DOE OSTI2023
In this study, WPI and its partners sought to understand galvanic corrosion in Mg-Al friction stir weld (FSW) joints. Unlike fusion welds, FSW is done in the solid state. This limits (but does not eliminate) the formation of brittle Al-Mg intermetallics, resulting in better joint strength and corrosion resistance. This study aimed to understand corrosion behavior of Mg-Al FSW joints by using a Cahn-Hilliard phase field electrochemistry model based on the work of Pongsaksawad et al. Its context challenge problem was an ultra-light door designed by Magna with 6061-Al sheet outer and ZEK100-Mg sheet inner panels, joined by an adhesive and FSW. Unlike most FSW joints, which weld through the softer material into the harder one, the Al sheet’s hem joint around Mg required the FSW tool to through the harder Al into the softer Mg, which was itself a challenge. Despite this challenge, PNNL succeeded in consistently making very strong FSW lap joints, by using a triflute tool and power control. Characterization showed mostly separate Al and Mg regions in the weld, usually with a hook protruding from Al into Mg, which likely contributed to high joint strength. Nanohardness mapping showed higher hardness in thin Mg swirls into the Al nugget, likely due to the intermetallics. The study used the industry standard SAE J2334 Cyclic Corrosion Test (CCT) to simulate corrosion conditions over the life of a vehicle, as well as linear polarization testing and ASTM G71 pitting corrosion testing. Corrosion reactions were: H 2 O + ½O 2 + 2e - → 2OH - at the Al cathode, and either Mg → Mg 2+ + 2e - or Mg + 2OH - → Mg(OH) 2 + 2e - at the Mg anode, with electron transfer through the joint. Mass loss increased with Al section length, supporting the hypothesis that galvanic corrosion in Al-Mg joints is limited by the cathodic reaction. Both pitting corrosion (first anode reaction) and hydroxide film formation (second reaction) were observed. The J2334 CCT test method was slightly modified, adding a chromium solution cleaning step after each week of corrosion testing, in order to remove Mg oxides and hydroxides and accurately measure mass loss over time. That said, FSW joints treated in this way did not did not exhibit significant reduction in lap shear strength of the joints vs. newly welded samples which had not undergone corrosion. Corrosion appeared to consist mainly of pitting in Mg in a way which did not directly affect the bond between the materials where the joints failed. A Cahn-Hilliard phase field model coupled with electrical potential described the electronically mediated galvanic corrosion electrochemical reactions described above in the four-component Al-Mg-H 2 O-(H 2 O+½O 2 ) system. This 2-D model successfully predicted Mg(OH)₂ formation at the anode in some circumstances, and Mg pitting corrosion in others, and showed the correct electric field directions in both cases. The model predicted Mg pit corrosion depth within a factor of two of measured pits.
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