Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “3D printing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Initial Assessment of 3D-Printed Molybdenum Lattices as a Substrate for Liquid Metal Plasma-Facing Components

Many liquid metal plasma-facing component concepts for fusion reactors require a capillary porous material to wick the liquid metal to the surface of the component. In this work, samples of 3D-printed molybdenum lattices designed to have pore sizes ranging from 100 to 1000 µm were fabricated by two different suppliers. The dimensions of the lattice structures were characterized using an optical microscope, revealing that the lattice walls were almost systematically thicker than they were designed to be and in turn the pores are all smaller than they were designed to be. In many cases the pores were completely clogged. Several spectroscopic techniques were used to characterize the chemical composition of the materials, collectively indicating the presence of a thick layer of oxygen-rich material extending more than 1 µm below the surface. Compression testing revealed significant asymmetry in the mechanical behavior depending on which direction the force was applied relative to the print direction. Lastly, lithium wetting tests of several lattice samples were performed, and a sample with ~250-µm pores was found to soak up lithium quickly after initial wetting of the surface occurred. The implications of these results for future liquid metal plasma-facing component design are discussed.

Parsons, Matthew S. [Princeton Plasma Physics Labo↗
DOE OSTI2025

Real-time process monitoring and automated control for direct ink write 3D printing of frontally polymerizing thermosets

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of complex geometries, yet its application to thermosets remains limited by post-processing requirements. Frontal ring-opening metathesis polymerization (FROMP) offers a promising alternative, enabling energy-efficient, in situ curing of freestanding thermoset structures. This study presents a real-time process monitoring and automated control system for direct ink writing (DIW) of FROMP thermosets. By integrating thermochromic leuco dyes and computer vision, we enable real-time polymerization front tracking, allowing autonomous printing parameter adjustments for consistent geometries across resin formulations. The system’s accuracy was validated against manual tracking, demonstrating precise front velocity detection. Its adaptability was confirmed by printing freestanding mechanical springs with different resins, achieving consistent geometries and mechanical properties despite front velocity variations. These findings highlight the potential of automated DIW control for scalable, repeatable, and material-agnostic 3D printing of thermosets.

Mejia, Edgar Brian [Sandia National Laboratories (↗
NASA NTRS2019

The 3D Printing of Polyimide Aerogels

Polyimide aerogels are a nanoporous material made by extracting the liquid portion of a wet gel and replacing it with air, while still maintaining the porous solid internal architecture. This results in a material with extremely low densities, low thermal conductivities, high internal surfaces areas, and low dielectric constants. Currently, complex aerogel forms are not possible, since they require molds in order to be shaped. To overcome this challenge, we are attempting to use various additive manufacturing techniques to produce complex architectures. Three different approaches are being studied to accomplish this. One is to print using a viscous wet gel and have the structure solidify at the end of the print, another is to use a mixing tip, where a less viscous gel and the final chemical that causes gelation will be mixed as it is printing, allowing it to gel layer by layer, and the third is to use a UV curable aerogel with a UV light following behind to solidify the gel as it prints. To have these approaches be successful, the printing parameters and the aerogel's chemical formulation need to be optimized. The more harmonious these two factors can be made, the more defined and complex the resulting structure can be. Preliminary results show that 3D printing polyimide aerogels are a viable option, but further optimization must occur for reliable printing.

Nosel, Theresa↗
NASA NTRS2014

Enabling Technologies for Entrepreneurial Opportunities in 3D printing of SmallSats

A consortium of innovative experts in additive manufacturing (AM) comprising Northrup Grumman Technical Services, University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), Configurable Space Microsystems Innovations & Applications Center (COSMIAC), NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC), and Youngstown State University, have made significant breakthroughs in the goal of creating the first complete 3D printed small satellite. Since AM machines are relatively inexpensive, this should lead to many entrepreneurial opportunities for the small satellite community. Our technology advancements are focused on the challenges of embedding key components within the structure of the article. We have demonstrated, using advanced fused deposition modeling techniques, complex geometric shapes which optimize the spacecraft design. The UTEP Keck Center has developed a method that interrupts the printing process to insert components into specific cavities, resulting in a spacecraft that has minimal internal space allocated for what traditionally were functional purposes. This allows us to increase experiment and instrument capability by provided added volume in a confined small satellite space. Leveraging initial progress made on a NASA contract, the team investigated the potential of new materials that exploit the AM process, producing candidate compositions that exceed the capabilities of traditional materials. These "new materials" being produced and tested include some that have improved radiation shielding, increased permeability, enhanced thermal properties, better conductive properties, and increased structural performance. The team also investigated materials that were previously not possible to be made. Our testing included standard mechanical tests such as vibration, tensile, thermal cycling, and impact resistance as well as radiation and electromagnetic tests. The initial results of these products and their performance will be presented and compared with standard properties. The new materials with the highest probability to disrupt the future of small satellite systems by driving down costs will be highlighted, in conjunction with the electronic embedding process.

