SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ATR REACTOR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2021

ECAR-3051 As-Run Physics Analysis For The AGC-3 Experiment Irradiated In The ATR

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

ECAR-2291 AS-RUN PHYSICS ANALYSIS FOR THE AGC-2 EXPERIMENT IRRADIATED IN THE ATR

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2015

AGR-3/4 Final Data Qualification Report for ATR Cycles 151A through 155B-1

This report provides the qualification status of experimental data for the entire Advanced Gas Reactor 3/4 (AGR 3/4) fuel irradiation. AGR-3/4 is the third in a series of planned irradiation experiments conducted in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for the AGR Fuel Development and Qualification Program, which supports development of the advanced reactor technology under the INL ART Technology Development Office (TDO). The main objective of AGR-3/4 irradiation is to provide a known source of fission products for subsequent transport through compact matrix and structural graphite materials due to the presence of designed-to-fail fuel particles. Full power irradiation of the AGR 3/4 test began on December 14, 2011 (ATR Cycle 151A), and was completed on April 12, 2014 (end of ATR Cycle 155B) after 369.1 effective full power days of irradiation. The AGR-3/4 test was in the reactor core for eight of the ten ATR cycles between 151A and 155B. During the unplanned outage cycle, 153A, the experiment was removed from the ATR northeast flux trap (NEFT) location and stored in the ATR canal. This was to prevent overheating of fuel compacts due to higher than normal ATR power during the subsequent Powered Axial Locator Mechanism cycle, 153B. The AGR 3/4 test was inserted back into the ATR NEFT location during the outage of ATR Cycle 154A on April 26, 2013. Therefore, the AGR-3/4 irradiation data received during these 2 cycles (153A and 153B) are irrelevant and their qualification status isnot included in this report. Additionally, during ATR Cycle 152A the ATR core ran at low power for a short enough duration that the irradiation data are not used for physics and thermal calculations. However, the qualification status of irradiation data for this cycle is still covered in this report. As a result, this report includes data from 8 ATR Cycles: 151A, 151B, 152A, 152B, 154A, 154B, 155A, and 155B, as recorded in the Nuclear Data Management and Analysis System (NDMAS). The AGR 3/4 data streams addressed in this report include thermocouple (TC) temperatures, sweep gas data (flow rates, pressure, and moisture content), and Fission Product Monitoring System (FPMS) data (release rates, release to birth rate ratios [R/Bs], and particle failure counts) for each of the twelve capsules in the AGR 3/4 experiment. During Outage Cycle 155A, fourteen flow meters were installed downstream from fourteen FPMS monitors to measure flows from the monitors; qualification status of these data are also included in the report. The final data qualification status for these data streams is determined by a Data Review Committee (DRC) composed of AGR technical leads, Sitewide Quality Assurance (QA), and NDMAS analysts. For ATR Cycles 151A through 154B, the DRC convened on February 12, 2014, reviewed the data acquisition process, and considered whether the data met the requirements for data collection as specified in QA approved INL ART TDO data collection plans. The DRC also examined the results of NDMAS data testing and statistical analyses, and confirmed the qualification status of the data as given in this report. The qualification status of AGR-3/4 irradiation data during the first six cycles were previously reported in INL/EXT-14-31186 document. This report presents data qualification status for the entire AGR-3/4 irradiation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Coolant Pump Predictive Data Analytics from Signatures Generated by the Recursive Short Time Fast Fourier Transform

