Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “SHUTDOWN”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,333 records · Page 74
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

The application of MAMMOTH for a detailed tightly coupled fuel pin simulation with a station blackout

The accurate calculation of desired quantities to predict fuel behavior in a nuclear reactor requires the solution of inter linked equations representing different physics phenomena. Traditional fuels performance codes often rely on internal empirical models for the pin power density and a simplified boundary condition on the cladding outer surface. These simplifications are performed because of the difficulty of coupling applications or codes on differing domains and mapping the required data. In this work the MAMMOTH application is employed in the demonstration of an approach that more consistent with first principles, in a simulation that couples the neutronics application Rattlesnake, the thermal fluids application RELAP-7 and the fuels performance application BISON. A single fuel pin was modeled based on the dimensions of a fuel rod from a Westinghouse 17*17 optimized PWR fuel assembly. The simulation consisted of a depletion period of 1343 days, representing three full operating cycles, followed by a station blackout (SBO) event. The fuel rod was depleted with a total pin power of 65.81 kW. After 1343 days the fission power was reduced to zero (simulating a reactor shutdown). Decay heat calculations provided the time-varying energy source after this time. For this problem, Rattlesnake, BISON, and RELAP-7 are coupled under MAMMOTH in a tightly coupled approach. Each system solves its physics on a separate mesh and, for RELAP-7 and BISON, on only a subset of the full problem domain. Rattlesnake solves the neutronics over the whole domain, which includes the fuel, cladding, gaps, water, and top and bottom rod holders. Here BISON is applied to the fuel and cladding with a 2-D axisymmetric domain, and RELAP-7 is applied to the flow of the circular outer water channel with a set of 1-D flow equations. For this work, the mesh on the Rattlesnake side is either be 3-D (for low order PN transport or diffusion) or 2-D axisymmetric (for diffusion). BISON has a matching ring structure mesh for the fuel so both the power density and local burnup are transferred accurately from Rattlesnake. At each depletion time step, Rattlesnake calculates a power density, fission density rate, burnup distribution and fast flux based on the current water density and fuel temperature. These are then mapped to the BISON mesh to perform a fuels performance solution. BISON calculates the fuel temperature and cladding surface temperature based upon the current power density and bulk fluid temperature. RELAP-7 then calculates the fluid temperature, water density fraction and water phase velocity based upon the cladding surface temperature. The fuel temperature and the fluid density are then passed back to Rattlesnake for another neutronics calculation. For this paper, sets of results from the detailed calculation are provided for both depletion and the SBO event. We demonstrate that a detailed simulation akin to first principles can be achieved using MAMMOTH and the various MOOSE application on differing domains. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

System Analysis Modeling and Intermodal Transportation for Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy is applying knowledge and understanding in the areas of systems level engineering, analysis, and decision making to better inform the waste management pathways for U.S. spent nuclear fuel (SNF). Currently there are 93 operating and 23 shutdown commercial nuclear reactors in the United States. SNF at most of these locations is being stored in spent fuel pools, dry storage, or both [1, 2]. This paper initially goes over the basics of the agent-based simulation tool known as the Next Generation System Analysis Model (NGSAM) that has the capability to model interaction and movements of individual components or groups like casks, railcars etc. The next section covers some of the methods implemented in the Java Transportation Operations Model (JTOM) to facilitate the movement of assemblies, casks, railcars etc. and the various intermodal transfer options. This section also covers the current cask loading and intermodal transfer times implemented in NGSAM. The last section goes over the proposed values for intermodal transportation, and cask transfer/loading operations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Assessment on Transport of Radioactive Species from Nuclear Facilities - 17079