Communications↗
DOE OSTI2025

Computational Modeling of a 3D Printed Recuperator and Subsequent Experimental Loop for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycles

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), in collaboration with mechanical-thermal energy storage (mTES) provider EarthEn, a US Department of Energy (DOE) Lab-Embedded Entrepreneurship Program (LEEP) recipient at ORNL’s Innovation Crossroads 2023, is utilizing a state-of-the-art patented 3D printing technique to design an additively manufactured (AM) supercritical CO2 (sCO2) recuperator (REC) for EarthEn’s charge/discharge cycle. The AM REC will be printed at ORNL’s Manufacturing Demonstration Facility using Inconel Alloy 718 and tested on a closed-loop, ∼100 kW scale experimental facility that is under construction. The testing will compare the printed design against a commercial-off-the-shelf Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger (PCHE) REC. The design of the sCO2 facility is guided by a Modelica-based system model which is primarily dependent on the open-source TRANSFORM library developed at ORNL and uses the open-source CoolProp library for thermophysical properties of sCO2 via the External Media library. It is envisioned that an iterative process will be followed between the physical loop and the system model wherein the initial experimental data will be used to tune the model, which in turn will be used to guide future loop operation. Simultaneously, the AM REC is being designed using computer-aided design models, and it is also being analyzed for hydraulic and thermomechanical response using commercial computational fluid dynamics software, Simcenter STAR-CCM+, on highperformance computing resources.1

See, Nate [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000178581202)↗
NASA NTRS2019

Monolithic Trace-Contaminant Sorbents Fabricated from 3D-Printed Polymer Precursors

The current trace-contaminant (TC) removal technology for use in Extravehicular Activities (EVAs) involves the use of a packed bed of acid-impregnated granular charcoal, which is difficult to regenerate. In this paper, results are presented on the development of vacuum-regenerable TC sorbents for use in the Portable Life Support System (PLSS). The sorbents are derived from 3D-printed polymer monoliths (e.g., honeycomb structures), which are then carbonized and activated in order to develop porosity, and also to enhance the TC-sorption capacity. Results are presented on the following aspects of carbon-sorbent development: (1) precursor selection; (2) monolith fabrication; (3) shape retention and strength; (4) carbon surface and porosity characterization; (5) TC-sorption capacity and vacuum-regeneration; (6) pressure drop; and (7) sub-scale sorbent prototype. The use of predominantly microporous monolithic carbon is associated with the following benefits: (a) high TC-sorption capacity; (b) low pressure drop; (c) rapid vacuum (pressure-swing) desorption due to thin monolith walls and low pressure drop; (d) good thermal management (high thermal conductivity and low adsorption/desorption thermal effects associated with physisorption); and (e) good resistance to dusty environments.

Portable Life Support System (PLSS)↗
DOE OSTI2025

3D printing of architected sulfur cathodes with dual-site atomic catalysts for accelerated polysulfide kinetics and Li-ion transport in high areal-loading lithium–sulfur batteries

