SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “FLEETS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,477 records · Page 82

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2016

Idaho National Laboratory's FY15 Greenhouse Gas Report

A greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory is a systematic approach to account for the production and release of certain gases generated by an institution from various emission sources. The gases of interest are those that climate science has identified as related to anthropogenic global climate change. This document presents an inventory of GHGs generated during Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 by Idaho National Laboratory (INL), a Department of Energy (DOE) sponsored entity, located in southeastern Idaho. In recent years, concern has grown about the environmental impact of GHGs. This, together with a desire to decrease harmful environmental impacts, would be enough to encourage the calculation of an inventory of the total GHGs generated at INL. Additionally, INL has a desire to see how its emissions compare with similar institutions, including other DOE national laboratories. Executive Order 13693 requires that federal agencies and institutions document reductions in GHG emissions. INL’s GHG inventory was calculated according to methodologies identified in federal GHG guidance documents using operational control boundaries. It measures emissions generated in three scopes: (1) INL emissions produced directly by stationary or mobile combustion and by fugitive emissions, (2) the share of emissions generated by entities from which INL purchased electrical power, and (3) indirect or shared emissions generated by outsourced activities that benefit INL (occur outside INL’s organizational boundaries, but are a consequence of INL’s activities). This inventory found that INL generated 58,330 metric tons (MT) of CO 2 equivalent (CO 2 e ) emissions during FY15. The following conclusions were made from looking at the results of the individual contributors to INL’s FY15 GHG inventory: • Electricity (including the associated transmission and distribution losses) is the largest contributor to INL’s GHG inventory, with over 50% of the CO 2 e emissions • Other sources with high emissions were employee commuting, mobile combustion (fleet fuels), stationary combustion (facility fuels), business air travel, and waste disposal (including fugitive emissions from the onsite landfill and contracted disposal) • Sources with low emissions were wastewater treatment (onsite and contracted), business ground travel (in personal and rental vehicles), and fugitive emissions from refrigerants. This report details the methods behind quantifying INL’s GHG inventory and discusses lessons learned on better practices by which information important to tracking GHGs can be tracked and recorded. It is important to note that because this report differentiates between those portions of INL that are managed and operated by Battelle Energy Alliance (BEA) and those managed by other contractors, it includes only the Laboratory activities overseen by BEA. It is assumed that other contractors will provide similar reporting for those activities they manage, where appropriate.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2015

What is the Impact of Utility Demand Charges on an Alternating Current Level 2 Elective Vehicle Supply Equipment Host?

The EVSE delivered by The EV Project included both residential and non-residential units. Approximately 4,000 non-residential ACL2 EVSE were installed in workplace environments, fleet applications and publicly accessible locations near retail centers, parking lots, and similar locations. The Blink ACL2 utilized in The EV Project is capable of charging at up to 7.2 kW power, although most vehicles in The EV Project charged at about 3.7 kW. This power can be a significant additional electrical load for the charging site host. This concern becomes greater when several EVSE are in operation on a site at the same time. Many electric utilities include maximum power demand as part of their commercial rate structure. The demand charge incurred by a commercial customer is related to the peak power used during a monthly billing cycle. This is in contrast to the total energy usage that is the more familiar utility charge seen for residential service. A demand charge is typically calculated based on the highest average power level over a 15 minute period during the monthly billing cycle and is not a cumulative-type charge. One objective of The EV Project was to elucidate the motivations and hindrances to potential site hosts of non-residential EVSE. The imposition of electric utility demand charges represents such a potential hindrance. This subject was introduced in the paper: DC Fast Charge - Demand Charge Reduction1, specifically dealing with DC Fast Chargers. The concept remains relevant to ACL2 EVSE, especially when several EVSE are deployed at the same site, which occurred frequently in the EV Project. In fact, the average number of ACL2 EVSE per site was 2.58 and varied by market from 1.79 to 3.45 per site. This paper identifies the impact of demand charges on non-residential ACL2 hosts in The EV Project

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

DOE OSTI2015

What is the Controllable Electrical Demand from Non-Residential Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment in the San Diego Region?