It is generally recognized that radioactive nuclides are most hazardous fission products that could be released in the event of reactor accidents. The reactor coolant system of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) nuclear plant exhibits radioactivity from various sources. These radiation sources consist of the fission products from fuel element and activated products from corrosion products. The complex infrastructure of the processes does not allow detailed measurement of activity until after the reactor is shutdown. All of the components that require dismantling will be radioactive which was caused by neutron activation during operation, contamination by corrosion products, contamination by damaged by fuel rods and leaks by equipment. Due mainly to the various operation modes and their aging, there are the increasing needs to carry out repair works that are not sufficiently provided for by the original design. Many difficulties are involved in these tasks, namely, high radiation doses, cramped areas, hard to reach components, coupled with stringent quality conditions. The need to simulate the behavior of corrosion products in a nuclear power plant environment has attracted many researchers' attention. It has performed the in-depth reviews of the various theories and physics associated with the corrosion products transportation, the laboratory loop testing, and the field measurements in operating plants. Before we start the decommissioning of nuclear power plants, workers, the public and the environment shall be properly protected from radiation hazards. For this purpose, a safety assessment should be carried out relating to the potential hazards that may occur during the decommissioning. The radiological hazards involved in the decommissioning activities also should be identified, and be taken into account in the safety assessment. The radiation conditions of the primary circuit are determined by the activity of corrosion and fission products that have accumulated on the internal surfaces of the components. Therefore the estimation of contamination on the components is very important and, may be the first step in the reactor operation and decommissioning of components. The predominant radionuclide in the PWR primary coolant is Co-60, although Co-58 contributes significantly to radioactivity level at the early stage of a reactor operation. Since Co-60 is produced from the in-core Co-58, which is the source of cobalt in a reactor coolant system, many researchers have investigated its transmutation in the core, its transport around the system, and its subsequent deposition on surfaces. The major parameter influencing the behavior of radioactivity, such as Co-60 in the coolant, is the corrosion product oxides. The objective of this work is to analyze the corrosion product activity transported in the primary circuit by using a multi-region model. This model, which is incorporated with the mass and activity transport between the dissolved corrosion products in the coolant and the surface, describes the specific activity of corrosion products in coolant and on the surfaces according to the operation modes as well as decommissioning stage. In order to evaluate the analysis of the corrosion products in an integral type reactor, a multi-region mass balance model is applied. The specific activities of the various species on the surface of core and steam generator throughout the effective full power hours, 15,000 hours, are simulated for the various modes of operations. As a result, the specific activities of corrosion products from the surface of primary circuit were shown as very low compared to those of other commercial nuclear power plants. In this simulated reactor, a significant reduction of specific activities from the activated corrosion products is obtained due to the introduction of titanium alloy to the steam generator tube and the avoidance of boric acid induced corrosion. From this result we conclude that we are able to predict the level of radioactive nuclides generated by corrosion products in a primary circuit according to the various modes of operations by using multi-region model. In this point of view it is concluded that this multi-region model can be used as an engineering tool for analysis of the corrosion products within the primary coolant for the nuclear power plants. It is also considered that it is possible to extend to a calculation tool for estimating the radiological hazards involved in the decommissioning activities in terms of safety assessment. (authors)

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2017

Modeling and Analysis of Coupled Flow Through Packed Beds as a Diagnostic Tool for Packed Bed Reactor Health - 17172