The practical deployment of lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) is hindered by fundamental limitations in conventional slurry-cast cathodes, including poor sulfur utilization, sluggish ion transport, and low areal capacity, particularly in thick electrodes required for high energy density. To address these challenges, we present direct ink writing (DIW) as an additive manufacturing strategy to fabricate advanced current-collector-free, 3D-printed sulfur cathodes (3DP S@CoNi-DSACs/NC) with hierarchically porous architectures that enhance lithium-ion diffusion, promote electrolyte penetration, and reduce interfacial resistance. The synergistic effects of Co/Ni dual-atom sites accelerate redox kinetics and mitigate polysulfide shuttling. As a result, the optimized 3DP cathode with a sulfur loading of 5.4 mg cm −2 demonstrated excellent rate capability, delivering a high reversible capacity of 1041.4 mAh g −1 at 1C with 85.5% capacity retention after 1000 cycles, significantly outperforming its cast counterpart. Remarkably, even at a higher sulfur loading of 8.1 mg cm −2 , the 3DP cathode maintains outstanding performance, achieving a discharge capacity of 1538.4 mAh g −1 and an areal capacity of 12.5 mAh cm −2 at 0.1C. This study not only demonstrates the functional integration of catalytically active materials into 3D printable sulfur cathode architectures but also offers a scalable and transformative platform for building high-performance LSBs beyond conventional electrode manufacturing methods.

3D electrode↗
DOE OSTI2026

Advancing Industry 4.0: Multimodal Sensor Fusion for AI-Based Fault Detection in 3D Printing

Additive manufacturing, particularly fused deposition modeling, is transforming modern production by enabling rapid prototyping and complex part fabrication. However, its layer-by-layer process remains vulnerable to faults such as nozzle clogging, filament runout, and layer misalignment, which compromise print quality and reliability. Traditional inspection methods are costly, time-intensive, and often limited to post-process analysis, making them unsuitable for real-time intervention. In this current study, the authors developed a novel, low-cost, and portable faultdetection system that leverages multimodal sensor fusion and artificial intelligence for real-time monitoring in FDM-based 3D printing. The system integrates acoustic, vibration, and thermal sensing into a non-intrusive architecture, capturing complementary data streams that reflect both mechanical and process-related anomalies. Acoustic and thermal sensors operate in a fully contactless manner, while the vibration sensor requires minimal attachment such that it will not interfere with printer hardware, thereby preserving portability and ease of deployment. The multimodal signals are processed into spectrograms and time-frequency features, which are classified using convolutional neural networks for intelligent fault detection. The proposed system advances Industry 4.0 objectives by offering an affordable, scalable, and practical monitoring solution that improves faultdetection accuracy, reduces waste, and supports sustainable, adaptive manufacturing.

42 ENGINEERING↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Additive Manufacturing Technologies for 3D Printing of Spacecraft Heat Shields

Ablative heat shields are an enabling technology for entry into planetary atmospheres. From the PICA heatshields used for several Mars rovers to the carbon phenolic material used for Galileo’s Jupiter entry probe, the heat shield manages the heat load transferred to the payload, protecting the sensitive scientific instruments carried on entry probes. The Additive Manufacturing of Thermal Protection Systems (AMTPS) project, an Early Career Initiative (ECI) funded by NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate and led by NASA Johnson Space Center, seeks to develop materials and processes for 3D printing ablative heat shields for spacecraft. Current methods for producing ablative heat shields are extremely labor intensive and require extensive hands-on processes and quality control characterization. Additive manufacturing (AM) offers the possibility of reduced production times, improved reliability, and enhanced performance via graded compositions. Costs will also be reduced by reducing the time and labor required for heat shield production. Direct integration of the heat shield onto the structure during processing simplifies integration and reduces risk.

Nathaniel Olson↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Additive Manufacturing Technologies for 3D Printing of Spacecraft Heat Shields

Ablative heat shields are an enabling technology for entry into planetary atmospheres. From the PICA heatshields used for several Mars rovers to the carbon phenolic material used for Galileo’s Jupiter entry probe, the heat shield manages the heat load transferred to the payload, protecting the sensitive scientific instruments carried on entry probes. The Additive Manufacturing of Thermal Protection Systems (AMTPS) project, an Early Career Initiative (ECI) funded by NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate and led by NASA Johnson Space Center, seeks to develop materials and processes for 3D printing ablative heat shields for spacecraft. Current methods for producing ablative heat shields are extremely labor intensive and require extensive hands-on processes and quality control characterization. Additive manufacturing (AM) offers the possibility of reduced production times, improved reliability, and enhanced performance via graded compositions. Costs will also be reduced by reducing the time and labor required for heat shield production. Direct integration of the heat shield onto the structure during processing simplifies integration and reduces risk.

