SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Powder Bed Fusion”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2018

Three-Dimensional Printing GRCop-42

GRCop-42 (Cu-4 at.% Cr-2 at.% Nb) is a copper (Cu)-chromium (Cr)-niobium (Nb) alloy that NASA developed for use in rocket propulsion components that required high thermal conductivity, excellent creep resistance, low-cycle fatigue life, and strength at elevated temperatures, such as combustion chamber liners and fuel injector face plates. Using powder bed fusion (PBF) 3D printing, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) successfully printed near-fully-dense GRCop-42 components that may equal to or exceed their traditionally manufactured predecessors. This Technical Memorandum serves to summarize the process that was developed to achieve 3D printable near-fully-dense and functional GRCop-42.

Cooper, K. G.↗

NASA NTRS2018

NASA’s Plans for Development of Standards for Additive Manufactured Components

There are currently no NASA standards providing specific design and construction requirements for certification of additively manufactured parts. Several international standards organizations are developing standards for additive manufacturing; however, NASA mission schedules preclude the Agency from relying on these organizations to develop standards that are both timely and applicable. NASA and its program partners in manned spaceflight (the Commercial Crew Program, the Space Launch System and the Orion Multi-purpose Crew Vehicle) are actively developing additively manufactured parts for flight as early as 2018. To bridge this gap, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has authored a center-level standard (MSFC-STD-3716)1 to establish standard practices for the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) process. In its draft form, the MSFC standard has been used as a basis for L-PBF process implementation for each of the manned space flight programs. The development of an Agency-level standard is proposed, which based upon the principles of MSFC-STD-3716, would have application to multiple additive manufacturing processes and be readily adaptable to all NASA programs.

Russell, Richard W.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Modeling Pore Closure in the Hot Isostatic Pressing of Additively Manufactured Inconel 718 Samples

Additive manufacturing provides opportunity for a new world of possibilities for metallic component design and fabrication; however, as-built part quality is notoriously variable, anisotropic, and degraded by porous defects. To improve quality, parts are commonly post processed using a variety of techniques including hot isostatic pressing (HIP). During HIP, high temperature and pressure is employed to improve microstructure and reduce pore volume by inducing visco-plastic deformation in the metallic substrate. Validated computational capabilities can provide predictions to guide the selection of processing condition, expected pore reduction, and the effects of varying entrapped gas in the pores. This discussion describes a micro-scale finite element structural model developed to predict pore closure due to HIP in as-built additively manufactured Inconel 718 samples produced by the laser powder bed fusion process. The model accounts for plastic deformation, creep, and internal pressure for a single pore. Pores are characterized in physical samples before and after HIP, and model predictions are compared to this measured data.

defect model prediction↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Additive Manufactured Ultra-Fine Lattice Structures for Propulsion Catalysts

Traditional mono-propulsion catalysts consist of coated ceramic or graphite foams that possess anisotropic mechanical and fluid properties limiting design, cost, availability, and operational use. Ultra-fine lattice structures are repeating unit cells with ligament thickness as small as 100 μm produced via Additive manufacture (AM). These lattice structures have the potential to replace coated foams used in a mono-propellant system catalysts. AM ultra-fine lattice structures are designed to mimic the operational intent of coated foams but with improved design flexibility, compressive strength, and flow behavior printed from into a single part directly from the preferred platinum metal alloy. The investigation objective was to conduct feasibility studies of AM ultra-fine lattice structures capable of replacing coated foams with superior functionality. NASA MSFC identified desired lattice characteristics and created designs while EOS developed optimized laser powder bed fusion AM parameters to manufacture Ti6Al4V and tungsten specimens. Optimized designs, computational tools, AM parameters, and post-process methods were developed. Specimens underwent x-ray micro-focus CT, metallographic inspection, compression testing, and flow testing. Results demonstrate that AM ultra-fine lattices improved geometric and performance repeatability with the potential for significantly increased availability while decreasing cost and lead time.

