Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Protection”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,423 records · Page 79
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Thermal protection barrier for delaying access

A thermal protection barrier including a base layer having a plurality of baffles with perforated walls and a high melting temperature granular media disposed within the plurality of baffles. When the base layer is breached by a thermal threat, the granular media is operable to flow through the perforated walls of the plurality of baffles to provide a controlled flow of granular media to an area proximate the breach for thwarting the thermal threat.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Overcharge protection of batteries using current interrupt devices

A battery system includes a main electrochemical cell that includes a cathode and an anode, a cathode tab electrically coupled to the cathode, and an anode tab electrically coupled to the anode. A second electrochemical cell is electrically coupled to the cathode tab and the anode tab. An interrupt device, such as a bi-stable metal disc, is operably coupled to the second electrochemical cell and at least one of the cathode tab or the anode tab. Upon overcharging of the main electrochemical cell, the voltage between the cathode tab and the anode tab causes the second electrochemical cell to generate gases that triggers the interrupt device, which in turn disconnects at least one of the cathode tab or the anode tab, thereby protecting the main electrochemical cell from further damages.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

System and method for protecting GPU memory instructions against faults

A system and method for protecting memory instructions against faults are described. The system and method include converting the slave instructions to dummy operations, modifying memory arbiter to issue up to N master and N slave global/shared memory instructions per cycle, sending master memory requests to memory system, using slave requests for error checking, entering master requests to the GM/LM FIFO, storing slave requests in a register, and comparing the entered master requests with the stored slave requests.

Kalamatianos, John↗
DOE OSTI2021

Semiconductor topologies and devices for soft starting and active fault protection of power converters

Various examples are provided related to semiconductor topologies and devices that can be used for soft starting and active fault protection of power converters. In one example, an active switch device includes an active switch having a gating control input; and a thyristor having a gating control input. The thyristor is coupled in parallel with the active switch. The active switch can be an IGBT, MOSFET, or other appropriate device. In another example, a power converter can include the active switch devices and switching control circuitry coupled to gating control inputs of the active switch devices.

Beddingfield, Richard B.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Protecting Smart Buildings with STIG

This is a submission for the 2022 Intern Poster Session. The abstract of the poster is: Smart buildings are getting more common, and so are hackers that target them. The physical systems in our businesses and homes are now vulnerable to cyber attacks. Using STIG, an INL program that turns cybersecurity data into graphs, buildings can be better protected.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Methods, systems, and computer readable media for protecting and controlling a microgrid with a dynamic boundary

Methods, systems, and computer readable mediums for protecting and controlling a microgrid with a dynamic boundary are disclosed. One method includes detecting a fault in a microgrid that includes a dynamic point-of-common-coupling (PCC), in response to determining that the microgrid is operating in a grid-connected mode, isolating the fault by tripping a microgrid side smart switch and a grid side smart switch that are located immediately adjacent to the fault, initiating the reclosing of the grid side smart switch, and initiating the reclosing for the microgrid side smart switch via resynchronization if the grid side smart switch is successfully reclosed, and in response to determining that the microgrid is operating in an islanded mode, isolating the fault by tripping a microgrid side smart switch that is located immediately adjacent to the fault, and initiating the reclosing of the microgrid side smart switch.

Wang, Fei↗
DOE OSTI2023

Nuclear fuel elements including protective structures, and related method of forming a nuclear fuel element

A nuclear fuel element includes a core comprising a fissile element and an additional element. A protective structure surrounds the core and comprises at least a first material surrounding the nuclear fuel. The first material comprises the fissile element and the additional element and comprises a greater than stoichiometric amount of the additional element. An outer portion of the nuclear fuel element comprises a metal. Related nuclear fuel elements, and related methods are also disclosed.

