SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “architecture design”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Landsat 9 Thermal Infrared Sensor 2 Architecture and Design
The Thermal Infrared Sensor 2 (TIRS-2) will fly aboard the Landsat 9 spacecraft and leverages the Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) design currently flying on Landsat 8. TIRS-2 will provide similar science data as TIRS, but is not a buildto-print rebuild due to changes in requirements and improvements in absolute accuracy. The heritage TIRS design has been modified to reduce the influence of stray light and to add redundancy for higher reliability over a longer mission life. The TIRS-2 development context differs from the TIRS scenario, adding to the changes. The TIRS-2 team has also learned some lessons along the way.
Human Landing System Storable Propellant Architecture: Mission Design, Guidance, Navigation, and Control
In preparation of the NextSTEP-2 Appendix H awards, NASA’s Human Landing System (HLS) Program (HLSP) went through an abbreviated Design Analysis Cycle (DAC), or miniDAC, to characterize and quantify how a storable propellant design would affect and improve overall system performance of the Government reference design. As part of that miniDAC, HLSP ran multiple trade studies and assessments, including aspects of Mission Design, Flight Mechanics (FM), and Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN\&C). The storable propellant designs were assessed through the baseline mission targeting the Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) and several alternate staging orbits. This paper focuses on the FM and GN\&C trades and assessments completed as part of the miniDAC as well as the GN\&C elements of the miniDAC Master Equipment List (MEL) developed for the storable propellant lander configurations.
Human Landing System Storable Propellant Architecture: Mission Design, Guidance, Navigation, and Control
In preparation of the NextSTEP-2 Appendix H awards, NASA’s Human Landing System (HLS) Program (HLSP) went through an abbreviated Design Analysis Cycle (DAC), or miniDAC, to characterize and quantify how a storable propellant design would affect and improve overall system performance of the Government reference design. As part of that miniDAC, HLSP ran multiple trade studies and assessments, including aspects of Mission Design, Flight Mechanics (FM), and Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN&C). The storable propellant designs were assessed through the baseline mission targeting the Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) and several alternate staging orbits. This paper focuses on the FM and GN&C trades and assessments completed as part of the miniDAC as well as the GN\&C elements of the miniDAC Master Equipment List (MEL) developed for the storable propellant lander configurations.
Human Landing System Storable Propellant Architectures: Mission Design, Guidance, Navigation, and Control
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
NASA's Surface Deformation and Change Designated Observable Architecture Study Current Status
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Technical Architecture and Design Strategies for Consolidating NASA Airborne and Field Data in the Catalog of Archived Suborbital Earth Science Investigations (CASEI)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Emerging Trends and Systemic Issues Influencing Today’s U.S. Electric Grid
With increasing shifts from vertically integrated to horizontally structured operations and from centralized to distributed electric power delivery, today’s electric power grid (the “grid”) operators and designers face the challenge of creating an architecture that accommodates a host of diverse requirements. The grid’s modes of operation must address concerns of reliability and stability, new deployments of renewable energy sources, threats from cyber-attacks and natural disasters, and increasingly distributed system operations. Grid modernization calls for a reliable, affordable, sustainable, agile, secure, and resilient grid. However, the modernization of the U.S. power grid is hampered by mounting complexity and diverging objectives from owners and operators and is consequently risky and fraught with potential missteps. Flawed architecture, design, and implementation will lead to stranded investments and lost opportunities. A principled approach to minimize risk and develop a robust grid of the future is to begin with a sound architecture for the grid to inform the design process. Architecture development starts with the context of influencing factors that provide constraints as well as driving goals. This report provides the context of emerging trends and cross-cutting systemic issues in the U.S. electric power grid and serves as a vital input for grid architecture development.
Design for Verification: Enabling Verification of High Dependability Software-Intensive Systems
Strategies to achieve confidence that high-dependability applications are correctly implemented include testing and automated verification. Testing deals mainly with a limited number of expected execution paths. Verification usually attempts to deal with a larger number of possible execution paths. While the impact of architecture design on testing is well known, its impact on most verification methods is not as well understood. The Design for Verification approach considers verification from the application development perspective, in which system architecture is designed explicitly according to the application's key properties. The D4V-hypothesis is that the same general architecture and design principles that lead to good modularity, extensibility and complexity/functionality ratio can be adapted to overcome some of the constraints on verification tools, such as the production of hand-crafted models and the limits on dynamic and static analysis caused by state space explosion.
