Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “impulse”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,603 records · Page 89
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Hydrogen Peroxide-Water-Ethanol-Monopropellant Blend for CubeSat Propulsion

Monopropellant propulsion that provides high performance and low hazards compared to state-of-art hydrazine are being investigated under NASA, DOD and commercially sponsored green propellant research and development programs. This NASAeffort looks at phosphate stabilized 50% hydrogen peroxide/water –ethanol blends to evaluate their stability and combustion behavior in submillimeter diameter microtube combustion apparatus for cubesat propulsion applications. Exploratory 7-day stabilitytests find no pressure rise in a sealed test tube environment at room temperature indicating at least short term stability of the mixture. Temperature rise during combustion testing in resistively heated nickel microtube apparatus shows that micro-combustion is achieved in the tube. Propellant density is approximately 1.2 g/cm3compared to 1.0 g/cm3for hydrazine. Theoretical specific impulse of the stoichiometric blend is 219 s at a chamber pressure of 20 psia and an area ratio of 30:1. Density-specific impulseof this blendis263 swhile hydrazine is only about 215-220 sin small reaction control system thrusters. This provides about 20-22% more density-specific impulse for the cubesat compared to hydrazine. The theoreticalcombustion temperature is2168°F, whichis thermally compatible with stainless steel materials of constructionand the nickel catalystused in the tests. Combustion test results are given for stoichiometric, as well as fuel-leanand fuel-richpropellant formulations. Thesetests focus on thermally and catalytically supported combustionin the microtube, whichrequires a microtube preheat temperature of about 900°F and sufficient residence time to achieve combustion that is stable and anchored in the tubewithout blowing through the tube unreacted. Thrust class is expected to be in the 10 mN range based on flow rate and estimated specific impulse.Power requirements are generally below 25 Wto heat the tube. Steady state combustion testing is typically conducted for 3 minutes and shows littledegradation of the hardware over multiple test cyclesindicating thatthere is little catalyst degradation over time and littlecatalyst deactivation due tothe phosphate stabilizer inthe hydrogen peroxide.

Monopropellant↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of a CubeSat-Scale Green Monopropellant Propulsion System for NASA’s Lunar Flashlight Mission

NASA’s Lunar Flashlight is a low-cost 6U CubeSat whose mission is to search for ice and mineral deposits inside of the scattered craters at Moon’s southern pole. To conduct its primary science mission, Lunar Flashlight must be placed in a stable lunar polar orbit which requires the utilization of an on-board propulsion system. However, to this date, most CubeSats have been propelled by cold-gas or electric propulsion systems that have proven to scale well but lack sufficient impulse to conduct large ΔV maneuvers such as orbit insertions. To this end, the Lunar Flashlight mission has chosen to utilize a custom-designed green monopropellant propulsion system developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology under the leadership ofNASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and support from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The developed system is capable of providing more than the required propulsive capability for full mission success while fitting inside of a 2.5U volume and weighing less than six kilograms. The system utilizes the Advanced Spacecraft Energetic Non Toxic (ASCENT) green monopropellant that provides higher specific impulse compared to traditional hydrazine while also being safer to handle. If successful, the presented propulsion system will enable Lunar Flashlight to be the first CubeSat to reach the Moon, the first to conduct an orbit insertion, and will be the firstCubeSat demonstration of the ASCENT propellant.

Grayson Huggins↗
NASA NTRS2018

Automatic Design of Missions to Small Bodies

The new JPL Small-Body Automatic Mission-Design System comprises two main elements: a database of pre-computed mission options to all known asteroids and comets, and an interactive web interface that can be used to design transfers to each small body. The system is kept current with the JPL Small Body orbit catalog, is publicly available, and can be accessed from the JPL Solar System Dynamics Group website. The missions computed by the automatic system are impulsive. However, a low-thrust v estimate is also provided. The database of pre-computed missions can be filtered to find potential targets with certain orbital and physical properties, and that meet specific mission-design constraints. In addition to describing the system in detail, this paper presents empirical analytic expressions to approximate the impulsive v requirements of missions to comets and to each family of asteroids, obtained by fitting statistical data. To show how the interactive interface works, we consider mission options to asteroid 99942 Apophis. We also include optimal mission opportunities to other selected small bodies.