Omar R Mireles↗

NASA NTRS2020

Additive Manufactured Ultra-Fine Lattice Structures for Propulsion Catalysts

Traditional mono-propulsion catalysts consist of coated ceramic or graphite foams that possess anisotropic mechanical and fluid properties limiting design, cost, availability, and operational use. Ultra-fine lattice structures are repeating unit cells with ligament thickness as small as 100 μm produced via Additive manufacture (AM). These lattice structures have the potential to replace coated foams used in a mono-propellant system catalysts. AM ultrafine lattice structures are designed to mimic the operational intent of coated foams but with improved design flexibility, compressive strength, and flow behavior printed from into a single part directly from the preferred platinum metal alloy. The investigation objective was to conduct feasibility studies of AM ultra-fine lattice structures capable of replacing coated foams with superior functionality. NASA MSFC identified desired lattice characteristics and created designs while EOS developed optimized laser powder bed fusion AM parameters to manufacture Ti6Al4V and tungsten specimens. Optimized designs, computational tools, AM parameters, and post-process methods were developed. Specimens underwent x-ray microfocus CT, metallographic inspection, compression testing, and flow testing. Results demonstrate that AM ultra-fine lattices improved geometric and performance repeatability with the potential for significantly increased availability while decreasing cost and lead time.

Omar R Mireles↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Additive Manufacture of Ultra-Fine Lattice Structures of Green Propulsion Catalysts

Traditional mono-propulsion catalysts consist of coated ceramic or graphite foams that possess anisotropic mechanical and fluid properties limiting design, cost, availability, and operational use. Ultra-fine lattice structures are repeating unit cells with ligament thickness as small as 100 μm produced via Additive manufacture (AM). These lattice structures have the potential to replace coated foams used in a mono-propellant system catalysts. AM ultrafine lattice structures are designed to mimic the operational intent of coated foams but with improved design flexibility, compressive strength, and flow behavior printed from into a single part directly from the preferred platinum metal alloy. The investigation objective was to conduct feasibility studies of AM ultra-fine lattice structures capable of replacing coated foams with superior functionality. NASA MSFC identified desired lattice characteristics and created designs while EOS developed optimized laser powder bed fusion AM parameters to manufacture Ti6Al4V and tungsten specimens. Optimized designs, computational tools, AM parameters, and post-process methods were developed. Specimens underwent x-ray microfocus CT, metallographic inspection, compression testing, and flow testing. Results demonstrate that AM ultra-fine lattices improved geometric and performance repeatability with the potential for significantly increased availability while decreasing cost and lead time.

Omar Mireles↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Hot-Fire Testing Results of Additively Manufactured NASA HR-1 towards Large Scale Implementation of Channel Wall Nozzles

Additive manufacturing (AM) has provided new design and manufacturing opportunities to reduce cost and schedules, consolidate parts, and optimize performance. One technique being evaluated is Laser Powder Directed Energy Deposition (LP-DED), which provides a significant increase in scale compared to Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF). NASA along with industry partners have been developing the LP-DED process to demonstrate internal channel geometry and development components for use in liquid rocket engine channel cooled nozzles. One material that has been the focus of this development is NASA HR-1, an Iron-Nickel based superalloy optimized for use in high pressure hydrogen environments. Material properties and process characterization has been completed on the high density thin-wall material in addition to advancements of the supply chain. NASA has also completed fabrication of several subscale and full scale channel wall nozzles in LP-DED NASA HR-1 and completed hot-fire testing. This includes refinement of the process to produce thin-walls and various channel geometries to meet the requirements for channel wall nozzle applications. This paper will provide an overview of the LP-DED process development, material characterization and properties, component manufacturing, and hot-fire testing. Hot-fire testing was completed for a lander-class 7K-lbf thrust chamber using Liquid Oxygen (LOX)/Methane. The design overview and results from hot-fire testing will be presented in addition to hardware development for future testing on 2K-lbf and 35k-lbf thrust chambers and large-scale manufacturing technology demonstrators.

Paul Gradl↗

NASA NTRS2021

Melt Pool Imaging using a Configurable Architecture Additive Testbed System

This paper describes the inline (coaxial to laser) near infrared (NIR) camera sensor on the Configurable Architecture Additive Testbed (CAAT). The CAAT is an instrument that provides the capability to investigate laser based additive manufacturing (AM) processes and is configured for the metal powder bed fusion process. A low cost NIR camera is radiometrically calibrated to obtain coaxial, inline, imagery of laser generated melt pools. The camera capabilities, system optical path, and the uncertainty in the temperature measurement from NIR surface area scans on a bare titanium alloy plate are presented and discussed. The surface radiance measurements are compared to optical microscopy images of the melt pool width and depth. A metallic additive manufacturing process thermal model is developed in order to predict thermal distributions during laser scanning. The predicted thermal distributions by the model for different configurations are compared to the coaxial NIR measurements and discussed.

