SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Waste Forms”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,405 records · Page 78

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2021

Predicting zeolites’ stability during the corrosion of nuclear waste immobilization glasses: Comparison with glass corrosion experiments

During the long-term corrosion of nuclear waste glasses under nuclear waste disposal conditions, the precipitation of zeolitic phases has been linked to a delayed acceleration in glass corrosion (known as “Stage III”). Hence, predicting the thermodynamic propensity for zeolites to form upon the dissolution of nuclear waste glasses is key to ensure their long-term performance. Here, we compile a unified, internally-consistent thermodynamic database “clay20” to estimate the stability of clay and feldspar phases relevant to nuclear waste immobilization glasses, including beidellite(Mg, Ca, Na, K), kaolinite, montmorillonite(Mg, Ca, Na, K), nontronite(Mg, Ca, Na, K), saponite(Ca, Na, K), and albite. Based on this, we report a geochemical modeling method allowing us to predict the stability of secondary phases (including zeolites, calcium–silicate–hydrate gels, and clays) upon the dissolution of nuclear waste immobilization glasses. We show that this approach offers a realistic description of the stability of the secondary phases forming during the dissolution of two archetypical model nuclear glasses (namely, the International Simple Glass, ISG, and WVUTh-203) under conditions relevant to nuclear waste disposal (T = 90°C, p = 1 bar) as a function of pH. We find that the formation of silica and clay secondary phases is thermodynamically favored at low pH (pH < 10), whereas, in contrast, zeolite (analcime) and calcium–silicate–hydrate phases are favored at high pH (pH > 10.5). This suggests that thermodynamics (i.e., not solely kinetics) plays a key role in determining the range of solution pH wherein stage III corrosion may occur, i.e., when zeolite formation is favored.

Zhen-Wu, Bi Yun↗

DOE OSTI2018

Optimizing the Pyrolysis of Polypropylene and High-Density Polyethylene for Contaminated Solid Waste Treatment - 18537

Organic waste is generally characterized by high volume-to-weight ratio. Organic waste contaminated with radionuclides may further pose a hazard due to radiolysis and generation of combustible and explosive gases. Thus, minimizing waste volume as well as forming a chemically stable and conditioned matrix are of high importance in the treatment of contaminated polymers. In the present study, the pyrolytic decomposition of the commonly used polyolefins, polypropylene (PP) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE), was explored as a method for waste minimization by obtaining high gaseous and low char and liquid yields. The effects of two aluminosilicate catalysts, Zeolite Y and ZSM-5, and reaction temperature on decomposition efficiency were evaluated based on product conversions and gas composition. Under pyrolytic conditions, PP decomposition resulted in higher decomposition efficiency than HDPE. Over the catalysts, pyrolysis of the polymers over ZSM-5 resulted in higher gas conversions than over Zeolite Y, with a more significant impact on HDPE than PP. Increasing the reaction temperature from 450 deg. C to 525 deg. C also resulted in increased polymer decomposition. However, differences in gas composition, including olefinic to paraffinic ratio and carbon number distribution, support that the catalysts and the temperature impact polymer decomposition by different and opposing mechanisms. This conclusion was further supported by the finding that the decomposition efficiency was not significantly enhanced in the presence of the catalyst at 525 deg. C. Taken together, our study highlights the advantage of using ZSM-5 and optimizing the reaction temperature for treatment of contaminated organic solid waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

NASA NTRS1993

Strategy for the reduction of total integrated fluid logistics to the Space Station Freedom

The use of an integrated environmental control and life support system (ECLSS) and secondary propulsion system (SRS) on the Space Station Freedom (SSF) has many potential advantages. Through the metabolism of food, the crew on-board the station will produce carbon dioxide as a waste gas and an excess of water in the form of urine and condensate. The processing of these waste fluids by the ECLSS could produce quantities of oxygen that would eliminate the need for cryogenic oxygen resupply and hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and/or methane that could be used with the addition of a resistojet system to provide a constant low thrust for station. This additional thrust would represent significant savings in required hydrazine resupply.

