SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Waste management”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,477 records · Page 82

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2013

Environmental Cost Analysis System (ECAS) Status and Compliance Requirements for EM Consolidated Business Center Contracts - 13204

The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has developed a web-accessible database to collect actual cost data from completed EM projects to support cost estimating and analysis. This Environmental Cost Analysis System (ECAS) database was initially deployed in early 2009 containing the cost and parametric data from 77 decommissioning, restoration, and waste management projects completed under the Rocky Flats Closure Project. In subsequent years we have added many more projects to ECAS and now have a total of 280 projects from 8 major DOE sites. This data is now accessible to DOE users through a web-based reporting tool that allows users to tailor report outputs to meet their specific needs. We are using it as a principal resource supporting the EM Consolidated Business Center (EMCBC) and the EM Applied Cost Engineering (ACE) team cost estimating and analysis efforts across the country. The database has received Government Accountability Office review as supporting its recommended improvements in DOE's cost estimating process, as well as review from the DOE Office of Acquisition and Project Management (APM). Moving forward, the EMCBC has developed a Special Contract Requirement clause or 'H-Clause' to be included in all current and future EMCBC procurements identifying the process that contractors will follow to provide DOE their historical project data in a format compatible with ECAS. Changes to DOE O 413.3B implementation are also in progress to capture historical costs as part of the Critical Decision project closeout process. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2010

Conceptual Design Report for Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility

This conceptual design report addresses development of replacement remote-handled low-level waste disposal capability for the Idaho National Laboratory. Current disposal capability at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex is planned until the facility is full or until it must be closed in preparation for final remediation (approximately at the end of Fiscal Year 2017). This conceptual design report includes key project assumptions; design options considered in development of the proposed onsite disposal facility (the highest ranked alternative for providing continued uninterrupted remote-handled low level waste disposal capability); process and facility descriptions; safety and environmental requirements that would apply to the proposed facility; and the proposed cost and schedule for funding, design, construction, and operation of the proposed onsite disposal facility.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2011

Conceptual Design Report for the Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Project

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2011

Conceptual Design Report for the Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Project

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2015

Demonstrating integration of CBP and ASCEM simulation tools - 15627

DOE-EM is supporting two crosscutting projects to develop software and conduct targeted experiments to enhance performance and risk assessment capabilities: the Cementitious Barriers Partnership (CBP) and the Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management (ASCEM). The CBP is a smaller-scale project of coordinated software development and experimentation focused on cementitious materials. ASCEM is a larger-scale project aimed at developing next-generation, science-based, reactive flow and transport simulation capabilities and supporting modeling tool-sets within a high-performance computing framework to address DOE-EM's waste management and environmental cleanup challenges. Complementary integration of CBP and ASCEM software tool-sets has been demonstrated through a joint simulation of radionuclide release and transport in a representative tank closure scenario. Specialized CBP capabilities for simulating reactive transport in cementitious materials were utilized in a near-field simulation of radionuclide leaching from the engineered system. The high-performance computing (HPC) capabilities of the ASCEM Amanzi simulator were utilized to simulate far-field flow and transport in the natural environment outside the closed tank. The ASCEM flow simulation provided boundary conditions to the CBP near-field model, which in turn provided radionuclide source terms to the ASCEM far-field transport simulation. The joint demonstration illustrates how the two crosscutting projects can be used in a complementary manner to enhance DOE performance and risk assessment. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2014

Calendar Year 2013 Annual Site Environmental Report for Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico

Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico is a government-owned/contractor-operated facility. Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, manages and operates the laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). The DOE/NNSA, Sandia Field Office administers the contract and oversees contractor operations at the site. This annual report summarizes data and the compliance status of Sandia Corporation’s sustainability, environmental protection, and monitoring programs through December 31, 2013. Major environmental programs include air quality, water quality, groundwater protection, terrestrial surveillance, waste management, pollution prevention, environmental restoration, oil and chemical spill prevention, and implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act. Environmental monitoring and surveillance programs are required by DOE Order 231.1B, Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting (DOE 2012).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Radiochemical Methodology Applied To Determination of gamma-Emitting Radionuclides In Waste Samples From IEA-R1 Reactor - 17265

