Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “solid state battery”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9

Solvent-Free and Non-Sintered 500 Wh/kg All Solid-State Battery

Navitas teamed up with UMD and ORNL to establish a reliable scientific research team. The project addressed processing limitations of state-of-the-art solid electrolytes by extending solvent-free electrode fabrication technology to the scalable production of cathode/solid electrolyte laminates. The innovation started with a solid-state sulfide electrolyte (LiPS) with Cl stabilization able to meet the keystone conductivity challenge in a film of practical thickness (μ 50 µm). The electrolyte was based on a composite of PTFE, and stabilized LiPSCl. With optimization, the ionic conductivity reached 3.3 ×10 -3 S/cm. The solid electrolyte with as low as 0.4% binder allowed long term cycling (> 500 cycles) of Li/SSE/Li cell at > 4 mA/cm 2 with the utilization of Li > 80%. The Li and SSE interfaces were successfully protected with LiF-rich SEI layer. NCM811cathode active materials were coated with a thin layer of Al 2 O 3 (5 nm). The free standing cathode film was fabricated through dry-process with Al2O3-coated NCM811, LiPSCl, active carbon, and small amount PTFE. The all-solid-state batteries were laminated with free standing surface coated NCM811 cathode film, free standing LiPSCl SSE film, and surface protected Li anode together in a single lamination step, and demonstrated high specific capacity (> 200 mAh/g) with coulombic efficiency > 99.5%. The all-solid-state batteries through solvent-free and no-sintering process are promising for large format cell with 500 Wh/Kg specific energy density.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Li Stripping Behavior of Anode‐Free Solid‐State Batteries Under Intermittent‐Current Discharge Conditions

Anode‐free manufacturing holds promise to enable high energy densities and lower Lithium (Li)‐metal solid‐state batteries (LMSSBs). Nevertheless, in contrast to thick Li foil (>50 µm), the stripping capacity of in situ‐formed Li (10–30 µm) is limited due to diminished creep flow, resulting in reduced accessible capacity. This study explores the correlation between stripping capacity and surface roughness of garnet Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) solid electrolyte. The results reveal that stripping capacity can be enhanced through the surface modification of solid electrolytes. Additionally, this study scrutinizes the stripping behavior of in situ Li under intermittent‐current discharge conditions, which are more relevant to the operational conditions of electric vehicles (EVs). It is demonstrated that, when compared to constant‐current stripping, intermittent‐current stripping effectively suppresses void formation and enhances the stripping capacity of in situ Li by 40%. It is considered that the intermittent current inhibits the accumulation of Li vacancies, thereby delaying the void formation. These findings provide valuable insights into the development of high‐performance anode‐free LMSSBs for EVs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Controlling dendrite propagation in solid-state batteries with engineered stress

Metal-dendrite penetration is a mode of electrolyte failure that threatens the viability of metal-anode-based solid-state batteries. Whether dendrites are driven by mechanical failure or electrochemical degradation of solid electrolytes remains an open question. If internal mechanical forces drive failure, superimposing a compressive load that counters internal stress may mitigate dendrite penetration. Here, we investigate this hypothesis by dynamically applying mechanical loads to growing dendrites in Li 6.6 La 3 Zr 1.6 Ta 0.4 O 12 solid electrolytes. Operando microscopy reveals marked deflection in the dendrite growth trajectory at the onset of compressive loading. For sufficient loading, this deflection averts cell failure. Using fracture mechanics, we quantify the impact of stack pressure and in-plane stresses on dendrite trajectory, chart the residual stresses required to prevent short-circuit failure, and propose design approaches to achieve such stresses. For the materials studied here, we show that dendrite propagation is dictated by electrolyte fracture, with electronic leakage playing a negligible role.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Morphologically Stable Li/Electrolyte Interface for All-Solid-State Batteries Enabled by 3D-Micropatterned Garnet

Morphological degradation at the Li/solid-state electrolyte (SSE) interface is a prevalent issue causing performance fading of all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). To maintain the interfacial integrity, most ASSBs are operated under low current density with considerable stack pressure, which significantly limits their widespread usage. In this work, a novel 3D-micropatterned SSE (3D-SSE) that can stabilize the morphology of the Li/SSE interface even under relatively high current density and limited stack pressure is reported. Under the pressure of 1.0 MPa, the Li symmetric cell using a garnet-type 3D-SSE fabricated by laser machining shows a high critical current density of 0.7 mA cm –2 and stable cycling over 500 h under 0.5 mA cm –2 . This excellent performance is attributed to the reduced local current density and amplified mechanical stress at the Li/3D-SSE interface. These two effects can benefit the flux balance between Li stripping and creep at the interface, thereby pre-venting interfacial degradation such as void formation and dendrite growth.