Although a nuclear reactor is a hostile environment for sensors and signal transmissions, the reactor core is amenable to acoustic communication. An acoustic measurement infrastructure installed at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) nozzle trench area records acoustic signals that can capture reactor operating states. The distinct states produce unique signatures that can be identified and tracked using data processing and data analytics. The infrastructure relies on acoustic transmission through ATR in-pile structural components, piping, and coolant that transmit acoustically modified signals generated by the coolant pumps. This paper will discuss results from using the Recursive Short Time Fast Fourier Transform (RSTFFT) technique used to process acoustic signals and provide signatures that are identified and monitored by analytics. The RSTFFT is applied to ATR data to understand the vibration levels and signatures for different operating regimes as displayed by the spectrogram. The combination of coolant pumps for normal and high-power operation generate unique signatures. These acoustic signatures are used to develop machine learning approaches to automatically classify operating regimes. Two machine-learning models, Support Vector Machines and Linear Discriminant Analysis, were developed to classify two event classes. Class 1 is a normal steady-state operation, and Class 2 is any event that is due to start up, shut down, or other actions. Both types of machine learning models had over a 96% prediction accuracy for the two classes. These results lay the foundation for predictive analytic frameworks that can be leveraged by ATR to optimize operations and maintenance.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2014

AGR-3/4 Data Qualification Report for ATR Cycles 151A, 151B, 152A, 152B, 154A, and 154B

This data report provides the qualification status of Advanced Gas Reactor-3/4 (AGR-3/4) fuel irradiation experimental data from Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Cycles 151A, 151B, 152A, 152B, 154A, and 154B, as recorded in the Nuclear Data Management and Analysis System (NDMAS). Of these cycles, ATR Cycle 152A is a low power cycle that occurred when the ATR core was briefly at low power. The irradiation data are not used for physics and thermal calculation, but the qualification status of these cycle data is still covered in this report. On the other hand, during ATR Cycles 153A (unplanned Outage cycle) and 153B (Power Axial Locator Mechanism [PALM] cycle), the AGR-3/4 was pulled out from the ATR core and stored in the canal to avoid being overheated. Therefore, qualification of the AGR-3/4 irradiation data from these 2 cycles was excluded in this report. By the end of ATR Cycle 154B, AGR-3/4 was irradiated for a total of 264.1 effective full power days. The AGR-3/4 data streams addressed in this report include thermocouple (TC) temperatures, sweep gas data (flow rates, pressure, and moisture content), and Fission Product Monitoring System (FPMS) data (release rates and release-to-birth rate ratios [R/Bs]) for each of the twelve capsules in the AGR-3/4 experiment. The final data qualification status for these data streams is determined by a Data Review Committee (DRC) composed of AGR technical leads, Sitewide Quality Assurance (QA), and NDMAS analysts. The DRC convened on February 12, 2014, reviewed the data acquisition process, and considered whether the data met the requirements for data collection as specified in QA-approved Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Technology Development Office (TDO) data collection plans. The DRC also examined the results of NDMAS data testing and statistical analyses, and confirmed the qualification status of the data as given in this report.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2025

Dynamic response of a freely rotating butterfly valve in the advanced test reactor – dynamic fluid-body interaction modeling

To regulate primary coolant flow in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), a butterfly valve was installed between the primary coolant pumps and the reactor core. If the mechanical connection between the valve's disk and its shaft ever fails, the disk will rotate freely. Rapid disk rotation may induce pressure surges that could damage upstream pipes. In the present work, the rotational trajectory and pressure evolution during a disk free-rotation scenario were analyzed via the dynamic fluid-body interaction (DFBI) approach in STAR-CCM+, with the movement of a solid being driven by the forces and moment/torque imposed by its surrounding fluid. Assuming a large initial opening angle, the disk accelerates slowly, but swiftly passes the closed position. As a result of the sudden valve closure, a pressure surge occurs in the upstream pipes, exceeding their maximum allowable pressure. Furthermore, the disk does not stabilize at the closed position but continually oscillates due to the unsteady nature of the coolant flow. Because of the significant and continuous water hammer effect, a fix to the butterfly valve is being implemented to prevent rapid valve closure due to failure at the valve's disk/shaft mechanical connection.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Extension of the Advanced Test Reactor Operating Envelope Via Enhanced Reactor Physics Validation Techniques

