VALIDATION AND DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANT SIMULATION PARAMETERS USING THE SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMIC CODE NEUTRINO
In recent years there has been an increase in flooding concern to nuclear power plants; thus, tools to reduce the cost of mitigation efforts are valuable to industry. Simulating flooding events is achieved through different methods and at varied levels of detail. However, these simulations must be able to match application conditions, which requires code validation as well as knowledge of which parameters affect the accuracy of the simulation. To validate and determine the significant parameters for these tools, a sloshing experiment was conducted at the George Washington University and then simulated with the smoothed particle hydrodynamic code Neutrino. The simulation setup was constructed to match the experiment as closely as possible, and the end-wall pressure results were analysed. The 90% and 50% end-wall pressure bounds were compared along with the pressure impulse. The simulation bounds fell mostly within the experimental bounds, with exceptions in insignificant low-pressure areas, such as at the beginning (~40% difference) and the end of the cycle (~40% difference). Another exception was seen at a point in the peak pressure (~75% difference). The simulated pressure impulse matched the experiments well and was within 10%. Additionally, seven parameters were qualitatively assessed and then investigated to determine their significance. The parameters’ significance was determined by sampling five values across the parameters’ range using the Risk Analysis Virtual Environment, then comparing the average pressure for each run. All seven parameters were identified as having some significance. However, the particle size, interaction-radius to particle-size ratio, and fluid settling seem to have a greater effect due to the larger fluctuation of the results. Now that the significant parameters are identified, further research is being done to quantify the significance of each parameter.