Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Measurement”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,549 records · Page 86

Measurement of e + e – → γ χ c J via initial state radiation at Belle

The process e + e – → γχ cJ (J = 1, 2) is studied via initial state radiation using 980 fb –1 of data at and around the Υ(nS) (n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) resonances collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy e + e – collider. Here, no significant signal is observed except from ψ(2S) decays. Upper limits on the cross sections between √s = 3.80 and 5.56 GeV are determined at the 90% credibility level, which range from a few pb to a few tens of pb. We also set upper limits on the decay rate of the vector charmonium [ψ(4040), ψ(4160), and ψ(4415)] and charmoniumlike [Y(4260), Y(4360), and Y(4660)] states to γχ cJ .

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Measurement of the decay B → D ℓ ν ℓ in fully reconstructed events and determination of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element | V c b |

We present a determination of the magnitude of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element |Vcb| using the decay B → Dℓν ℓ (ℓ = e,μ) based on 711 fb –1 of e + e – → Υ(4S) data recorded by the Belle detector and containing 772 × 10 6 BB¯ pairs. Here, one B meson in the event is fully reconstructed in a hadronic decay mode, while the other, on the signal side, is partially reconstructed from a charged lepton and either a D + or D 0 meson in a total of 23 hadronic decay modes. The isospin-averaged branching fraction of the decay B → Dℓν ℓ is found to be B(B 0 → D – ℓ + ν ℓ ) = (2.31 ± 0.03(stat) ± 0.11(syst))%. Analyzing the differential decay rate as a function of the hadronic recoil with the parametrization of Caprini, Lellouch, and Neubert and using the form-factor prediction G(1) = 1.0541 ± 0.0083 calculated by FNAL/MILC, we obtain η EW |V cb | = (40.12 ± 1.34) × 10 –3 , where ηEW is the electroweak correction factor. Alternatively, assuming the model-independent form-factor parametrization of Boyd, Grinstein, and Lebed and using lattice QCD data from the FNAL/MILC and HPQCD collaborations, we find η EW |V cb | = (41.10 ± 1.14) × 10 –3 .

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