The US Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, is building the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) in Richland, Washington, to immobilize the hundreds of millions of liters of radioactive waste stored at the Hanford Site in Washington state. The offgas generated during vitrification of these wastes requires treatment to remove and/or destroy chemical and radioactive hazardous components before release to the atmosphere. In particular, volatile and semi-volatile hydrocarbon components are to be catalytically oxidized to carbon dioxide and water, whereas nitrogen oxides (NOx) are to be catalytically reduced to nitrogen and water. These tasks are accomplished in a series of packed bed reactors. Achieving the requisite Destruction/Removal Efficiency (DRE) for each of the tracked components is highly dependent on the flow characteristics of the offgas through the packed beds. The flow kinetics may be monitored and characterized during the initial warm-up of the system. The gases, initially at 76 deg. C (169 deg. F), (a) flow through one side of a countercurrent heat exchanger to recover heat from the exiting gases (which have already passed through the catalytic beds), (b) are then further heated electrically to approximately 400 deg. C (750 deg. F; the preferred operating temperature of the Thermo Catalytic Oxidizer (TCO)), (c) pass through the TCO where the reduced components of the offgas are oxidized over a supported Pt catalyst bed, (d) are partially cooled to approximately 315 deg. C (600 deg. F) by addition of approximately 25% (by weight) diluted ammonia/air mixture, (e) pass through the Selective Catalytic Reducer (SCR) where the NOx components are converted to N{sub 2} and H{sub 2}O over a supported V2O{sub 5}/TiO{sub 2} catalyst bed, and (f) exit through the hot side of the countercurrent heat exchanger. The electrical heater is not powerful enough to raise the temperature of the offgas to the desired 400 deg. C without the contribution of the heat recovered in the heat exchanger. Moreover, the thermal mass of the beds and housings of the TCO and SCR require a significant input of thermal energy to reach the desired operating temperatures; the better part of a day is required to bring the unit from ambient temperatures to operating temperatures. Therefore, the temperature of the stream during the initial warm-up of the system at each point in the system is dependent upon the thermal mass, flow dispersion, and permeability of the components, quantified as characteristic/representative volumes and residence times. By monitoring the temperature of the offgas as it enters and exits each portion of the system during this warm-up period one may model the system as a series of small Continuously Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTR)s (referred to as 'CSTRlets') to explain the flow kinetics through the catalyst beds. These component CSTRlets are adjustable in size and number, that one may model the flow profile of the gases through the catalyst beds. For example, a single large CSTR will present an effluent temperature profile with a simple exponential decay shape. Concatenating more CSTRlets generate more complex sigmoidal responses. Concatenating one CSTRlet significantly larger than the others in the train also alters the shape of the effluent temperature profile, in a fashion not replicable by a train of equal-sized CSTRlets. The ultimate goal is to accurately emulate the entire system as a representative CSTRlet train. Once accomplished, this characterization may be used in subsequent warm-ups (following shutdown for catalyst maintenance, for example) or by an intentional step change in inlet offgas temperature to detect/diagnose anomalies in flow through the beds (e.g., channeling or partial blockage.) This work presents development of this model through analytical, calculational, and empirical means. - The analytic model is accomplished by Laplace transform analysis of each component to recover component process transfer functions. - The calculational portion is performed via brute force finite element calculation. - Fitting empirical data from the warm-up of the TCO skid allows one to select the hypothetical CSTRlet trains which best fit the TCO and SCR beds for the analytical and finite element calculations. The first portion of this paper presents the development of the analytical (Laplace space) model of the coupled system. Estimated values for the initial temperature, mass, specific heat, electrical heat, and relative quantities of the offgas, catalyst beds, stainless steel housings, and ammonia dilution stream are used to generate expected temperature profiles at several selected junctures of the system. The number and size of the component hypothetical CSTRlets are calculated from the analytical model and are used to predict temperature profiles at the exit of the system and at intermediate junctions between system components (where thermocouples are present in the actual unit.) The finite element calculations employ a series of CSTRlet volumes to produce a similar suite of temperature profiles, for comparison with the analytical model results. Finally, empirical data from the Factory Acceptance Test system warm-up are used to select and compare the results from each modeling strategy to select the CSTRlet train(s) which best model the behavior of the actual system. This work presents a novel method of system component characterization, of value to the WTP plant and similar vitrification facilities as well as chemical process industries unrelated to waste management. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Innovative Solutions To Solve Complex Radioactive Waste Management Problems In The U.S. - 2017 Richard S. Hodes, M.D. Honor Lecture Award - 17609

Ever since Wilhelm Roentgen, Henri Becquerel, and Marie Curie discovered x-rays, radioactivity, and radium, respectively, at the turn of the nineteenth century, nuclear technologies have continued to evolve and significantly enrich the quality of life for mankind. The evolution of such technologies has enabled our society to diagnose medical illnesses without the need for invasive surgeries, treat cancers, conduct research, develop new kinds of pharmaceuticals, preserve our food supply, and generate over 20% of our nation's electricity from commercial nuclear power plants. While these life-changing technologies have significantly enriched our quality of life and advanced our understanding of the sciences, they also generate radioactive waste that must be managed responsibly in a manner that protects public health. Over the past several decades, decision makers have developed a patchwork of policies to safely manage radioactive wastes-policies that are not necessarily based on the risk posed to public health, but more often on the origins of the waste and the manner in which they are defined in federal legislation. However, in the past several years, much progress has been made to better risk-inform the practices of managing Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) in the United States. In 2012, the nation's first regional commercial facility for disposing of Class A, B, and C LLW since the U.S. Congress enacted the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980, as amended in 1985, was opened in Andrews County, Texas. Since then, other innovative LLW management solutions have emerged, ranging from cost-effective disposal options for wastes with very low levels of radioactivity to depleted uranium, and perhaps ultimately, for waste exceeding the concentration-based limits for Class C LLW (i.e., Greater Than Class C LLW) as specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), chap. 61.55. Most recently, a license application for a consolidated interim storage facility for Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) is currently under review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Should the NRC approve the license application, SNF currently located at 12 shutdown and decommissioned nuclear reactors could be placed into interim storage in Texas. Approval of this license application would facilitate the complete decommissioning of nuclear power plants, returning them to green-fields, and allowing the local communities to re-purpose the lands for further economic development. Over the next decade, many of these waste management challenges that once seemed insurmountable may soon be transformed into a reality. As will be discussed at the award lecture, achieving such possibilities clearly aligns with the vision of creating innovative radioactive waste management solutions for our nation that were championed by the late physician and statesman, Dr. Richard S. Hodes. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Selection and Validation of Alternate Slag Sources for Saltstone Production - 16145