The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute is currently in the process of qualifying a low-enriched-uranium fuel element design for the new Ki-Jang Research Reactor (KJRR). As part of this effort, a prototype KJRR fuel element was irradiated in this paper for several operating cycles in the northeast flux trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. The KJRR fuel element contained a very large quantity of fissile material (618 g 235 U) in comparison with historical ATR experiment standards (<1 g 235 U), and its presence in the ATR flux trap was expected to create a neutronic configuration that would be well outside of the approved validation envelope for the reactor physics analysis methods used to support ATR operations. Accordingly, it was necessary to conduct an extensive set of new low-power physics measurements in the ATR Critical Facility (ATRC), a companion facility to the ATR, located in an immediately adjacent building and sharing the same fuel storage canal. The new measurements included fission power distributions, reactivity, and measurements related to the calibration of the in-core online instrumentation. The effort was focused on the objective of expanding the validation envelope for the computational reactor physics tools used to support ATR operations and safety analysis to include the planned KJRR irradiation in the ATR and similar experiments that are anticipated in the future. The computational and experimental results have demonstrated that the neutronic behavior of the KJRR fuel element in the ATRC is well understood in terms of its general effects on ATRC core reactivity and fission power distributions and its effects on the calibration of the ATR Lobe Power Calculation and Indication System, as well as in terms of its own internal fission rate distribution and total fission power per unit ATRC core power. Finally, taken as a whole, these results have significantly extended the ATR physics validation envelope, thereby enabling an entire new class of irradiation experiments.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2022

CFD-Chemical Model of One-Third Scale Demonstration of DOE Sealed Canister with ATR Fuel

Road-ready and final disposition packaging configurations for the advanced test reactor (ATR) fuel currently specifies storage within helium backfilled DOE sealed standard canisters. The aluminum cladding of the ATR fuel contains an oxyhydroxide layer of boehmite/bayerite that generates hydrogen when subjected to irradiation. Understanding the effect of this hydrogen buildup over time to important for long term storage considerations. Previous modeling efforts have built a coupled CFD-chemical model to simulate the temperature gas phase concentrations within the DOE sealed standard canisters. A demonstration case for these DOE sealed canisters will be eventually performed with a one-third scale mockup that has been instrumented with thermocouples and gas concentration probes. This study seeks to model the planned canister for validation of the previously developed model, such that confidence in its long-term prediction can be increased. The deployment of the instrumented lid for online monitoring in intended for a period of 10+ years based on previous monitoring of commercial fuel storage; however, the model is still run for the previously used 50-year storage periods. This case is modeled with a G-value using a bi-linear function such that it decreases at higher dose rates to be consistent with experiments. Validation efforts of the model would likely revolve around the results for the 1st year, so the results of this timeframe are also highlighted. For dried fuel of the nominal decay heat (18W), the predicted hydrogen concentration is 0.19% after 1 year, 0.91% after 10 years, and 2.8% after 50 years, with a maximum pressure of 1.26 atm. Consistent with previous modeling, the decay heat of the fuel is the main factor that influences the results. For undried fuel in pure helium, the hydrogen concentration ranges from 0.23 to 1.2% after 1 year, 1.25-6.2% after 10 years and 8.8 to 18.84% after 50 years. For dried fuel in pure helium the hydrogen concentration ranges from 0.06% to 0.34% after 1 year, 0.35-2.11% after 10 years and 0.95 to 6.6% after 50 years. While long-term results in the presence of residual air are mostly the same, early reactions with O 2 can delay significant production of H 2 until it is consumed to form more water vapor, lowering the range to 0.14 to 1.0% after 1 year. The maximum absolute pressure that is reached across any scenario is 2.06 atm. In the event of residual air, the presence of nitric acid is possible in the range of 18-131 ppm after 1 year, 174-1180 ppm after 10 years, and 586-3500 ppm after 50 years. As long as the fuel is sufficiently dried, or of nominal decay heat, a 4% lower flammability limit of hydrogen will not be reached within a 10-year monitoring period.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