Farnocchia, Davide↗
NASA NTRS2017

Development of a 50,000-s, Lithium-fueled, Gridded Ion Thruster

The ion propulsion system on NASA’s Dawn mission provided over 11 km/s delta-V to the spacecraft. There is potential interest in missions that have delta-V’s an order of magnitude greater than this, i.e., 100 km/s to 200 km/s. To perform such missions would require a thruster that can produce a specific impulse roughly an order of magnitude greater than the 3100 s of the Dawn ion propulsion system. A 50-kW gridded ion thruster is being developed for operation with lithium propellant to produce a specific impulse of 50,000 s. The resulting thruster design requires a net accelerating voltage of 9 kV and a beam current of 5.5 A. Discharge chamber modeling is used to design a 35-cm diameter ring-cusp discharge chamber with six magnet rings. The discharge chamber is masked down to produce an active grid area that is ~25 cm diameter. Modeling suggests that the unique ionization characteristics of lithium may enable discharge chamber operation at a propellant efficiency of 99%. Operation at such a high propellant efficiency could significantly reduce the production of charge-exchange ions and thereby significantly reduce erosion of the accelerator grid.

Goebel, Dan M.↗
NASA NTRS2019

SmallSat missions enabled by paired low-thrust hybrid rocket and low-power long-life Hall thruster

The capabilities of a SmallSat-class spacecraft targeting the outer solar system and using a combined chemical and electric propulsion system are explored. The development of compact hybrid rockets has enabled high-thrust engines to be packaged tightly enough to fit on cubesat and SmallSat spacecraft. These hybrid rockets provide 10’s-100 N of thrust depending on the propellant load & >300 s of specific impulse and have been demonstrated in both ambient and vacuum environments. Advancements in low-power long-life Hall thruster technologies have provided the potential for significantly greater propellant throughputs, enabling their use as a primary propulsion element on interplanetary spacecraft. In a recent characterization test campaign, the MaSMi-DM Hall thruster demonstrated power throttling from 150 – 1000 W with >1500 s of specific impulse available at >500 W and >40% total thrust efficiency available at >300 W; peak values of 1940 s and 53% were observed. A notional low-mass spacecraft employing a combined hybrid rocket and low-power electric propulsion system was designed and used for mission concept analysis targeting the outer solar system. Using an imposed wet mass limit of 400 kg, mission trajectories to Saturn and Uranus were generated. Orbit capture with >40% of the launch mass was shown to be possible at either target, with mission transfer times of 7.5 years and 13.5 years for Saturn and Uranus, respectively. Significant follow-on mission activities near Saturn (e.g. to Titan & Enceladus) were also possible by carrying extra propellant mass while remaining under the total wet mass limit.

Karp, Ashley C.↗
NASA NTRS2021

CME Magnetic Structure and IMF Preconditioning Affecting SEP Transport

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar energetic particles (SEPs) are two manifestations of the various solar phenomena that are known to cause severe space weather effects throughout the heliosphere. The evolution of CMEs after eruption, especially in terms of their magnetic structure, and the configuration of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) that influences the transport of SEPs are currently areas of active research. These two aspects are not necessarily independent of each other, especially during solar maximum when multiple eruptive events can occur close in time. Accordingly, we present in this work theanalysis of a CME that erupted from the Sun on 2012 May 11 (SOL2012-05-11) and an SEP event following an eruption that took place on 2012 May 17 (SOL2012-05-17),∼20◦in both latitude and longitude away from the May 11 CME source region. After observing in detailthe eruption and early evolution of the May 11 CME using remote-sensing data from three viewpoints, we evaluate its propagation through interplanetary space using several models.Then, we analyse in-situ measurements from five predicted impact locations (Venus, Earth, the Spitzer Space Telescope, the Mars Science Laboratory en route to Mars, and Mars) in the inner heliosphere in order to search for CME signatures. We find that all five in-situlocations detect signatures of an impulsive SEP event, which we trace back to the May 17 eruption. These findings suggest that the May 11 CME, which was crossing the various locations around the time of the May 17 eruption, provided a direct magnetic connectivityfor the efficient transport of SEPs with an impulsive profile. We discuss the space weather implications of CME evolution, regarding in particular its magnetic structure, and CME-driven IMF preconditioning that facilitates SEP transport from a later event. Finally, this work remarks the importance of the availability of data from multiple spacecraft, even those that do not include space weather research as their primary objective.

