SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
A multi-scale model reveals that the microstructure of the Li metal anode can impact the performance of solid-state batteries. Micron-sized, columnar grains are preferred for minimizing void formation at the solid electrolyte interface.
Solid-state sodium-metal batteries assembled with a composite solid-electrolyte separator and Na 0.72 Li 0.24 Mn 0.75 Si 0.01 O 2 cathode, utilizing reversible cationic (Mn) and anionic (O) redox, achieve high initial specific capacity of 180 mA h g −1 .
Solid-state batteries (SSBs) promise more energy-dense storage than liquid electrolyte lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, first-cycle capacity loss is higher in SSBs than in LIBs due to interfacial reactions. The chemical evolution of key interfaces in SSBs has been extensively characterized. Electrochemically, however, we lack a versatile strategy for quantifying the reversibility of solid electrolyte (SE) redox for established and next-generation SSB electrolytes. In this work, we perform tailored electrochemical tests and operando X-ray diffraction to disentangle reversible and irreversible sources of capacity loss in positive electrodes composed of Li 6 PS 5 Cl SE, Li(Ni 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 )O 2 (NMC), and carbon conductive additives. We leverage an atypically low voltage cutoff (2.0 V vs. Li/Li + ) to quantify the reversibility of SE redox. Using slow (5.5 mA g NMC −1 ) cycling paired with >100 h low-voltage holds, our cells achieve a surprising 96.2% first-cycle coulombic efficiency, which is higher than previously reported (mean: 72%, maximum: 91.6% across surveyed literature). We clarify that sluggish NMC relithiation kinetics have been historically mistaken for permanently irreversible capacity loss. In conclusion, through systematic decoupling of loss mechanisms, we uncover the unexpected reversibility of SE redox and isolate the major contributors to capacity loss, outlining a strategy for accurate assessment of next-generation SE materials and interface modifications.
Sulfide solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) in all-solid-state batteries (SSBs) are recognized for their high ionic conductivity and inherent safety. The LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathode offers a high thermodynamic potential of approximately 3.8 V vs. Li/Li + and a theoretical specific capacity of 200 mA h g −1 . However, the practical utilization of NMC811 in sulfide SSBs faces significant interfacial challenges. The oxidation instability of sulfide solid electrolytes against NMC811 and the formation of the cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) during cycling lead to degradation and reduced cell performance. Volumetric changes in NMC during lithiation and de-lithiation can also cause detachment from sulfide electrolytes or internal particle cracking. Despite extensive galvanostatic cycling studies to address the issues, the calendar life of sulfide SSBs remains poorly understood. Here, we systematically studied the effects of four different catholytes on the calendar aging of LiNbO 3 (LNO)-coated NMC811, including Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl), Li 3 InCl 6 –Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LIC–LPSCl), Li 3 YCl 6 –Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LYC–LPSCl), and Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 (LGPS). Our results indicate that LPSCl provides optimal capacity retention when stored at high state-of-charge (SOC) at room temperature, but the LIC–LPSCl cathode shows significant capacity degradation and chemical incompatibility. We also established an effective electrochemical calendar aging testing protocol to simulate daily usage, enabling quick inference of the calendar life of SSBs. In conclusion, this new testing approach accelerates materials selection strategies for high-nickel NMC composite cathodes in sulfide SSBs.
The NMC–RGO framework can reduce the contact area between solid electrolytes and carbon in the composite cathode while this unique structure can provide facile electron transport pathways to the NMC through the RGO framework.
Li 3.6 In 7 S 11.8 Cl has a face-centered cubic arrangement of S 2− /Cl − stabilized by Li + /In 3+ that form 3D ion conduction paths. The moisture stability and fast ion conduction make Li 3.6 In 7 S 11.8 Cl a promising electrolyte for solid-state batteries.
Solid-state Li-ion electrolytes (SSEs) are essential for the development of next-generation solid-state Li-metal batteries and new Li-extraction electrochemical cells.
Fracture in the garnet-type solid electrolyte Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) poses a critical threat to both the performance and safety of solid-state batteries. To unravel the coupled chemomechanical processes that govern fracture in LLZO under external loading, we carry out large-scale molecular-dynamics simulations with a validated machine-learning force field. Our results demonstrate that triaxial stresses at crack flanks trigger a localized cubic-to-tetragonal phase transformation, which is accompanied by Li-ion rearrangement. The emergent tetragonal domains feature lattice contraction normal to the fracture plane, imposing coherent misfit strains that provide an additional driving force for further crack propagation. Crucially, introducing Li deficiencies stabilizes the cubic phase, postponing the phase transition and thereby delaying fracture initiation. These findings highlight the role of intrinsic phase instability in dictating LLZO's fracture resistance and its critical connection to local Li concentration. This chemomechanical coupling points toward targeted strategies to enhance the mechanical robustness of garnet electrolytes, including tuning Li content, ensuring dopant homogeneity, and refining processing protocols.
Interface resistance has become a significant bottleneck for solid-state batteries (SSBs). Most studies of interface resistance have focused on extrinsic mechanisms such as interface reactions and imperfect contact between electrodes and solid electrolytes. Interface potentials are an important intrinsic mechanism that is often ignored. Here, we highlight Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) as a tool to image the local potential at interfaces inside SSBs, examining the existing literature and discussing challenges in interpretation. Drawing analogies with electron transport in metal/semiconductor interfaces, we showcase a formalism that predicts intrinsic ionic resistance based on the properties of the contacting phases, and we emphasize that future battery designs should start from material pairs with low intrinsic resistance. Here, we conclude by outlining future directions in the study of interface potentials through both theory and experiment.