As-Run Physics Analysis for the AGC-4 Experiment Irradiated in the ATR

This Engineering Calculations Analysis Report (ECAR) documents the results of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) detailed physics analyses performed to calculate the displacements per atom (DPA) and the fast neutron fluence (E > 0.1 MeV) of the Advanced Graphite Creep (AGC) experiment, AGC-4, irradiated in the ATR East Flux Trap (EFT) (see Figure 1) during ATR Cycle 157D, 158A, 162A, 162B, 164A, 164B, 166A, and Cycle 166B. This ECAR also reports the neutron and photon heat rates for the materials of the AGC-4 experiment for ATR Cycle 158A (timestep 19), which provides to the maximum heating. The results for these evaluations and analysis are reported herein. The AGC-4 as-run specimen neutron fast fluence (E > 0.1 MeV), DPA, and material heat rate calculations were performed using a general-purpose Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code. All calculated results are tabulated herein.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Comparison of Subdivided Versus Full-Length Fuel Pin Burnup in the ATF-2 Safety Analysis

The Accident Tolerant Fuels (ATF) campaign, under the Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) Advanced Fuels program, was developed after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant disaster in 2011. Under ATF, fuel and cladding concepts are to be developed and tested that may more readily withstand an accident similar to the one that occurred at Fukushima Daiichi. ATF is a combination of industry, universities, and national laboratories in an effort to develop advanced accident tolerant cladding and fuel concepts. The end goal of the ATF program is to insert a lead test rod (LTR) or lead test assembly (LTA) into an operating commercial power light water reactor by 2022. In order to meet this 2022 insertion goal, ATF is split into three separate phases: ATF-1, ATF-2, and ATF-3. The first phase of the ATF program, ATF-1, is the concept feasibility study and early irradiation testing. Feasibility, fabrication, and out-of-pile testing are happening at universities and laboratories all over the United States. Irradiation testing of these concepts is happening at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). Early irradiation testing involves testing clad and/or fuel in drop-in capsules in the ATR. Currently, these capsules are in the relatively low-flux positions in the ATR, but some newer concepts and concepts that require higher burnup will be moved to the higher-flux positions later on during irradiation. Currently, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Westinghouse Electric Company, Areva, and General Electric (GE) have inserted capsules for ATF-1, although more concepts are planned. The second phase of ATF, ATF-2, is the focus of this paper. ATF-2 is the loop testing of fuel pins with new cladding and fuel concepts to simulate pressurized water reactor (PWR) and boiling water reactor (BWR) environments. ATF-2 will concurrently be happening at the ATR and at the Halden Reactor in Norway. The ATF-2 irradiation at the ATR will only simulate a PWR environment. ATF-2 will be inserted into the ATR pressurized water loop, Loop 2A, in the Center Flux Trap (CFT), where chemistry, temperature, and pressure can all be controlled separately from the primary coolant system and other loops in ATR. Loop 2A will be borated, pressurized to 2200 psi nominal, and have an average water temperature of 300 deg. C. A borated loop with fueled rodlets is extremely rare for Nuclear Energy experiments in the ATR, so ATF-2 will demonstrate new and unique capabilities for INL. ATF-3 is the testing of fresh and irradiated ATF concepts at the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility. The TREAT Reactor is planned for restart, re-establishing U.S. transient testing capabilities after nearly 20 years of non-operations. TREAT will test ATF concepts under transient conditions, such as a reactivity insertion accident. In addition to fresh fuel pins, TREAT will use from ATF2 and do transient testing on those irradiated pins. The information TREAT will provide to the vendors to support fuel licensing will be valuable, showing that these concepts do enhance the accident tolerance of the fuel in commercial reactors. (author)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Molten Salt in the Advanced Test Reactor [Slides]

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is one of the world’s most important resources for fuel qualification. Prior to this project, ATR could not support molten salt irradiation experiments. This work expands ATR’s capability to support fuel qualification for molten salt reactors.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2020

As-Run Neutronics Evaluation for the CSM-10584 Experiment in the ATR

This engineering calculations and analysis report (ECAR) documents the results of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) detailed Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code full-core model as-run physics analysis performed to support the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) experiment in the B-5 position.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2025