Erika Palmerio↗
NASA NTRS2021

Performance and High-Speed Characterization of a 100-kW Nested Hall Thruster

The performance of a three-channel, 100-kW class nested Hall thruster was evaluated on xenon propellant for total powers up to 102 kW. The thruster demonstrated stable operation in all seven available channel combinations at discharge voltages from 300 V to 500 V and three different current densities. The resulting test matrix contained forty-six unique conditions ranging from 5 to 102 kW total power and 16 to 247 A discharge current. At each operating condition, thrust and telemetry was measured, and from these measurements specific impulse and efficiency were calculated. All seven channel combinations showed similar performance at a given discharge voltage and current density. The largest thrust recorded was 5.4 N ± 0.1 N at 99 kW, 400 V discharge voltage. Total efficiency and specific impulse ranged from 0.54 to 0.67 ± 0.03 and 1800 seconds to 2650 seconds ± 60 seconds, respectively. It was found that the thrust of the three channels firing together was not larger than the sum of each channel firing individually. Discharge current oscillations were also characterized with peak-to-peak and root-mean-square values and with high-speed camera analysis, which provide insight into how the discharge channels oscillate, and how those oscillations are affected by the presence of other operating channels. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of operation beyond 100 kW, as well as the general viability of NHT technology for future mission applications.

High-power↗
NASA NTRS2021

Compass Final Report: Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP)-Chemical Vehicle 1.2

Many previous studies have examined sending crews to and from Mars. The most economical involved a ‘conjunction’ class whereby the crew spends around 500 days on Mars waiting for a ‘cheap’ return. The total mission time results in over a 1000-day mission duration (about 3 years). Given the current experience level of only one year on the International Space Station (ISS), it of interest to reduce that time to only two years, thus reducing risk and minimizing required Mars surface infrastructure. The Phase 1.1 Study goal was stated as follows, “Determine the feasibility of a two-year roundtrip class Mars mission concept of operation that enables boots on Mars no later than 2036.” While the Phase1 study did show feasibility for the NEP-Chemical option, the 2036 Opposition opportunity was found to stress the schedule due to proposed technology development schedules. A 2039 Opposition (which requires even more energy than the 2036 case) was chosen as representative for Phase 1.2. Phase 1.2 also sought to further refine the concept, building on the feasibility, but addressing several challenges brought by the red team and habitat team. Given the date of 2039, nearer term technologies, primarily nuclear thermal and nuclear electric were deemed as the most viable for these missions. As will be shown, the energy required to perform such a mission in only two years (for the 2039 opportunity at least) is about three times that of the three-year conjunction mission. The rocket equation shows that this mission would then require several times the propellant of the three-year mission unless the specific impulse (ISP) of the propulsion system can be increased. Based on lunar needs, a limit of five Space Launch System (SLS) launchers with 8.4m fairings was imposed for the piloted transportation portion of the mission, limiting the size of the system. When using nuclear electric propulsion, the main limiting factor was packaging the required radiator area. The higher Isp nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) system option is described herein but with a twist: in order to keep the size of radiators packageable in one SLS and use proven reactor power system technology (~1200K reactor outlet temperature and superalloy-class Brayton) the NEP system had to be combined with a chemical propulsion system. This combination of electric propulsion and high thrust chemical was found to be useful in previous design studies combining solar electric propulsion (SEP) and chemical propulsion. Such a combination allowed the low-thrust system to provide significant change in velocity (∆V) during the interplanetary portions of the mission, thereby notably reducing the ∆V required by the high thrust system to capture and depart from the Mars gravity well. Here the high thrust ‘impulsive’ system is more efficient due to the Oberth Effect. A plethora of trades, both at the mission and system level, as well as the subsystem level were performed to develop these vehicle concepts. An entire family of NEP-Chemical transportation vehicles is described herein. The main driver and the primary focus was the piloted vehicle but additional concepts for cargo were performed using the same ‘building blocks’ in order to reduce costs and provide commonality.