Using JWST Heritage to Enable a Future Large Ultra-Violet Optical Infrared Telescope
To the extent it makes sense, leverage JWST knowledge, designs, architectures, GSE. Develop a scalable design reference mission (9.2 meter). Do just enough work to understand launch break points in aperture size. Demonstrate 10 pm stability is achievable on a design reference mission. Make design compatible with starshades. While segmented coronagraphs with high throughput and large bandpasses are important, make the system serviceable so you can evolve the instruments. Keep it room temperature to minimize the costs associated with cryo. Focus resources on the contrast problem. Start with the architecture and connect it to the technology needs.
Flexible Rover Architecture for Science Instrument Integration and Testing
At NASA Ames Research Center, the Intelligent Robotics Group (IRG) fields the K9 and K10 class rovers. Both use a mobile robot hardware architecture designed for extensibility and reconfigurability that allows for rapid changes in instrumentation and provides a high degree of modularity. Over the past ssveral years, we have worked with instrument developers at NASA centers, universities, and national laboratories to integrate or partially integrate their instruments onboard the K9 and K10 rovers. Early efforts required considerable interaction to work through integration issues such as power, data protocol and mechanical mounting. These interactions informed the design of our current avionics architecture, and have simplified more recent integration projects. In this paper, we will describe the IRG extensible avionics and software architecture and the effect it has had on our recent instrument integration efforts, including integration of four Mars Instrument Development Program devices.
Mars Pathfinder Flight System Design and Implementation
This paper describes the system architecture, design and implementation approach for the Mars Pathfinder spacecraft scheduled to land on the surface of Mars on July 4, 1997. Mars Pathfinder is one of the new series of small, challenging missions doing significant science/engineering on a fast schedule and cost capped budget.
Architecture Robustness in NASA’s Moon to Mars Capability Development – FY23 Data Results
In preparation for humanity’s return to the Moon, it is important to advance technologies and capabilities that will allow for sustainability on the lunar surface and prepare for human missions to Mars. As charged in Space Policy Directive-1, NASA’s Artemis program will advance and develop technologies on the lunar surface that can be leveraged towards a safe and successful human round-trip mission to Mars. NASA’s Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate Capabilities Integration Team (ESDMD CIT) is advancing a continuous effort to identify and map gaps between capabilities and anticipated human spaceflight architecture elements. As upcoming exploration missions approach, the architectural design tradespace increasingly narrows. This paper provides an updated exploration of certain architectural and element design choices for upcoming missions to the Moon and Mars, comparing and contrasting capability gaps and classes of capability gaps that are architecture robust with those that are not. In doing so, we identify certain capabilities as relevant, and therefore robust, across varying architectural possibilities while identifying other capabilities as only applicable to specific architectural pathways. Capabilities that are applicable to multiple elements across the architecture have more architectural breadth because of their increased likelihood of remaining relevant even if changes are made to some elements they are mapped to. Correspondingly, capabilities that are applicable to specific elements across the architecture but are necessary under almost any eventuality have more architectural depth because of their increased likelihood of remaining relevant even if architecture changes are made. One of the key analyses in this paper is an exploration of architecture robustness as a function of capability area, as defined by the NASA Technology Taxonomy. These results are then evaluated and analyzed across human spaceflight architecture elements to gain a greater understanding of the relationships between exploration capabilities and the systems that will eventually be implemented. Additional insights regarding investment strategies are also considered. General conclusions about these relationships are drawn.
Design of an integrated airframe/propulsion control system architecture
The design of an integrated airframe/propulsion control system architecture is described. The design is based on a prevalidation methodology that uses both reliability and performance. A detailed account is given for the testing associated with a subset of the architecture and concludes with general observations of applying the methodology to the architecture.