3D-micropatterned garnet↗

Oxide‐Based Solid‐State Batteries: A Perspective on Composite Cathode Architecture

Abstract The garnet‐type phase Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) attracts significant attention as an oxide solid electrolyte to enable safe and robust solid‐state batteries (SSBs) with potentially high energy density. However, while significant progress has been made in demonstrating compatibility with Li metal, integrating LLZO into composite cathodes remains a challenge. The current perspective focuses on the critical issues that need to be addressed to achieve the ultimate goal of an all‐solid‐state LLZO‐based battery that delivers safety, durability, and pack‐level performance characteristics that are unobtainable with state‐of‐the‐art Li‐ion batteries. This perspective complements existing reviews of solid/solid interfaces with more emphasis on understanding numerous homo‐ and heteroionic interfaces in a pure oxide‐based SSB and the various phenomena that accompany the evolution of the chemical, electrochemical, structural, morphological, and mechanical properties of those interfaces during processing and operation. Finally, the insights gained from a comprehensive literature survey of LLZO–cathode interfaces are used to guide efforts for the development of LLZO‐based SSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Degradation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Sulfide Solid-State Batteries by Conductive Interfaces

The superionic solid-state argyrodite electrolyte Li 6 PS 5 Br can improve lithium and lithium-ion batteries' safety and energy density. Despite many reports validating the conductivity of this electrolyte, it still suffers from passivating electrode degradation mechanisms. At first analysis, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) should be more thermodynamically stable in contact with sulfide electrolytes. However, without substantial improvements to interfacial engineering, we find that LFP is not inherently stable against Li 6 PS 5 Br. We hypothesize argyrodite oxidation favorably competes with LFPAs delithiation, insulating the electrolyte-electrode interface and causing large overpotential losses. We show that compared to LiNi x Mn y Co z O 2 , LFP has no actual electrochemical stability advantage despite operating at a lower voltage. We utilize tender energy XAS and XPS to show that chemical reactions occur between LFP and the Li 6 PS 5 Br solid electrolyte and these reactions are exacerbated by cycling. We also show that electrochemical degradation occurs at the interface between the solid electrolyte ion conductor and any electron conductor, namely the active material and carbon additives. We further demonstrate that LiNbO 3 cathode coatings on LFP can delay electrochemical degradation by electronically insulating the LFP-sulfide electrolyte interface but not prevent its occurrence at the carbon-electrolyte interface.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Unlocking the Electrochemical–Mechanical Coupling Behaviors of Dendrite Growth and Crack Propagation in All-Solid-State Batteries

Dendrite growth and crack propagation are two major hurdles on the road towards the large-scale commercialization of lithium metal all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). Due to the high multiphysics coupled nature of the underlying dendrite growth mechanism, understanding it has been difficult. Herein, for the first time, an electrochemical-mechanical model is established that directly couples dendrite growth and crack propagation from a physics-based perspective at the cell level. Results reveal that overpotential-driven stress propels a crack to penetrate through the solid electrolyte, creating vacancies for dendrite growth, leading to the short circuit of the battery. Thus, high lithiation/charging rate and low conductivity of electrolytes can accelerate the electrochemical failure of the battery. It is further discovered that Young's modulus E LLZO of the electrolyte has competing contributions to the fracture and dendrite growth; specifically, when E LLZO = 40-100 GPa, the short circuit is triggered early. A larger toughness value hinders the crack propagation and mitigates the Li dendrite growth. The developed multiphysics model provides an in-depth understanding of the coupling of crack propagation and dendrite growth within ASSBs and an insightful mechanistic design guidance map for robust and safe ASSB cells.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