Nuclear Power↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of High Temperature Material Needs for Space Nuclear Propulsion Reactors

Space nuclear propulsion systems are capable of enabling future crewed missions to Mars. Two primary options of these systems exist: nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) and nuclear electric propulsion (NEP). NTP systems use a reactor as a heat exchanger to heat a hydrogen propellant to produce high specific impulse (≥ 900 s) and thrust (10 - 100 klbf). A NTP materials challenge is development of nuclear fuel capable of operating for short durations (hours) under high power densities (≥ 5 MW/L) and temperatures (> 2700 K) in a corrosive hydrogen environment. In NEP systems, the reactor heats a working fluid which transfers heat to a power conversion system to power electric thrusters. NEP is capable of higher specific impulse (≥ 2000 s) but limited to low thrust (10s lbf). Light weight vessel and in-core structural materials that are radiation-resistant, creep-resistant, and dimensionally stable while operating at ~1500 K over mission times up to several years are needed for NEP. Both systems can benefit from high temperature neutron moderators. Through the Space Nuclear Propulsion project, NASA, supported by the DOE, is developing NTP and NEP systems. Technology maturation planning and risk reduction activities related to fabrication and testing of reactor material candidates is ongoing. This presentation overviews NTP and NEP materials needs and current ceramic and composite development activities.

nuclear thermal propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2021

Development of a CubeSat-Scale Green Monopropellant Propulsion System for NASA's Lunar Flashlight Mission

NASA's Lunar Flashlight is a low-cost 6U CubeSat whose mission is to search for ice and mineral deposits inside of the scattered craters at Moon's southern pole. To conduct its primary science mission, Lunar Flashlight must be placed in a stable lunar polar orbit which requires the utilization of an on-board propulsion system. However, to this date, most CubeSats have been propelled by cold-gas or electric propulsion systems that have proven to scale well but lack sufficient impulse to conduct large $\Delta V$ maneuvers such as orbit insertions. To this end, the Lunar Flashlight mission has chosen to utilize a custom-designed green monopropellant propulsion system developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology under the leadership of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center and support from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The developed system is capable of providing more than the required propulsive capability for full mission success while fitting inside of a 2.5U volume and weighing less than six kilograms. The system utilizes the Advanced Space Craft Energetic Non Toxic (ASCENT) green monopropellant that provides higher specific impulse compared to traditional hydrazine while also being safer to handle. If successful, the presented propulsion system will enable Lunar Flashlight to be the first CubeSat to reach the Moon, the first to conduct an orbit insertion, and will be the first CubeSat demonstration of the ASCENT propellant.

Kowalkowski, Matthew↗
NASA NTRS2021

Long-Duration Wear Testing of the ASTRAEUS Thruster, Phase I: 50 kg Xe Throughput

The thruster component of the Ascendant Sub-kW Transcelestial Electric Propulsion System successfully completed a propellant throughput demonstration of 50 kg Xe. The thruster was operated for a total of 3,287 h, of which 97.9% was spent at 300 V – 1000 W, and generated 790 kN-s of total impulse. Thrust, telemetry, and temperature measurements periodically recorded at four operating conditions spanning 200 – 500 V and 200 – 1000 W revealed constant performance across the full test duration. High-fidelity plasma simulations of the erosion of the thruster’s downstream faces suggest a theoretical lifetime capability of >30 kh, corresponding to propellant throughput of >450 kg Xe and a total impulse of >7 MNs, at the 300 V – 1000 W operating condition. The test was voluntarily paused after 50 kg Xe throughput to take these erosion measurements before the test was resumed at a different operating condition.