The EVSE deployed by The EV Project included both residential and non-residential units. Approximately 4,000 non-residential AC Level 2 (ACL2) EVSE were installed in workplace environments, fleet applications and publicly accessible locations near retail centers, parking lots, and similar locations. The power required to recharge a plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) can be a significant additional electrical load to electric grid but may also provide a controllable resource for mitigating grid overload issues. Electric utilities seek ways to reduce their generating costs by controlling the maximum (peak) load on their system, their generating resources, and frequency and voltage control on the system. This management may be achieved indirectly, through rates that incentivize their customers (including PEV owners) to manage the charging of their vehicles, or may take the form of direct utility control of non-residential EVSE. What insight can The EV Project data provide related to the magnitude of this impact and the potential controllable demand? The paper What is the Controllable Electrical Demand from Residential EVSE in the San Diego Region?1 addressed this question for residential EVSE. This paper quantifies the total controllable electrical load imposed on the electric grid by non-residential PEV charging in the San Diego region of The EV Project.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗

DOE OSTI2015

What Were the Cost Drivers for Publicly Accessible Charging Installations?

Publicly accessible EVSE stations in The EV Project are defined as those installed for businesses, institutions, and municipalities to provide charging for any plug-in electric vehicle (PEV). Typically, no formal relationship exists between the charging site host and the PEV driver utilizing the EVSE. Whereas, fleet, workplace, and residential charging stations are intended to serve a restricted population of PEVs with drivers formally related to the charging site host in some manner. Costs for installation of publicly accessible EVSE units were an important consideration of The EV Project, because these costs had an impact on host participation and, subsequently, on the public’s perception of PEV adoption. In an effort to achieve the objective of establishing and studying a rich infrastructure of publicly accessible charging stations, The EV Project intended to make AC Level 2 EVSE free to the host; including installation. This would have reduced the economic influence on the host’s decision to install a station at locations that the EV Micro Climate® planning process identified as desirable. Although The EV Project provided a significant allowance toward the cost of installation, in many cases, actual installation costs exceeded that allowance. Other concerns from prospective charging site hosts included the observation that there were not enough PEVs to create demand for stations, and hosts were being requested to effectively eliminate a customer parking space to be designated for PEV charging.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2015

Characterize Clustering of Non-Residential Alternating Current Level 2 Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment

The EVSE deployed by The EV Project included both residential and non-residential units. Approximately 4,000 non-residential AC Level 2 (ACL2) EVSE were installed in workplace environments, fleet applications and those publicly accessible located near retail centers, parking lots, and similar locations. The Blink ACL2 is capable of charging at up to 7.2 kW power, although most vehicles in The EV Project charged at about 3.7 kW. The charge rate and energy consumed to recharge the battery are determined by the plug-in electric vehicle’s (PEV’s) on-board battery management system. The impact on the local electrical grid becomes greater when several EVSE are charging PEVs on a site at the same time, or when several commercial EVSE sites are geographically close and charging simultaneously. This may place stresses on the local power transformer providing energy to these sites. What insight can The EV Project data provide in characterizing the effect of several geographically close non-residential EVSE?

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗

DOE OSTI2016

A Business Case for Advanced Outage Management

The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program develops and validates technologies that will make the U.S. operating nuclear fleet more efficient and competitive. The program has developed a standard methodology for determining the impact of new technologies in order to assist nuclear power plant (NPP) operators in building sound business cases. This paper presents a generic business case for implementation of technology that supports Advanced Outage Management (AOM). The analysis presented demonstrates that advanced communication and networking and analytical technologies will allow NPP to conduct outages with fewer people in management roles and the remaining people can be more effective and more productive. The benefits are quantified with a rough order of magnitude that provides directional guidance to NPPs that are interested in developing a similar business case. Advanced Outage Management is enabled by a suite of technologies, which are described in further detail in the body of this report. They include: • Mobile Work Packages (MWP) • Computer Based Procedures (CBP) • Personal Digital Assistants (PDA) also referred to as smart devices • Barcode readers • High bandwidth wireless networks • Collaboration software (i.e., OneNote) • Advanced digital displays • Advanced data analytics All the hardware necessary to implement AOM as envisioned in this report is readily available today. Configuration to perform within the plant systems and regulatory boundaries would need to be developed by the NPP. 1. The resulting business case demonstrates benefits in two major categories: 2. Reduction in resources required to manage the outage, a. Increased productivity in outage work that reduces the likelihood of schedule overruns: b. reduce likelihood of bulk work resulting in outage delays c. improved management of critical path single issues, d. improved management of emergent work (improve time to collect data and prepare response) It is important to note that in order to realize these benefits at the scale described in this report requires the plant to rethink how technologies can disrupt current processes; how data might be captured, processed, analyzed and presented with little or no human intervention. In many cases, technology be fully utilized in a way that not only aides productivity, but is utilized towards “work destruction” – elimination of work that is currently performed through a human interface.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Fuel Cycle Technologies 2016 Achievements Report