Gould, Marston J.↗

DOE OSTI2012

Waste Treatment Plant - 12508

The Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) will immobilize millions of gallons of Hanford's tank waste into solid glass using a proven technology called vitrification. The vitrification process will turn the waste into a stable glass form that is safe for long-term storage. Our discussion of the WTP will include a description of the ongoing design and construction of this large, complex, first-of-a-kind project. The concept for the operation of the WTP is to separate high-level and low-activity waste fractions, and immobilize those fractions in glass using vitrification. The WTP includes four major nuclear facilities and various support facilities. Waste from the Tank Farms is first pumped to the Pretreatment Facility at the WTP through an underground pipe-in-pipe system. When construction is complete, the Pretreatment Facility will be 12 stories high, 540 feet long and 215 feet wide, making it the largest of the four major nuclear facilities that compose the WTP. The total size of this facility will be more than 490,000 square feet. More than 8.2 million craft hours are required to construct this facility. Currently, the Pretreatment Facility is 51 percent complete. At the Pretreatment Facility the waste is pumped to the interior waste feed receipt vessels. Each of these four vessels is 55-feet tall and has a 375,000 gallon capacity, which makes them the largest vessels inside the Pretreatment Facility. These vessels contain a series of internal pulse-jet mixers to keep incoming waste properly mixed. The vessels are inside the black-cell areas, completely enclosed behind thick steel-laced, high strength concrete walls. The black cells are designed to be maintenance free with no moving parts. Once hot operations commence the black-cell area will be inaccessible. Surrounded by black cells, is the 'hot cell canyon'. The hot cell contains all the moving and replaceable components to remove solids and extract liquids. In this area, there is ultrafiltration equipment, cesium-ion exchange columns, evaporator boilers and recirculation pumps, and various mechanical process pumps for transferring process fluids. During the first phase of pretreatment, the waste will be concentrated using an evaporation process. Solids will be filtered out, and the remaining soluble, highly radioactive isotopes will be removed using an ion-exchange process. The high-level solids will be sent to the High-Level Waste (HLW) Vitrification Facility, and the low activity liquids will be sent to the Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Vitrification Facility for further processing. The high-level waste will be transferred via underground pipes to the HLW Facility from the Pretreatment Facility. The waste first arrives at the wet cell, which rests inside a black-cell area. The pretreated waste is transferred through shielded pipes into a series of melter preparation and feed vessels before reaching the melters. Liquids from various facility processes also return to the wet cell for interim storage before recycling back to the Pretreatment Facility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Characterization of Tc-99 Speciation and Chemical Composition of 241-AN-102 Tank Waste Supernatant - 19201

Technetium (Tc) in its isotopic form {sup 99}Tc is generated in high yields from the fission of {sup 235}U and {sup 239}Pu. A significant inventory of {sup 99}Tc remains at the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site, and it is one of the most difficult contaminants to address. In the strongly alkaline solutions that are typical of Hanford tank waste, Tc exists as both pertechnetate (TcO{sub 4}{sup -} in oxidation state VII) and in reduced forms (oxidation state <VII) collectively known as non-pertechnetate species. Pertechnetate is a well-characterized anionic Tc species that can be removed from low-activity waste by anion exchange or other methods. There is no definitive information on the origin or a comprehensive description of the non-pertechnetate species in Hanford tanks. Designing strategies for effective management of Tc, including separation and immobilization, requires an understanding of the molecular structure of the non-pertechnetate species and their identification in actual tank waste samples. Developing this advanced understanding would facilitate development of new technologies for treating dissimilar Tc species. Toward this objective, a spectroscopic library of the Tc(I) [fac-Tc(CO){sub 3}]{sup +} and Tc(IV, VI, VII) compounds was generated using a range of techniques and applied to the characterization of actual 241-AN-102 tank waste supernatant. A sample of the 241-AN-102 tank waste (collected in 2013) was processed to remove {sup 137}Cs by spherical resorcinol-formaldehyde (sRF) ion exchange resin after the sodium concentration was adjusted to 5.6 M. The Cs-loaded sRF column was eluted with 0.45 M HNO{sub 3}. As-received AN-102, Cs-depleted AN-102 effluent, and sRF eluate fractions were comprehensively characterized for chemical composition and speciation of Tc using {sup 99}Tc nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The results of these analyses demonstrated for the first time that non-pertechnetate Tc present in the 241-AN-102 tank waste is composed of several low-valent Tc species, including the Tc(I) [fac-Tc(CO){sub 3}L{sub 3}]{sup +}, Tc(IV), and possibly Tc(VI) compounds. This is the second experimental observation of the [fac-Tc(CO){sub 3}L{sub 3}]{sup +} species in the Hanford tank waste that highlights their importance for waste processing. In addition, the chemical composition of the 241-AN-102 tank waste was characterized with the focus on small chelators. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Physical and Flow Properties of Glass Forming Chemicals (V2O5, SnO, SnO2, Cr2O3, FeCr2O4, and ZrSiO4) and Mixtures

