average of the individual, continuous datastreams received by the ARM Data Archive. Therefore, data availability is directly related to individual instrument uptime expressed in hours. Data not at the ARM Data Archive are caused by downtime (scheduled or unplanned) of the individual instruments. Missing data caused by scheduled downtime are not included in the metrics. Thus, the average percentage of data in the ARM Data Archive represents the average percentage of the time the instruments were operating for the quarter.

Southern Great Plains, North Slope of Alaska, East↗
DOE OSTI2016

Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility Operations Quarterly Report April 1-June 30, 2016

Individual datastreams from instrumentation at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility fixed and mobile research sites are collected and routed to the Data Management Facility (DMF) for processing in near-real time. Instrument and processed data are then delivered approximately daily to the ARM Data Archive, where they are made freely available to the research community. For each instrument, ARM calculates the ratio of the actual number of processed data records received daily at the ARM Data Archive to the expected number of data records. The results are tabulated by 1) individual datastream, site, and month for the current year, and 2) site and fiscal year dating back to 1998. The U.S. Department of Energy requires national user facilities to report time-based operating data. The requirements involve the: Actual hours of operation (ACTUAL) – 24 hours per day, 91 days or 2184 hours for this quarter Estimated maximum operation or uptime target (TARGET) Variance (VARIANCE), which is equal to (1 – [ACTUAL/TARGET]) TARGET and VARIANCE numbers account for unplanned downtime. Differences in TARGET performance reflect the complexity of local logistics and the frequency of extreme weather events. It is impractical to measure TARGET for each instrument or datastream. Data availability reported here refers to the average of the individual, continuous datastreams received by the ARM Data Archive. Therefore, data availability is directly related to individual instrument uptime expressed in hours. Data not at the ARM Data Archive are caused by downtime (scheduled or unplanned) of the individual instruments. Missing data caused by scheduled downtime are not included in the metrics. Thus, the average percentage of data in the ARM Data Archive represents the average percentage of the time the instruments were operating for the quarter.

North Slope of Alaska, Eastern North Atlantic, Sou↗
DOE OSTI2019

Overview and Status of the Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility Cryogenics System

The Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) will host the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), an international multi-kiloton Long-Baseline neutrino experiment that will be installed about a mile underground in Lead, SD. Detectors will be located inside four cryostats filled with almost 70,000 ton of ultrapure liquid argon, with a level of impurities lower than 100 parts per trillion of oxygen equivalent contamination. The Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) provides the conventional facilities and cryogenics infrastructure supporting this experiment. The cryogenics system supplies and maintains the argon needed for DUNE, as it enables the study of neutrinos from a new and improved beamline from Fermilab, as well as the dynamics of supernovae and the possibility of proton decay. This contribution describes the main features, performance, functional requirements and modes of operations of the LBNF cryogenics system. It also details its current status, present and future needs to support the DUNE experiment.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Fermilab-EP Facility Improvements

Electro-chemical Polishing (EP) is one of the key technologies of surface treatments for niobium superconducting cavities. FNAL has established Cold EP method and applied on all single cell cavities (1.3GHz~3.9GHz) processed at FNAL EP facility since 2016. Cold EP method allows to achieve continuous large current oscillations during EP process and provide the uniform removal over the cell with the variation of ±15%. The details of Fermilab EP facility and Cold EP method are presented in this poster. TUP022 Summary • More than 200 EP on over 60 single cell cavities had been successfully performed using Cold EP method at FNAL and helped to achieve high Q, high field, and FE free performances during cryogenic tests of single cell cavities. • Uniform removal over the cell with the variation of ±15% had been achieved by Cold EP method, this is especially important on final removal for doped-cavities. • Cold EP method on 9-cell cavities at ANL EP facility is in progress. • Large EP tool for 1.3GHz 9-cell and 650MHz 5-cell was transferred from AES to FNAL CPL (Cavity Processing lab.) and the re-built work is under discussions. Electrolyte