To stabilize low activity salt solution produced at the Savannah River Site (SRS) the salt waste is mixed with a combination of fly ash (FA), ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to form a grout termed saltstone. Upon curing, the low activity waste is encapsulated within the hardened cementitious matrix. While the sources of the dry feed components have remained unchanged for several years, SRS was recently notified that its domestic source of GGBFS would no longer be available due to the shutdown of the steel making plant that produced the ferrous slag as a by-product. This shut-down follows a trend in the reduction of domestic ferrous slag sources. Alternate GGBFS vendors were sought and a program developed to validate the alternate sources for use in saltstone. GGBFS is primarily utilized in the construction industry as a replacement for OPC and the requirements of a GGBFS source, based on an American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard, are predominantly limited to demonstrating that the GGBFS replacement will provide equivalent strength in comparison to the baseline OPC-based concrete. This affords the construction industry significant flexibility with respect to the GGBFS source that can be used. In contrast, GGBFS has a role of significantly more importance when utilized in saltstone. In particular, the reducing blast furnace environment under which GGBFS is produced yields reducing species, such as sulfide (S{sup 2-}) and ferrous iron (Fe{sup 2+}), which are believed to facilitate the long-term immobilization of redox sensitive contaminants (e.g. technetium-99 ({sup 99}Tc)). In addition, a change in GGBFS source has the potential to impact the rheological properties and the reactive heat generation of the grout, which may adversely affect the ability to pump the grout to a Saltstone Disposal Unit (SDU) and the temperatures attained within an SDU, respectively. As such, alternate GGBFS sources for the processing of saltstone require significantly more scrutiny than is prescribed by the ASTM standard. Four alternate GGBFS sources were evaluated. All four sources met the ASTM requirements, only one source was considered viable for use in saltstone based on preliminary evaluation. The other three sources will require a more intensive assessment to determine their potential applicability. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Design and Construction of the Paddys Run Streambank Stabilization Project at the Fernald Preserve, Harrison, Ohio - 16165

The Fernald Preserve is a former uranium-processing plant that underwent extensive remediation pursuant to CERCLA and is now managed by the US DOE Office of Legacy Management. While remediation of buildings and soil contamination was completed in 2006, aquifer remediation is ongoing. Paddys Run is a second-order stream that runs to the south along the western side of the Fernald Preserve. The Paddys Run watershed encompasses nearly 41 km{sup 2} (16 mi{sup 2}), including most of the Fernald site. Field personnel conducting routine site inspections in March 2014 observed that Paddys Run was migrating east via bank erosion into the 'Pit 3 Swale', an area of known surface-water contamination. The soil there was certified pursuant to site regulatory agreements and meets all final remediation levels. However, weekly surface-water monitoring is conducted from two puddles within the swale area, when water that exceeds the final remediation levels is present. Paddys Run had migrated east approximately 4 m (13 ft) in 2 years and was approximately 29 m (95 ft) from the sample location. This rapid migration threatened existing conditions that allowed for continued monitoring of the swale area and also threatened Paddys Run water quality. Therefore, DOE and regulators determined that the east bank of Paddys Run required stabilization. This was accomplished with a design that included the following components: relocation of approximately 145 m (475 ft) of streambed 9 m (30 ft) west, installation of a rock toe along the east bank, installation of two cross-vane in-stream grade-control structures, stabilization of a portion of the east bank using soil encapsulated lifts, and regrading, seeding, and planting within remaining disturbed areas. In an effort to take advantage of low-flow conditions in Paddys Run, construction was initiated in September 2014. Weather delays and subsurface flow within the Paddys Run streambed resulted in an interim shutdown of the project area in December 2014. Construction activities resumed in April 2015, with completion in November 2015. To date, this stabilization project has been successful. The regraded bank and streambed have remained stable, and no compromise to installed cross-vanes, the rock toe, or the soil encapsulated lifts has been observed. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Crystallization of Sodium Phosphate Dodecahydrate and Re-crystallization to Natrophosphate in Simulated Hanford Nuclear Waste - 16188

