Gas-Phase Complexes of Americium and Lanthanides with a Bis-triazinyl Pyridine: Reactivity and Bonding of Archetypes for F-Element Separations
Bis-triazinyl pyridines (BTPs) exhibit solution selectivity for trivalent americium over lanthanides (Ln), the origins of which remain uncertain. Here in this paper, electrospray ionization was used to generate gas-phase complexes [ML 3 ] 3+ , where M = La, Lu, or Am and L is EtBTP 2,6-bis(5,6-diethyl-1,2,4-triazin-3-yl)-pyridine. Collision-induced dissociation (CID) of [ML 3 ] 3+ in the presence of H 2 O yielded a protonated ligand [L(H)] + and hydroxide [ML 2 (OH)] 2+ or hydrate [ML(L–H)(H 2 O)] 2+ , where (L–H) - is a deprotonated ligand. Although solution affinities indicate stronger binding of BTPs toward Am 3+ versus Ln 3+ , the observed CID process is contrastingly more facile for M = Am versus Ln. To understand the disparity, density functional theory was employed to compute potential energy surfaces for two possible CID processes, for M = La and Am. In accordance with the CID results, both the rate determining transition state barrier and the net energy are lower for [AmL 3 ] 3+ versus [LaL 3 ] 3+ and for both product isomers, [ML 2 (OH)] 2+ and [ML(L–H)(H 2 O)] 2+ . More facile removal of a ligand from [AmL 3 ] 3+ by CID does not necessarily contradict stronger Am 3+ –L binding, as inferred from solution behavior. In particular, the formation of new bonds in the products can distort kinetics and thermodynamics expected for simple bond cleavage reactions. In addition to correctly predicting the seemingly anomalous CID behavior, the computational results indicate greater participation of Am 5f versus La 4f orbitals in metal–ligand bonding.