Furuta, F.↗
DOE OSTI2019

OSU High Temperature Test Facility Design Technical Report, Revision 2

The HTTF is an integral test facility, which has been designed to model the behavior of interest for a MHTGR during the Depressurized Conduction Cooldown (DCC) event. It also has the potential to conduct limited explorations into the progression of the Pressurized Conduction Cooldown (PCC) event and phenomena during normal operations. The facility is scaled 1:4 by height and 1:64 by volume. A scaling report has been developed and provides further detail into the scaling analysis for the HTTF. The maximum core power for the facility is approximately 2.2MW. The core region will be of a modular design to allow for both the prismatic block core and the pebble bed core designs to be tested. However, only the prismatic block design is discussed in this report. The HTTF consists of the following systems: A primary system consisting of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV), the circulator, cross over ducts and primary piping. The core internals sit inside the RPV and provide support for the core and core heaters. The purpose of the primary system is to maintain the pressure boundary, remove heat from the core through convection, conduction and radiation, and provide heat to the core through a series of electrical heaters. A secondary system consisting of a steam generator, feed water system and main steam system. The purpose of the secondary system is to remove heat from the primary system during heat up, cool down and normal operations. A reactor cavity simulation system consisting of a cavity tank, gas conditioning system and a series of break valves. Note that the prototypical MHTGR sits inside of a cavity. In the event of a break the helium will blowdown into this cavity. At the HTTF, the cavity is modeled as a separate tank, the reactor cavity simulation tank (RCST) and is connected to the RPV through break valves—hot-leg, cold-leg, upper break, and lower break. A reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) consisting of a series of water cooled panels and the water supply system for these panels. The HTTF RCCS is not a scaled prototypical RCCS system for the MHTGR. It is provided in the HTTF in order to set the boundary condition for radiation heat transfer from the RPV. Various auxiliary systems including the city water supply system, the electrical power supply and distribution system, the chilled water system and the instrument air system.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Commissioning the JLab LERF Cryomodule Test Facility

The JLab Low Energy Recirculating Facility, LERF, has been modified to support concurrent testing of two LCLS-II cryomodules. The cryomodules are installed in a similar fashion as they would be in the L1 section of the LCLS-II linac, including the floor slope and using all of the LCLS-II hardware and controls for cryomodule cryogenics, vacuum, and RF (SSA and LLRF). From the start, it was intended to use LCLS-II electronics and EPICS software controls for cryomodule testing. In affect the LERF test facility becomes the first opportunity to commission and operate the LCLS-II LINAC hardware and software controls. Support for specific cryomodule high level test applications like Q0 and HOMs measurements, are being developed from the basic cryomodule control suite. To support the testing, 2 K He is supplied from the CEBAF south linac cryogenic system, where care must be taken when using the LERF test facility to not upset the CEBAF cryogenics plant. This paper discusses the commissioning of the hardware and software development for testing the first two LCLS-II cryomodules.

Hovater, C.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Examining the Net Revenue and Downstream Flow Impact Trade-Offs for a Network of Cascading, Small-Scale Hydropower Facilities: Preprint

In this work, we used a price-taker model to investigate the trade-offs between net revenue and downstream flow impacts for a network of small, cascading hydro facilities. The network consisted of 36 facilities, each with a small amount of local storage (between 2 and 45 minutes). Generator sizes ranged between 0.5 and 1 MW, nominal, and the total capacity of the network was 33.5 MW. We used a multi-integer linear programing model to maximize the net revenue of the combined network subject to operating and environmental constraints. Net revenue optimizations relied on historic price data, and dry, typical, and wet years were studied to help ensure robustness. Energy and ancillary service sales were included in the net revenue calculations, and both unit commitment and dispatch simulations were performed. We found that limiting the downstream flows to ±50% of the river’s natural flows had a negligible impact on net revenues (<1% reduction), irrespective of hydrologic conditions, and even when downstream flows were limited to ±5%, net revenues were only impacted by 4%. These outcomes are significant because they demonstrate how an array of small-scale hydropower facilities can be operated to have minimal impact on natural stream flows—addressing a critical environmental concern.

downstream flow↗
DOE OSTI2022

US Advanced and Novel Accelerator Beam Test Facilities

Demonstrating the viability of Advanced Accelerator Concepts (AAC) relies on experimental validation. Over the last three decades, the US has maintained a portfolio of advanced and novel accelerator test facilities to support research critical to AAC. The facilities have enabled pioneering developments in a wide variety of beam and accelerator physics, including plasma-wakefeld and structure-wakefeld acceleration. This paper provides an overview of the current portfolio of US facilities possessing charged particle drive beams with high energies, on the order of tens of joules per pulse, or drive lasers with high peak powers, on the order of a petawatt, and are actively conducting AAC research.

