Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “STS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8

Atmospheric environment for Space Shuttle Atlantis (STS-43) launch

A summary of selected atmospheric conditions observed near Space Shuttle Atlantis (STS-43) launch time on August 2, 1991, at Kennedy Space Center, Florida is presented. Values of ambient pressure, temperature, moisture, ground winds, visual observations (cloud), and winds aloft are included. The sequence of prelaunch Jimsphere-measured vertical wind profiles is given. The final atmospheric profile, which consists of wind and thermodynamic parameters versus altitude, for STS-43 vehicle ascent was constructed. The STS-43 ascent atmospheric data profile was constructed by Marshall Space Flight Center's Earth Science and Applications Division to provide an internally consisted data set for use in postflight performance assessments and represents the best estimate of the launch environment to the 400,000-ft altitude that was traversed by the STS-43 vehicle.

Jasper, G. L.↗

Summary Report of Mission Acceleration Measurements for STS-62, Launched 4 March 1994

The second mission of the United States Microgravity Payload on-board the STS-62 mission was supported with three accelerometer instruments: the Orbital Acceleration Research Experiment (OARE) and two units of the Space Acceleration Measurements System (SAMS). The March 4, 1994 launch was the fourth successful mission for OARE and the ninth successful mission for SAMS. The OARE instrument utilizes a sensor for very low frequency measurements below one Hertz. The accelerations in this frequency range are typically referred to as quasisteady accelerations. One of the SAMS units had two remote triaxial sensor heads mounted on the forward MPESS structure between two furnance experiments, MEPHISTO and AADSF. These triaxial heads had low-pass filter cut-off frequencies at 10 and 25 Hz. The other SAMS unit utilized three remote triaxial sensor heads. Two of the sensor heads were mounted on the aft MPESS structure between the two experiments IDGE and ZENO. These triaxial heads had low-pass filter cut-off frequencies at 10 and 25 Hz. The third sensor head was mounted on the thermostat housing inside the IDGE experiment container. This triaxial head had a low-pass filter cut-off frequency at 5 Hz. This report is prepared to furnish interested experiment investigators with a guide to evaluating the acceleration environment during STS-62 and as a means of identifying areas which require further study. To achieve this purpose, various pieces of information are included, such as an overview of the STS-62 mission, a description of the accelerometer system flown on STS-62, some specific analysis of the accelerometer data in relation to the various mission activities, and an overview of the low-gravity environment during the entire mission. An evaluation form is included at the end of the report to solicit users' comments about the usefulness of this series of reports.

Rogers, Melissa J. B.↗

LET spectra measurements from the STS-35 CPDs

Linear energy transfer (LET) spectra derived form automated track analysis system (ATAS) track parameter measurements for crew passive dosimeters (CPD's) flown with the astronauts on STS-35 are plotted. The spread between the seven individual spectra is typical of past manual measurements of sets of CPD's. This difference is probably due to the cumulative net shielding variations experienced by the CPD's as the astronauts carrying them went about their activities on the Space Shuttle. The STS-35 mission was launched on Dec. 2, 1990, at 28.5 degrees inclination and 352-km altitude. This is somewhat higher than the nominal 300-km flights and the orbit intersects more of the high intensity trapped proton region in the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA). However, in comparison with APD spectra measured on earlier lower altitude missions (STS-26, -29, -30, -32), the flux spectra are all roughly comparable. This may be due to the fact that the STS-35 mission took place close to solar maximum (Feb. 1990), or perhaps to shielding differences. The corresponding dose and dose equivalent spectra for this mission are shown. The effect of statistical fluctuations at the higher LET values, where track densities are small, is very noticeable. This results in an increased spread within the dose rate and dose equivalent rate spectra, as compared to the flux spectra. The contribution to dose and dose equivalent per measured track is much greater in the high LET region and the differences, though numerically small, are heavily weighted in the integral spectra. The optimum measurement and characterization of the high LET tails of the spectra represent an important part of the research into plastic nuclear track detector (PNTD) response. The integral flux, dose rate, dose equivalent rate and mission dose equivalent for the seven astronauts are also given.

