SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Baseline”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Scaled Wind Farm Technologies Facility Baselining Project Accelerates Work.
Abstract not provided.
Baseline Conditions to Observe Modal Coupling in a Nonlinear Bolted Structure.
Abstract not provided.
Building Regional Baselines and a Suite of Spatial Tools to Better Prepare for Oil Spills
Presented by NETL at AGU Ocean Sciences Meeting, 02/20
Baseline Airfoil Cooling Designs for a 5-10MW Combined Heat and Power Turbine Application - Conference Presentation
This presentation is a summary of the conference paper presented at American Society of Mechanical Engineers Turbo Expo in Pittsburgh PA, June 7 through 11, 2021.
Baseline Graphite Characterization
Select necessary material properties Apply sampling plan Perform standardized testing Evaluate/compare properties Build NQA-1 qualified database Apply the “system” and database to the evaluation and qualification of future grades of graphite
Baseline Emissions Measurements from Reciprocating Compressor Packing
A novel liquid reciprocating compressor packing seal concept is being developed to reduce methane emissions from reciprocating compressor packing by 95%. To provide the leakage basis for this project, a benchmark test was performed to measure the leakage from a 50Hp Ariel reciprocating compressor that will be used for the testing comparisons throughout the project. Brand-new packing replacement parts were installed to minimize leakage that could be due to worn internals and rings
Baseline Mechanical Testing Characterization
This poster shows the performance of 5KN and 50KN proving rings based on their historical verification data collected following ASTM E4 standards.
Study of Spherical Array Target for Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment
Spherical Array Target was studied by implementing the geometry in LBNE's Beam Simulation source code g4lbne version v3r2p4 and Monte Carlo. To compare with Nominal LBNE target, unoscillated Far Detector neutrino flux was produced using different parameters: sphere diameter 17mm and 13mm, different longitudinal positions, two interaction length and less, beam size R/3 and 1.7mm, and beam offset from 50 $\mu$m to 1mm. The 1.86 interaction length (901mm), 17mm diameter target, with beam size 1.7mm gives higher $\nu_{\mu}$ flux up to 10% from 0-3.5 GeV, and suppresses flux up to 70% at energy higher than 3.5 GeV.
Short Baseline Experiments
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A Systematic Study to Determine 5G Baseline Performance for Scientific Computing
The fifth-generation (5G) cellular networks envisions achieving higher data rates, improved connectivity, reduced latency, and better quality of service (QoS) than the fourthgeneration (4G) cellular networks. Such improved performance can be utilized to address the challenges in applications such as electricity generation in power systems. The traditional power grids responsible for electricity generation suffer from drawbacks such as life-threatening blackout crises, and energy storage proliferation as they are not robust to extreme climatic conditions. A recent study proposed the idea of extending the capabilities of advanced wireless technologies such as the current 5G to develop a robust, energy-efficient, and secure smart grids. However there are two main challenges associated with the integration of power systems and wireless technologies. First, it is imperative to understand the architecture and the enabling technologies of 5G to ensure that the performance requirements of the smart grids are met. Second, an end-to-end testbed is required to determine if the performance requirements are met by estimating the 5G characteristics such as latency, and throughput. Our proposed alleviates the aforementioned concerns in the following manner. To begin with, a systematic study of the 5G architecture including both the StandAlone (SA) and Non-Standalone (NSA) operations is presented. Furthermore, a detailed survey of the possible 5G enabling technologies is elicited. In addition to these, an end-toend testbed that can estimate the 5G characteristics is explained in detail with appropriate preliminary results.
Results and Perspectives from Short Baseline Neutrino Experiments
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Assessment of preliminary results of baseline high entropy alloys manufactured at INL
Materials development is needed to support the design and deployment of advanced nuclear reactors that will operate at higher temperatures and in harsher environments than the current light water reactor fleet. High entropy alloys have been identified as a class of alloy that could address the needs of advanced reactors, such as the molten salt reactors, due to their potential strength, radiation resistance, and corrosion resistance. This project summarizes the work done in fiscal year 2024 for the Additive Manufacturing of High Entropy Alloys for Nuclear Applications Project. This work has focused on examination of potential alloy compositions, down selection based on simulated results, and preliminary testing of down selected alloys.
