Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “GUIDANCE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,477 records · Page 82

Directed Acyclic Graph Guidance Documentation

For over a decade, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has tracked and configuration-managed approximately 30 risks to astronaut health and performance that occur before, during and after spaceflight. The Human System Risk Board (HSRB), a Health and Medical Technical Authority (HMTA) Board at NASA Johnson Space Center, is the entity responsible for identifying, assessing, analyzing, and monitoring the official understanding of the risk or risk posture for each of the Human System Risks and determining – based on evaluation of the available evidence – when that risk posture changes. The ultimate purpose of tracking and researching these risks is to find ways to reduce the risk that astronaut crews face during spaceflight. Historically, research, development and operations relevant to one risk have been conducted in isolation from other risks; these individual risk ‘silos’ enabled initial characterization of each specific risk. In spaceflight however, the impact of exposure to risk for astronaut crews is cumulative, and not independent of exposures or other risks, as all the adverse effects of the spaceflight environment begin at launch, continue throughout the duration of the mission and in some cases across the lifetime of the crews. In January of 2020, the HSRB at NASA embarked on a pilot project designed to assess the potential value of causal diagramming as a tool to facilitate understanding these cumulative and interdependent effects as applied within Human System Risk management. This process uses directed acyclic graphs as a means of formalizing a shared mental model of the causal flow of risk among Risk Board stakeholders. Initially this model was to improve communication among those stakeholders, but the potential value exceeds communication alone. Formalization of the process for creating these causal diagrams will enable the creation of a composite risk network that is vetted by members of the NASA community and configuration managed. The causal diagrams are formulated as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to function as a type of knowledge graph for reference for the board and its stakeholders. This document outlines the pilot process, the standardized approaches, and guidance for risk custodian teams when creating and updating DAGs as a part of the NASA Human System Risk Management process.

Risk↗

Mars 2020 Perseverance Entry Descent and Landing Guidance Navigation and Control

On February 18th, 2021, NASA landed Perseverance on the Jezero crater (Mars). This paper presents an overview of the Guidance, Navigation and Control (GNC) system for the Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) phases of the Mars 2020 Mission. It describes the GNC architecture, including sensors, actuators and algorithms. It takes the perspective of the GNC mode commander and shows its as-flown performance.

Brugarolas, Paul↗

Reconstructed Flight Performance of the Powered Descent Guidance and Control System for the Mars 2020 Perseverance Mission

On February 18th, 2021, the Mars 2020 mission successfully landed the “Perseverance” rover at Jezero crater on Mars. The Powered Descent Guidance and Control (PDGC) system was inherited from the Mars Science Laboratory mission and its parameters were tuned to support Terrain Relative Navigation for the Mars 2020 mission. The PDGC system architecture consists of a trajectory and an attitude commander, six feedback control loops and thruster allocation logic. The PDGC commands eight throttleable Mars Lander Engines to actively guide and control the vehicle during each powered flight phase. This paper describes the design and the as-flown performance of the PDGC system.

Way, David W.↗

Low SWaP Onboard Satellite Navigation, Guidance, and Control Technology

Onboard autonomy is a necessity for responsive space operations. Autonomous navigation, guidance, and control (NGC) enables space missions to reduce their dependence on high demand ground assets and costly ground personnel. It also allows for in-situ decision making and higher return on mission data. A flight software and hardware system providing this capability, called “autoNGC,” is currently being developed at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center for infusion into multiple future missions. The first build of autoNGC, providing autonomous navigation for lunar orbiting spacecraft, is targeted for completion by Fall 2024. It provides sensor fusion of multiple measurement types including pseudo-range from a weak signal Global Navigation Satellite Service (GNSS) receiver, 1-way and 2-way direct to Earth (DTE) range and Doppler, bearing and range from optical camera sensed images, and an accelerometer. AutoNGC is also being targeted for future missions that involve small body proximity operations, Sun Earth Libration point orbits, and distributed systems missions (DSMs) including those at outer planets. AutoNGC flight software is being built upon the plug-and-play architecture of the core Flight System (cFS) [Ref. 1]. Figure (Slide 7) shows the message-based software bus layout of various software applications (“apps”) consisting of the standard cFS apps and autoNGC interface apps and libraries. Accurate onboard navigation and timing is obtained through the Goddard Enhanced Onboard Navigation System (GEONS) software library [Ref. 2], which fuses different measurement types through an extended Kalman filter (EKF) framework. Optical measurements that are ingested in GEONS are provided by the cFS Goddard Image Analysis and Navigation Tool (cGIANT) app [Ref. 3]. This app processes optical images to extract the bearing angles of the centroid of the imaged body (near or far), the range to the imaged body, and/or of the features on the surface of a body to perform terrain relative navigation (TRN). Measurement of range to the body’s center of mass can also be derived from the detection of the limb. The first build of autoNGC for a lunar orbiting spacecraft is a minimal size, weight, and power (SWaP) hardware design allowing for inclusion into CubeSats and SmallSat-size class buses. Advancements in miniaturized space processors, such as the SpaceCube 3.0 Mini and the SpaceCube Mini-Z [Ref. 4] are utilized for low SWaP while maintaining a high level of performance. Figure (Slide 11) shows the composition of the first autoNGC build. The current enclosure design has dimensions 12 cm x 17 cm x 13.5 cm. The box mass is expected to be less than 2 kg, and the nominal power is 21 W. The hardware interfaces are designed for flexibility with a variety of sensor inputs. The achievable navigation performance depends on the sensors utilized, including the onboard clock for 1-way pseudo-range measurements. Analysis using a configuration that consists of weak signal GPS, TRN, and 1-way DTE has shown position and velocity accuracies of 10 meters and 2 cm/s (3-σ ) RSS, respectively, with onboard time knowledge estimated to better than 13 ns (3-σ ), for a spacecraft in a representative 12-hour eccentric lunar orbit. Other measurement types such as x-rays from known pulsars (called XNAV) and cross-links can also be processed in GEONS. With the plug-and-play architecture of autoNGC, cFS apps can easily be added and replaced, even after launch. Goddard is actively seeking partners to collaborate in the development of additional capabilities for autoNGC, including industry, academia, and others across the US Government. Plans are being formulated to make the autoNGC software platform available for use by any US government organization to leverage the non-recurring engineering associated with the development of onboard autonomous NGC 3 capabilities. As advancements in space qualified sensors, microprocessors, and algorithms are made, the autoNGC platform provides a ready starting point for inclusion of these technologies.