Additive manufacturing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Influence of Thermophysical Property Variability on Thermal Predictions of Ti-6Al-4V

The additive manufacturing (AM) industry has experienced rapid growth in recent decades as industrial interest in the process has grown. Because of this, there are many groups interested in simulations of the AM process. However, the influence of thermophysical property variability on the melt pool geometry during processing of various AM alloys is unclear. The goal of my work at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) was to characterize this influence on Ti-6Al-4V during AM processing alongside developing a tool to enable equivalent studies on other AM materials. To facilitate this process, a database tool was developed to contain and organize thermophysical data previously reported by primary sources. The specific thermophysical properties of interest for this study were density, specific heat capacity, and conductivity. Thermal diffusivity was calculated using the other three properties. This data was then fit with a Gaussian distribution and then randomly sampled from using Monte Carlo random value sampling. Using the Rosenthal equation, this sample data was used to simulate the temperature field during additive manufacturing and extract the melt pool geometry. Specifically, the melt pool’s length, width, and depth. This process was repeated an arbitrary number of times, with the default being 1000. Once this information was obtained, histograms were made showing the distributions of the sizes of the melt pool’s length, width, and depth. Representative statistical metrics of the distributions were calculated (mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variance). This work found that at the simulated processing values, the melt pool’s width and depth had a 5.7% variation while the length had a 3.2% variation. Additionally, a tool was constructed to graph a thermal color map representation of the melt pool for specific, arbitrary values of density, specific heat, and conductivity. This tool allowed for more efficient plotting of individual queries of the thermophysical properties. The results that were observed in the research were that values reported in literature vary and this variance can have a significant impact on the simulation. Predictions of the melt pool’s dimensions show that length has a standard deviation of approximately 6 μm, width has a standard deviation of approximately 5 μm, and depth can vary by approximately 3 μm. Considering the mean sizes of length, width, and depth are 185 μm, 88 μm, and 44 μm respectively, such a deviation is significant. This shows that depth, for example, could be more than 10% larger or smaller than expected. This demonstrates that variability in the reported thermophysical properties are not negligible and should be expected to have an influence on the results of the laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. When simulating this process in the future, measures should be taken to account for this discrepancy and the uncertainty involved

Justin Martin↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Principles of Directed Energy Deposition for Aerospace Applications

Metal Additive Manufacturing is changing how components are being fabricated for rocket propulsion and aerospace applications. Many additive manufacturing technologies are evolving, and active research is being conducted across academia, industry, and government to advance processes, materials, design, post-processing, and applications. While much focus has been on Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) techniques, several large-scale techniques are also rapidly evolving using directed energy deposition (DED) techniques. This lecture will provide an overview of various DED technologies, a comparison among the technologies, various materials, parameters used to deposit, and several examples of DED applications for propulsion and aerospace components.

Additive Manufacturing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Metal Additive Manufacturing Developments for Propulsion Applications

NASA has been involved in the development and maturation of metal additive manufacturing (AM) for space applications since the 2000’s. Several efforts have focused on the understanding of AM processes through material characterization and testing, standards development, component fabrication, and infusion into development and flight applications. While many common aerospace alloys have been and continue to be a focus of ongoing development, the need for custom-alloy developments for high performance applications enabled by various AM processes has been realized. The applications being targeted are liquid rocket engines with high heat fluxes, high pressure, and that utilize propellants such as hydrogen, which can degrade the alloy. NASA has recently focused on the development and advancement of novel alloy advancement using AM for use in these harsh environments, such as GRCop-42, GRCop-84, NASA HR-1, and JBK-75. These alloys have been evaluated using powder bed fusion (PBF), directed energy deposition (DED), and solid-state AM processes. The results from these processes have demonstrated that AM can enable rapid development of new alloy systems that can yield higher performances across various metal AM processes. These alloys have undergone the fundamental metallurgical evaluations, heat treatment study, and microstructure characterization and mechanical testing campaign. This, combined with direct application-specific component fabrication and hot-fire testing, enabled the increase of the Technology Readiness Level (TRL). This presentation will provide a background and overview of various AM-enabled novel alloys, a comparison across the AM processes, and development including metallurgical and mechanical property studies. It will also cover the latest advancement in the parallel component development and testing and future developments. The goal of these alloy development and use of various AM processes is to allow for technology infusion into NASA and commercial spaceflight missions as well as to establish and sustain the needed commercial AM supply chain.