NOvA Dual-Baseline Search for Active-to-Sterile Neutrino Oscillations using Neutrino- and Antineutrino-Enriched Samples
We report a search for neutrino oscillations to sterile neutrinos in the NOvA detectors under a model with three active and one sterile neutrinos. This search simultaneously fits data in the two NOvA detectors and is the first from NOvA to use both neutrino- and antineutrino-mode beams, with exposures of $26.61\times10^{20}$ and $12.50\times10^{20}$ protons on target, respectively. There is no evidence for sterile neutrinos in the data and we are able to exclude regions of parameter space that were allowed by previous experiments, including most of the allowed region reported by IceCube.
Crustal dynamics project session 4 validation and intercomparison experiments 1979-1980 report
As part of the Crustal Dynamics Project, an experiment was performed to verify the ability of Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR), Very Long Baseline interferometry (VLBI) and Doppler Satellite Positioning System (Doppler) techniques to estimate the baseline distances between several locations. The Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) lasers were in operation at all five sites available to them. The ten baselines involved were analyzed using monthly orbits and various methods of selecting data. The standard deviation of the monthly SLR baseline lengths was at the 7 cm level. The GSFC VLBI (Mark III) data was obtained during three separate experiments. November 1979 at Haystack and Owens Valley, and April and July 1980 at Haystack, Owens Valley, and Fort Davis. Repeatability of the VLBI in determining baseline lengths was calculated to be at the 2 cm level. Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) VLBI (Mark II) data was acquired on the Owens Valley to Goldstone baseline on ten occasions between August 1979 and November 1980. The repeatability of these baseline length determinations was calculated to be at the 5 cm level. National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Doppler data was acquired at all five sites in January 1980. Repeatability of the Doppler determined baseline lengths results were calculated at approximately 30 cm. An intercomparison between baseline distances and associated parameters was made utilizing SLR, VLBI, and Doppler results on all available baselines. The VLBI and SLR length determinations were compared on four baselines with a resultant mean difference of -1 cm and a maximum difference of 12 cm. The SLR and Doppler length determinations were compared on ten baselines with a resultant mean difference of about 30 cm and a maximum difference of about 60 cm. The VLBI and Doppler lengths from seven baselines showed a resultant mean difference of about 30 cm and maximum difference of about 1 meter. The intercomparison of baseline orientation parameters were consistent with past analysis.
Evaluation of thermostat location for multizone commercial building performance
In multi-zone buildings, it is often found that a single shared thermostat controls more than one conditioned zones. Although these shared zones are supposed to have similar thermal needs (e.g., cooling and heating load), in reality, they are not mainly due to different orientations, sizes of windows, occupancy, space types, etc. This can cause unnecessary energy waste or thermal discomfort for the occupants. How to quantify this impact in multizone buildings remains a research gap. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the impact of different sensor (i.e., thermostat) locations for multizone commercial buildings through a comprehensive modeling study. Here, two different scenarios for the sensor locations were selected to evaluate the impact in terms of energy and thermal comfort. The scenario (1) is that one to five sensors distributed among the five zones, but the sensor readings from selected zones will be used for no-sensor zones, which is no-mean sensor scenario. The scenario (2) is that one to five sensors distributed among the five zones, but the average temperature from the shared zones will be used for each of the shared zones, which is a mean sensor scenario. The uncertainty analysis was performed for different sensor location scenarios.(a)The major findings from an energy perspective, for scenario (1), the differences of cooling energy go as high as 17% more or 12% less, compared with the baseline. For heating energy consumption, the discrepancies go as high as 51% more or 52% less, compared with baseline. For site energy consumption, the discrepancies go as high as 3.2% more or 3.2% less, compared with baseline. For fan energy consumption, the discrepancies go as high as 3.2% more or as low as 1.0% less, compared with baseline. For scenario (2), the discrepancies of cooling energy go as high as 3% more, or 0.5% less, compared with the baseline. For heating energy consumption, the discrepancies, are go as high as 10.1% more or as low as 3.0% less, compared with baseline. For site energy consumption, the discrepancies go as high as 1.3% more or 0.3% less, compared with baseline. For fan energy consumption, the discrepancies go as high as 3.1% more or as low as 1.0% less, compared with baseline.(b) In terms of the indoor thermal comfort, for the no-mean-sensor scenarios, the discrepancies of unmet hours for cooling mode can be as high as 1,200 h, compared with the baseline. The discrepancies of unmet hours for heating mode can be as high as 740 h, compared with the baseline. For the mean-sensor scenarios, the discrepancies of unmet hours for cooling mode can be as high as 750 h, compared with the baseline. The discrepancies of unmet hours for heating mode can be as high as 50 h, compared with the baseline.