Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “IGNITION SYSTEM”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1988

Modeling of the transient ignition of a nonmetal/oxygen system by heterogeneous reaction - Effects of oxygen pressure

A theoretical model of the transient ignition of a nonmetallic polymer in a pure oxygen environment was developed and used to assess the safety of an oxygen system under elevated pressure. Results demonstrated that, for a general oxygen system, the ignition temperautre is sensitive to the external heating rate as well as such system parameters as the minimum ignition heat flux and the corresponding minimum ignition temperature. As the oxygen pressure increases, the minimum ignition temperature decreases, until, at a sufficiently high oxygen pressure, spontaneous ignition occurs. Numerical results generated by the model were correlated with the reported ignition data for polyethylene, Teflon, and nylon.

Yuen, Walter W.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Comparison results for ignition in conjugate systems

The exothermic reaction of an arbitrarily shaped solid in a well-mixed continuous flow of constant density and velocity is investigated analytically, with a focus on a zeroth-order reaction in a pellet. Comparison theorems for the basic problem and the eigenvalue problem of ignition are derived, and the domain dependence of the bifurcation point is explored using the method of Joseph (1976). Some typical analytical results are presented in tables and compared with published values obtained using numerical methods.

Pushpavanam, S.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Space Launch System Scale Model Acoustic Test Ignition Overpressure Testing

The overpressure phenomenon is a transient fluid dynamic event occurring during rocket propulsion system ignition. This phenomenon results from fluid compression of the accelerating plume gas, subsequent rarefaction, and subsequent propagation from the exhaust trench and duct holes. The high-amplitude unsteady fluid-dynamic perturbations can adversely affect the vehicle and surrounding structure. Commonly known as ignition overpressure (IOP), this is an important design-to environment for the Space Launch System (SLS) that NASA is currently developing. Subscale testing is useful in validating and verifying the IOP environment. This was one of the objectives of the Scale Model Acoustic Test, conducted at Marshall Space Flight Center. The test data quantifies the effectiveness of the SLS IOP suppression system and improves the analytical models used to predict the SLS IOP environments. The reduction and analysis of the data gathered during the SMAT IOP test series requires identification and characterization of multiple dynamic events and scaling of the event waveforms to provide the most accurate comparisons to determine the effectiveness of the IOP suppression systems. The identification and characterization of the overpressure events, the waveform scaling, the computation of the IOP suppression system knockdown factors, and preliminary comparisons to the analytical models are discussed.

Nance, Donald↗
NASA NTRS2015

Space Launch System Scale Model Acoustic Test Ignition Overpressure Testing

The overpressure phenomenon is a transient fluid dynamic event occurring during rocket propulsion system ignition. This phenomenon results from fluid compression of the accelerating plume gas, subsequent rarefaction, and subsequent propagation from the exhaust trench and duct holes. The high-amplitude unsteady fluid-dynamic perturbations can adversely affect the vehicle and surrounding structure. Commonly known as ignition overpressure (IOP), this is an important design-to environment for the Space Launch System (SLS) that NASA is currently developing. Subscale testing is useful in validating and verifying the IOP environment. This was one of the objectives of the Scale Model Acoustic Test (SMAT), conducted at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). The test data quantifies the effectiveness of the SLS IOP suppression system and improves the analytical models used to predict the SLS IOP environments. The reduction and analysis of the data gathered during the SMAT IOP test series requires identification and characterization of multiple dynamic events and scaling of the event waveforms to provide the most accurate comparisons to determine the effectiveness of the IOP suppression systems. The identification and characterization of the overpressure events, the waveform scaling, the computation of the IOP suppression system knockdown factors, and preliminary comparisons to the analytical models are discussed.

Nance, Donald K.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SLS Ignition Overpressure-Sound Suppression System Performance Evaluated Against Historical Configurations

During the start-up of a number of launch vehicles that include solid rocket motor (SRM), the ignition transient and acoustic environments are mitigated by the implementation of a water spray system located immediately below the SRM nozzle exit plane (NEP). For NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS), this water system is referred to as the Ignition Overpressure / Sound Suppression (IOP/SS) system. The SLS Induced Environments (IE) technical discipline conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the design and as-tested performance of the IOP/SS water that will operate underneath both Boosters during the Artemis I launch. As part of this evaluation, flow rates and imagery from a number of integrated launch pad / mobile launcher IOP/SS flow tests were studied. Additional insight was leveraged from the Shuttle heritage IOP/SS system that includes data and imagery from a number of Flight Readiness Firings (FRF) and water flow tests. Lastly, the IE study included a qualitive comparison of the Shuttle and SLS systems to the equivalent water flow systems for Titan and Atlas V and determined that the NASA water flow systems are substantially different than those supporting other launch vehicles.

Ignition Overpressure↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SLS Ignition Overpressure-Sound Suppression System Performance Evaluated Against Historical Configurations

During the start-up of a number of launch vehicles that include solid rocket motor (SRM), the ignition transient and acoustic environments are mitigated by the implementation of a water spray system located immediately below the SRM nozzle exit plane (NEP). For NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS), this water system is referred to as the Ignition Overpressure / Sound Suppression (IOP/SS) system. The SLS Induced Environments (IE) technical discipline conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the design and as-tested performance of the IOP/SS water that will operate underneath both Boosters during the Artemis I launch. As part of this evaluation, flow rates and imagery from a number of integrated launch pad / mobile launcher IOP/SS flow tests were studied. Additional insight was leveraged from the Shuttle heritage IOP/SS system that includes data and imagery from a number of Flight Readiness Firings (FRF) and water flow tests. Lastly, the IE study included a qualitive comparison of the Shuttle and SLS systems to the equivalent water flow systems for Titan and Atlas V and determined that the NASA water flow systems are substantially different than those supporting other launch vehicles.

Ignition Overpressure↗
NASA NTRS1982

Method and apparatus for suppressing ignition overpressure in solid rocket propulsion systems

The transient overpressure wave produced upon ignition of a solid rocket booster is suppressed by providing within the launch platform, a plurality of pipes and spray heads disposed around the periphery of the exhaust gas plume near its upper end and spraying water into the upper end of the plume during ignition. A large amount of water, preferably equivalent in mass of exhaust products being ejected, is sprayed into the plume in a direction generally perpendicular to plume flow.

Guest, S. H.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Free-piston Stirling hydraulic engine and drive system for automobiles

The calculated fuel economy for an automotive free piston Stirling hydraulic engine and drive system using a pneumatic accumulator with the fuel economy of both a conventional 1980 spark ignition engine in an X body class vehicle and the estimated fuel economy of a 1984 spark ignition vehicle system are compared. The results show that the free piston Stirling hydraulic system with a two speed transmission has a combined fuel economy nearly twice that of the 1980 spark ignition engine - 21.5 versus 10.9 km/liter (50.7 versus 25.6 mpg) under comparable conditions. The fuel economy improvement over the 1984 spark ignition engine was 81 percent. The fuel economy sensitivity of the Stirling hydraulic system to system weight, number of transmission shifts, accumulator pressure ratio and maximum pressure, auxiliary power requirements, braking energy recovery, and varying vehicle performance requirements are considered. An important finding is that a multispeed transmission is not required. The penalty for a single speed versus a two speed transmission is about a 12 percent drop in combined fuel economy to 19.0 km/liter (44.7 mpg). This is still a 60 percent improvement in combined fuel economy over the projected 1984 spark ignition vehicle.

Beremand, D. G.↗