Source record↗

Summary Report of mission acceleration measurements for STS-66. Launched November 3, 1994

Experiments flown in the middeck of Atlantis during the STS-66 mission were supported by the Space Acceleration Measurement System (SAMS). In particular, the three triaxial SAMS sensor heads collected data in support of protein crystal growth experiments. Data collected during STS-66 are reviewed in this report. The STS-66 SAMS data represent the microgravity environment in the 0.01 Hz to 10 Hz range. Variations in the environment related to differing levels of crew activity are discussed in the report. A comparison is made among times when the crew was quiet during a public affairs conference, working quietly, and exercising. These levels of activity are also compared to levels recorded by a SAMS unit in the Spacelab on Columbia during the STS-65 mission.

Rogers, Melissa J. B.↗

STS-63 Space Shuttle report

The STS-63 Space Shuttle Program Mission Report summarizes the Payload activities and provides detailed data on the Orbiter, External Tank (ET), Solid Rocket Booster (SRB), Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (RSRM), and the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) systems performance during this sixty-seventh flight of the Space Shuttle Program, the forty-second since the return to flight, and twentieth flight of the Orbiter vehicle Discovery (OV-103). In addition to the OV-103 Orbiter vehicle, the flight vehicle consisted of an ET that was designated ET-68; three SSME's that were designated 2035, 2109, and 2029 in positions 1, 2, and 3, respectively; and two SRB's that were designated BI-070. The RSRM's that were an integral part of the SRB's were designated 360Q042A for the left SRB and 360L042B for the right SRB. The STS-63 mission was planned as an 8-day duration mission with two contingency days available for weather avoidance or Orbiter contingency operations. The primary objectives of the STS-63 mission were to perform the Mir rendezvous operations, accomplish the Spacehab-3 experiments, and deploy and retrieve the Shuttle Pointed Autonomous Research Tool for Astronomy-204 (SPARTAN-204) payload. The secondary objectives were to perform the Cryogenic Systems Experiment (CSE)/Shuttle Glo-2 Experiment (GLO-2) Payload (CGP)/Orbital Debris Radar Calibration Spheres (ODERACS-2) (CGP/ODERACS-2) payload objectives, the Solid Surface Combustion Experiment (SSCE), and the Air Force Maui Optical Site Calibration Tests (AMOS). The objectives of the Mir rendezvous/flyby were to verify flight techniques, communication and navigation-aid sensor interfaces, and engineering analyses associated with Shuttle/Mir proximity operations in preparation for the STS-71 docking mission.

Fricke, Robert W., Jr.↗

STS-73 (USML-2) Final Report

The report is organized into sections representing the phases of work performed in analyzing the STS-73 (USML-2) results. Section 1 briefly outlines the Orbital Acceleration Research Experiment (OARE), system features, coordinates, and measurement parameters. Section 2 describes the results from STS-73. The mission description, data calibration, and representative data obtained on STS-73 are presented. Also, the anomalous performance of OARE on STS-73 is discussed. Finally, Section 3 presents a discussion of accuracy achieved and achievable with OARE.

Rice, James E.↗

OARE STS-78 (LMS-1) Final Report

The report is organized into sections representing the phases of work performed in analyzing the STS-78 (LMS-1) results. Section 1 briefly outlines the Orbital Acceleration Research Experiment (OARE) system features, coordinates, and measurement parameters. Section 2 describes the results from STS-78. The mission description, data calibration, and representative data obtained on STS-78 are presented. Also, the anomalous performance of OARE on STS-78 is discussed. Finally, Section 3 presents a discussion of accuracy achieved and achievable with OARE. Appendix A discusses the data processing methodology in detail.

Rice, James E.↗

OARE STS-75 (USMP-3) Final Report

The report is organized into sections representing the phases of work performed in analyzing the STS-75 (USMP-3) results. Section 1 briefly outlines the Orbital Acceleration Research Experiment (OARE) system features, coordinates, and measurement parameters. Section 2 describes the results from STS-75. The mission description, data calibration, and representative data obtained on STS-75 are presented. Also, the anomalous performance of OARE on STS-75 is discussed. Finally, Section 3 presents a discussion of accuracy achieved and achievable with OARE.