Cross-Code Verification of Neutronics Analysis Tools at INL Applied for 238 Pu Production in the Advanced Test Reactor

Here, analyses are completed for experiments prior to experiment irradiation in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). Various codes are used to qualify all experiments planned for insertion in the reactor, thereby ensuring that all safety and programmatic requirements are satisfied preirradiation. Among the common experiment analysis tools at INL are MCNP5 coupled to ORIGEN2 (MOPY) and MC21. MOPY uses MCNP5 for transport calculations along with calculations for fluxes and select reaction rates, and then ORIGEN2 handles the step-by-step and postirradiation depletion. MC21 handles all in-reactor transport and step-by-step, during-irradiation, depletion calculations, and then ORIGEN (SCALE 6.2.3) is used for decay and dose calculations postirradiation. The MOPY results, along with those obtained via two variations of the MC21 model, were compared in terms of 238 Pu production in the ATR’s H10 position. For the MOPY model, the MC21 model utilizing the HELIOS-based fission product (FP) library, and the MC21 model utilizing the expanded 1300 FP library, the during-cycle irradiation in-core heating results were sufficiently equivalent; however, the MOPY model and the MC21 model with the HELIOS library showed some differences relating to the respective FP libraries. Ultimately, the MC21 model with a 1300 FP library produced the most consistent results throughout the cycle, whereas the MC21 model that utilized the (smaller) HELIOS library was able to handle during-irradiation analysis but lacked certain short-lived FPs that significantly contributed to the total decay heat at shutdown. MOPY, on the other hand, was found to overpredict fission gas production, as a result of limitations in the ORIGEN2 code.

ATR↗

DOE OSTI2016

Initial Results from the High Fluence UCSB ATR-2 Irradiation

A primary focus of the Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program (LWRSP) is the safe operation of nuclear reactors to extended lifetimes of up to 80 years. One of the primary reactor components of concern is the reactor pressure vessel (RPV), which is increasingly embrittled over time due to damage from high energy neutrons created in the reactor core. Radiation damage leads to the formation of nm-scale precipitates and solute-defect clusters, which result in an increase in the steel's ductile to brittle transition temperature. Transition temperature shifts (TTS) are used to quantify and regulate embrittlement. Extended life operation will subject some RPVs to higher neutron fluences than previously experienced by in-service vessels. Thus, robust prediction methods must be developed that ensure the safety of our nation's fleet of reactors. Current models underpredict embrittlement data from high flux test reactor irradiations at extended life fluences. It has been hypothesized that one reason for this underprediction is the formation of so-called 'Late- Blooming Phase' Mn-Ni-Si precipitates, which form and grow only at high fluence and that are currently not included in regulatory models. Recent research has demonstrated the existence of high volume fractions of intermetallic Mn-Ni-Si precipitate (MNSP) phases at high fluence and have generated significant insight into their character. However, a number of questions remain regarding MNSPs, such as: 1) what alloys are most susceptible to MNSP formation; 2) how is MNSP formation affected by flux (φ), fluence (φt) and irradiation temperature (T{sub irr}); and, 3) how to accurately predict TTS under extended life low flux service conditions? The fact that no two RPVs are exactly the same, both in terms of the steel composition and vessel service conditions, makes these questions particularly difficult to answer. Further, understanding the effect of flux differences between test reactor irradiations and in-vessel service is absolutely critical. Hence, physical models must be developed that predict TTS as a function of alloy solute content and vessel service conditions. A large-scale irradiation designed to develop and validate an extended life embrittlement prediction model was recently completed in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory as part of the DOE sponsored Nuclear Scientific User Facilities. This experiment, called the UCSB ATR-2 irradiation, is a collaboration between Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL) and the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) and is now primarily supported by the DOE Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program. The experiment is designed to investigate the single and combined effects of neutron φ, φt, T{sub irr} and alloy chemistry on precipitate formation, hardening and embrittlement. While postirradiation examinations (PIE) is ongoing, and is expected to take several years to complete, the first preliminary results are presented below. It should also be noted that Rolls-Royce has been a collaborator in UCSB ATR-2 from the start, and there are several other national and international institutions supporting the PIE. (authors)