The nuclear waste at the Hanford site near Richland, WA, has large concentrations of phosphate in the form of the phosphate ion, sodium phosphate dodecahydrate (Na{sub 3}PO{sub 4}.12H{sub 2}O.(1/4)NaOH) and natrophosphate (Na{sub 7}F(PO{sub 4}){sub 3}.19H{sub 2}O). Sodium phosphate dodecahydrate can form a gel and natrophosphate can crystallize large particles, complicating the processing of slurries of both salts. The gel is regarded as more problematic, so natrophosphate has historically been crystallized to prevent phosphate gelling. This study determined if natrophosphate crystals can grow to large size in short time periods (a few weeks), time periods relevant to short process shutdowns. Solutions of NaOH and NaAl(OH){sub 4} were blended at different ratios with stock solutions containing NaOH, NaF, and Na{sub 3}PO{sub 4} at 50 deg. C. The mixtures were allowed to cool to 22 deg. C, and the crystal growth was monitored by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) for 17 days. Four of the six blends investigated gelled rapidly due to Na{sub 3}PO{sub 4}.12H{sub 2}O.(1/4)NaOH precipitation. The gel slowly dissipated over time as the solids recrystallized into natrophosphate. In one case, the natrophosphate reached sizes of greater than 1000 microns in diameter in just 4 days. This rapid gelling and crystallization kinetics is important to engineers trying to manage nuclear wastes high in phosphates. Hanford tank farm engineers are developing sampling plans to support temperature and process control strategies for preventing the formation of solid phosphates. They are also developing methods of suspending large natrophosphate crystals. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Groundwater Monitoring Guidance for Decommissioning Planning - 16228

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is preparing a document called Groundwater Monitoring Guidance for Decommissioning Planning. This guidance is the first part of a multi-year EPRI project which summarizes experiences with both operational and decommissioning groundwater protection programs and compares the two in order to identify data gaps. The EPRI guidance will show how to address these data gaps and provide recommended decommissioning preparatory actions. The second part of this project will addresses the long term stewardship of a groundwater protection program after the permanent shutdown of the plant during the SAFSTOR period and/or during the active decommissioning of the plant. This paper will discuss the content of the first EPRI guidance document that is focused on decommissioning planning. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Implementation of Enhanced Attenuation at the DOE Mound Site OU-1 Landfill: Accelerating Progress and Reducing Costs - 16270