For a sustainable nuclear waste vitrification process at the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), proper selection and consistent supply of glass-forming chemicals (GFCs) are crucial. Establishing rigorous acceptance criteria for the characterization of GFCs will be required to operate the vitrification facility and to mitigate any processing issues or failures. Low-activity wastes (LAW) are blended with GFCs to form slurry melter feeds and vitrified in a melter. To enhance properties of waste glasses, new chemicals are being introduced to the current GFC mixture (Vienna et al. 2016; Muller et al. 2017, 2019). In this study, three new GFCs were evaluated for enhanced LAW glass formulations: chromium oxide (Cr 2 O 3 ), vanadium oxide (V 2 O 5 ), and stannic oxide (SnO 2 ). These three oxide components are included in enhanced waste glass (EWG) formulations and GFCs with the appropriate physical and flow properties are needed. As a starting point, single metal oxide GFCs: Cr 2 O 3 , V 2 O 5 , and SnO 2 were sourced and tested. To characterize these new individual GFCs and mixtures of GFCs, the industrial bulk characterization consultant, Jenike and Johanson, was employed to measure physical and flow properties of individual GFCs and their mixtures. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) also measured several selected physical properties for data evaluation as a quality assurance step. In addition, PNNL measured physical and rheological properties of slurry melter feeds containing those GFCs. Subsequent data analyses and verification were conducted. The purpose of this report is to assess the applicability of these GFCs for LAW vitrification based on their properties. This report will help understand measured data and evaluate new GFCs for use. Moreover, this report may give useful insights to help troubleshoot any GFC and melter feed transport and mixing issues that arise during processing, leading to a successful cleanup mission at WTP.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

NASA NTRS1978

The disposal of nuclear waste in space

The important problem of disposal of nuclear waste in space is addressed. A prior study proposed carrying only actinide wastes to space, but the present study assumes that all actinides and all fission products are to be carried to space. It is shown that nuclear waste in the calcine (oxide) form can be packaged in a container designed to provide thermal control, radiation shielding, mechanical containment, and an abort reentry thermal protection system. This package can be transported to orbit via the Space Shuttle. A second Space Shuttle delivers an oxygen-hydrogen orbit transfer vehicle to a rendezvous compatible orbit and the mated OTV and waste package are sent to the preferred destination. Preferred locations are either a lunar crater or a solar orbit. Shuttle traffic densities (which vary in time) are given and the safety of space disposal of wastes discussed.

Burns, R. E.↗

DOE OSTI2026

High waste loading glass formulation development for high-P HLW

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2013

Production of iron from metallurgical waste

A method of recovering metallic iron from iron-bearing metallurgical waste in steelmaking comprising steps of providing an iron-bearing metallurgical waste containing more than 55% by weight FeO and FeO equivalent and a particle size of at least 80% less than 10 mesh, mixing the iron-bearing metallurgical waste with a carbonaceous material to form a reducible mixture where the carbonaceous material is between 80 and 110% of the stoichiometric amount needed to reduce the iron-bearing waste to metallic iron, and as needed additions to provide a silica content between 0.8 and 8% by weight and a ratio of CaO/SiO.sub.2 between 1.4 and 1.8, forming agglomerates of the reducible mixture over a hearth material layer to protect the hearth, heating the agglomerates to a higher temperature above the melting point of iron to form nodules of metallic iron and slag material from the agglomerates by melting.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2014

