Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Burn”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,567 records · Page 87
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Final CRADA Report: Accelerated Burn-up Accumulation Test of Clean Core Thorium Energy Designated ANEEL Fuel

Clean Core Thorium Energy (CCTE), LLC, located in Oak Brook, Illinois, is committed to the development of alternative nuclear fuels. CCTE is focused on leveraging the inherent benefits of thorium to create a novel nuclear fuel solution for our worlds growing power demand. Unlike some other fuel cycles proposing to use thorium in advanced reactors, CCTE is focused on deploying solid fuel designs (ceramic pellets in metallic cladding) in existing pressurized heavy-water reactors (PHWRs) and Canada deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactors. CCTE’s fuel design, referred to as Advanced Nuclear Energy for Enriched Life (ANEEL), uses mixed thorium-uranium oxide ((Th,U)O2) to enhance reactor operational strategies while producing significantly low attractiveness material in terms of nuclear proliferation. The overall project objective is to investigate the performance of high burnup ANEEL fuel via an irradiation experiment to be performed in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The scope of work for this CRADA was specifically aimed at performing conceptual design and analysis to support development of an irradiation test rig, development of a fuel fabrication process for the experiment pellets, fabrication and qualification of the pellets, and shipment of the pellets to INL so they can be used to construct experiment rodlets.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2013

Development and validation of ALEPH2 Monte Carlo burn-up code

The ALEPH2 Monte Carlo depletion code has two principal features that make it a flexible and powerful tool for reactor analysis. First of all, its comprehensive nuclear data library ensures the consistency between steady-state Monte Carlo and deterministic depletion modules. It covers neutron and proton induced reactions, neutron and proton fission product yields, spontaneous fission product yields, radioactive decay data and total recoverable energies per fission. Secondly, ALEPH2 uses an advanced numerical solver for the first order ordinary differential equations describing the isotope balances, namely a Radau IIA implicit Runge-Kutta method. The versatility of the code allows using it for time behavior simulation of various systems ranging from single pin model to full-scale reactor model. The code is extensively used for the neutronics design of the MYRRHA research fast spectrum facility which will operate in both critical and sub-critical modes. The code has been validated on the decay heat data from JOYO experimental fast reactor. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2013

An economic analysis of a light and heavy water moderated reactor synergy: burning americium using recycled uranium

An economic analysis is presented for a proposed synergistic system between 2 nuclear utilities, one operating light water reactors (LWR) and another running a fleet of heavy water moderated reactors (HWR). Americium is partitioned from LWR spent nuclear fuel (SNF) to be transmuted in HWRs, with a consequent averted disposal cost to the LWR operator. In return, reprocessed uranium (RU) is supplied to the HWRs in sufficient quantities to support their operation both as power generators and americium burners. Two simplifying assumptions have been made. First, the economic value of RU is a linear function of the cost of fresh natural uranium (NU), and secondly, plutonium recycling for a third utility running a mixed oxide (MOX) fuelled reactor fleet has been already taking place, so that the extra cost of americium recycling is manageable. We conclude that, in order for this scenario to be economically attractive to the LWR operator, the averted disposal cost due to partitioning americium from LWR spent fuel must exceed 214 dollars per kg, comparable to estimates of the permanent disposal cost of the high level waste (HLW) from reprocessing spent LWR fuel. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2012

New Strategies for Licensing the Storage and Transportation of High Burn-up Spent Nuclear Fuel in the United States - 12546

An alternative approach may be needed to the licensing of high-burnup fuel for storage and transportation based on the assumption that spent fuel cladding may not always remain intact. The approach would permit spent fuel to be retrieved on a canister basis and could lessen the need for repackaging of spent fuel. This approach is being presented as a possible engineering solution to address the uncertainties and lack of data availability for cladding properties for high burnup fuel and extended storage time frames. The proposed approach does not involve relaxing current safety standards for criticality safety, containment, or permissible external dose rates. Packaging strategies and regulations should be developed to reduce the potential for requiring fuel to be repackaged unnecessarily. This would lessen the chance of accidents and mishaps during loading and unloading of casks, and decrease dose to workers. A packaging approach that shifts the safety basis from reliance upon the fuel condition to reliance upon an inner canister could eliminate or lessen the need for repackaging. In addition, the condition of canisters can be more readily monitored and inspected than the condition of fuel cladding. Canisters can also be repaired and/or replaced when deemed necessary. In contrast, once a fuel assembly is loaded into a canister and placed in a storage overpack, there is little opportunity to monitor its condition or take mitigating measures if cladding degradation is suspected or proven to occur. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Extended Storage of High Burn-up Fuel Cask R and D Project - 17145