Clarke, Christine↗
DOE OSTI2022

Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Observational Facilities to Study Dark Matter

We present an overview of future observational facilities that will significantly enhance our understanding of the fundamental nature of dark matter. These facilities span a range of observational techniques including optical/near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy, measurements of the cosmic microwave background, pulsar timing, 21-cm observations of neutral hydrogen at high redshift, and the measurement of gravitational waves. Such facilities are a critical component of a multi-pronged experimental program to uncover the nature of dark matter, while often providing complementary measurements of dark energy, neutrino physics, and inflation.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2022

Design of a Test Article and Test Facility to Investigate Flow-Induced Vibration of a Helical Coil Steam Generator

NuScale Power LLC (NuScale) is developing a small modular reactor (SMR) with unique design features and arrangements that require testing to provide quality data for safety analysis codes and design validation, as well as for technology maturation. A multi-phase testing program is underway at NuScale to demonstrate that its unique helical coil steam generator design is not susceptible to flow-induced vibration during operation. The phases of the testing program include modal testing of individual tubes during test article fabrication and modal and flow testing after test article completion. NuScale has contracted SIET S.p.A. in Piacenza, Italy for the design and fabrication of the test article and test facility. In-fabrication testing was performed at the site of test article build in Cremosano, Italy. Modal testing and flow testing of the completed test article will be performed at SIET’s facilities in Piacenza. This paper discusses the design of the test article and test facility, including supporting systems, required to generate the quality data required to support NuScale’s comprehensive vibration assessment program as part of the overall licensing effort for NuScale’s first-of-a-kind small modular light water reactor.

Flow-induced vibration, helical coil, steam genera↗
DOE OSTI2022

Whitepaper submitted to Snowmass21: Advanced accelerator linear collider demonstration facility at intermediate energy

It is widely accepted that the next lepton collider beyond a Higgs factory would require center-of-mass energy of the order of up to 15 TeV. Since, given reasonable space and cost restrictions, conventional accelerator technology reaches its limits near this energy, high-gradient advanced acceleration concepts are attractive. Advanced and novel accelerators (ANAs) are leading candidates due to their ability to produce acceleration gradients on the order of 1--100~GV/m, leading to compact acceleration structures. Over the last 10-15 years significant progress has been achieved in accelerating electron beams by ANAs. For example, the demonstration of several-GeV electron beams from laser-powered capillary discharge waveguides, as well as the proof-of-principle coupling of two accelerating structures powered by different laser pulses, has increased interest in ANAs as a viable technology to be considered for a compact, TeV-class, lepton linear collider. However, intermediate facilities are required to test the technology and demonstrate key subsystems. A 20-100 GeV center-of-mass energy ANA-based lepton collider can be a possible candidate for an intermediate facility. Apart from being a test beam facility for accelerator and detector studies, this collider will provide opportunities to study muon and proton beam acceleration, investigate charged particle interactions with extreme electromagnetic fields (relevant for beam delivery system designs and to study the physics at the interaction point), as well as precision Quantum Chromodynamics and Beyond the Standard Model physics measurements. Possible applications of this collider include the studies of $\gamma\gamma$ and $e$-ion collider designs.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Cryogenic User Facilities for R&D on Noble Liquid Detectors and Low Temperature Devices

Cryogenic test facilities are critical infrastructure for physics experiments in a variety of fields, perhaps most notably for particle detection with noble liquid detectors, low-temperature device development, and quantum information research. However, considerable investment and technical knowledge are required to construct and operate such facilities. This white paper discusses proposals for user facilities aimed at broadening the availability of testing capabilities for the scientific community.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2023

Integration of Nuclear Material Accounting Data and Process Monitoring Data for Improvement on Detection Probability in Safeguarding Electrochemical Processing Facilities (Final Technical Report)

