DOE OSTI2018
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's licensing requirements for land disposal of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) in 10 CFR Part 61 classify LLRW wastes as Class A, B, C, or Greater-Than- Class C (GTCC). GTCC waste includes activated metals that are generated primarily by nuclear power reactors. Activated metals represent a significant volume (880 cubic meters) of GTCC wastes that may be generated as current commercial power reactors are decommissioned. Additionally, these wastes are expected to contain radionuclides that are very long-lived and are mobile in the environment (e.g., Tc-99 and I-129) as well as transuranic radionuclides that, while not as mobile as other radionuclides, have greater potential for health consequences should such radionuclides reach receptor locations in sufficient concentrations. Quantities of surface contamination on activated metals have typically been reported using a combination of assumptions, calculations, and measurements. For example, projections of future activity associated with surface contamination, or the surface activity, for the activated metals is dependent on assumptions made regarding fuel behavior (e.g., modern fuel performance is expected to be different from fuel performance in the 1970's). In this study, we examined published information to better understand how assumptions, calculations, and measurements used for estimating quantities of surface contamination on activated metals can influence the estimated quantities. The analysis in this report was performed to better understand how estimates for the activated metal inventory of GTCC metal could influence potential decisions regarding the siting and design of disposal facilities. It was found that the variability in surface contamination either measured or estimated was sufficiently large that characterization of the radionuclide inventory for GTCC activated metals, especially the transuranic radionuclides, is critically important for establishing the siting and design requirements for a disposal facility. Overly conservative assumptions for the inventory could significantly limit disposal options, whereas, overly optimistic assumptions with respect to the inventory could lead to a disposal facility that may not protect off-site receptors. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