Under contract by EPRI and DOE, AREVA Federal Services LLC (AFS) is leading a team consisting of AREVA Inc. and Dominion Virginia Power (Dominion) to develop and conduct a full-scale confirmatory Research project with HBU fuel. A test plan was developed using an existing TN Americas (TN) TN-32 bolted storage cask with a modified, specially instrumented lid to be engineered and then loaded with multiple cladding types of HBU pressurized water reactor (PWR) UNF from Dominion's North Anna Power Station (this modified cask is identified as TN-32B). Seven specially designed thermocouple lances, each containing nine detectors, will be inserted into the designated fuel assembly guide tubes through the modified cask lid. The loaded cask with the monitoring system will be placed into dry storage on the existing North Anna Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) pad for a period of extended monitoring. In addition, design modifications to the lid have been incorporated to permit periodic gas sampling of the cask internals during the storage period on the ISFSI pad. The fuel selected for this research project ranges in average assembly burnup between 50 GWD/MTU to 67 GWD/MTU. The instrumentation used to collect the thermal data is very similar to in-core thermocouple detectors used at nuclear power plants and is considered very reliable for this application. Prior to cask loading at North Anna, a series of 'fit up' tests will be performed at the fabricator to ensure proper alignment, fit and function of the modified cask and related instrumentation and equipment. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

High burn-up spent nuclear fuel vibration integrity study - 15134

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has developed the cyclic integrated reversible-bending fatigue tester (CIRFT) approach to successfully demonstrate the controllable fatigue fracture of high burnup (HBU) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in a normal vibration mode. CIRFT enables examination of the underlying mechanisms of SNF system dynamic performance. Due to the inhomogeneous composite structure of the SNF system, the detailed mechanisms of pellet-pellet and pellet-clad interactions and the stress concentration effects at the pellet-pellet interface cannot be readily obtained from a CIRFT system measurement. Therefore, finite element analyses (FEAs) are being used to complement the experimental work by estimating values of local stresses and strains from the measured global moment-curvature. These results and their implications will be used for further investigation. Major findings of CIRFT on the HBU SNF are as follows: - The degree of bonding between pellets, as well as the bonding between pellets and clad in the SNF system plays an important role in the vibration performance of SNF. - Fuel structure contributes to SNF system stiffness. - There are significant variations in stress and curvature of SNF systems during vibration cycles resulting from segment pellet and clad interactions. - SNF failure initiates at the pellet-pellet interface region and appears to be spontaneous. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Extended Storage of High Burn-up Fuel Cask R and D Project - 16591

Under contract by EPRI and DOE, AREVA Federal Services LLC (AFS) is leading a team consisting of AREVA Inc. and Dominion Virginia Power (Dominion) to develop and conduct a full-scale confirmatory Research project with HBU fuel. A test plan was developed using an existing AREVA Transnuclear (TN) TN-32 bolted storage cask with a modified, specially instrumented lid to be engineered and then loaded with multiple cladding types of HBU pressurized water reactor (PWR) UNF from Dominion's North Anna Power Station (this modified cask is identified as TN-32B). Seven specially designed thermocouple lances, each containing nine detectors, will be inserted into the designated fuel assembly guide tubes through the modified cask lid. The loaded cask with the monitoring system will be placed into dry storage on the existing North Anna Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) pad for a period of extended monitoring. In addition, design modifications to the lid have been incorporated to permit periodic gas sampling of the cask internals during the storage period on the ISFSI pad. The fuel selected for this research project ranges in average assembly burnup between 50 GWD/MTU to 67 GWD/MTU. The instrumentation used to collect the thermal data is very similar to in-core thermocouple detectors used at nuclear power plants and is considered very reliable for this application. Prior to cask loading at North Anna, a series of 'fit up' tests will be performed at the fabricator to ensure proper alignment, fit and function of the modified cask and related instrumentation and equipment. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Assessing the Success of Shipping High Burn-Up Sister Rods from ORNL to PNNL - 19456