Rice, James E.↗

STS-78 Space Shuttle Mission Report

The STS-78 Space Shuttle Program Mission Report summarizes the Payload activities as well as the Orbiter, External Tank (ET), Solid Rocket Booster (SRB), Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (RSRM), and the Space Shuttle main engine (SSME) systems performance during the seventy-eighth flight of the Space Shuttle Program, the fifty-third flight since the return-to-flight, and the twentieth flight of the Orbiter Columbia (OV-102). In addition to the Orbiter, the flight vehicle consisted of an ET that was designated ET-79; three SSME's that were designated as serial numbers 2041, 2039, and 2036 in positions 1, 2, and 3, respectively; and two SRB's that were designated BI-081. The RSRM's, designated RSRM-55, were installed in each SRB and the individual RSRM's were designated as 360L055A for the left SRB, and 360L055B for the right SRB. The STS-78 Space Shuttle Program Mission Report fulfills the Space Shuttle Program requirement as documented in NSTS 07700, Volume 7, Appendix E. The requirement stated in that document is that each organizational element supporting the Program will report the results of their hardware (and software) evaluation and mission performance plus identify all related in-flight anomalies. The primary objective of this flight was to successfully perform the planned operations of the Life and Microgravity Spacelab experiments. The secondary objectives of this flight were to complete the operations of the Orbital Acceleration Research Experiment (OARE), Biological Research in Canister Unit-Block II (BRIC), and the Shuttle Amateur Radio Experiment II-Configuration C (SAREX-II). The STS-78 mission was planned as a 16-day, plus one day flight plus two contingency days, which were available for weather avoidance or Orbiter contingency operations. The sequence of events for the STS-78 mission is shown in Table 1, and the Space Shuttle Vehicle Management Office Problem Tracking List is shown in Table 2. The Government Furnished Equipment/Flight Crew Equipment (GFE/FCE) Problem Tracking List is shown in Table 3. The Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) Problem Tracking List is shown in Table 4. Appendix A lists the sources of data, both formal and informal, that were used to prepare this report. Appendix B provides the definition of acronyms and abbreviations used throughout the report. All times during the flight are given in Greenwich mean time (G.m.t.) and mission elapsed time (MET).

Fricke, Robert W., Jr.↗

STS-40 Get Away Special Experiment Preflight Briefing

Live footage shows the preflight briefing of the Get Away Special Experiment for STS-40. The focus of the discussion is the payloads that STS-40 will carry. Some of the experiments that are scheduled include crystal growth, melting and re-growing of gallium nitride, fluid behaviors, ecological alteration of plants, growth of semiconductors, thermal transfer, flux behavior, orbiter stability, and the effects of cosmic rays on floppy disks. Also shown is a video release of the STS-40/SLS-1 mission. The STS-40 crew, Commander Bryan D. O'Connor, Pilot Sidney M. Gutierrez, Mission Specialists James P. Bagian, Tamara E. Jernigan, M. Rhea Seddon, and Payload Specialists F. Drew Gaffney, and Millie-Hughes Fulford, are seen while they exercise and perform their experiments.

Source record↗

STS-97 Mission Highlights Resource Tape

Various clips give an overview of the STS-97 Endeavour mission. Footage includes Endeavour on the launch pad, the crew of STS-97 (Commander Brent W. Jett, Pilot Michael J. Bloomfield, and Mission Specialists Joseph R. Tanner, Carlos I. Noriega, and Marc Garneau) suiting up, replays of the nighttime launch, Launch Control Center at Kenendy Space Center during countdown, and the activities of flight days one through three. The activities of flight days four through six can be seen on 'STS-97 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 2 of 3' (document ID 20010020282). The activities of flight days seven through eleven and Endeavour's landing can be found on 'STS-97 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 3 of 3' (document ID 20010020283).

Source record↗

STS-102 Mission Highlight Resource Tape, Tape 2 of 4

A continuation of 'STS-102 Mission Highlight Resource Tape, Part 1 of 2, Tape 1 of 2' (internal ID 2001096942), this video shows highlights from flight day five of STS-102, including the deployment of the Space Shuttle's Robotic Arm and the opening of the hatch between the Unity Module and Leonard Multipurpose Logistics Module by Expedition 1 Commander Bill Shepherd. The activities of flight days 6-14 can be seen on 'STS-102 Mission Highlight Resource Tape, Part 2 of 2, Tape 1 of 2' (internal ID 2001096943) and 'STS-102 Mission Highlight Resource Tape, Part 2 of 2, Tape 2 of 2' (internal ID 2001096940).