C. J. Gramling↗

Introduction To Space Shuttle Rendezvous Guidance, Navigation, and Control

The Rendezvous Intro continues to be used for training and reference purposes almost 17 years after it was first published. While this document does not address Orion rendezvous, some Orion personnel are using it as a reference for rendezvous GNC and trajectory concepts. This edition contains corrections that have been identified since the 3rd edition was published in 2000. In addition, new material has been added that was developed by the author in the 1990s and early part of the first decade of the 21st century. While some of this material is perhaps too detailed for an introduction, it is of value and the author wanted to make it available to JSC personnel. The sections on Lambert targeting guidance have been significantly expanded.

John L Goodman↗

Tracing NASA Contributions Toward Aviation Safety Stakeholder Guidance

The System-Wide Safety project at NASA is developing the concept and a subset of supporting technologies for evolving safety management from a post-accident iterative improvement on safety performed by large commercial operators only to predictive and increasingly autonomous safety functions that are performed during operations across vehicles, airports, and services. The system of interest is the In-time Aviation Safety Management System (IASMS), recommended by the National Academies for NASA to develop the concept in coordination with the broad and diverse community of stakeholders in aviation safety. Because the system context is the airspace and aviation industry, it is important to create and maintain traceability from the research work and system architecture elements developed at NASA to community-created roadmaps and aviation agency guidance.

IASMS↗

Guidance Performance of Bank-Angle and Alpha-Beta Steering for A Large Robotic Mars Entry Vehicle

Entry performance using Apollo-based entry guidance is assessed with a future entry system for a large robotic payload. Both a traditional bank-angle steering system and an innovative alpha-beta steering concept are considered to compare flight performance. Results indicate alpha-beta steering provides an order of magnitude improvement in crossrange error and mean altitudes up to 1 km higher than bank-angle steering. Results also show alpha-beta steering provides downrange errors with a spread half of that of bank-angle steering. Lastly, alpha-beta steering is found to provide a narrower spread of terminal altitude, Mach number, and dynamic pressure, indicating safer parachute deploy conditions.

Daniel L Engel↗

Energize the Future - Systems Engineering Processes and Methods: Tracing NASA Contributions Toward Aviation Safety Stakeholder Guidance

The System-Wide Safety project at NASA is developing the concept and a subset of supporting technologies for evolving safety management from a post-accident iterative improvement on safety performed by large commercial operators only to predictive and increasingly autonomous safety functions that are performed during operations across vehicles, airports, and services. The system of interest is the In-time Aviation Safety Management System (IASMS), recommended by the National Academies for NASA to develop the concept in coordination with the broad and diverse community of stakeholders in aviation safety. Because the system context is the airspace and aviation industry, it is important to create and maintain traceability from the research work and system architecture elements developed at NASA to community-created roadmaps and aviation agency guidance.

MBSE↗

Comparison between the United States and United Kingdom Criticality Safety Personnel Training Program Guidance

The discipline of criticality safety (CS) has been developed in order to maintain safety in operations where significant amounts of fissionable material are to be manipulated. The operation is assessed by an individual or team of CS practitioners and an operational safety envelope is developed. The envelope can consist of limits on materials (i.e. fissionable mass, reflectors, moderators etc.), geometry (i.e. spacing, volume, etc.), and/or proscribed operating procedures which uphold a level of safety margin for personnel and equipment involved. The following paper is an overview of the similarities and differences in guidance on training programs for CS personnel at United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK) laboratories. This work was performed under the auspices of Joint Working Group 30 of the Mutual Defence Agreement between the United States and United Kingdom.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Building America Case Study: Design Guidance for Passive Vents in New Construction Multifamily Buildings, New York, New York