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DoE's) Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC), in collaboration with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the commercial nuclear industry have initiated a group of projects to obtain data to support the enhancement of the technical bases for the extended storage and transportation of high-burnup (HBU) (>45 GWd/MTU) spent nuclear fuel (SNF). Under this overall effort, a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-licensed storage cask was loaded with Thirty-Two (32) HBU SNF assemblies. The cask was modified to allow radial and axial temperature profiles to be measured using thermocouple lances inserted through the lid. Twenty-five (25) rods from similar assemblies of similar claddings, in-reactor placement, and burnup histories (herein called 'sister rods') have been shipped from the North Anna Nuclear Power Plant and are currently being nondestructively tested at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). To meet UFD's research objectives, testing on ten (10) of these rods is required to be performed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Although the twenty-five rods were originally received at ORNL in the 10-160B, the PNNL facility that would need to receive the ten (10) rods did not have an active history with using the 10-160B. This paper first identifies and summarizes various criteria and evaluations used in helping to select which package will be used for the shipment of the ten (10) sister rods to PNNL (i.e., Bases on why the NACLWT was chosen). With the shipment scheduled to be complete, identified potential concerns, issues, lessons learned, and transportation summary documents were studied (post-shipment). The adequacy of the criteria and evaluations used to choose the NAC-LWT were accessed to determine their adequacy. The results show the criteria were adequate. However, it was noted that DOE Order 460.2A, DOE M 460.2-1A, and DOE G 460.2-1 have differences in the terminology and scope, resulting in clarity issues and differences in regulatory interpretation. Since one-of-a kind spent fuel shipments are uncommon, the topic will be significant interest to people who work in radioactive material packaging and transportation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Criticality Benchmarking of the Oregon State TRIGA Reactor Using the MCNP Burn Option

Neutronic analyses of the Oregon State TRIGA Reactor (OSTR) have historically been performed using a thoroughly validated MCNP model. This model was originally created in 1997 in support of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) research, when the core still utilized highly-enriched uranium (HEU) fuel. The OSTR core was converted to low-enriched uranium (LEU) in the fall of 2008. To more accurately represent the converted state of the core, the MCNP model was modified to incorporate fuel material information from the fuel manufacturer (AREVA). In previous versions of the model, the fuel elements were assumed to have a uniform isotopic composition. Chemical analysis from AREVA provided far more resolved material information, allowing for increased fidelity in the representation of the fuel. The model was also updated to ENDF/B-VII.1 cross section libraries as the previous model utilized ENDF/B-VI. The primary impetus for the update of the MCNP model was the desire to have a more accurate assessment of criticality conditions of the OSTR. The OSTR utilizes three core configurations which are defined by the contents of the B1 grid position. If fuel resides in B1, this is designated as the 'normal' core. Otherwise, there are two aluminum in-core irradiation tubes (ICITs) that can be placed in B1. There is an unlined tube, designated simply as the ICIT, and there is a cadmium-lined tube, designated as the CLICIT. Table 1 contains a summary of the results of a series of MCNP criticality calculations which used the original 'fresh fuel' isotopics from the fall of 2008 in conjunction with critical rod height data from December 2013. Calculations were performed at 15 W, which is where the daily core excess measurements are taken, and at 1 MW, which is the current full-power level at the OSTR. The k-effective values indicate that the fresh fuel material cards are highly inaccurate and over-predict the criticality by at least $1.20 in every core configuration (based on a β{sub eff} value of 0.0075), thus it was desired to perform a depletion calculation to obtain more accurate fuel information. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