Multilateral Spent Fuel Management Efforts: Nonproliferation and Energy Implications in the Asia Pacific
Management of spent nuclear fuel in the Asia Pacific will be a growing challenge in coming decades as the region continues its rapid economic and nuclear energy expansion. Accompanying this growth has been skyrocketing energy demand. The capacity of nuclear energy in the Asia Pacific is expected to increase by approximately 50% by 2035. In fact, of the 66 reactors under construction worldwide, 47 are being built in the Asia Pacific region alone. In a sense, the area is experiencing the so-called ‘Nuclear Renaissance’, which could simultaneously increase proliferation risks while fueling economic growth and political stability. And because ‘Asia Pacific’ includes North America, Oceania, East Asia, Southeast Asia and, by some definitions, South and Central Asia as well as the Middle East, the demand for nuclear energy in particular is expected to continue. Consequently, the Asia Pacific region will soon face important decisions about how to support and implement the necessary infrastructure for nuclear energy expansion and deal with the waste, while also meeting all nonproliferation obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). One option for dealing with spent nuclear fuel that should be considered is multilateral spent fuel management. Such an effort could help reduce risks associated with safety, proliferation and security of nuclear energy. While the original idea of multilateral spent nuclear fuel management is a decades-old concept, no official plan has been developed because of challenges related to cost, liability, transportation, export controls, international commerce, and nonproliferation, to name a few. Nonetheless, as more and more newcomer countries decide to develop nuclear energy, but do not yet have a strategic plan or the financial means to deal with the waste, the international community may need to take a more proactive approach in developing a multilateral effort, particularly with respect to geological repositories and interim dry storage. Risks and benefits will need to be analyzed, while the role of such an effort in the revival of the Nuclear Renaissance will need to be evaluated. This paper provides an overview of spent nuclear fuel management efforts in the Asia Pacific region and attempts to analyze the possible benefits and feasibility of a multilateral approach.