Goebel, Dan↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Extremely High Isp Spacecraft Propulsion System

Specific Impulse, Isp, is a measure of a rocket engine’s efficiency. It is calculated relative to the Earth’s gravitational field, where Isp = ve/ go, with go= 9.8 m/s2 and the escape velocity of the propellant, ve, in m/s. Chemical rockets have ve < 4.4x103 m/s and Isp < 450 seconds. As an alternative, the NASA Glenn Research Center developed multiple generations of Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP), high Isp, ion engines using Xe gas as a propellant. Consequently, over 100 SEP Ion Thrusters provide geo-synchronous station keeping along with deep space probes like Deep Space One and Dawn. These have ve » 2.9 x 104 m/s with Isp = 3x103 seconds. These thrusters have continuous operating lifetimes of thousands of hours allowing continuous acceleration making up for the very low thrust. Chang-Diaz’ Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR) has the potential for four times the propellant escape velocity and four times the specific impulse1. Unfortunately, this comes at a tremendous electrical power cost, estimated at 200 kWe for maintaining the International Space Station in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Although nuclear fission and fusion reactors2 have been suggested for powering nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) it only doubles the Isp over chemical rockets but with comparable thrust. Instead, we propose using Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) reactions.

High Isp Propulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Nuclear Propulsion for Deep Space Science Missions

The use of nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) 1 and nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) 2 systems on deep space science missions to the outer planets and into the interstellar medium 3 can yield significant spacecraft system and mission performance benefits and improvements relative to the use of conventional chemical propulsion systems. Several recent and ongoing programs are developing the technologies and systems required to realize a near-term deep space nuclear propulsion capability. NTP provides improved propulsion efficiencies compared to chemical propulsion, while also providing substantial thrust. This combination of high thrust and increased specific impulse (I_sp) provides high acceleration and extended thrusting periods, enabling greatly reduced trip-times on certain types of missions compared to various propulsive alternatives. For examples, compared to a baseline mission using chemical propulsion, NTP-powered missions to Jupiter or Uranus could deliver approximately 2.4-3.6 times more payload (in the case of Jupiter, the payload delivery is significantly larger than the Juno spacecraft). In this comparison, the higher end of the payload advantage is obtained when the trip time is held equal for the NTP-powered vehicle and a vehicle using a chemical propulsion departure stage. NTP systems are presently under development by multiple government agencies. NASA’s Space Nuclear Propulsion (SNP) project aims to demonstrate a hydrogen-fed NTP engine at 900 s specific impulse (I_sp) and approximately 10-15 klb_f of thrust. DARPA’s Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) program is targeting a demonstration of an NTP system in the cislunar space between the Earth and the Moon. An appropriately phased development plan that applies the development of the reactor technology for an NTP engine in this performance class and leverages mature, existing liquid rocket component hardware provides a path to a lower cost propulsion system that can be realized on a shorter development schedule. NEP, with high Isp in the 2,000-8,000 s range, can also provide advantages over chemical propulsion, including a much greater payload delivery mass and the flexibility for planners to trade between delivered mass and a wider window of mission trajectory options. Electric propulsion (EP) systems have demonstrated great utility, performing notably on the Dawn mission to enable rendezvous and orbital insertion at two separate bodies, Vesta and Ceres. An NEP-powered vehicle would have a similar capability to visit multiple bodies, loitering at each before moving to the next. A 10 kW_e NEP system provides a power- rich environment on the spacecraft that is simply not possible using present radioisotope power systems, giving mission planners more scientific instrument and communication hardware options. Several programs and projects are presently developing NEP systems and subsystems in the 10 kW_e power range, leveraging past reactor work and recent nuclear power generation risk-reduction demonstration activities such as the Demonstration Using Flattop Fission (DUFF) and the Kilopower Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY (KRUSTY). The goal of the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Joint Energy Technology Supplying On-Orbit Nuclear Power (JETSON) program is an in-space demonstration vehicle that has a 10 kW_e -class fission power source. These past and present efforts can be combined with the ongoing development of 10 kW_e -class electric propulsion systems (notably the NEXT-C ion thruster or the Hall-effect thrusters for Power and Propulsion Element of the Lunar Gateway) to provide a pathway to a low-cost, reliable NEP system for deep space science application.