A field demonstration of enhanced attenuation (EA) was initiated in 2014 to expedite the remediation of industrial solvents in the groundwater impacted by the former landfill Operable Unit 1 (OU-1) at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Mound, Ohio, Site. EA uses active engineering solutions to alter the target site so that the contaminant plume will passively stabilize and shrink. For OU-1, the EA was implemented by targeted injection of an electron donor (vegetable oil) to create 'structured geochemical zones'. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the altered subsurface system encounter alternating anaerobic and aerobic environments along the plume flow path. The effect of these structured geochemical zones is effective and rapid degradation of parent compounds such as trichloroethene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE), and daughter compounds such as cis-1,2-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride. EA at Mound OU-1 provides a transition to natural attenuation and is an alternative to the baseline pump-and-treat (P and T) system. Industrial solvents (primarily TCE) and other VOCs that originated from the former solid-waste landfill contaminated the groundwater in the Buried Valley Aquifer beneath the Mound site. A groundwater P and T system was initiated in 1996 to control the plume, and a soil vapor extraction system was installed and operated from 1997 to 2003 to remove the bulk of the VOC sources from the vadose zone. Physical removal of the landfill waste and contaminated soil was performed between 2006 and 2010. Approximately 76,100 cubic meters (99,500 cubic yards) of material were removed from the OU-1 landfill area. Operation of the groundwater P and T system continued throughout this period. The principles and technical basis of the ongoing EA field demonstration were developed by the Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council. The goal of the EA implementation is to provide a bridge between active groundwater treatments and monitored natural attenuation. EA relies on understanding and manipulating the contaminant mass balance. Technologies are applied to sustainably reduce the contaminant loading from the source and/or increase the rate of natural attenuation processes within the plume. In 2014, a core team that included DOE, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Ohio EPA, and technical support organizations evaluated remedial options for OU-1. During the 2014 evaluation, the team projected a cleanup time frame for the baseline P and T system of 26 additional years and a cleanup time frame for the EA remedy of 13 years. On the basis of that evaluation, EPA approved the implementation of the EA remedy that required the shutdown of the P and T system. The combination of technologies implemented for OU-1 EA included (a) neat vegetable oil in the vadose zone in the former landfill and (b) emulsified vegetable oil within the footprint of the groundwater plume. In the first part of the deployment, neat oil spreads laterally and forms a thin layer on the water table beneath residual soil sources to intercept and reduce future VOC loading and to reduce oxygen inputs to the local groundwater. In the second part of the deployment, emulsified oil forms active bioremediation anaerobic treatment zones within the plume footprint to degrade existing groundwater contaminants (via reductive dechlorination, co-metabolism, or both) and stimulates long-term attenuation capacity in the down-gradient aerobic plume (via co-metabolism). The results from the first year of the field demonstration indicate that the dissolved TCE and PCE plumes have decreased in size and mass. Statistical tests indicate that the VOC concentrations in the majority of the source-area wells are decreasing. The VOC concentrations throughout the plume are projected to be below the target maximum contaminant level of 2 to 5 μg/L within 5 to 10 years-sooner than the design projection of 13 years. The biogeochemistry and microbial community within the structured geochemical zones are consistent with the design and appear to be stable. At Mound OU-1, EA has accelerated progress toward the remedial action objectives and reduced costs. Ongoing monitoring will determine whether the EA remedy has transitioned the site into monitored natural attenuation status and whether the EA will continue to be effective, timely, and sustainable. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Canada's Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program - Ten Years of Progress and Achievements - 16456

Nuclear legacy liabilities have resulted from more than 60 years of nuclear research and development carried out on behalf of Canada. The liabilities are located at Atomic Energy of Canada Limited's (AECL) Chalk River Laboratories in Ontario and Whiteshell Laboratories in Manitoba, as well as three shutdown prototype reactors in Ontario and Quebec that are being maintained in a safe storage state. Estimated at about $10.6 billion (B) (current day Canadian dollars), these liabilities consist of disused nuclear facilities and associated infrastructure, a wide variety of buried and stored waste, and contaminated lands. The Government of Canada established the Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program (NLLP) in 2006 to implement a long-term strategy to safely and cost-effectively reduce risks and liabilities, and invested approximately $1.4 B over the 10-year duration of the Program to implement the strategy. Risks and liabilities were reduced through projects and activities that decommissioned and removed out-dated facilities, remediated lands affected by past practices, and improved the management of legacy radioactive waste. The NLLP formally ended in September 2015 when the restructuring of AECL's Nuclear Laboratories was completed, and a Government-owned Contractor-operated (GoCo) management model came into effect. The nuclear decommissioning and waste management work that was previously carried out under the NLLP was transitioned into the new GoCo contract. Over the 10-year duration of the NLLP, the Program achieved good progress in addressing health, safety and environmental priorities, reducing liabilities, and providing the studies, plans and facilities that will be needed to enable subsequent phases of the strategy. The NLLP provided a strong basis for the GoCo contractor to accelerate risk and liability reduction at AECL sites. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Future German R and D on HLW Disposal - 16519

