Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “collaborative”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,513 records · Page 84

The Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM): Community-Focused Collaborative Model Development Accelerating Research to Operations

The Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCSDA) Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) is a fast, 1-D radiative transfer model used in numerical weather prediction, calibration/validation, etc. across multiple federal agencies and universities. The key benefit of the CRTM is that it is a satellite simulator. It provides a highly accurate representation of satellite radiances by using the specific sensor response functions convolved with a line-by-line radiative transfer model (LBLRTM). CRTM covers the spectral ranges consistent with all present operational and most research satellites, from visible to microwave. The capability to simulate ultraviolet radiances and support space-based radar sensors is being added over the next two years in CRTM Version 3.0. In addition to simulated radiances, the CRTM also provides Jacobian outputs needed to interpret satellite observations for numerical weather prediction. The Jacobian estimates how changes in geophysical parameters affect simulated measurements from satellite sensors. Using the Jacobian in modeling and weather prediction improves the accuracy and efficiency of data analysis, leading to better weather predictions. The CRTM model's success and growth depend on community contributions and evaluation. To facilitate this, we have made the CRTM highly accessible through modular programming, clear documentation and tutorials, public domain licensing, unfettered public access via Github, and a clear path to operational implementation for innovative research. We encourage and welcome contributions from the community to help us continue to improve the CRTM.

Benjamin T Johnson↗

Facilitating Crew-Computer Collaboration During Mixed-Initiative Space Mission Planning

As NASA looks toward longer duration missions, there will inevitably be a stronger emphasis on crew autonomy, particularly in the domains of mission planning. Ensuring that astronauts, while subject to lengthy periods of communication delay with Earth-based mission support personnel, are able to independently adapt their schedules to rapidly changing environments is a critical aspect of deep-space exploration. This task will likely require the assistance of computer support systems, as the task of mission planning is complex and currently requires dedicated console operators. A mixed-initiative approach can help alleviate some of the more workload-heavy aspects of planning by offloading the intricate task of constraint management to a computer, while still allowing the crew member to maintain overall control of the plan. Playbook is a mission planning tool that has been developed specifically to support this type of mixed-initiative scheduling. This paper examines: 1) the operational evidence of the challenges and viability of autonomous crew planning, and 2) the novel scheduling capabilities in Playbook that are meant to address those findings.

human-computer interaction↗

NASA/ONERA Collaboration on Small Hovering Rotor Broadband Noise Prediction using Lattice-Boltzmann and Structured Navier-Stokes Solvers

This work compares two lattice-Boltzmann method solvers, PowerFLOW and ProLB, and two structured Navier-Stokes solvers, OVERFLOW2 and FAST, used by NASA and ONERA, respectively, for the broadband noise prediction of an ideally twisted rotor as part of Implementing Arrangement number FR-0685-0, ‘Comparing Computational Fluid Dynamics Solvers for Broadband Noise Prediction.’ Predicted results are evaluated against measured data from both smooth and rough blade sets acquired in the Small Hover Anechoic Chamber at the NASA Langley Research Center. Aerodynamic thrust predictions are seen to agree more favorably with the rough-blade measurements, whereas torque predictions agree better with the smooth-blade measurements. A tonal noise comparison shows better agreement to the measured data with the two structured Navier-Stokes solvers than with the two lattice-Boltzmann solvers, which is thought to be caused by the different geometric discretization associated with each solver paradigm. Broadband noise comparisons show that both lattice-Boltzmann method solvers trend well with the smooth-blade measurements, with the exception of an overprediction by ProLB between 4 kHz and 15 kHz. OVERFLOW2 is seen to capture the measured nondeterministic tonal content between 3 kHz and 8 kHz on a narrowband spectral basis and FAST agrees well with the rough blades on a one-third octave band basis.

Christopher S. Thurman↗