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE- NE) established the Fuel Cycle Technologies (FCT) program to address challenges such as growing stockpiles of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and high-level waste (HLW), and an urgency to enhance accident tolerance of the existing reactor fleet. Resolution of these challenges involves developing systems that reduce waste while improving resource utilization and safety. Towards this goal, the FCT program implemented a research and development (R&D) science-based approach, integratesing theory and experiment with high performance computing modeling and simulation. The FCT program establishes and strengthens collaborations with experts at international agencies, universities, and industry to develop the nuclear fuel cycle of the future. DOE-NE national laboratories and their international counterparts provide extensive expertise and experience and access to critical R&D facilities. Universities provide a wellspring of innovative ideas while industry provides the venue to integrate the expertise, experience, and ideas into commercial practice.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2014

Human Factors Engineering Design Phase Report for Control Room Modernization

In this report, we review recent work performed at the Human System Simulation Laboratory (HSSL) at the Idaho National Laboratory. The U.S. Department of Energy has sponsored work under the Light Water Reactor Sustainabilty (LWRS) program to assist U.S. utilities in extending the operating life of the U.S. fleet of commercial reactors. Control room modernization is a key research and demonstration area within LWRS. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711) outlines four phases of developing a new human-system interface (HSI). One of the key steps in NUREG-0711 is the design phase. In this report, we outline the process and findings from several simulator workshops, which centered on early design phase activities. Prototypes for a turbine control system upgrade for a main control room at a commercial nuclear power plant were developed and evaluated using licensed reactor operators at the HSSL. This iterative design-evaluation cycle succeeded in refining the design of the HSI and readying it for final implementation and formal validation and verification exercises. This report serves as a useful template to explicate design steps that are not currently required by NUREG-0711 but that ensure a usable and safe control room replacement system.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Prototype System for Detecting Interactions between Current Plant Configuration States and Component Manipulations Directed by In-Use Procedures

This research effort is a part of the Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program, which is a research and development (R&D) program sponsored by the Department of Energy. The LWRS Program is performed in close collaboration with industry R&D programs that provide the technical foundations for licensing and managing the long term, safe, and economical operation of current nuclear power plants (NPPs). The LWRS Program serves to help the United States (U.S.) nuclear industry adopt new technologies and engineering solutions that facilitate the continued safe operation of these NPPs and extension of their current operating licenses. The Outage Risk Management Improvement Pilot Project seeks to improve the management of nuclear power plant outages through the development of tools to assist in evaluating pending activities against requirements to detect undesired interactions. Significant efforts are expended to manage the nuclear risk of an outage. The utilities conduct pre outage risk assessments, based on a very detailed review of the outage schedule, to identify where combinations of outage work and equipment out of service would result in degraded conditions with respect to nuclear safety or regulatory compliance. Probabilistic risk assessment studies are conducted to quantify the incremental core damage frequency as a result of the outage activities and system unavailability. These studies are usually presented to site and fleet management, the site plant operational review committee, and the NPP’s independent Nuclear Safety Review Board for concurrence that the outage is planned safely and that reasonable measures have been taken to reduce the added risk of conducting the outage. During the outage, the plant configuration is monitored continuously to ensure that it conforms to the approved safety plan. Deviations must be assessed and approved by management committees and, in some cases, the plant operational review committee. In virtually all outage meetings and job briefings, the current nuclear safety status of the plant is communicated, including information on the specific equipment that is being relied on to meet the requirements of the nuclear safety plan. In addition, Operations and the Outage organizations implement several layers of physical and administrative barriers to prevent unintended interaction with the systems and equipment credited for nuclear safety. In spite of all these efforts, nuclear safety challenges still occur too frequently in outages. While some of these are due to failures of equipment credited for safety, the majority occur because of human error. These typically involve some form of interaction between work activities and plant configuration changes. Some of them are very subtle and are extremely challenging to detect in advance. Nevertheless, they are not acceptable and represent clear opportunities to improve nuclear safety during outages. This project will develop tools and strategies to minimize these interactions. This report describes a prototype tool designed to support plant personnel in controlling work during NPP outages to prevent unintended interactions. A software application was created to manage and display important configuration information and utilize natural language processing to access the impacts of upcoming procedures and work orders. Initial industry feedback is also presented.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Zero-Emission Bus Evaluation Results: County Connection Battery Electric Buses