Griffith, George W.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Applying protective coatings to optical fibers

Apparatus, systems, and methods that provide coats on a glass optical fiber including of an inner layer and an outer layer. The method includes two steps. First, a conductive polymer coating is applied to the optical fiber as it is being produced. Second, a protective coating is applied to that conductive polymer coating. The conductive polymer coating is applied immediately after the fiber is drawn from preform to fiber.

Calta, Nicholas P.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Assessment of the Phase-to-Ground Fault Apparent Admittance Method with Phase/Ground Boundaries to Detect Types of Electrical Faults for Protective Relays Using Signature Library and Simulated Events

Protective relays in electric power grids recognize the types of electrical faults in a few seconds. The most common detection method to detect the types of electrical faults is based on measuring the angle between the zero and negative sequence currents. However, it is not completely accurate because the phase to phase ground and phase to ground electrical faults could have the same detection conditions. Therefore, engineers need to plot the events after an electrical fault to observe the nature of the incidents in detail. In this study, the phase to ground fault apparent (PGFA) admittance method with phase/ground boundaries identified the types of electrical faults located in distribution power lines and feeders. This method was based on measuring the PGFA admittance magnitudes for the faulted and non-faulted phases, resulting in greater than zero and near zero, respectively. The PGFA admittance algorithm was built with MATLAB/ Simulink software and tested with signature library and grid simulation events. The PGFA method with phase/ground boundaries was evaluated with the confusion matrix. The measured and predicted values matched in more than 90% of the tests, and the PGFA admittance method with phase/ground boundaries presented an accuracy of 94.3% and a precision of 100%.

Piesciorovsky, Emilio↗
DOE OSTI2023

System and method for protecting GPU memory instructions against faults

A system and method for protecting memory instructions against faults are described. The system and method include converting the slave instructions to dummy operations, modifying memory arbiter to issue up to N master and N slave global/shared memory instructions per cycle, sending master memory requests to memory system, using slave requests for error checking, entering master requests to the GM/LM FIFO, storing slave requests in a register, and comparing the entered master requests with the stored slave requests.

Kalamatianos, John↗
DOE OSTI2013

The Environmental Protection Agency's Safety Standards for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Potential Path Forward in Response to the Report of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future - 13388

Following the decision to withdraw the Yucca Mountain license application, the Department of Energy created a Blue Ribbon Commission (BRC) on America's Nuclear Future, tasked with recommending a national strategy to manage the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. The BRC issued its final report in January 2012, with recommendations covering transportation, storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF); potential reprocessing; and supporting institutional measures. The BRC recommendations on disposal of SNF and high-level waste (HLW) are relevant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which shares regulatory responsibility with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC): EPA issues 'generally applicable' performance standards for disposal repositories, which are then implemented in licensing. For disposal, the BRC endorses developing one or more geological repositories, with siting based on an approach that is adaptive, staged and consent-based. The BRC recommends that EPA and NRC work cooperatively to issue generic disposal standards-applying equally to all sites-early in any siting process. EPA previously issued generic disposal standards that apply to all sites other than Yucca Mountain. However, the BRC concluded that the existing regulations should be revisited and revised. The BRC proposes a number of general principles to guide the development of future regulations. EPA continues to review the BRC report and to assess the implications for Agency action, including potential regulatory issues and considerations if EPA develops new or revised generic disposal standards. This review also involves preparatory activities to define potential process and public engagement approaches. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Hanford River Protection Project Life cycle Cost Modeling Tool to Enhance Mission Planning - 13396

