Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Additively Manufacturing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,585 records · Page 88

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AND REGULATORY TESTING OF CANISTERS FOR SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT

The back end of the fuel cycle focuses on the interim storage, transportation, and final disposition of the spent nuclear fuel from nuclear reactors. Commercial light water nuclear power stations across the United States operate with fuel assemblies being irradiated for up to 6 years (planned) in the reactor pressure vessel. After their planned irradiation, the fuel assemblies are moved to a spent fuel pool within the facility complex. After the spent nuclear fuel is removed from the fuel pool, it is typically inserted into a welded metal canister that can be transferred between overpacks for storage, transportation and possibly disposal. Most dry storage systems being used by industry today use dual purpose canisters (DPCs), designed for use in storage and transportation overpacks, but not specifically designed for disposal. Triple purpose-canisters, designed for disposal in addition to storage and transportation, have also been researched. Traditional manufacturing methods for spent fuel canisters involve fusion welding along the length or circumference of the canister which results in high tensile residual stresses in the joint weld zone (WZ) and heat affected zone (HAZ). In this paper, spent fuel canister designs were printed by wire arc additive manufacturing (AM) using the 316L SS welding wire to demonstrate: 1. Feasibility of spent nuclear fuel canister fabrication using this advanced manufacturing method, 2. Dynamic response of the additive manufacture canister design when subjected to the federally mandated Normal Conditions of Transport (NCT) and Hypothetical Accident Conditions (HAC) physical tests for Type B packages. This paper will focus on the canister printing design and structural tests. The AM 3D printed design, regulatory testing, and post-test evaluation of the canister tested to the 10 CFR 71.71 and 10 CFR 71.73 requirements will be presented. One AM canister design was subjected to the penetration, free drop, and puncture test. Before and after the dynamic structural tests, the AM canister design was scanned with a handheld scanner to capture a 3D CAD geometry to compare to the 3D printed canister design in the deformed shape. The scanned geometry was sectioned in areas with deformation and the cross-section profile was measured to determine accurate and repeated results of the deformed shape of the AM canister design.

Martinez, Oscar↗

Thermal stability of anisotropic bonded magnets prepared by additive manufacturing

Abstract In this research, anisotropic NdFeB + SmFeN hybrid and NdFeB bonded magnets are additively printed in a polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) polymer binder. Printed NdFeB + SmFeN PPS bonded magnets displayed excellent magnetic properties ( B r [remanence] = 6.9 kG [0.69 T], H cj [coercivity] = 8.3 kOe [660 kA/m], and BH max [energy product] = 9.9 MGOe [79 kJ/m 3 ]) with superior corrosion resistance and thermal stability. The anisotropic NdFeB bonded magnet shows a high coercivity of 14.6 kOe (1162 kA/m) with a BH max of 8.7 MGOe (69 kJ/m 3 ). The coercivity and remanence temperature coefficients for NdFeB + SmFeN hybrid bonded magnets are −0.10%/K and −0.46%/K, and for NdFeB bonded magnets are −0.14%/K and −0.53%/K in the range of 300–400 K, indicating that the hybrid bonded magnets are thermally stable. The average flux aging loss for hybrid magnets was also determined to be very stable over 2000 h at 448 K (175°C) in air with 2.04% compared to that of NdFeB magnets with 3.62%.

thermal stability↗

Comparing the deformation mechanism in 316 L stainless steel fabricated by hybrid and additive manufacturing

This study rationalizes the relatively higher elongation with minimal strength drop of 316L stainless steel (316LSS) manufactured using the hybrid approach in comparison to a fully additive approach followed by machining. It was found that twinning was the dominant deformation mechanism in 316LSS produced by both additive and hybrid approaches. Additionally, the relatively lower fraction of twins in the as-fabricated state of hybrid approach compared to a fully additive approach resulted in delaying the onset of steady-state strain hardening rate to higher strain levels, thereby resulting in an overall increase in elongation to failure.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

On the melt pool dynamic of voxel-controlled metal matrix composites via hybrid additive manufacturing: Laser powder bed fusion and ink-jetting

In this study, the effect of the addition of reinforcement nanoparticles to the 316L matrix by adopting ex-situ and in-situ method (drop on demand jetting) to produce 316L/Al 2 O 3 nanocomposite was investigated. In the ex-situ method, the Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles (NPs) were lightly mixed with 316L powder and processed by laser powder bed fusion. In the in-situ method, an ethanol-based ink containing Al 13 nanoclusters (NCs) was added to 316L powder and then processed by laser. Both ex-situ and in-situ method produced nanocomposites with Al-Si-Mn-O-enriched precipitations within the 316L matrix. The addition of NPs/NCs to the 316L matrix, altered the geometrical characteristic of the single-track melt pools. At the same laser power, with increasing the amount of Al 2 O 3 NPs and Al 13 NCs the melt pool deepened due to reduced thermal conductivity and prolonged liquid presence. Further, as a result, 316L/1 wt% Al 13 NCs deposited single track showed larger grains in comparison to 316L single track. At a high laser power of 150W, the Marangoni flow and the buoyancy force caused the nanoparticles to agglomerate and float to the top surface of tracks; therefore, the wt% fraction of precipitation was drastically reduced due to the loss of Al. The 316L/Al 2 O 3 NPs and 316L/Al 13 NCs exhibited the microhardness of 285 ± 13 HV and 293 ± 7 HV, respectively, higher than the deposited 316L single track, 265 ± 15 HV. Lastly, a hybrid LPBF+ink-jet printer was adopted to selectively change the composition of different zones by adding Al 13 NCs ink to 316L and producing a voxel-controlled metal matrix composite.

316L↗