The U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT's) Federal Transit Administration (FTA) supports the research, development, and demonstration of low- and zero-emission technology for transit buses. FTA funds research projects with a goal of facilitating commercialization of advanced technologies for transit buses that will increase efficiency and improve transit operations. DOT's Research, Development, and Technology Office (OST-R) also has an interest in zero-emission bus (ZEB) technology deployment and commercialization. OST-R is coordinating and collaborating with FTA on the evaluation process and results by providing funding to cover additional evaluations. FTA and OST-R are collaborating with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to conduct in-service evaluations of advanced technology buses developed under its programs. NREL uses a standard evaluation protocol for evaluating the advanced technologies deployed under the FTA programs. FTA seeks to provide results from new technologies being adopted by transit agencies. The eight evaluations selected to date include battery electric buses (BEBs) and fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs) from different manufacturers operating in fleets located in both cold and hot climates. The purpose of this report is to present the results from Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (County Connection) deployment of four BEBs in Concord, California. NREL's evaluation of the BEBs at County Connection was funded by OST-R.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Modular Controllable Transformers (MCT)

Large Power Transformers (LPTs) are at the heart of the electricity infrastructure and are critical pieces in today’s grid. Aging assets, long turn-around times, transportation delays and dependence on foreign manufacturing for these components have created conditions for points of failure across the system. Moreover, there is no available dynamic control on these passive sections of the grid. For all the automation embedded on the low voltage side of the low voltage side of the system there is absolutely no flexibility on the high voltage side. Changes in power flow patterns are brought about by altering dispatch patterns for generators which requires a coordinated effort and is often time consuming. Traditional FACTS based approaches such as UPFC or HVDC light involve massive modifications to the existing infrastructure. Recent instances of physical attacks on LPTs and the slow recovery process associated with fixing or replacing these damaged units has created an increased awareness for this issue. LPT designs are highly customized owing to specific field requirements. Long lead times coupled with transportation delays make procuring and installing LPTs a lengthy process. In an attempt to minimize the recovery time following an LPT failure, transformer manufacturers have developed mobile transformer units. These units typically consist of either a single-phase or three-phase transformer mounted on a truck and characterized by compact form factors. By reducing the assembly time and transport time these units offer a fast and temporary solution to LPT failures. Several efforts led by DOE, Edison Electric Company (EEI) and North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) have led to the RecX program. RecX transformers consist of single phase transformers transported on specialized assemblies to enable fast restoration and minimal installation time. NERC and EEI have instituted transformer sharing programs like Spare Equipment Database (SED) as well as Spare Transformer Equipment Database (STEP) which encourage utilities to maintain and share a fleet of LPTs. Mobile transformers are typically limited to less than 100 MVA to enable transportation on a trailer. Also, the efficiency of mobile transformer units and RecX transformers is lower since they are temporary solutions. The ideal replacement solution would be one that could utilize a set of standardized transformers while incorporating flexibility to influence metrics like power flow, apparent impedance and voltage profiles. In view of these issues the team at Georgia Tech proposed a concept called Modular Controllable Transformers (MCTs). This project was commissioned as a part of DOE’s Transformer Resiliency and Advance Component (TRAC) program. The approach consists of splitting one large unit rated upwards of 100 MVA with smaller modular, standardized units. Each of these smaller units are augmented with a converter to add power flow, voltage and impedance control. Splitting the power level into multiple units has two important implications. By making smaller units, the transportation times can be reduced drastically. Moreover, even though these units have very specific impedance and other parameters, the augmented converters can make it emulate the unit being replaced. Thus, faster replacement times and added controls are achieved making this an extremely resilient approach. In the event of one modular units failure, the other two controllable units can operate in the most resilient fashion keeping the net system overloads to a minimum. Moreover, for the same probability of failure only a fraction of the system capacity is lost. The converter is augmented on to the tertiary winding of the transformer making it retrofittable in the field without massive modifications to the system. The material proposed in this report highlights design considerations to minimize recovery time as well as results displaying overall improvement in resiliency. The cost analysis of this approach shows significant savings compared to UPFC and HVDC lite based approaches. Extensive analysis was conducted on numerous aspects of this project over the course of this project. Simulation studies were conducted to prove the 5MVA converter design. Challenging BIL constraints and transient issues were addressed over the course of this project. Simulations on EMTP platform presented in consequent sections were used to finely tune the control for the same. A final design for a back-to-back 5MVA neutral-point-clamped (NPC) converter was completed in this project. Furthermore, switching components like high power IGBTs from IXYS Westcode Press-Pack series and ABB Stackpack series were identified for this application. These devices exhibit a blocking voltage of 6.5 kV and a nominal collector current of 900 A. Potential housing options as well as existing commercial option were identified for this converter design. A 56 MVA modular transformer unit was designed with Delta Star Inc. with consultation and inputs from all project members. The transformer cooling systems were chosen to be Oil Natural Air Forced (ONAF) to optimize ease of transport. A full Product Requirement Document (PRD) for the converter and the transformer was generated. The team also investigated key aspects of resiliency and how to quantify the same. A metric was developed to analyze resiliency and numerous simulation cases were presented. Increased (N-1) resiliency and outage resistance was showcased through simulation on the Texas Large scale power system. Dynamic control capabilities were also showcased on numerous system level simulations. An IEEE 30 bus system was used to show the ability of the MCT approach to reduce line congestion. Power flow control; a part of the MCTs abilities, showcased a 29% reduction in transformer loading on the same system. Full control over tie line flows was demonstrated on a modified IEEE 13 bus system. Dynamic LTC capabilities were shown through simulation and were compared to traditional LTCs. Furthermore, the ability of the MCTs to alter apparent transformer impedance was simulated to promote standardization of modular transformer units while retaining the ability to emulate a varied range of impedance characteristics. Thus granular control over power flow, voltages, impedances and was presented. Regulatory analysis conducted by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) further bolstered the efficacy of the MCT approach and verified the added resiliency achieved due to this approach. As a conclusion, it was proved that the resilience improvement obtained from using the MCT approach is justified by just one failure in a 30-year period. This means that the benefits obtained from using the MCT approach far outweigh the cost of setting this approach up. As a part of the future efforts, the team is proposing building a (12.47-24) kV/400 kVA scaled down unit to control 5MVA of power flows. Emphasis would be laid on using commercial components to speed up the build of these units. Further the actual transport of the modular transformer unit would be a part of this operation and would provide insight into transportation issues. The approach shows much promise and adds key dynamic control on passive sub transmission and transmission sectors.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

