DOE OSTI2020
The objective is to determine compression test characteristics of stainless steel honeycomb material to be able to represent honeycomb structures accurately in analytical models used to simulate hypothetical accident scenarios of shipping packages. Honeycomb is a material used primary in the aerospace industry due to its high strength-to-weight ratio. Because it doesn't have a shelf life and can withstand high heats, it is an excellent candidate for a structural material in package designs. Honeycomb has orthotropic material properties. The honeycomb currently being evaluated is made of metal ribbons spot welded together to form hexagon pattern between metal plates. The hexagon ribbons are brazed to the metal plates. The complexity of the honeycomb significantly lengthens the simulation time, which is further complicated when the brazing, welding, and imperfections of the material is considered. This means to affectively represent the honeycomb in simulation programs, such as Abaqus, the material needs to be approximated as a uniform orthotropic material. This requires material properties in each of the three directions, T, W, and L. The T direction is defined as the 'strong' direction, perpendicular to the honeycomb sheet. The L direction is parallel the ribbon and the W direction is perpendicular to the ribbon. Honeycomb has 3 different compression stages. Stage 1 is the initial compression where the honeycomb maintains its structural integrity and does not permanently deform from loads from normal operations. Stage 2 is when the initial buckling causes irreversible damage to the honeycomb. Stage 2 is the one we are most interested in because it absorbs the most energy from a hypothetical accident scenario. During Stage 2, the honeycomb fails layer-by-layer, indicating that the more layers, the longer material crushing is sustained, and thus the more energy that is absorbed. Stage 3 is final compression, similar to compressing solid metal. During stage 3 the stress increases with a diminishing rate of elongation and the honeycomb is completely failed where the plates between the honeycomb core sandwich the crushed honeycomb ribbon. The stress-strain graph bellow shows compression test of 3 different samples in the T direction. The red lines divide the three stages. The far left is Stage 1, the middle stage 2, and the right stage 3. The data collected is displayed in the table below. The expressions in the table represent the regression formula that represents each stage of the compression on a stress-strain graph. Stage 1 is assumed to intersect with the origin; data for stage 3 for the crush in W and L directions where unable to be gathered due to the nature of failure for those directions. Stage 1 and 2 are linear regressions while stage 3 is a degree 2, to best match the curve. Linear regression is used on stage 2 because ultimately that represents the energy absorbed. With more data, a degree n x 2 regression would be a more appropriate regression for stage 2, where n is the number of layers. The table below is the approximation of each scenario and stage. Each stage starts and ends at the intersection of the next stage. There where two main objectives for these tests: firstly to understand how honeycomb performs under extreme compression, and secondly to be able to numerically represent the honeycomb structure. Both of these where completed to varying degrees. It is important understood how the honeycomb fails. If it is crushed in the T direction it retains its integrity even after being crushed, however when crushed in the L and W crush direction, if it fails, it disintegrates, and loses all integrity. Also, the more layers the more time the material spends in stage 2. Failure is started by buckling, thus if there is any imperfection, the stress will not spike but transition straight into stage 2. The data collected and aggregated can be used for initial simulation of honeycomb used in packages. The initial testing has set the ground work for more data to be collected in order to verify results and to allow more confidence in the simulation results. This is only the initial data collected. The next steps is to continue to collect more data to verify results and to test more variants of honeycomb, with different brazing, layers, and shape.