The Life cycle Cost Model (LCM) Tool is an overall systems model that incorporates budget, and schedule impacts for the entire life cycle of the River Protection Project (RPP) mission, and is replacing the Hanford Tank Waste Operations Simulator (HTWOS) model as the foundation of the RPP system planning process. Currently, the DOE frequently requests HTWOS simulations of alternative technical and programmatic strategies for completing the RPP mission. Analysis of technical and programmatic changes can be performed with HTWOS; however, life cycle costs and schedules were previously generated by manual transfer of time-based data from HTWOS to Primavera P6. The LCM Tool automates the preparation of life cycle costs and schedules and is needed to provide timely turnaround capability for RPP mission alternative analyses. LCM is the simulation component of the LCM Tool. The simulation component is a replacement of the HTWOS model with new capability to support life cycle cost modeling. It is currently deployed in G22, but has been designed to work in any full object-oriented language with an extensive feature set focused on networking and cross-platform compatibility. The LCM retains existing HTWOS functionality needed to support system planning and alternatives studies going forward. In addition, it incorporates new functionality, coding improvements that streamline programming and model maintenance, and capability to input/export data to/from the LCM using the LCM Database (LCMDB). The LCM Cost/Schedule (LCMCS) contains cost and schedule data and logic. The LCMCS is used to generate life cycle costs and schedules for waste retrieval and processing scenarios. It uses time-based output data from the LCM to produce the logic ties in Primavera P6 necessary for shifting activities. The LCM Tool is evolving to address the needs of decision makers who want to understand the broad spectrum of risks facing complex organizations like DOE-RPP to understand how near-term programmatic decisions affect life cycle costs and commitments. (authors)

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2012

Radioactive Water Treatment at a United States Environmental Protection Agency Superfund Site - 12322

A water treatment system at a United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Superfund site impacted by radiological contaminants is used to treat water entering the site. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is actively managing the remedial action for the USEPA using contracts to support the multiple activities on site. The site is where former gas mantle production facilities operated around the turn of the century. The manufacturing facilities used thorium ores to develop the mantles and disposed of off-specification mantles and ore residuals in the surrounding areas. During Site remedial actions, both groundwater and surface water comes into contact with contaminated soils and must be collected and treated at an on-site treatment facility. The radionuclides thorium and radium with associated progeny are the main concern for treatment. Suspended solids, volatile organic compounds, and select metals are also monitored during water treatment. The water treatment process begins were water is pumped to a collection tank where debris and grit settle out. Stored water is pumped to a coagulant tank containing poly-aluminum chloride to collect dissolved solids. The water passes into a reaction tube where aspirated air is added or reagent added to remove Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC'S) by mass transfer and convert dissolved iron to a solid. The water enters the flocculent polymer tank to drop solids out. The flocculated water overflows to a fluidized bed contact chamber to increase precipitation. Flocculation is where colloids of material drop out of suspension and settle. The settled solids are periodically removed and disposed of as radioactive waste. The water is passed through filters and an ion exchange process to extract the radionuclides. Several million liters of water are processed each year from two water treatment plants servicing different areas of the remediation site. Ion exchange resin and filter material are periodically replaced and disposed of as radioactive waste. A total of 0.85 m{sup 3} of waste sludge per year requires disposal on average, in addition to another 6.6 m{sup 3} of waste cartridge filters. All water discharges are regulated by a state of New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit implemented by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act). Laboratory analyses are required to satisfy requirements of the state NPDES permit. Specific monitoring parameters and discharge rates will be provided. Use of the water treatment systems drastically reduces the amount of contaminated water requiring solidification and water disposal to near zero. Millions of liters of potentially contaminated water from excavation activities is treated and released within permit limits. A small volume of solid radioactive waste (21 cubic meters) is generated annually from water treatment process operations. Management of ground and surface water is effectively controlled in remediation areas by the use of sumps, erosion control measures and pumping of water to storage vessels. Continued excavations can be made as water impacting the site is effectively controlled. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Use of natural resource damages settlement funds for watershed protection at the Fernald Preserve, Harrison, Ohio - 15309