The Brazilian reactor IEA-R1 has been in operation since 1957. It is an open pool-type nuclear research reactor, operating at 2 to 5 MW that uses water as coolant, moderator and biological shield. Polypropylene filter cartridges are part of the water treatment system of the reactor and become radioactive as they remove suspended solid material from the cooling water during the operation of the reactor. Annually, the replacement of the filters from the reactor's water treatment system generates about 36 units. The development of a method for the characterization of the radionuclides present in the filters is required for routine operation in the Radioactive Waste Management Facility (RWMF) in order to determine the radioisotopic inventory of the waste packages. Wastes from nuclear reactors contain transuranic elements, activation and fission products, only few of them emitting gamma radiation measurable by simple gamma scanning methods. The method of the Scaling Factors (SF) uses empirically determined proportions between the concentrations of Difficult to Measure (DTM) radionuclides and that of easily measurable gamma emitters called Key Nuclide (KN), to calculate DTM concentrations. The objective of this study is to describe a method of the dissolution of the filter cartridges for determination of gamma emitting radionuclides. To determine the activity of a sample by means of of gamma spectrometry, it is necessary previous knowledge of the efficiency curve for a given geometry, which can be obtained by calibrating the efficiency and energy of the detector. The need to dissolve the filter cartridges has arisen given the difficulty in obtaining a standard source with the same filter geometry. Therefore, for this work, the calibration curve was constructed using a mixed gamma-ray standard with known activities, same geometry, density, physical state and chemical composition of the source to be analyzed. A sample with background count (BG) was prepared and analyzed under the same conditions as the samples and the result was subtracted from the results obtained for each filter sample. After many tests, it was possible to establish a method for the dissolution of filter cartridges for the determination of gamma-emitting radionuclides. A mixed gamma-ray standard was produced in liquid form, containing the following radionuclides: {sup 241}Am, {sup 137}Cs and {sup 60}Co, which have photo-peaks at the following energies: 59.54, 661.66 and 1332.49 keV, respectively. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2016

Improving Workplace Management and Performance - A Lost Art? - 16004

Undertaking projects on nuclear licensed sites or on sites with a radiological connotation will undoubtedly lead to a variety of challenges. In many instances these challenges will be slightly different to those affiliated with projects on sites which do not have a radiological concern. However, common approaches can still often be found and transferable learning from other industries can also be applied. The majority of these challenges relate to worker safety (both occupationally and radiologically), protection of the public and the environment, public communication, and the choice of technical and logistical approaches taken (e.g. for areas like decommissioning, waste management, environmental remediation). Notwithstanding these challenges the success of site-related projects also depends heavily on the functionality of the project team. The aim here is to highlight a number of logical approaches that are too often overlooked and which might often lead to improvements in workplace management and performance. A successful project team is rarely built overnight, as it relies on the establishment of a harmonious working atmosphere, and continuous communication as well as demonstrable recognition of the relevance of the role of the different team members. Improving workplace management and performance can be approached through a number of ways. First, there are clear benefits in developing an industry-specific culture, but of equal importance is the application of learning from other industries. Second, improving workplace performance often comes down to treating people in the right manner and showing them respect. A culture of competition and blame in the workplace often results in individuals being too defensive or withholding useful information. Creating a harmonious atmosphere can help to overcome some of these barriers. The third area of improving workplace management and performance is through developing and empowering personnel on a more formal basis. This can be achieved through initiatives like the Investors In People (IiP) National Standard, which many countries now support. Achieving this National Standard provides an opportunity to demonstrate to both your personnel and your clients that you are committed to this initiative and that you want to improve workplace performance. The IiP National Standard can lead to a range of benefits. A combination of formal initiatives, developing sector-specific approaches and applying learning from other industries can lead to noticeable improvements in workplace management and performance. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Hanford Site Composite Analysis Technical Approach Description: Integrated Computational Framework.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in DOE O 435.1 Chg. 1, Radioactive Waste Management, requires the preparation and maintenance of a composite analysis (CA). The primary purpose of the CA is to provide a reasonable expectation that the primary public dose limit is not likely to be exceeded by multiple source terms that may significantly interact with plumes originating at a low-level waste disposal facility. The CA is used to facilitate planning and land use decisions that help assure disposal facility authorization will not result in long-term compliance problems; or, to determine management alternatives, corrective actions, or assessment needs if potential problems are identified.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Hanford Site Composite Analysis Technical Approach Description: Atmospheric Transport Modeling.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in DOE O 435.1 Chg. 1, Radioactive Waste Management, requires the preparation and maintenance of a composite analysis (CA). The primary purpose of the CA is to provide a reasonable expectation that the primary public dose limit is not likely to be exceeded by multiple source terms that may significantly interact with plumes originating at a low-level waste disposal facility. The CA is used to facilitate planning and land use decisions that help assure disposal facility authorization will not result in long-term compliance problems; or, to determine management alternatives, corrective actions or assessment needs, if potential problems are identified.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Hanford Site Composite Analysis Technical Approach Description: Waste Form Release.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in DOE O 435.1 Chg. 1, Radioactive Waste Management, requires the preparation and maintenance of a composite analysis (CA). The primary purpose of the CA is to provide a reasonable expectation that the primary public dose limit is not likely to be exceeded by multiple source terms that may significantly interact with plumes originating at a low-level waste disposal facility. The CA is used to facilitate planning and land use decisions that help assure disposal facility authorization will not result in long-term compliance problems; or, to determine management alternatives, corrective actions or assessment needs, if potential problems are identified.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Hanford Site Composite Analysis Technical Approach Description: Automated Quality Assurance Process Design.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2011