The KAERI advanced spent fuel conditioning process (ACP) process is a critical component of the US- South Korean nuclear cooperation and the following “123 Agreement.” Its development has received considerable attention in both countries. The ACP is an electrochemical processing (pyroprocessing) that recycles over 96% of the used nuclear fuel (UNF). It is also intrinsically proliferation-resistant in theory. In normal operation, the U/TRU product is very hot radiologically. In addition, the Cm provides a high level of spontaneous neutrons, making the product unsuitable for weapon use. However, as pointed in some study, “the need for safeguards to protect against the diversion and misuse of separated plutonium applies essentially equally to all grades of plutonium.” As pointed by many studies, the well-established traditional Nuclear Material Accounting (NMA) approach cannot be directly applied to electrochemical processing because of the lack of an input accountability tank, the non-continuous material flow, and the unsatisfactory level of confidence in sampling methods. Therefore, nuclear safeguards remain a grand challenge in the developing of commercial electrochemical separations facilities, especially around the heart of such facilities, the electrorefiner (ER) systems. In contrast to NMA data, process monitoring (PM) data is normally an indirect measurement of the SNM and is acquired much more frequently. In a broad sense, PM includes monitoring by various types of equipment, e.g. radiation detectors, cameras, voltage, current sensors. Because it is already being collected by the operator, the additional cost to safeguards is low. It has long been believed that PM data can supplement NMA data and help improve safeguards, although the benefits are hard to quantify. The U.S. DOE’s Material Protection, Accounting, and Control Technology (MPACT) campaign has made substantial investments into innovative PM sensor technology and predictive model development for real- or near real-time measurement and prediction of molten salt density and level, salt composition and actinide concentration especially Pu, the cell voltage, and the cell current to supplement traditional NMA. For aqueous-based reprocessing facilities, it is reported that PM, integrated with traditional NMA, have a high detection probability for specific diversions. For electrochemical reprocessing, preliminary studies have shown that PM data can support traditional NMA in various ways by providing a basis to estimate some of the in-processing nuclear material inventories. Despite early success, further studies on fusion of PM data and NMA data are still needed, which is the goal of this proposed work.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

A novel approach to criticality accident detection for a legacy facility

For operations on the Sellafield site involving fissile material a Criticality Accident Alarm System (CAAS) has traditionally been installed unless an omission case can be made. An omission case would examine if, in the absence of all controls, a criticality could reasonably be expected or whether the potential dose to an operator would remain below a maximum acceptable dose. It is a UK legal requirement for adequate emergency arrangements to be in place for hazards on a nuclear licensed site. For facilities where criticality is credible there is a regulatory expectation that a -Criticality Warning System- should be in place. A -Criticality Warning System- is not necessarily a full CAAS and alternative means of criticality detection may be part of an adequate emergency plan. The Sellafield site has a Magnox fuel reprocessing facility which has been operated since the 1960's. Evaporation of the Medium Active (MA) liquid waste from this process is undertaken in an associated building. Following extensive review of the plant and process a number of maloperations which can route fissile material to the MA evaporator were identified. Adequate controls to prevent these scenarios were shown to be in place. In the unlikely event of a failure of controls leading to sustained loss of fissile material a criticality incident may occur and hence an emergency plan was determined to be necessary. The novel emergency arrangements which were developed utilized the existing gamma monitor network located across multiple building floors. These gamma monitors are present for radiological safety. This emergency arrangement would require rapid interpretation of the gamma alarms by an operator and the manual triggering of a criticality evacuation alarm. The gamma monitors were demonstrated to be able to detect the minimum incident of concern (10{sup 15} fissions) as well as being able to alarm during the ramp up in power of a large criticality incident (10{sup 18} fissions). It was shown that a criticality accident could readily be distinguished from a radiological event (e.g. loss of containment). To support this work, criticality excursion analysis was used to examine the likely characteristics of a criticality in the MA evaporator. This novel arrangement was justified due to a number of factors including: the limited remaining operational lifetime of this facility (<5 years), the low frequency of maloperation coupled with a failure of controls and the crucial risk reduction provided by the continued reprocessing of Magnox fuel. Furthermore, the time and cost involved with design and installation of a standard CAAS would be substantially greater than a plan based upon existing instrumentation. These arguments were accepted by the UK regulator the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR). (author)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