The Fernald, Ohio, Site, also called the Fernald Preserve is a former uranium processing plant that underwent extensive remediation pursuant to CERCLA. The Fernald site is managed by the US DOE Office of Legacy Management. US DOE and the Ohio EPA settled a long-standing CERCLA natural resource damage claim against the site in November 2008. As part of the settlement, US DOE paid $13.75 million to compensate for natural resource injury. These settlement funds were appointed for restoration, replacement, or acquisition of equivalent natural resources at or near the Fernald Preserve. Following finalization of a Funds Utilization Plan in February 2010, the Fernald Natural Resource Trustees (composed of US DOE, Ohio EPA, and the US Department of the Interior and known collectively as the Trustees) used a portion of the settlement funds to initiate the Paddys Run Conservation Project. This effort is a means to secure development rights and conservation easements within the Paddys Run watershed. Paddys Run is a third-order stream located on the western side of the Fernald Preserve. The Trustees partnered with Three Valley Conservation Trust to obtain assistance with land acquisition and conservation easement management. Since Fall 2012, more than 1,093 hectares (2,700 acres) have been permanently protected via easement or purchase. The Trustees are also partnering with MetroParks of Butler County, Ohio, to establish a nature preserve on acquired land. The Salamander Run Preserve is situated on 51 hectares (125 acres) of forest and former agricultural land approximately 11 kilometers (7 miles) north of the Fernald site. The land was purchased by Three Valley Conservation Trust and is undergoing ecological restoration using settlement funds. Upon completion, the property will be donated to MetroParks of Butler County, Ohio.(authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Protective coatings for lithium anodes

A hybrid protective coating includes an inorganic component and an organic component such that the inorganic component includes at least one of a metal oxide, a metal fluoride, or combination thereof, and the organic component includes at least one metalcone.

Elam, Jeffrey W.↗
DOE OSTI2017

Diablo Canyon power plant digital process protection system replacement licensing experience using ISG-06 - 395

This paper provides a summary of the preparation of a License Amendment Request (LAR) for replacement of the existing Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP) Eagle 21 digital Process Protection System (PPS) by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG and E) using US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) Digital I and C (DI and C) Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) document ISG-06, Licensing Process . The USNRC has designated the LAR for the DCPP PPS replacement project as the pilot application for use of DI and C ISG-06. DI and C ISG-06, Revision 1, issued for use on January 19, 2011, describes the licensing process the NRC staff may use to review an LAR for a DI and C modification. The LAR for the replacement of the Eagle 21 PPS was submitted to the NRC on October 26, 2011, was accepted for review on January 13, 2012, and was approved on December 21, 2016. A more detailed review of the specific PPS replacement design including the Defense-In-Depth and Diversity approach is provided in a paper presented at the 2015 conference. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Adaptive Fault Current-Limiting Control of MMC for Protection of Multiterminal HVDC Systems: Preprint

For the development of multi-terminal high voltage DC (MTDC) transmission, it is critical to design the protection system that can selectively isolate the faulty area from the healthy part of the dc grid using DC circuit breakers (DCCBs) while ensuring continuous operation of converter stations in the healthy part. However, because of the lack of fault current blocking capability in half-bridge (HB) modular multilevel converters (MMCs), when a dc fault occurs, the rising fault currents can quickly reach the blocking threshold within a few milliseconds and disrupt the operation of MMCs in the healthy part. Large DC reactors are often considered in series with DCCBs to reduce the rate of rise of fault currents and prevent blocking of MMCs in the healthy part of the grid. However, large DC reactors can prohibitively increase the cost of the system, particularly when they are considered in an offshore environment, for instance in offshore wind projects. Large dc reactors can also introduce stability issues and create post-fault oscillations. This paper presents an adaptive fault current limiting control method for MMCs to avoid their blocking and enable continuous operation of MTDC systems. It contains two parts: The first part is based on circulating current feedforward control that emulates virtual reactors in each arm of an MMC, which is immediately activated when the fault current starts to increase, to reduce the rate of rise of the fault current; the second part is triggered when the fault current exceeds a preset threshold by temporarily bypassing the SMs, serving as a complement to the fault current limiting effect of the first part. Both parts do not require fault detection signal and they are activated automatically during faults. Simulation case studies of a four-terminal bipolar MMC-HVDC system are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control methods.

active fault current limiting↗