Kurt A. Polzin↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Nuclear Propulsion for Deep Space Science Missions

The use of nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) 1 and nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) 2 systems on deep space science missions to the outer planets and into the interstellar medium 3 can yield significant spacecraft system and mission performance benefits and improvements relative to the use of conventional chemical propulsion systems. Several recent and ongoing programs are developing the technologies and systems required to realize a near-term deep space nuclear propulsion capability. NTP provides improved propulsion efficiencies compared to chemical propulsion, while also providing substantial thrust. This combination of high thrust and increased specific impulse (I_sp) provides high acceleration and extended thrusting periods, enabling greatly reduced trip-times on certain types of missions compared to various propulsive alternatives. For examples, compared to a baseline mission using chemical propulsion, NTP-powered missions to Jupiter or Uranus could deliver approximately 2.4-3.6 times more payload (in the case of Jupiter, the payload delivery is significantly larger than the Juno spacecraft). In this comparison, the higher end of the payload advantage is obtained when the trip time is held equal for the NTP-powered vehicle and a vehicle using a chemical propulsion departure stage. NTP systems are presently under development by multiple government agencies. NASA’s Space Nuclear Propulsion (SNP) project aims to demonstrate a hydrogen-fed NTP engine at 900 s specific impulse (I_sp) and approximately 10-15 klb_f of thrust. DARPA’s Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) program is targeting a demonstration of an NTP system in the cislunar space between the Earth and the Moon. An appropriately phased development plan that applies the development of the reactor technology for an NTP engine in this performance class and leverages mature, existing liquid rocket component hardware provides a path to a lower cost propulsion system that can be realized on a shorter development schedule. NEP, with high Isp in the 2,000-8,000 s range, can also provide advantages over chemical propulsion, including a much greater payload delivery mass and the flexibility for planners to trade between delivered mass and a wider window of mission trajectory options. Electric propulsion (EP) systems have demonstrated great utility, performing notably on the Dawn mission to enable rendezvous and orbital insertion at two separate bodies, Vesta and Ceres. An NEP-powered vehicle would have a similar capability to visit multiple bodies, loitering at each before moving to the next. A 10 kW_e NEP system provides a power- rich environment on the spacecraft that is simply not possible using present radioisotope power systems, giving mission planners more scientific instrument and communication hardware options. Several programs and projects are presently developing NEP systems and subsystems in the 10 kW_e power range, leveraging past reactor work and recent nuclear power generation risk-reduction demonstration activities such as the Demonstration Using Flattop Fission (DUFF) and the Kilopower Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY (KRUSTY). The goal of the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Joint Energy Technology Supplying On-Orbit Nuclear Power (JETSON) program is an in-space demonstration vehicle that has a 10 kW_e -class fission power source. These past and present efforts can be combined with the ongoing development of 10 kW_e -class electric propulsion systems (notably the NEXT-C ion thruster or the Hall-effect thrusters for Power and Propulsion Element of the Lunar Gateway) to provide a pathway to a low-cost, reliable NEP system for deep space science application.

Kurt A. Polzin↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

RApid Blade and Blade-Vortex InTeraction (RABBIT) GUI implementation via MATLAB Application Designer

Rotorcraft noise source identification and reduction is crucial to the emergence of the Urban Air Mobility (UAM) market. One key rotor noise source is Blade Vortex Interaction (BVI), caused by the rotor wake interacting with the rotor blades. The low-fidelity RApid Blade and Blade-Vortex InTeraction (RABBIT) tool was created to predict the location and characteristics of Blade-Vortex Interaction (BVI) noise. RABBIT enables engineers to quickly locate and understand designs or configurations that cause significant BVI noise. Furthermore, RABBIT can identify the time and location of blade overlap for coaxial rotors. RABBIT is not a general acoustic prediction tool, but instead utilizes vortex and wake parameters to visualize and predict only BVI noise. To date, RABBIT has been validated against CAMRAD II and ANOPP2/AARON for three NASA Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology (RVLT) concept vehicles: the Quiet Single Main Rotor (QSMR), Side-by-Side, and Quadrotor. RABBIT has been shown to be a useful BVI prediction tool capable of visualizing BVI as a function of various parameters. Impulse factor and time rate of change of loading allows for a unique BVI prediction technique that provides information on impulse strength, location, and frequency. This presentation will highlight how MATLAB’s App Designer was utilized to enable users to navigate RABBIT easily and efficiently without prior experience with MATLAB or rotorcraft acoustics. RABBIT users can build and view rotors in real time with options to control blade chord, radius, phasing, and airfoil geometry. Furthermore, multiple rotors can be combined to create state-of-the-art multi-rotor vehicles or fleets. Editable tables, sliding bars, and push buttons were implemented within MATLAB’s App Designer for RABBIT’s GUI to allow engineers and designers to predict low order acoustic impact of BVI occurrences.