The formation of crystals in glasses containing rare earth oxides

Korean spent nuclear fuel will reach the capacity of the available temporary storage by 2016. Pyroprocessing and direct disposal seems to be an alternative way to manage and reuse spent nuclear fuel while avoiding the wet reprocessing technology. Pyroprocessing produces several wastes streams, including metals, salts, and rare earths, which must be converted into stabilized form. A suitable form for rare earth immobilization is borosilicate glass. The borosilicate glass form exhibits excellent durability, allows a high waste loading, and is easy to process. In this work, we combined the rare earths waste of composition (in wt%) 39.2Nd{sub 2}O{sub 3}–22.7CeO{sub 2}–11.7La{sub 2}O{sub 3}–10.9PrO{sub 2}–1.3Eu{sub 2}O{sub 3}–1.3Gd{sub 2}O{sub 3}–8.1Sm{sub 2}O{sub 3}–4.8Y{sub 2}O{sub 3} with a baseline glass of composition 60.2SiO{sub 2}–16.0B{sub 2}O{sub 3}–12.6Na{sub 2}O–3.8Al{sub 2}O{sub 3}–5.7CaO–1.7ZrO{sub 2}. Crystallization in waste glasses occurs as the waste loading increases. It may produce complicate glass processing and affect the product quality. To study crystal formation, we initially made glasses containing 5%, 10% and 15% of La{sub 2}O{sub 3} and then glasses with 5%, 10% and 15% of the complete rare earth mix. Samples were heat-treated for 24 hours at temperatures 800°C to 1150°C in 50°C increments. Quenched samples were analyzed using an optical microscope, scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive spectroscopy, and x-ray diffraction. Stillwellite (LaBSiO{sub 5}) and oxyapatite (Ca{sub 2}La{sub 8}Si{sub 6}O{sub 26}) were found in glasses containing La{sub 2}O{sub 3}, while oxyapatite (Ca{sub 2}La{sub 8}Si{sub 6}O{sub 26} and NaNd{sub 9}Si{sub 6}O{sub 26}) precipitated in glasses with additions of mixed rare earths. The liquidus temperature (T{sub L}) of the glasses containing 5%, 10% and 15% La{sub 2}O{sub 3} were 800°C, 959°C and 986°C, respectively; while T{sub L} was 825°C, 1059°C and 1267°C for glasses with 5%, 10% and 15% addition of mixed rare earth oxides. The component coefficients T{sub B2O3}, T{sub SiO2}, T{sub CaO}, and T{sub RE2O3} were also evaluated using a recently published study.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2018

Radioactive Test Platform Demonstrating the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste Process at Hanford - 18628

The Hanford Site is implementing a phased process for treating liquid legacy radioactive waste. The process is called the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste process (DFLAW). The DFLAW includes a filtration and ion-exchange unit in the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) that removes solids and cesium. This pretreat feed is then sent to a vitrification facility where glass-forming solids are added and the waste is turned into glass in a melter. The melter off-gas liquid condensate is evaporated in the Effluent Management Facility (EMF), with the concentrate recycled back into the feed. A laboratory-scale test platform has been built to test various aspects of the DFLAW process using samples of actual radioactive waste. The current platform represents four of the major unit operations: filtration, ion-exchange, vitrification, and off-gas condensation. A lab scale EMF is being designed to supplement the current platform. The platform is expandable to add any or all unit operations. The radioactive test platform has three missions. The first is simply to demonstrate the DFLAW process with real waste. A second objective is to address flowsheet gaps and opportunities, some of which require testing with real waste. Some gaps and opportunities include addressing the fate of mercury in the flowsheet, evaluating salt and aluminum precipitation, and proving new glass formulations with real waste. A third objective of the radioactive test platform is to demonstrate or evaluate future operations and alternative flowsheets. Some of the future operations evaluated will be the life expectancy of the resin in real waste, resin sampling, evaluation of how waste affects melter throughput, and grouting various primary and secondary waste streams. The radioactive test platform is therefore a crucial tool for verifying and optimizing the DFLAW flowsheet at Hanford with real waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Radioactive Waste Management in a Treatability and Optimisation Perspective - 17527