Additive Manufacturing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development Lifecycle for Propulsion Components

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) is a generic term that captures a variety of fabrication processes. Each of these manufacturing process has unique advantages and challenges for use in aerospace propulsion applications. The most commonly used AM processes include Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), Directed Energy Deposition (DED), and solid-state processes as in Cold Spray, Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing, and Additive Friction Stir Deposition. While detailed research has been conducted among many of the AM processes to mature processing parameters and material properties, navigating which processes are best to select is difficult as it is based on specific component requirements. The focus of this presentation is to provide an overview of considerations for each of metal AM process selection for aerospace components based on various key attributes. These key attributes include geometric considerations, metallurgical characteristics, cost basis, post-processing and maturity of the processes. The data for these trade selections are based on studies that NASA as performed internally and with academic and industry partners. These studies include multiple AM build experiments to evaluate (1) geometric variations and constraints within the processes, (2) alloy characterization and mechanical testing, (3) pathfinder component development and hot-fire evaluations, and (4) certification approaches. This presentation summarizes these results and is meant to introduce specific examples which show what to consider when designing a metal AM component for aerospace propulsion applications.

Paul Gradl↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Having a Come-Apart: Lessons Learned from Additively Manufactured Hardware Failures

NASA has been engaged with additively manufactured (AM) process and component development since the 2000’s. AM offers various technical advantages, such as enhanced hardware design complexity, part consolidation, and processing of novel alloys in addition to programmatic advantages for reduction in processing time and cost. The focus of much of the AM development at NASA has been to mature the various processes, characterize material properties, develop standards, produce demonstrator parts, and integrate AM hardware in liquid rocket engines. These aspects have been demonstrated through process and design iterations using a methodical characterization, test-fail-fix cycles, as well as application and dissemination of lessons learned. In addition to these fundamental demonstrations of the AM process and hardware development, alloys that provide performance advantages in the high temperature and high-pressure environments have been matured for use in rocket engines. These environments are challenging for any alloy and any design, and the AM process is required to fully meet the intended design requirements. The importance of proper AM process was made evident in the failure of a Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) copper-alloy combustion chamber during a hot-fire test due to a degraded material quality resulted from an AM process issue. The hot-fire test aimed to demonstrate high duty cycle under a risk-tolerant development project, where consequences of component failure would be minimal. However, the unintentional component failure emphasized the necessity of robust material characterization and rigorous process control procedures for the safe use of AM components in critical applications. In part, such concerns motivate the AM certification approach that NASA has recently adopted in NASA-STD-6030 “Additive Manufacturing Requirements for Spaceflight Systems”. This presentation provides an overview of the previously mentioned failure, a discussion on the evaluation of the failed chamber and supplemental chambers produced at the same time, a representative material samples that included intentional build witness lines, and a summary of the key results and recommendations from the evaluations. NASA continues to approach AM processes and designs with a level of risk and acceptance of failures that is appropriate for the project objectives, with the overall goal of safe implementation of AM technology and transferring AM technology into commercial space applications. The objective of this presentation is to provide awareness to the community working critical and non-critical AM components and the lessons learned on proper implementation of AM.

Additive Manufacturing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

ASTM International Conference on Additive Manufacturing – 2022

The In-Situ Project: Correlating In-situ monitoring data and Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) methods to characterize defect populations in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) material NDE is critical to enable the safe use of additive manufactured (AM) parts in aerospace applications. However, traditional NDE methods are not fully adaptable to complex AM geometries to appropriately screen for critical defects, and L-PBF processes inherently generate defects. In-situ monitoring techniques can give information about the quality of the build process and indicate process variations that could potentially create defects. Proven, causal correlations between in-situ monitoring indications and resulting defects are needed to inform about the final quality of the part. Thus, the development of a new approach is necessary. NASA started a two-phase study that would investigate techniques for characterizing defect populations in L-PBF material, first in material with induced defects, then in a nominal L-PBF process, by correlating in-situ, NDE, and serial sectioning data. Objectives also include the evaluation of seeded defect methodologies for realistic defect creation, creating a baseline of defect populations in a Qualified Material Process (QMP), characterizing the effect of heat treatment, and correlating defect populations with tensile and fatigue properties. By comparing computed tomography images, in-situ monitoring images, and metallography images, the team has been able to draw preliminary conclusions. They include a better understanding of the limitation of the NDE tools, learning about the “healing” of the samples observed during layer building and a comparison study on different laser power variation samples. Those preliminary conclusions will help dictate the follow-up work that will be presented at the conference.