Natasha Lydia Schatzman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Centrifugal Nuclear Thermal Rocket Challenges and Potential

The Centrifugal Nuclear Thermal Rocket (CNTR) is a liquid fueled fission propulsion concept designed to heat propellant to 5000 K prior to expansion through a nozzle. A specific impulse up to 1800 s may be achieved using hydrogen propellant, and a specific impulse up to 1000 s may be achieved using more storable propellants such as methane, ammonia, or propane. The high uranium density of the liquid metallic uranium or liquid uranium carbide fuel will help enable compact engines suitable for missions such as fast (<15 month) round trip human Mars missions or high delta-V missions in cislunar space. Long term applications of the CNTR could include the advanced exploration and utilization of the solar system through direct use of in-situ volatiles as propellant. Challenges associated with the CNTR are numerous. Centrifugal force is used to retain the liquid fuel in rotating fuel cylinders, and rotational velocities up to 5000 rpm may be required. Propellant flow must be directed such that all structures and moderators in the core are adequately cooled prior to the propellant entering the liquid fuel and being heated to 5000 K. The rotating fuel cylinder wall (RFCW) must have an inner surface designed to be compatible with liquid uranium metal or uranium carbide fuel up to at least 1500 K, and that inner surface may also need to be textured to help maintain acceptable wall temperatures. Propellant must flow radially inward through the RFCW while fuel is simultaneously contained. The RFCW should ideal-ly be made from a material with low neutron absorption to help minimize engine mass and facilitate the use of High Assay Low Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel in the system. The drive system for the rotating fuel cylinders must support all phases of operation. This paper will discuss computational and experimental research being conducted to address some of the challenges associated with the CNTR, and will also note potential mission benefits from the CNTR.

Michael G. Houts↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effects of Heat Transfer Coefficient Variation on Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Engine Performance

A physics-based Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) Testing Reference Design (TRD) power balance model was coded in Simulink to investigate engine performance for various design and parameter modifications. Since the primary mode of heat transfer in NTP engines is convective, the convective heat transfer coefficient (HTC) is a key parameter that requires accurate representation. The industry standard Westinghouse correlation has an uncertainty of ±20% which was investigated in this study. The results showed that a 20% decrease in the HTC led to a 4.14% increase in maximum fuel temperature while a 20% decrease in the HTC led to a 1.81% decrease in maximum fuel temperature suggesting that narrowing the uncertainty of this correlation through experimental work would be a critical step in the development of NTP engines. Furthermore, a maximum fuel temperature relationship with specific impulse was developed for the TRD engine which showed potential engine operation between specific impulse values of 715 and 900 seconds with minimal changes to the engine design. This graph could be useful for high level vehicle performance estimations for fuel types with different maximum operating temperatures.

Heat Transfer Coefficient↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effects of Varying the Heat Transfer Coefficient on Engine Performance

A physics-based Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) Testing Reference Design (TRD) power balance model was coded in Simulink to investigate engine performance for various design and parameter modifications. Since the primary mode of heat transfer in NTP engines is convective, the convective heat transfer coefficient (HTC) is a key parameter that requires accurate representation. The industry standard Westinghouse correlation has an uncertainty of ±20% which was investigated in this study. The results showed that a 20% decrease in the HTC led to a 4.14% increase in maximum fuel temperature while a 20% decrease in the HTC led to a 1.81% decrease in maximum fuel temperature suggesting that narrowing the uncertainty of this correlation through experimental work would be a critical step in the development of NTP engines. Furthermore, a maximum fuel temperature relationship with specific impulse was developed for the TRD engine which showed potential engine operation between specific impulse values of 715 and 900 seconds with minimal changes to the engine design. This graph could be useful for high level vehicle performance estimations for fuel types with different maximum operating temperatures.

Heat Transfer Coefficient↗