In order to meet recycling criteria or to fulfil Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) for disposal there are many different management concepts for radioactive waste that can be applied. Which concept or set of concepts to use to optimize waste management depends on several factors, among them, the regulatory framework for recycling, the availability of a disposal facility and the acceptance criteria for disposal. The required pre-treatment and other pre-disposal activities should be carefully analyzed for each of the disposal options, as they are significant contributors to the total cost for managing the waste. Waste Acceptance Criteria are living documents that should be updated when regulatory framework changes as well as when new treatment methods and new packaging and barrier systems develop. Each waste treatment facility, has its own specific limitations and therefore its own WAC/CFA (conditions for acceptance), which depends both on the plant design and national legislation. Many waste owners, countries or licensees, have their preferred, and in some cases well established, waste routes for certain waste streams. In some countries, the full chain from waste treatment through to disposal of radioactive waste is in place, whilst other countries still are in the process of establishing their repository program. The worst case scenario for any licensee or waste owner is waste which is not possible to qualify for disposal. This can be due to poor or degraded waste containers, unspecified content in waste packages, or wastes that are not suitable for disposal in their current form. Such deficiencies result in expensive actions related to waste retrieval, new characterisation and/or costly investigations. The EDF Group has a fleet of waste treatment facilities and has, for decades, provided waste treatment services to domestic and international customers. This paper will discuss important waste owner considerations and EDF experiences related to the optimization of the waste management process. This will be from both a treatment and an end-state perspective. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2013

The surface structure of α-uranophane and its interaction with Eu(III) – An integrated computational and fluorescence spectroscopy study

Uranophane is a rare U(VI) secondary silicate mineral formed in nature by the oxidation of the primary mineral uraninite. It is also relevant to the long-term geochemistry of nuclear waste repositories, where it can be formed under oxidizing conditions and has the potential to act as a secondary barrier to the migration of radionuclides through mineral sorption reactions. A combination of classical molecular dynamics and ab-initio density functional theory (DFT) has been employed to investigate the uranophane|water interface as well as the interfacial reactivity of the U(VI) silicate toward acidic conditions and radionuclide ion sorption. The sorption simulations have been complemented by experimental sorption studies and laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy to help identify the molecular structure of the surface sorbed species. Experimental distances and essential coordination numbers are properly captured by the simulation results within bulk uranophane, while interfacial water is found to orient primarily with the hydrogen-atoms directed towards the negatively charged surface. Sorption sites for water are observed to belong to 3 different groups: (1) those involving uranyl oxygen, (2) involving uranyl and silica hydroxyl oxygen atoms, and (3) involving hydroxyl hydrogen. The pKa of the surface -OH groups have been calculated using a variety of models, including a bond valence approach and utilization of the energetics of deprotonation within DFT. Under basic conditions, deprotonation of the Si-OH groups is likely responsible for uranophane dissolution. Finally, the stability and structure of surface sorbed Eu3+ has been examined, with a stable inner-sphere species being observed.

Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory↗

DOE OSTI2026

Glass Formulation Development for Al, Fe, and Na Phosphate HLW

The primary objective of the work described herein was to develop and identify HLW glass compositions and glass forming additive blends that achieve high waste loadings and processing rates for high phosphorus HLW streams while maintaining acceptable glass properties. Another objective was to determine the effect of phosphate form (aluminum, iron, sodium) on feed processing properties, glass production rates, and product quality while vitrifying a high phosphorus HLW stream. This was accomplished through a combination of crucible-scale tests, vertical gradient furnace tests, and confirmation tests on a DM100 melter system.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Low Activity Waste Tuning Feed Material Testing VSL-18R4350-1 (Final Report)