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2023

Transport Modeling of As-Run ATR Cycles for U-10Mo Fuel Qualification Experiment

The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Materials Management and Minimization has been tasked with converting the five remaining United States High Performance Research Reactors (U.S. HPRR) from highly enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR), Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR), and National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR); and DOE regulates the High Flux Isotope Reactor and Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). To meet the high demands of these reactors, the U.S. HPRR program has chosen to use 90% uranium - 10% molybdenum (U-10Mo) monolithic fuel. This plate-type fuel will undergo multiple irradiation experiment campaigns in ATR, from mini-plates to full element tests, over a large range of operating conditions. This will provide data in support of the fuel qualification of each reactor. This summary focuses on the as-run neutronic analysis of the first series of mini-plate (MP-1) experiments, which have been irradiated in the ATR. MP-1 experiment’s main goal is to demonstrate the fabrication process and meet the fuel irradiation performance requirements with primary focus on the fuel plates associated with the three NRC reactors, with a small focus on the low power requirements of the ATR fuel. The MP-1 experiments are planned to be the basis of the monolithic U-10Mo fuel for qualification through the NRC.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2021

AGR 5/6/7 Data Qualification Report for ATR Cycles 162B through 168A

This report provides the qualification status of experimental data for the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) 5/6/7 fuel irradiation. AGR-5/6/7 was conducted in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in support of development and qualification of tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) low-enriched fuel for use in high temperature gas-cooled reactors. The objectives of the AGR-5/6/7 experiments are to: (i) irradiate reference-design fuel particles to support fuel qualification, (ii) establish operating margins for the fuel beyond normal operating conditions, and (iii) provide irradiated-fuel performance data and irradiated-fuel samples for post-irradiation examination (PIE) and safety testing. The test train contains five separate capsules that were independently controlled and monitored. Each capsule contains multiple 12.51-mm-long compacts filled with low enriched uranium carbide/oxide (UCO) TRISO fuel particles. The primary objective of the AGR-5/6 test (Capsules 1, 2, 4, and 5) is to verify successful performance of the reference-design fuel under normal operating conditions. The AGR-7 test (Capsule 3) was designed to explore fuel performance at higher temperatures to demonstrate the capability of the fuel to withstand conditions beyond normal operating conditions in support of plant design and licensing. AGR 5/6/7 will also provide irradiated-fuel performance data on fission-gas release from failed particles during irradiation. The AGR-5/6/7 capsules were irradiated in the ATR northeast flux trap location. The experiment began on February 16, 2018 and ended on July 22, 2020, spanning nine ATR cycles over two and a half years. Thus, the AGR-5/6/7 fuel compacts were irradiated for a total of 360.9 effective full power days. The AGR 5/6/7 experiment was able to remain in the reactor core during all three Powered Axial Locator Mechanism (PALM) cycles (163A, 165A, and 167A) without overheating its fuel compacts. This report includes irradiation monitoring data from nine ATR Cycles: 162B, 163A, 164A, 164B, 165A, 166A, 166B, 167A, and 168A, as stored in the Nuclear Data Management and Analysis System (NDMAS). During irradiation, data records consisted of instantaneous measurements recorded every minute and provided by text files automatically every 2 hours. The AGR 5/6/7 data streams addressed in this report include thermocouple (TC) temperatures, sweep gas data (flow rates [capsule inlet, outlet, and downstream at detector], pressure, and moisture content), and Fission Product Monitoring System (FPMS) data (release rates and release to birth rate ratios [R/Bs]) for each of the five capsules. A total of 94,989,908 TC temperature and sweep gas data records were received and processed by NDMAS for AGR 5/6/7 irradiation. Of these records, 41,593,387 (or 43.7% of the total) met data collection and accuracy requirements and are labeled as Qualified. A total of 57,746,693 TC temperature readings were captured from 54 installed TCs. Among them, 10,034,676 TC temperature records (only 17.4%) were Qualified and 47,701,371 TC temperatures (or 82.6%) are Failed due to 48 TC failures (63.5%) and due to missing values (19.1%). To assess performance of the operational TCs, analysis of daily correlations between TCs found no evidence of virtual junction failure for any TCs. Analyses on control charts of TC temperature differences revealed trending in TC readings for TC2, 4, 5, and 13 in Capsule 3, but there is no conclusive indication of TC drift failure that caused those trends. Therefore, TC control charts are not used to disqualify TC data, but only for users’ consideration. For sweep gas flow rates, a total of 31,519,747 gas flow records (84.4%) are Qualified for use for AGR-5/6/7 experiment; 5,723,468 gas flow records (15.4%) are Failed due mostly to missing values; and 74,641 high sweep gas flow rates (0.2 %) are Trend. A large number of Failed missing TC temperature and gas flow values were caused by an error in the data output script that outputted a ‘NULL’ value when values were unchanged. This problem was fixed during the outage of Cycle 166B, which led to a substantially decreased number of missing values during the last three cycles. Nonetheless, a large amount of non-missing data remained because of the high data acquisition frequency (1-minute) and still provided sufficient data to effectively monitor the experiment as designed. For FPMS data, NDMAS received and processed fission product release and R/B data for nine ATR cycles, when ATR core reached full power during AGR 5/6/7 irradiation. These data consist of 110,388 release rate records and 110,388 R/B records for the twelve radionuclides (Kr 85m, Kr 87, Kr 88, Kr 89, Kr 90, Xe 131m, Xe 133, Xe 135, Xe 135m, Xe 137, Xe 138, and Xe 139) for each of the five capsules. Equivalent numbers of uncertainty records associated the release rates and R/B values were provided. To date, qualification status of the FPMS data stored in the NDMAS dat