Nathaniel Olson↗
NASA NTRS2016

Summary Report on Phase I Results from the 3D Printing in Zero G Technology Demonstration Mission, Volume I

Human space exploration to date has been confined to low-Earth orbit and the Moon. The International Space Station (ISS) provides a unique opportunity for researchers to prove out the technologies that will enable humans to safely live and work in space for longer periods of time and venture beyond the Earth/Moon system. The ability to manufacture parts in-space rather than launch them from Earth represents a fundamental shift in the current risk and logistics paradigm for human spaceflight. In September 2014, NASA, in partnership with Made In Space, Inc., launched the 3D Printing in Zero-G technology demonstration mission to explore the potential of additive manufacturing for in-space applications and demonstrate the capability to manufacture parts and tools on orbit using fused deposition modeling. This Technical Publication summarizes the results of testing to date of the ground control and flight prints from the first phase of this ISS payload.

in-space manufacturing↗
DOE OSTI2024

Melt compounding of spray-dried cellulose nanofibrils/polypropylene and their application in 3D printing

Abstract Micro- and nano-scale cellulosic fillers exhibit excellent dispersion and distribution within a thermoplastic matrix during the process of melt compounding or injection molding. In this study, spray-dried cellulose nanofiber (SDCNF) powders were manufactured using a pilot-scale rotating disk atomizer spray dryer. Bleached Kraft pulp (BKP), unbleached Kraft pulp (UKP), and old corrugated cardboard pulp (OCC) fibrillated at a fines level of 90% were used as feedstock materials for spray-drying. BKP-, UKP-, and OCC- SDCNFs were compounded with polypropylene using a twin screw co-rotating extruder. Maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (MAPP) was used as a coupling agent in the composite formulations. The tensile, flexural, and impact properties of SDCNF-filled PP composites increased at 10 wt% SDCNF loading. The presence of SDCNFs in the PP matrix resulted in faster crystallization and a 12% reduction in the degree of crystallinity of the neat PP. The coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of neat PP was reduced by up to 31% attributable to the presence of the SDCNFs. Application of the SDCNF-reinforced PP composites in 3D printing reduced the shrinkage rate of the printed neat PP by 39%, and the printability of the PP was significantly improved with the addition of the SDCNFs.

Materials Science↗
NASA NTRS2024

3D Printing and Surface Engineering of Ti6Al4V Scaffolds for Enhanced Osseointegration in an In Vitro Study

Ti6Al4V superalloy is recognized as a good candidate for bone implants owing to its biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, and high strength-to-weight ratio. While dense metal implants are associated with stress shielding issues due to the difference in densities, stiffness, and modulus of elasticity compared to bone tissues, the surface of the implant/scaffold should mimic the properties of the bone of interest to assure a good integration with a strong interface. In this study, we investigated the additive manufacturing of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds and coating modification for enhanced osteoconduction using osteoblast cells. The results showed the successful fabrication of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds with adequate strength. Additionally, the surface treatment with NaOH and Dopamine Hydrochloride (DOPA) promoted the formation of Dopamine Hydrochloride (DOPA) coating with an optimized coating process, providing an environment that supports higher cell viability and growth compared to the uncoated Ti6Al4V scaffolds, as demonstrated by the higher proliferation ratios observed from day 1 to day 29. These findings bring valuable insights into the surface modification of 3D-printed scaffolds for improved osteoconduction through the coating process in solutions.

metal additive manufacturing↗
DOE OSTI2025

Effects of Surface Treatments on the Outgassing of 3D-Printed 316L Stainless Steel.

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) is a world leader in designing and operating particle accelerators for nuclear and particle physics research. These accelerators rely on electric fields to propel particle beams, which are then directed and focused using magnetic fields. To ensure these beams travel without interference, they must move through an ultra-high vacuum environment, typically around 10⁻⁹ torr. Maintaining such a vacuum requires materials with exceptionally low outgassing rates. 316L stainless steel is a common material choice for vacuum systems due to its low outgassing rates, excellent corrosion resistance, non-magnetic properties, and high mechanical strength. When manufactured using traditional methods like machining, extrusion, and casting, the vacuum properties of 316L stainless steel are well understood. However, the behavior of 316L stainless steel produced through additive manufacturing, such as Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS), is not as well documented. This study aims to determine the outgassing rate of 316L stainless steel fabricated using DMLS. The investigation focuses on measuring the outgassing rates of 1.5 2 vacuum reducers and evaluating the effects of surface preparation techniques, such as mechanical polishing and electropolishing, on the outgassing performance. Understanding the outgassing performance of 3D-printed 316L stainless steel could enable Fermilab engineers to adopt this fabrication method for producing complex parts designed for ultra-high vacuum environments. These advancements have the potential to benefit projects, such as the Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and the Proton Improvement Plan-II (PIP-II), by improving design flexibility and fostering innovation in accelerator development.