All solid-state lithium-ion batteries (ASSLIBs) have gained significant interest in recent years due to their wide range of applications, including mobile devices, electric vehicles, and grid storage. Garnet-type Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) solid-state electrolyte (SSE) continues to be a significant player in the fabrication of ASSLIBs with excellent ionic conductivity on the order of 10 -3 S•cm -1 with the integration of dopants and sintering aids to assist conductivity and structural evolution during the sintering procedure. Traditional sintering techniques, such as solid-state sintering (SSS), have been proven to yield desirable crystal structures. However, the low ionic conductivity results from inferior microstructure, and lithium loss is a significant challenge. Recently, a relatively novel sintering process called rapid laser sintering (RLS) has shown great potential for achieving fully dense solid oxide electrolytes with less lithium loss, resulting in high ionic conductivity [1] [2] [3] [4]. Here, we applied a modified RLS method using precursor powders instead of pre-synthesized LLZO powders to fabricate Al-doped LLZO (Li 6.1 La 3 Zr 2 Al 0.3 O 12 + 13 wt% Li 2 CO 3 ) and Ta-doped LLZO (Li 6.4 La 3 Zr 1.4 Ta 0.6 O 12 + 5 wt% LiOH•H 2 O) dense electrolytes. This rapid laser reactive sintering (RLRS) could potentially reduce the number of processing steps and therefore lower the manufacturing cost. We hope the rapid high-temperature sintering can densify the electrolyte and avoid the lithium loss for achieving high lithium-ion conductivity. In this work, we optimized a combination of laser parameters (speed and power), initial precursor composition, and controlled atmospheres to discover the optimal conditions for reaching the efficacious crystal structure, microstructure, and ionic conductivity.
Solid Power has teamed with Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) to develop an all solid-state lithium-ion battery (ASSB), enabled by a high-capacity Si anode and a solid state electrolyte (SSE). Replacing liquid electrolytes with solid electrolytes addresses the calendar life challenges that currently limit the widespread adoption of Si anodes. In this project, Si-SSE composite materials have been developed with a specific capacity >1500 mAh/g (at electrode level). A Si anode was coated by using a roll-to-roll process. All-solid-state NMC-Si pouch cells have been assembled and tested. Cycle life of 1100 at 100% DOD has been demonstrated in the solid state Si pouch cell. Excellent calendar life is achieved in the cell via a high temperature storage test.
This project aims to advance the fundamental understanding on how the cation or anion doping influence on the crystal structure, phase stability and ion transport of novel Na superionic conductors. Specifically, we focus on the Na 3-x A x SbS 4-y X y family solid electrolytes (A: cation dopant, X: anion dopant), a class of promising materials for all-solid-state sodium batteries owing to their high ionic conductivity and compositional tunability. By integrating materials synthesis, neutron scattering, and electrochemical characterization and theoretical simulations, this project sees to elucidate 1) how does the synthesis approaches (solid-state reaction, low-temperature reaction) on the phase purity and doping process; 2) how chemical doping (A: cation dopants such as Sn; X: anion dopants such as Se, F) modulate lattice dynamics and Na+ migration as well as interface stability toward Na metal. Specifically, this project’s proposed technology involves three objectives: (1) synthesize novel Na-ion conductors (anion or cation doped Na 3 SbS 4 ) with high phase purity and examine their structural features (e.g., phase stability); (2) understand Na-ion conductive properties of new Na-ion conductors through a combination of experimental characterizations and theoretical simulations; (3) investigate the interface stability of novel Na superionic conductors with electrode materials in solid-state Na batteries. These objectives will be achieved through combined experimental synthesis/characterizations and computational approaches. The obtained knowledge will provide a comprehensive synthesis-structure-property correlation, enabling the rational design of novel solid-state conductors with excellent conductivity and stability.
The project has two primary objectives: (1) down select three-dimensional (3D) printing and post-processing approaches for solid-state electrolyte (SSE) / cathode integration, and (2) understand battery failure mechanisms via ex situ and in situ characterization.
The project has two primary objectives: (1) down select three-dimensional (3D) printing and post-processing approaches for solid-state electrolyte (SSE) / cathode integration, and (2) understand battery failure mechanisms via ex situ and in situ characterization.
The project has two primary objectives: (1) down select three-dimensional (3D) printing and post-processing approaches for solid-state electrolyte (SSE) / cathode integration, and (2) understand battery failure mechanisms via ex situ and in situ characterization.
The project has two primary objectives: (1) down select three-dimensional (3D) printing and post-processing approaches for solid-state electrolyte (SSE) / cathode integration, and (2) understand battery failure mechanisms via ex situ and in situ characterization.
Disclosed are electrochemical devices, such as lithium ion battery electrodes, lithium ion conducting solid-state electrolytes, and solid-state lithium ion batteries including these electrodes and solid-state electrolytes. Also disclosed are methods for making such electrochemical devices. Also disclosed are composite electrodes for solid state electrochemical devices. The composite electrodes include one or more separate phases within the electrode that provide electronic and ionic conduction pathways in the electrode active material phase.
A super ion conductor composition is disclosed. The super ion conductor composition has the general formula: A 1+x M x/2 Zr 2−x/2 (PO 4 ) 3 , where each A is independently Na or Li, M is Mn or Mg, and subscript x is from 0.5 to 3. A solid electrolyte comprising the super ion conductor composition, and a method of preparing the solid electrolyte, are also disclosed. The method comprises combining a zirconium compound, a manganese or magnesium compound, a sodium compound, and a phosphate compound to give a mixture; and calcining the mixture to give the super ion conductor composition, thereby preparing the solid electrolyte. Functional materials and devices comprising the super ion conductor composition are also disclosed, including a catholyte composition, an ion conducting solid electrolyte membrane, as well as all-solid-state batteries.