Source record↗

STS-100 Mission Highlights Resource Tape

An overview of the STS-100 Endeavour mission is given through footage of each flight day. Scenes from flight days one through three show activities such as astronaut prelaunch procedures (breakfast, suit-up, and boarding Endeavour), the countdown and launch of the orbiter, and on-orbit activities, including the opening of the orbiter's payload bay doors, the checkout of the equipment to be used in the mission's spacewalks, and the rendezvous and docking of Endeavour with the International Space Station. A collection of views of the Earth from space include Lake Michigan and Lake Superior, Lake Erie and Ontario, the St. Lawrence River, the US Eastern Shore, Lake Manicouagan, Ile d'Anticosti, Gaspe Peninsula, Island of Newfoundland, Labrador, and the US West Coast. Additional shots show sunlight on the Indian Ocean, cloud cover over the Pacific Ocean, and a night view of an electrical storm over Africa. Footage from flight days 4-11 can be found on 'STS-100 Mission Resource Tape, Part 2 of 4' (internal ID 2001117678), 'STS-100 Mission Resource Tape, Part 3 of 4' (internal ID 2001117680), and 'STS-100 Mission Resource Tape, Part 4 of 4' (internal ID 2001117681).

Source record↗

STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape

An overview of the STS-92 Discovery mission (crew: Commander Brian Duffy, Pilot Pamela Melroy, and Mission Specialists Koichi Wakata, Leroy Chiao, Peter Wisoff, Michael Lopez-Alegria, and William McArthur) is given through footage of each flight day. Scenes from flight days one through five show activities such as astronaut prelaunch procedures (breakfast, suit-up, and boarding Discovery), launch, rendezvous and dock with the International Space Station, an various on-orbit activities such as the installation of the Z1 truss and the spacewalks performed by Chiao and McArthur. Footage from flight days 6-14 can be seen on 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 2 of 4' (internal ID 2001120373), 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 3 of 4' (internal ID 2001120376), and 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 4 of 4' (internal ID 2001120371).

Source record↗

STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape

A continuation of 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 1 of 2' (internal ID 2001120375), this video shows footage from flight day six of the STS-92 mission. Mission Specialists Jeff Wisoff and Mike Lopez-Alegria are seen as they perform their spacewalks to work on the Third Pressurized Mating Adapter and Z1 truss. Additional scenes show Mission Specialist Pam Melroy washing her hair and Commander Brian Duffy shaving. For footage from flight days 7-14, see 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 3 of 4' (internal ID 2001120376) and 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 4 of 4' (internal ID 2001120371).

Source record↗

STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape

A continuation of 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 1 of 4' (internal ID 2001120375), 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 2 of 4' (internal ID 2001120373), and 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 3 of 4' (internal ID 2001120376), this video shows footage from flight days 11-14 of the STS-92 mission. The landing of the Discovery Orbiter is seen.

Source record↗

STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape

A continuation of 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 1 of 4' (internal ID 2001120375) and 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 2 of 4' (internal ID 2001120373), this video shows footage from flight days 7-10 of the STS-92 mission. Scenes include the spacewalks performed by Mission Specialists Leroy Chiao and Bill McArthur to prepare the International Space Station (ISS) for the solar arrays that will be arriving with the next mission, the undocking of Discovery from the ISS, and the crewmembers (Commander Brian Duffy, Pilot Pamela Melroy, and Mission Specialists Koichi Wakata, Leroy Chiao, Peter Wisoff, Michael Lopez-Alegria, and William McArthur) are heard as they answer questions about the mission in an on-orbit interview. Several crewmembers are also seen as they shave and then have a meal. For footage from flight days 11-14 of the mission, see 'STS-92 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 4 of 4' (internal ID 2001120371).

Source record↗

STS-104 Mission Highlights Resource Tape

A continuation of 'STS-104 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 1 of 4' (internal ID 2001214904), this video shows footage from flight days four through seven of the STS-104 mission. Mission Specialists Mike Gernhardt and Jim Reilly are seen during their spacewalks, Pilot Charles Hobaugh and Mission Specialists Janet Kavandi, Mike Gernhardt, and Jim Reilly, and Expedition 2 Flight Engineer Susan Helms work inside the newly installed Quest Airlock. Expedition 2 Flight Engineer Jim Voss is seen as he works to outfit the vestibule between the Unity Module and Quest and opening the hatch between the two components of the International Space Station. Flight days seven (continued) though twelve can be found on the videos 'STS-104 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 3 of 4' (internal ID 2001214906) and 'STS-104 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 4 of 4' (internal ID 2001214905).

Source record↗