Cloud, Jaiden [Central State University]↗
NASA NTRS2014

Biomaterials Out of Thin Air: In Situ, On-Demand Printing of Advanced Biocomposites: A New Materials Design and Production Technique Using 3D-Printed Arrays of Bioengineered Cells

We have completed the proof of concept described in our Phase I proposal, a two-material array of nonstructural proteins. We created an implementation of each step in our technology concept and demonstrated its critical functionality. The biological chassis and printing hardware we created as part of this work can be re-used for future work by inserting a material coding region upstream of the fluorescent tag. Overall, we showed that our technology concept is sound. The mission benefit analyses, as described in our Phase I proposal, are complete and contained in this report. These calculations show that our technology can save hundreds of kilograms of upmass for a potential planetary human habit construction mission: the mass per habitat module can be reduced by approximately one third if the biomaterials are manufactured on Earth and included in the mission upmass, and the full 240 kg per module can be saved if the materials are derived entirely from in situ resources. Mass savings between these two extremes is expected for an actual mission, depending on the level of in situ resource extraction technology. We have shown that continued advancement of this technology concept for use in a space mission environment is justified. Our survey of future development pathways proved extremely informative in light of the lessons learned from our proof of concept work and mission scenario analyses. For example, we were able for the first time to distinguish between the levels of functionality provided by production of structural proteins, other polymers such as polysaccharides, and true organic-inorganic composites such as bone and mineralized shell. This new information represents a significant advance in formulating specific applications, and key enabling technologies, for our proposed concept. We surveyed potential collaborations with other projects and synergies with enabling technologies that are developing. We have received requests for collaboration from other institutions, including labs at Stanford University and Drexel University. We have also received visits from industry, including Organovo, a tissue engineering company, and Autodesk, a major 3D and materials design software company. Finally, we have been in touch with the team behind the 2013 NIAC Phase ll 'Super Ball Bot-Structures for Planetary Landing and Exploration' and are planning to develop our biomaterial printing technology with the goal of enabling tensegrity-based rovers such as theirs to use lighter, more robust materials. A smooth transition from TRL 2 to TRL 3 assumes that the implementations of the technology concept which demonstrate critical functionality are also pathways for future development; while this is the case for most hardware or software projects, the multidisciplinary nature of our project, particularly the biological aspect of it, means that this is not always true. For example, as part of this work we showed that although there are large number of known genetic parts that correspond to non-structural materials, this is not true for sequences for structural organic proteins, let alone biominerals. These realizations allowed us to further subdivide our concept into more detailed development areas, some of which are clearly established at TRL 3, others of which were newly identified sub-technologies moved from TRL 1 to TRL 2. Similarly, although a single feasibility /benefit analysis is sufficient for advancement from TRL 2 to TRL 3, not all potential benefits to a technology concept as broad in scope as ours are apparent at TRL 2. Both our future pathways survey and our proof of concept work highlighted that the true mass savings potential of our technology concept cannot be quantified without modification of existing materials modelling tools to take into account the possibility of positional materials properties customization. Therefore, we have simultaneously both advanced one potential set of applications of our technology concept from TRL 2 to TRL 3 and also identified a previously unknown set of applications and advanced it from TRL 1 to TRL 2. Overall, we have moved the original formulation of our concept forward from TRL 2 to TRL 3, and the expanded formulation of it presented in this document has been advanced from a combination of TRL 1 and early 1RL 2 to an overall late TRL 2. We have also identified the key areas necessary for both short-term and long-term advancement, and made recommendations for specific future work in the most promising directions. With future work on a 1-2 year timeframe to continue advancement to overall TRL 3, we will be well positioned to begin work on a specific space mission technology insertion path.

Biology↗