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

High-temperature steam oxidation study of irradiated FeCrAl defueled specimens

Post irradiation examinations (PIE) were performed on irradiated iron-chromium-aluminum (FeCrAl) specimens. These FeCrAl specimens were fabricated at the US Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The experimental setup involved subjecting FeCrAl cladding, along with UO 2 pellets, to irradiation in the Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). In parallel, the FeCrAl alloy tubing without UO 2 pellets was irradiated at ORNL's High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR). After irradiation, the ATR-irradiated rodlet was transported to an ORNL hot cell, where it was sectioned into multiple samples for the PIE and severe-accident testing. The sectioning process revealed that the fuel was not bonded to the cladding and could be easily detached from sectioned cladding slices. Microstructural analysis of the fuel cross sections demonstrated no significant interaction between the fuel and the cladding. Additionally, high-temperature steam oxidation tests on defueled cladding segments showed minimal oxygen uptake even at 1200 °C. Here, the ATR-irradiated specimens began to exhibit signs of enhanced oxidation upon reaching a temperature of 1300 °C. Furthermore, enhanced oxidation was observed on the inner surface of the ATR-irradiated FeCrAl specimen, which had been subjected to 1300 °C for a duration of 1 min. By contrast, high-temperature steam oxidation experiments indicated that the HFIR-irradiated FeCrAl cladding provided good thermal stability when exposed to 1300 °C for up to 4 h. Comparative analysis encompassing the oxidation behavior of the ATR-irradiated fueled FeCrAl, HFIR-irradiated unfueled FeCrAl, and unirradiated FeCrAl suggests that the fuel–cladding interaction, although not visible via standard microscale electron microscopy measurements, may accelerate the deterioration of FeCrAl cladding in beyond-design-basis accident scenarios.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2025

Log-N/Period Power Offset Sensitivity Calculation

This study focused on the calculation of sensitivity values for Channels 4 and 5 in the Log-N/Period system at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). The Log-N/Period system provides an indication of reactor power generation between criticality and full power. This indication is determined by the power offset and the current produced by the detector. Sensitivity values for Channels 4 and 5 were calculated using existing equations, documents, reactor startup data.

42 - ENGINEERING↗