additive manufacturing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design of a GRCop-42 Regeneratively Cooled Thrust Chamber Assembly and Feed System

An additively manufactured thrust chamber assembly was designed and printed using laser powder bed fusion. The NASA-developed material GRCop-42 was used for its high strength and high temperature characteristics. The combustion chamber and nozzle utilize regenerative coolant channels to achieve long duration hot fire tests. Design for additive manufacturing was used to create geometries not easily attainable with traditional machining. The thrust chamber assembly was post processed to ensure print quality and verify for testing. A feed system – encompassing all propellant lines, valves, sensors, and tanks – was designed and built to enable steady state, pressure regulated testing. Pressure transducers, thermocouples, and load cells were placed to enable measurements of the propellant properties and engine performance. Venturis and orifices were used throughout the system to control the flow rates to the thrust chamber. Aside from providing propellants, the feed system provides pressure using nitrogen, and purges the lines during shutdown. The design process for this testing platform is described. A testing campaign on the hardware will be conducted by the Akronauts Rocket Design Team at the University of Akron in Spring 2023.

Dillon M. Petty↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design of a GRCop-42 Regeneratively Cooled Thrust Chamber Assembly and Feed System

Dillon M. Petty↗

NASA NTRS2023

A 3D Printable Alloy Designed for Extreme Environments

Multiprincipal-element alloys are an enabling class of materials owing to their impressive mechanical and oxidation-resistant properties, especially in extreme environments. Here we develop a new oxide-dispersion-strengthened NiCoCr-based alloy using a model-driven alloy design approach and laser-based additive manufacturing. This oxide-dispersion-strengthened alloy, called GRX-810, uses laser powder bed fusion to disperse nanoscale Y 2 O 3 particles throughout the microstructure without the use of resource-intensive processing steps such as mechanical or in situ alloying. We show the successful incorporation and dispersion of nanoscale oxides throughout the GRX-810 build volume via high-resolution characterization of its microstructure. The mechanical results of GRX-810 show a twofold improvement in strength, over 1,000-fold better creep performance and twofold improvement in oxidation resistance compared with the traditional polycrystalline wrought Ni-based alloys used extensively in additive manufacturing at 1,093 °C. The success of this alloy highlights how model-driven alloy designs can provide superior compositions using far fewer resources compared with the ‘trial-and-error’ methods of the past. These results showcase how future alloy development that leverages dispersion strengthening combined with additive manufacturing processing can accelerate the discovery of revolutionary materials.

Timothy M. Smith↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Metal Additive Manufacturing for Rocket Engines: Successes and Failures

NASA has been developing additive manufacturing (AM) for various technical and programmatic advantages for complex rocket engine and aerospace components. This maturation has focused on various AM processes, new alloys, characterizing material properties, developing standards, producing demonstrator parts, and integrating AM hardware in liquid rocket engines through test-fail-fix cycles, as well as application and dissemination of lessons learned of the AM lifecycle. The importance of proper AM processing was made evident in the failure of a Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) copper-alloy combustion chamber during a hot-fire test due to a degraded material quality. The hot-fire test aimed to demonstrate high duty cycle under a risk-tolerant development project, where consequences of component failure would be minimal. However, the unintentional component failure emphasized the necessity of robust material characterization and rigorous process control procedures for the safe use of AM components in critical applications. This presentation provides an overview of the development failure, a discussion on the evaluation of the failed chamber and supplemental chambers produced at the same time, a representative material samples that included intentional build witness lines, and a summary of the key results and recommendations from the evaluations. NASA continues to approach AM processes and designs with a level of risk and acceptance of failures that is appropriate for the project objectives, with the overall goal of safe implementation of AM technology and transferring AM technology into commercial space applications. This presentation with provide critical awareness to the community lessons learned on proper implementation of AM.

L-PBF↗