DOE OSTI2018

Development of LWR fuels with enhanced accident tolerance. Final report

After a tsunami triggered plant black out at the Fukushima Daiichi site, followed by hydrogen explosions, the US Department of Energy partnered with fuel vendors to study safer alternatives to the current UO2 – zirconium alloy fuel system. This accident tolerant fuel (ATF) alternative should better tolerate a loss of cooling in the core for a considerably longer time while maintaining or improving the fuel performance during normal operation conditions. General Electric, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and their partners are proposing to replace zirconium alloy cladding in current commercial light water power reactors with an iron-chromium-aluminum (FeCrAl) cladding such as APMT, C26M or FeCrAl ODS, which has been named IronClad by GE. Extensive testing and evaluation has been conducted to determine the suitability of FeCrAl for the entire fuel cycle from rod fabrication to used fuel disposition. Most of the environmental characterization was conducted to evaluate the behavior of IronClad under normal operation conditions and under severe accident conditions. Results show that FeCrAl has excellent corrosion resistance under normal operation conditions and FeCrAl is several orders of magnitude more resistant than zirconium alloys to degradation by superheated steam under accident conditions, generating less heat of oxidation and lower amount of combustible hydrogen gas. Higher parasitic neutron absorption and potential tritium release into the coolant effects can be minimized by design and operational measures. IronClad material can be manufactured using traditional melting and forging (C26M) or powder metallurgy processes (APMT & FeCrAl ODS). Tubes can be made to full length of 5 m with a wall thickness of 0.4 mm by pilgering or drawing. The fuel rods can be readily hermetically sealed in an industrial production setting by welding end caps to the thin wall tubing using either TIG or resistance welding. The implementation of FeCrAl IronClad cladding is a near term solution to enhance the safety of the current fleet of commercial light water power reactors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2018

System Studies for Global Nuclear Assurance & Security: 3S Risk Analysis for Small Modular Reactors (Volume I)—Technical Evaluation of Safety Safeguards & Security