This document addresses the use of passive vents as a source of outdoor air in multifamily buildings. The challenges associated with implementing passive vents and the factors affecting performance are outlined. A comprehensive design methodology and quantified performance metrics are provided. Two hypothetical design examples are provided to illustrate the process. This document is intended to be useful to designers, decision-makers, and contractors implementing passive ventilation strategies. It is also intended to be a resource for those responsible for setting high-performance building program requirements, especially pertaining to ventilation and outdoor air. To ensure good indoor air quality, a dedicated source of outdoor air is an integral part of high-performance buildings. Presently, there is a lack of guidance pertaining to the design and installation of passive vents, resulting in poor system performance. This report details the criteria necessary for designing, constructing, and testing passive vent systems to enable them to provide consistent and reliable levels of ventilation air from outdoors.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Guidance for Federal Agencies on EPAct 2005 Section 701: Alternative Fuel Use Requirements for Dual-Fueled Vehicles

Section 701 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) requires Federal agencies to use alternative fuel in dual-fueled vehicles when it is reasonably available and not unreasonably more expensive than gasoline (42 U.S.C. Section 6374(a)(3)(E)). Since 2007, Federal agencies have requested waivers for vehicles from the Section 701 requirements as part of a June data call for the subsequent fiscal year (FY). The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) has reviewed those waiver requests and granted or denied them prior to the subsequent FY. At the end of each FY, DOE FEMP has reviewed each Federal agency's covered alternative fuel use and compared it to total fuel use in non-waivered vehicles to determine compliance. This guidance provides two different processes through which DOE will begin evaluating waiver requests for FY 2021 (beginning with the FY 2020 data call): Automated reporting in the Federal Fleet Sustainability Dashboard (FleetDASH), and waiver requests in FAST.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Mentoring and QA Guidance: Home Energy Score

This guidance document for DOE Home Energy Score partners details different paths for mentoring new assessors as well as quality assurance standards and pathways for participating partners.

Home Energy Score, Mentoring, Desktop Quality Assu↗

Desktop Quality Assurance Guidance: Home Energy Score

This document provides guidance for DOE's Home Energy Score Desktop Quality Assurance Auditors on best practices and tips for success in conducting in-field Home Energy Score assessments.

Home Energy Score, Desktop Quality Assurance, DTQA↗

NETL CO2U LCA Guidance Toolkit Introduction

This presentation was given on October 25, 2021 to the Fossil Energy and Carbon Management Carbon Use Welcome Session for algae-based projects. It described the LCA tools available under the NETL CO2 Utilization Guidance Toolkit.

Krynock, Michelle↗

NETL Crosscutting Program Research Guidance – Condensers and Wastewater Treatment Projects

This report, prepared by U.S. DOE/NETL, gives guidance for extramural researchers on how to construct a techno-economic analysis to evaluate advanced technologies related to power plant condensers, and FGD wastewater treatment systems. For both technology classes, an overview of performance and cost issues is given, as well as recommendations for assumptions researchers can use to perform their own analysis. Using a common set of assumptions for all analyses allows the research community to compare results, since the same set of assumptions is used for all cases. This paper was discussed in a session at the 2019 NETL Crosscutting Program Technology Review meeting.

Grol, Eric↗

Cybersecurity Guidance for Distributed Energy Resource Management Systems (DERMS)

As part of the Securing Solar for the Grid (S2G): Cybersecurity for Solar Systems workshop at RE + in Las Vegas, Nevada, NREL researchers discuss an ongoing effort to develop cybersecurity guidance for vendors and operators of distributed energy resource management systems (DERMS). This guide will prioritize cybersecurity best practices that can be testing and developed for a potential future standard. This presentation will highlight NREL's ongoing work in this area and future areas of research.

cyber↗

EPRI Report: Guidance in the Use of Robotics and Automation for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants - 17440

In the coming ten years, approximately 100 commercial nuclear power plants will be shut down worldwide, adding to the fifty nuclear power plants already shut down that have not yet entered into decommissioning. Just under a half of the overall cost of decommissioning a nuclear power plant is utility staffing costs (costing approximately 20 million USD per year of the decommissioning project), with waste and dismantlement costs making up the remainder. Decommissioning across the globe is being executed largely by manual labor. Some overview organizations such as OECD have concluded that the nuclear industry has not fully exploited or implemented current technological capabilities, and relies on outdated technology to perform decommissioning tasks. The use of more efficient and effective decommissioning technologies and processes could reduce the decommissioning project schedule and therefore the $20 M/year staffing costs incurred throughout the decommissioning project life. Such systems may also offer a substantial benefit with respect to worker safety and exposure reduction. However, tasks for which use of such systems is beneficial must be carefully considered. The systems themselves need to be robust and generally trouble free to operate in the demanding environment of commercial power plant decommissioning. EPRI is preparing a report, Guidance in the Use of Robotics and Automation for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants, which documents approaches that can perform decommissioning work in a safe and ALARA manner while reducing the overall cost to decommission a nuclear power plant. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