In 2009, after the General elections, the new German Government showed a relatively positive attitude towards a prolonged use of nuclear power. Power plant shutdown was planned for the year 2032. Nuclear power was considered as a sort of transition energy technology until the energy supply would take place by the use of renewable energy sources. This was in line with the legal framework and the political strategy of the energy turnaround. Then, 17 nuclear power plants (NPP) were operational. The Fukushima incident heralded the sound of drastic changes in the German energy policy: Besides an intermediate stop of operation of reactors until a so-called stress test was accomplished, the general political decision was to phase-out nuclear earlier than planned and to implement faster the decisions regarding the energy transition policy. The shut-down of the last German nuclear power plant will occur in 2022. Accordingly, all the necessary legal changes were made. A consensus about the appropriate waste management strategy for heat generating waste (spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and vitrified waste (HLW)) was still pending at this time. Public and political discussions on this subject continued as in the years before. In July 2013, after intensive discussions, most of the parties represented in the German parliament agreed to eventually tackle the challenge of finding a repository by a consensual, transparent and science-based approach. This was to be codified in a law. In July 2013, the Site Selection Act passed the parliament. This law should pave the way for a new holistic process that addresses social, political, and scientific aspects of siting and the site selection process. The basics for this process should be provided by the 'Commission Storage of Radioactive Waste Materials' which was established according this law. Against this background discussions showed that scientific-technical R and D activities should be mirrored accordingly and R and D has to deal both with the future challenges of radioactive waste HLW disposal and related aspects. Considering this the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi), which is responsible for non-site specific R and D, created the new Research Concept 'Research for the management of radioactive waste', being fundamental and the frame for non-site specific R and D projects funded by BMWi. Key changes - mirroring the new requirements and different aspects - touch the issues: host rock research, i.e. all potential host rocks available in Germany are equally addressed and there is no prioritization, consideration of consequences of prolonged storage at NPP sites, alternative waste management strategies compared to direct disposal in a mined repository, and involvement of socio-technical aspects.This paper intends to highlight the key changes, its consequences, and will give a brief overview on first initiated R and D activities. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Content Addition and Testing for 2017 NRC Amendment for the Versa-Pac Type A Fissile Packaging - 18120

The Versa-Pac is a certified Type A, fissile packaging (USA NRC Certificate no. USA/9342/AF-96), often used as a waste package for one time use. Continuous content additions have improved the versatility of the package resulting in expanded uses for the nuclear industry. Principal design of the Versa-Pac packaging maintains the use of an inner liner positioned inside a 55-gallon (VP-55) or 110-gallon drum (VP-110), as used for decades in the transport and disposal of Type A fissile materials. The Versa-Pac is used directly or in conjunction with pails, pipe containers, poly bottles, and a variety of smaller containers, inserts and vessels. The Versa-Pac content developments assist the industry with site shutdown, decommissioning, and cleanup operations, allowing for removal, transport, and storage options for the residual waste materials. A 2017 NRC license amendment application adds new capabilities to the Versa-Pac that include a low 1.25 wt% {sup 235}U enriched uranium loading, small quantities of UF{sub 6} in the form of 1S and 2S cylinders, and a payload mass increase from 250 to 350 pounds for the Versa-Pac 55-gallon version (VP-55). The lower uranium enrichment loading of 1.25 wt% {sup 235}U allows for a higher uranium mass limit. The inclusion of 1S and 2S UF{sub 6} cylinders fills an industry need to remove and dispose of long-stored material during site cleanup activities. The content payload mass limit is increased for low contaminated or radioactive heavy metal contents, such as cut plant components and ingots. Regulatory certification of new contents is demonstrated by test, analysis, and a combination of these techniques to show that the design function of the Versa-Pac as a Type A fissile package remains unchanged. Specific UF{sub 6} criticality and thermal analysis upgrades are added to the design documentation to accommodate 1S and 2S UF{sub 6} cylinders. The parameters for criticality analyses are simplified, ensuring no credit for cylinder containment is required for HAC thus reducing the reliance on a single specific shoring device. An upgrade of the Versa-Pac thermal analysis demonstrates compliance with ANSI N14.1 UF{sub 6} cylinder thermal limits. A new drop test sequence for the VP-55 was performed, documenting the addition of the 350-pound payload and demonstrating the VP-55 maintains structural integrity during the NCT and HAC drop, crush and puncture events as defined by 10 CFR 71. The testing and analyses show no loss of the material occurs and the package maintains the material in a subcritical state. This paper traces the engineering and licensing efforts involved in expanding the Versa-Pac's versatility for the 2017 NRC amendment application; summarizing the new testing and results for the payload increase, the content addition criticality and thermal evaluations, and content description for the Versa-Pac Safety Analysis Report. The NRC license amendment is scheduled for Winter 2017. Testing and supporting analyses reported in the Versa-Pac Safety Analysis Report demonstrates the content developments met the performance requirements of 10 CFR 71 for a Type A fissile package. A revision of the NRC Certificate of Compliance is expected in Spring 2018. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Robotic Underwater Decontamination Services for Nuclear Applications-18464