High level waste (HLW) from the Hanford tank farms will be retrieved and transferred to the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The waste will be pretreated to separate the soluble chemical salts (mostly sodium nitrate/nitrite and sodium hydroxide) from the bulk of the radioactive materials. This decontaminated salt solution is the low activity waste (LAW) stream which constitutes most of the total waste volume. The remaining HLW contains most of the radioactive materials but a fraction of the volume. Each of these waste streams is directed to an independent processing facility where the waste is mixed with glass forming chemicals (mostly silica and borax or boric acid) and fed into the melters for stabilization by conversion into glass. The molten glass is poured into stainless steel containers to produce packages for disposal: local shallow burial for the LAW containers and a future geologic repository for the HLW containers. The LAW facility melters produce significant quantities of NOx-laden off-gas that require abatement in accordance with 10 CFR 830 and air emission requirements. The NOx emissions also pose a safety risk. The LAW facility commissioning sequence requires that the melters be operated and process control loops tuned prior to introducing waste or waste feed materials that produce NOx. Therefore, a temporary or permanent system architecture is needed that provides a feed supply to the melters for the purpose of melter testing and off-gas tuning that does not result in the production of significantly hazardous off-gas products.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Remote Handling Approach for Whiteshell Laboratories Standpipe and Bunker Legacy Waste Retrieval - 18417

Veolia Nuclear Solutions (VNS) has been contracted by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) to design and delivery a system to retrieve and repackage legacy waste on-site. The waste has a variety of forms and conditions and requires a flexible and robust set of remote handling devices to complete the task. The focus of this paper is to highlight the remote handling philosophy being used on the project which can be applicable to other projects. This approach is based on past experience and uses a range of remote handling devices and techniques matched to the variety of tasks in the project. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2015

CEA decommissioning and clean-up activities legacy waste management and lessons learned - 15506

The CEA has generated radioactive waste in both liquid and solid form for more than 50 years within the scope of its R and D, clean-up and dismantling programs. The vast majority of the waste produced is transferred to disposal centers in approved waste packages. Nonetheless, a large quantity of legacy waste still remains in ageing facilities in which the storage conditions are sometimes no longer satisfactory with respect to the safety requirements that are constantly evolving. As part of a broad clean-up and dismantling process focusing on these ageing facilities managed by the CEA, the top priority is to shut down nuclear activities on two symbolic sites: Grenoble and Fontenay-aux-Roses, which are both located in a dense urban environment. After about ten years of dismantling, the nuclear facilities on the Grenoble site are on their way to be completely decommissioned in the regulatory sense of the term. Furthermore, the radwaste issue on this site has raised no specific problems, though it did require developing innovative and sometimes costly waste outlets. The older Fontenay-aux-Roses site is where the first experimental research on minor actinide separation took place. The facilities on this site have reached a stage in dismantling which necessitates the recovery of irradiating legacy waste containing alpha, beta and gamma emitters. The transfer of this waste to interim storage centers more than 600 kilometers away is a decisive factor in reducing the site's nuclear source term and in ensuring the satisfactory progress of the dismantling operations. This paper details the issues raised by the recovery of legacy waste, which requires greater characterization to better understand its radiological and chemical status. This waste also requires better characterization to meet the storage requirements of new sites designed for storage periods exceeding 50 years prior to its final disposal in a deep geological repository. The issue of transporting waste on public roads is specifically covered, along with the strategy defined to securely transfer all legacy waste resulting from the CEA's very diverse R and D programs. Emphasis is placed on finding the right balance between collecting the necessary data on the waste to be transported, ensuring the reconditioning of this waste so it can be transported safely, and maintaining an efficient industrial-scale waste transfer process to limit the lead times and costs related to legacy waste recovery operations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Conception and Operation of a New Treatment Center for Radioactive Waste from High Energy Accelerators - 18293

CERN has operated high-energy accelerators for more than 60 years of research in fundamental physics. The side-product of this activity is the generation of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste, most of which is in solid form and free of surface contamination. Today, one operational year produces about 400 tons of radioactive waste which need to be disposed of towards the final repositories of the two CERN Host States, France and Switzerland. A new facility for the collection, interim storage, characterization and treatment of radioactive waste became operational at CERN in 2015. This facility was specifically conceived for an accelerator complex with a wide range of challenging waste items, which are often unique in their irradiation history as well as in their physical, chemical and radiological characteristics. The disposal rate was ramped up in 2016 with a unique treatment process tailored for metallic low-level waste. In 2017, two parallel processes were successfully tested for the elimination of radioactive cables and for the recycling of valuable metals. This paper gives an overview of the challenges in the design, commissioning and operation of the CERN radioactive waste treatment center. It outlines the methodology followed for the conception of the elimination processes, which can be of guidance for the development of similar facilities. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