Coupling interests in small modular reactors (SMR) as efficient and effective method to meet increasing energy demands with a growing aversion to cost and schedule overruns traditionally associated with the current fleet of commercial nuclear power plants (NPP), SMRs are attractive because they offer a significant relative cost reduction to current-generation nuclear reactors—increasing their appeal around the globe. Sandia's Global Nuclear Assurance and Security (GNAS) research perspective reframes the discussion around the "complex risk" of SMRs to address interdependencies between safety, safeguards, and security. This systems study provides technically rigorous analysis of the safety, safeguards, and security risks of SMR technologies. The aim of this research is three-fold. The first aim is to provide analytical evidence to support safety, safeguards, and security claims related to SMRs (Study Report Volume I). Second, this study aims to introduce a systems-theoretic approach for exploring interdependencies between the technical evaluations (Study Report Volume II). The third aim is to demonstrate Sandia's capability for timely, rigorous, and technical analysis to support emerging complex GNAS mission objectives.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Understanding the Opportunities of Biofuels for Marine Shipping

This report examines the potential benefits, feasibility, and barriers to the use of biofuels in place of heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine gas oil for marine vessels. More than 90% of world’s shipped goods travel by marine cargo vessels powered by internal combustion (diesel) engines using primarily low-cost residual HFO, which is high in sulfur content. Recognizing that marine shipping is the largest source of anthropogenic sulfur emissions and is a significant source of other pollutants including particulates, nitrogen oxides, and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), the International Maritime Organization enacted regulations to lower the fuel sulfur content from 3.5 wt.% to 0.5 wt.% in 2020. These regulations require ship operators either to use higher-cost, low-sulfur HFO or to seek other alternatives for reducing sulfur emissions (i.e., scrubbers, natural gas, distillates, and/or biofuels). The near-term options for shipowners to comply with regulations include fueling with low-sulfur HFO or distillate fuels or installing emissions control systems. However, few refineries are equipped to produce low-sulfur HFO. Likewise, the current production rates of distillates do not allow the necessary expansion required to fuel the world fleet of shipping vessels (which consume around 330 million metric tons). This quantity is more than twice that used in the United States for cars and trucks. The other near-term option is to install emission control systems, which also requires a significant investment. All of these options significantly increase operational costs. Because of such costs, biofuels have become an attractive alternative since they are inherently low in sulfur and potentially also offer greenhouse gas benefits. Based on this preliminary assessment, replacing HFO in large marine vessels with minimally processed, heavy biofuels appears to have potential as a path to reduced emissions of sulfur, CO 2 , and criteria emissions. Realizing this opportunity will require deeper knowledge of (1) the combustion characteristics of biofuels in marine applications, (2) their compatibility for blending with conventional marine fuels (including HFO), (3) needs and costs for scaling up production and use, and (4) a systems assessment of their life cycle environmental impacts and costs. It is recommended that a research program investigating each of these aspects be undertaken to better assess the efficacy of biofuels for marine use.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Technologies to Reactors: Enabling Accelerated Deployment of Nuclear Energy Systems Workshop Report

Nuclear energy provides almost 20% of the electric power in the United States, producing power with high availability while accounting for 63% of our carbon-free energy production. While we have the capacity to expand this clean power source within the United States, we have not built any advanced reactor plant designs in our rapidly evolving electricity generation market, where cost is a major driver. With construction cost and plant safety being major elements of cost for new nuclear, advanced reactor technologies could provide lower cost, safer, carbon-free, grid-resilient energy sources for the US electricity grid. When the current fleet of nuclear reactors was originally designed, many of today’s science and technology (S&T) advances were not available. Today these advances show great promise for transforming our national approach to nuclear reactor design. Other industries are capitalizing on rapid innovations in materials, manufacturing, sensors and control systems, and high-fidelity modeling and simulation (M&S), along with data analytics to provide lower costs in manufacturing and extended ranges of operations. In the nuclear industry, these innovations can translate into similar benefits as well as rapid design and qualification of advanced nuclear fuels. Effectively implementing these types of innovations could position American expert leadership to compete more fully in the international nuclear energy market. In July of 2018, the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy sponsored a workshop to address these possibilities: “Technologies to Reactors: Enabling Accelerated Deployment of Nuclear Energy Systems.” Workshop participants explored how modern and emerging S&T can be used to transform the approach to nuclear reactor design, licensing, and operation to accelerate deployment of advanced nuclear energy systems. More than 80 experts from federal agencies, academia, and industry participated in the workshop to develop consensus on priority technology directions (PTDs) and recommend technology and deployment initiatives to explore and demonstrate key benefits for the nuclear community.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Metallurgical aspects influencing the resistance to steam oxidation and fracture toughness of select advanced replacement alloys for LWR core internals