F and N Rich Solid Electrolyte for Stable All-Solid-State Battery

We report the instability of sulfide solid electrolytes to Li anode and high-voltage LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathodes limits the cyclic performance of all-solid-state lithium battery (ASSLB). Herein, the stability of Li 6 PS 5 Cl against Li anode is enhanced by mixing a small amount (0.32 wt%) of CuF 2 -LiNO 3 (CL) into Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte layer to in-situ form a mixed-conductive-lithiophobic and self-healing LiF-Li 3 N-Cu solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) at Li 6 PS 5 Cl-CL/Li interface. The critical current density (CCD) of Li 6 PS 5 Cl-CuF 2 -LiNO 3 increases to 1.4 mA cm –2 /1.4 mAh cm –2 at room temperature, which is much higher than that of pristine Li 6 PS 5 Cl (0.4 mA cm –2 /0.4 mAh cm –2 ) even though mixing 0.32 wt% CL into Li 6 PS 5 Cl slightly reduces the ionic conductivity from 2.9 × 10 –3 to 1.5 × 10 –3 S cm –1 . The compatibility of Li 6 PS 5 Cl-CL electrolyte to single-crystalline NMC811 (S-NMC811) is further enhanced by adding a small amount (0.02 wt%) of AlF 3 into Li 6 PS 5 Cl-CL forming Li 6 PS 5 Cl-CuF 2- LiNO 3 -AlF 3 (Li 6 >PS 5 Cl-CLA) as a cathode electrolyte and by doing Cl – on S-NMC811 (Cl@S-NMC811) surface. The Cl@S-NMC811-Li 6 PS 5 Cl-CLA|Li 6 PS 5 Cl-CL|Li cells with areal capacity of 2.55 mAh cm -2 achieve a capacity retention of 69.4% after 100 cycles at 1C (1C = 200 mAh g -1 ). Adding a small amount of SEI and cathode/electrolyte interphase (CEI) former into the sulfide electrolytes with minimal reduction (48.3%) of ionic conductivity is an effective method to enhance the performance of ASSLB.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Overcoming Anode Instability in Solid‐State Batteries through Control of the Lithium Metal Microstructure

Abstract Enabling the lithium metal anode (LMA) in solid‐state batteries (SSBs) is the key to developing high energy density battery technologies. However, maintaining a stable electrode–electrolyte interface presents a critical challenge to high cycling rate and prolonged cycle life. One such issue is the interfacial pore formation in LMA during stripping. To overcome this, either higher stack pressure or binary lithium alloy anodes are used. Herein, it is shown that fine‐grained ( d = 20 µm) polycrystalline LMA can avoid pore formation by exploiting the microstructural dependence of the creep rates. In a symmetric cell set‐up, i.e., LiǀLi 6.25 Al 0.25 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO)ǀLi, fine‐grained LMA achieves > 11.0 mAh cm −2 compared to ≈ 3.6 mAh cm −2 for coarse‐grained LMA ( d = 295 µm) at 0.1 mA cm −2 and at moderate stress of 2.0 MPa. Smaller diffusion lengths (≈ 20 µm) and higher diffusivity pathway along dislocations ( D d ≈ 10 −7 cm 2 s −1 ), generated during cell fabrication, result in enhanced viscoplastic deformation in fine‐grained polycrystalline LMA. The electrochemical performances corroborate well with estimated creep rates. Thus, microstructural control of LMA can significantly reduce the required stack pressure during stripping. These results are particularly relevant for “anode‐free” SSBs wherein both the microstructure and the mechanical state of the lithium are critical parameters.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Scale-Up of Novel Li-Conducting Halide Solid State Battery Electrolyte

LBNL and project partner Saint Gobain (SG) demonstrated scalable processing of halide-based solid state batteries. SG’s innovative halide-based SSE utilized in this project is inherently scalable: it can be compressed into a dense electrolyte sheet at room temperature under moderate pressure, can be processed in dry air, and does not present any safety issues during processing or end use. The halide material forms the dense electrolyte layer, and is dispersed in the thick cathode to form a highly conductive path for Li ions. The halide also comes in contact with various environments and other materials (solvents, binders, processing equipment, etc.) throughout the battery manufacturing process, and must be stable in contact with cathode and anode materials during operation.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Deciphering Chemical/Electrochemical Compatibility of Li 3 InCl 6 in 5.2 V High-Voltage LiCoO 2 All-Solid-State Batteries