Y-12 Groundwater Protection Program Groundwater And Surface Water Sampling And Analysis Plan For Calendar Year 2012

This plan provides a description of the groundwater and surface water quality monitoring activities planned for calendar year (CY) 2012 at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) that will be managed by the Y-12 Groundwater Protection Program (GWPP). Groundwater and surface water monitoring performed by the GWPP during CY 2012 is in accordance with the following goals: (1) to protect the worker, the public, and the environment; (2) to maintain surveillance of existing and potential groundwater contamination sources; (3) to provide for the early detection of groundwater contamination and determine the quality of groundwater and surface water where contaminants are most likely to migrate beyond the Oak Ridge Reservation property line; (4) to identify and characterize long-term trends in groundwater quality at Y-12; and (5) to provide data to support decisions concerning the management and protection of groundwater resources. Groundwater and surface water monitoring will be performed in three hydrogeologic regimes at Y-12: the Bear Creek Hydrogeologic Regime (Bear Creek Regime), the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek Hydrogeologic Regime (East Fork Regime), and the Chestnut Ridge Hydrogeologic Regime (Chestnut Ridge Regime). The Bear Creek and East Fork regimes are located in Bear Creek Valley and the Chestnut Ridge Regime is located south of Y-12 (Figure A.1). Additional surface water monitoring will be performed north of Pine Ridge along the boundary of the Oak Ridge Reservation. Modifications to the CY 2012 monitoring program may be necessary during implementation. Changes in programmatic requirements may alter the analytes specified for selected monitoring wells or may add or remove wells from the planned monitoring network. Each modification to the monitoring program will be approved by the Y-12 GWPP manager and documented as an addendum to this sampling and analysis plan. The following sections of this report provide details regarding the CY 2012 groundwater and surface water monitoring activities. Section 2 describes the monitoring locations in each regime and the processes used to select the sampling locations. A description of the field measurements and laboratory analytes is provided in Section 3. Sample collection methods and procedures are described in Section 4, and Section 5 lists the documents cited for more detailed operational and technical information. The narrative sections of the report reference several appendices. Figures (maps and diagrams) and tables (excluding a data summary table presented in Section 4) are in Appendix A and Appendix B, respectively. Groundwater Monitoring Schedules (when issued throughout CY 2012) will be inserted in Appendix C, and addenda to this plan (if issued) will be inserted in Appendix D. Laboratory requirements (bottle lists, holding times, etc.) are provided in Appendix E, and an approved Waste Management Plan is provided in Appendix F.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2016

A Dual Alpha/Gamma Imaging Tool to Manage Decommissioning Operations

The knowledge of the radiological state of a nuclear plant under decommissioning is a key factor at any stage of the project: from the initial characterization (to define the best scenario and the main dismantling steps), during the monitoring of the decontamination operations, for the waste management and, last but not least, for the final controls. During a facility's operation, a clear view of the process radiological level is equally necessary, in order to plan maintenance scheduling and optimize interventions by personnel. Radiation protection teams generally ensure worker radiological safety, and also supply dose mappings for each of the areas associated with typical spectra. In most cases, this mapping does not give enough information to be used as input data when preparing maintenance or clean-up work. With advances in activity modeling calculation codes (using 3D), the way measurements are made to recover the best input radiological data on site is a key factor. Nuclear instrumentation is still in progress and the evolution of the technologies and software allow us to get imaging information in real time. The gamma camera is going to evolve and to become more compact and more sensitive. New portable gamma cameras have to be tested under high level dose rate. The alpha camera is also evolving: from the first prototype tested on site to solar blind alpha camera (to reduce the influence of light) to the new dual alpha/gamma prototype. (authors)

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Reactor Licensing

This is the licensing presentation for the Waste Management Symposia 2023. It covers licensing activities, LMP, and manufacturing licenses.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2015

Feasibility studies for the design of disposal vaults for multi-purpose containers (MPCs): construction, operation, ventilation and management of heat - 15175