Life extension of the existing nuclear reactors imposes accumulated damages, such as higher fluences and longer period of corrosion, to structural materials, which would result in significant challenges to the traditional reactor materials such as type 304 and 316 stainless steels. Advanced alloys with superior radiation resistance will increase safety margins, design flexibility, and economics for not only the life extension of the existing fleet but also new builds with advanced reactor designs. The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) teamed up with Department of Energy (DOE) to initiate the Advanced Radiation Resistant Materials (ARRM) program, aiming to develop and test degradation resistant alloys from current commercial alloy specifications by 2021 to a new advanced alloy with superior degradation resistance in light water reactor (LWR)-relevant environments by 2024. Corrosion resistance in water environment is one of the fundamental properties required for LWR core internal materials. High-temperature steam oxidation tests are not only an accelerated life testing method to uncover potential failure modes in a short period of time, but also an approach to evaluate materials’ resistance to accidental scenarios. Coupons, prepared from fourteen candidate alloys that were selected under the ARRM program, were exposed to 1 bar full steam with ~10 part-per-billion oxygen content at 600 and 650°C for up to 5,000 h, which were weighed at 500-h intervals. Ni-base superalloys are an important class of alloys for reactor applications. Alloys 690, 725, and X- 750 were three of the selected Ni-base superalloys exposed to the steam tests. This report summarizes the metallurgical aspects, such as alloy thermodynamics and the nature of the oxides and the diffusivities of primary elements, and their effects on oxidation behavior of the three alloys. In addition to monitoring mass change, microstructures of the 5000h-exposed samples of alloys 690, 725, and X-750 were characterized using scanning and transmission electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. Together with thermodynamic calculations, the scale constitution and its exfoliation behavior were discussed. Based on experimental and theoretical values, a new model was proposed to quantitatively estimate the metal thickness loss of the alloys. Alloy X-750 was found to have the best resistance to steam oxidation with the least metal thickness loss (<1 μm), which were slightly superior to alloy 690. Alloy 725 exhibited the worst resistance to steam oxidation with the greatest metal thickness loss, e.g., ~2.5 μm at 650°C, which is nearly three times of the metal thickness losses of alloys 690 and X-750 at 650°C. The greatest metal thickness loss of alloy 725 might be attributable to its high Mo content. Photos of the fracture toughness tested samples of eight alloys are presented, which will be correlated with their fracture toughness results and planned tensile test results to select representative alloy samples for detailed microstructural characterization to reveal their microstructure and properties relationships.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 37

The Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 37 is a statistical compendium prepared and published by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office. Designed for use as a desk-top reference, the Data Book represents an assembly and display of statistics and information that characterize transportation activity, and presents data on other factors that influence transportation energy use. The purpose of this document is to present relevant statistical data in the form of tables and graphs. The latest edition of the Data Book is available via the Internet (cta.ornl.gov/data).This edition of the Data Book has 12 chapters which focus on various aspects of the transportation industry. Chapter 1 focuses on petroleum; Chapter 2 – energy; Chapter 3 – highway vehicles; Chapter 4 – light vehicles; Chapter 5 – heavy vehicles; Chapter 6 – alternative fuel vehicles; Chapter 7 – fleet vehicles; Chapter 8 – household vehicles; Chapter 9 – nonhighway modes; Chapter 10 – transportation and the economy; Chapter 11 – greenhouse gas emissions; and Chapter 12 – criteria pollutant emissions. The sources used represent the latest available data. There are also two appendices which include detailed source information for some tables and measures of conversion. A glossary of terms is also included for the reader’s convenience.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Direct Injection 4.3L Propane Engine Research Development and Testing (Final Technical Report)

The objective of this project is to develop a propane-fueled direct injection (DI) engine and emissions control system based on a current production General Motors 4.3 L spark-ignited, DI V6 engine. The team will integrate this engine and aftertreatment system into a package delivery vehicle, and demonstrate a 20% greenhouse gas (GHG) improvement over the baseline gasoline 6.0 L engine version of the vehicle while meeting U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Phase 2 medium-duty/heavy-duty and GHG emission regulations. Engine dynamometer, chassis dynamometer, and in-use fleet test data will be incorporated into the required Autonomie simulations.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