Large interfacial resistance is a widely recognized impediment to the advancement of high-voltage, all-solid-state batteries. However, a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental cause behind the interfacial resistance between solid electrolytes and typical layered oxide cathodes has not yet been achieved. Here, we investigated the high-voltage stability of Li 3 InCl 6 and elucidated the underlying interfacial electrochemical reactions between LiCoO 2 and Li 3 InCl 6 . Further, the pairing of Li 3 InCl 6 with LiCoO 2 exhibited a superior capacity retention of 73.6% even at 5.2 V, much higher than 28.2% charged at 4.6 V in lithium-ion batteries after 70 cycles. The enhanced high-voltage stability of ASSBs is attributed to the stable interface formed between LiCoO 2 and Li 3 InCl 6 and the reinforced surface and bulk structure stability. On the other hand, the ultrahigh voltage still causes the partial decomposition of Li 3 InCl 6 and generates interfacial compounds such as InClO and cobalt and indium chlorides/oxides.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Different interfacial reactivity of lithium metal chloride electrolytes with high voltage cathodes determines solid-state battery performance

A deep understanding of the interaction of the surface of cathode materials with solid electrolytes is crucial to design advanced solid-state batteries (SSBs). This is especially true for the new class of lithium metal chloride (Li-M-Cl) solid electrolytes which are receiving rapidly growing attention due to their very high oxidative stability (>4 V) in combination with good ionic conductivity that can enable long cell cycle life. While Li-M-Cl electrolytes typically contain resource-limited metals (M) such as indium or rare earths, work has focused on substituting M with more abundant elements such as zirconium. Via operando resistance measurements using intermittent current interruption we explore the dynamic evolution of the interphase at the surface of Ni-rich NCM85 or NCM111 cathode particles inside a working SSB with three different Li-(M 1 ,M 2 )-Cl catholytes (Li 3 InCl 6 , Li 2 Sc 1/3 In 1/3 Cl 4 and Li 5/2 Y 1/2 Zr 1/2 Cl 6 ) to reveal the impact of the cationic metal substitution on the interfacial chemistry. We show that the metal plays a critical role in determining high voltage stability, contrary to prior assumptions. Using a combination of cyclic voltammetry and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy measurements of the electronic band structure to assess oxidative stability; coupled with DFT calculations and ToF-SIMS to evaluate products formed at the interface at different upper cutoff potentials and degrees of delithiation, we are able to differentiate between electrochemical and chemical degradation. We find that Li 2 Sc 1/3 In 1/3 Cl 4 yields the highest (and Li 3 InCl 6 the lowest) stability against electrochemical oxidation, while Li 5/2 Y 1/2 Zr 1/2 Cl 6 undergoes a detrimental chemical reaction with oxygen released from Ni-rich NCM85 at high potentials, resulting in fast capacity fading. Altogether, our work establishes a platform for the metrics and an approach that can be utilized to efficiently evaluate the stability of new halide SEs in SSB cells.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Regulated lithium ionic flux through well-aligned channels for lithium dendrite inhibition in solid-state batteries

The utilization of solid electrolyte (SE) to suppress lithium (Li) dendrites is promising but still far from satisfactory due to the inhomogeneous Li plating/stripping. In this paper, we demonstrated a novel strategy to inhibit Li dendrites via regulating Li-ion flux in SE by using vertically aligned channels. The ion-insulating walls facilitated uniform distribution of Li-ion flux through the channels, leading to a homogeneous Li deposition, thus alleviating Li dendrite formation. As a result, symmetric cells with this SE exhibited excellent long-term stability (1000 h) against Li metal. In addition, Li4Ti5O12 (LTO)/Li cell with the developed SE achieved good battery performance over 100 cycles. The mechanism for dendrite suppression was further investigated by phase-field simulation. This work provides a novel strategy by manipulating uniform Li-ion flux to fabricate SE to inhibit Li dendrites and facilitates the development of high-performance rechargeable Li batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Solid electrolyte material and solid-state battery made therewith

A solid electrolyte material comprises Li, T, X and A wherein T is at least one of P, As, Si, Ge, Al, and B; X is one or more halogens or N; A is one or more of S and Se. The solid electrolyte material has peaks at 17.8°±0.75° and 19.2°±0.75° in X-ray diffraction measurement with Cu-Kα(1,2)=1.5418 Å and may include glass ceramic and/or mixed crystalline phases.

Francisco, Brian E.↗

Solid electrolyte material and solid-state battery made therewith

A solid electrolyte material comprises Li, T, X and A wherein T is at least one of P, As, Si, Ge, Al, and B; X is one or more halogens or N; A is one or more of S and Se. The solid electrolyte material has peaks at 17.8°±0.75° and 19.2°±0.75° in X-ray diffraction measurement with Cu-Kα(1,2)=1.5418 Å and may include glass ceramic and/or mixed crystalline phases.

Francisco, Brian E.↗