The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) subsidiary, Radioactive Waste Management Ltd (RWM) is responsible for the safe implementation of a Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) for radioactive waste in the UK. As part of their generic programme to underpin the planned designs for a GDF, work is ongoing to explore a range of possible geological disposal concepts. This work developed GDF concept designs for Multi-Purpose Containers (MPC) disposal in the generic host rock types considered: higher strength (crystalline), lower strength sedimentary (sedimentary / clay formations) and evaporite rocks. This paper is specific to concepts for the disposal of MPC for Pressurised Water Reactor (PWR) spent nuclear fuel (SF). The key outcomes of the feasibility studies to improve the understanding of the MPC disposal concept and the specific challenges to construct, operate, ventilate, manage heat and backfill associated with this concept are summarised in this paper. The management of the high loading of radiogenic heat (from 12 PWR SF assemblies in MPCs compared to 4 in 'standard' disposal containers) during an extended open phase (delayed backfilling of the disposal area) of up to 300 years was investigated. The concept designs developed demonstrate it is feasible to construct, operate and ventilate disposal vaults to accommodate open 'storage' periods required for transitional thermal decay of high heat generating waste in higher strength and lower strength sedimentary host rock types considered by RWM. This work focused on developing two contrasting disposal concepts which are applicable to both higher strength and lower strength rock environments; both of which illustrate how vault temperature, stability and groundwater inflows can be controlled to delay backfilling and allow MPC package thermal output to decrease. MPC disposal in evaporite rock does not require a cooling period due to its high thermal conductivity and favourable performance at higher temperatures; therefore the concept developed for this rock includes immediate backfilling of disposal tunnels. A clear understanding of the interactions and limitations associated with heat management during the open period was developed by investigation of a 'Heating Ventilation and Air-Conditioning System' (HVAC). It was concluded that removal of heat from the disposal tunnels / vaults is feasible, but introduces significant operational complexity. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Advances in Resin Management Using 3R-Scan - 20154

The most important factor underlying optimal waste management is developing a clear picture of the radioactivity content of the waste and its impact on waste disposal cost. For over 35 years since the publishing of 10CFR61, waste characterization has relied on sampling the final waste product after formation. In the days following 10CFR61, the cost of final disposal was marginal with only a small impact on the overall costs. Constraints were added by provisions of the Low Level Waste Policy Act of 1985 leading to increasingly limited access to those disposal sites that remained available. In addition, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pressure promoting waste volume reduction led to disposal costs inevitably rising. Despite this, characterization practices in monitoring of waste generation for activity content still center on the same dated processes. This results in a disposal classification on the basis of endpoint sampling without consideration of the homogeneity of the waste mixture. It can also disregard consideration of the representativeness of the single or small sample base. As a minimum effort, a formalized sampling program of a fixed grouping of waste streams can be implemented that could account for more than 95% of all of the activity carried in solid waste products. The sample results for each radionuclide could then be trended as time passes to develop reasonable scaling factors for difficult to measure radionuclides. This process, identified in NRC guidance, has been rigorously followed by a relatively small number of facilities. The trended scaling factors serve to improve accuracy by identifying anomalous results that could otherwise go undetected. Direct monitoring of the accumulation of activity in process streams generating solid radwaste, including demineralizers and filter streams, is a more precise approach. Nearly all of these streams are monitored by plant chemistry on a regular schedule to maintain water quality. This paper discusses viable options for developing the basis for characterization through process monitoring of the accumulation of activity at the point of generation. Special focus is on resin bed tracking and how process knowledge of these streams can be brought together to form a consistent and precise solid waste radioactivity inventory. Some of the specific points covered in this paper include the merger of the fission product release computer program, 3R-STAT, with the radwaste sample analysis computer program, SCAN4 to create 3R-SCAN, the importance of individual waste stream influences on the overall source term, and the use of historic sample data to develop scaling factors using an automated process. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2015

Converting campus waste into renewable energy – A case study for the University of Cincinnati

Highlights: • A case study to show the benefits of waste-to-energy projects at a university. • Evaluated the technical and economic feasibilities as well as GHG reduction. • A tool for other universities/communities to evaluate waste-to-energy projects. - Abstract: This paper evaluates the implementation of three waste-to-energy projects at the University of Cincinnati: waste cooking oil-to-biodiesel, waste paper-to-fuel pellets and food waste-to-biogas, respectively. The implementation of these waste-to-energy (WTE) projects would lead to the improvement of campus sustainability by minimizing waste management efforts and reducing GHG emissions via the displacement of fossil fuel usage. Technical and economic aspects of their implementation were assessed and the corresponding GHG reduction was estimated. Results showed that on-site implementation of these projects would: (1) divert 3682 L (974 gallons) of waste cooking oil to 3712 L (982 gallons) of biodiesel; (2) produce 138 tonnes of fuel pellets from 133 tonnes of waste paper (with the addition of 20.75 tonnes of plastics) to replace121 tonnes of coal; and (3) produce biogas that would be enough to replace 12,767 m{sup 3} natural gas every year from 146 tonnes of food waste. The economic analysis determined that the payback periods for the three projects would be 16 months for the biodiesel, 155 months for the fuel pellet, and 74 months for the biogas projects. The reduction of GHG emission from the implementation of the three WTE projects was determined to be 9.37 (biodiesel), 260.49 (fuel pellets), and 11.36 (biogas) tonnes of CO{sub 2}-eq per year, respectively.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