Successful Underwater Robotic Decontamination Demonstrates Dose-Saving And Outage-Shortening Technology Diakont successfully provided underwater robotic decontamination services on a North American nuclear power plant's refueling cavity and dryer-separator pool in Spring 2017 using a new tool system. Historically, nuclear plant operators have conducted cleaning and decontamination of these surfaces manually, after draining water from the space. However manual decontamination is slow, and can result in excessive personnel dose exposure. The underwater robotic decontamination services present a vast improvement over manual decontamination because it reduces personnel dose exposure, reduces radwaste, doesn't impact plant chemistry, and doesn't risk inadvertently spreading contamination. Also the new decontamination method avoids the risk of personnel injury and component damage associated with hydrolasing. And by performing the decontamination robotically while the cavities are flooded, in many cases the critical path outage schedule can be shortened. Able to decontaminate horizontal, vertical, and curved surfaces, the decontamination tools easily navigate to areas within flooded cavities that are inaccessible to previous solutions, performing decontamination in parallel to other activities including fuel movement. Also, unlike other legacy solutions, the new tools do not require continuous use of an overhead crane or other method of suspension while performing the decontamination activities. The ROV-type decontamination tool attaches and drives along the cavity and component surfaces using a high-force, no-flow vortex generator, even in the presence of Residual Heat Removal (RHR) or shutdown cooling flow. Efficient, effective cleaning is performed using a rugged brushing action to detach the crud, while vacuuming it away at high flow rates to a submerged filter. At the Spring 2017 refueling outage, the decontamination services with the new methodology were so effective that no additional manual cavity decontamination was required after drain-down. Using the tool's ability to swim, attach, and crawl, field technicians decontaminated the majority of the surfaces designated by the plant operator. Preliminary surveys indicated that all contamination levels were reduced to <50 K dpm/100 cm{sup 2}, helping the utility meet their INPO/Industry collective radiation exposure goals. The new cleaning and decontamination services are ideal for servicing various underwater areas within nuclear power plants such as refueling cavities, BWR-6 drywell heads, spent fuel pools, cask loading pools and fuel transfer canals. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Decommissioning of the Chernobyl NPP: Problems, Progress, Prospects - 18485

Decommissioning of the Chernobyl NPP provides a special case due to a number of peculiarities: it is prescheduled decommissioning, the facilities undergone a major accident with off-site contamination, no previous experience of decommissioning of RBMK-type nuclear power units, unavailability of proper spent fuel and radioactive waste management infrastructure, special types of waste. The most challenging issue is the final decommissioning of the Unit 4 destroyed by the major accident on 26 April 1986. Neither of four RBMK-1000 nuclear power units was in operation till the end of the design-based lifetime, Units 1 and 3 being in operation for 19 years each, Units 2 and 4 even less. The last operating unit, Unit 3, was permanently shutdown on December 15 2000, however the main obstacle to complete a complex technological and radiological survey was spent fuel left in reactor pools and in the core due to lack of capacity in the existing interim spent fuel storage of wet type (ISF-1). So removal of spent fuel from the core and reactor pools was considered as one of the priority tasks. While construction of ISF-2 (of dry type) was delayed due to different reasons, safety reassessment and modernization of ISF-1 enabled capacity increase and transfer of all non-damaged fuel assemblies into ISF-1. Thus Chernobyl NPP Units were fully vacated from spent fuel. Since that Chernobyl NPP Units are considered as the radioactive waste facility. Dismantlement of Units 1,2 turbine hall equipment is on the way and some progress is achieved in technical solution for fragmentation of long-size equipment. All dismantled equipment after decontamination and characterization is either released from regulatory control or disposed as solid radioactive waste. The details are discussed in the paper. Eventually the comprehensive technological and radiological survey of Chernobyl NPP Units had been completed and detailed decommissioning programme had been endorsed. The decommissioning strategy chosen for the Chernobyl NPP is based on the deferred dismantlement approach, so final dismantlement of all equipment and constructions is supposed after some period of decay storage. However, the issue of the final state of the site and its further use is still open. The main reason for it is the lack of clear picture as for the destroyed Unit 4, as technical solutions concerning its highly damaged and contaminated constructions and so called fuel containing masses (FCM) are not available yet. It could be reasonably predicted also that the internal part of the so called exclusion zone will not be released into non-restricted use in near future due to characteristics of its contamination. Possible implications of these and other factors on further decommissioning activities and some approaches to find solutions are discussed in the paper. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

National Plan for the Disposal of Existing and Future TRU Wastes - 18616

Now that the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) has re-opened, after being down for three years due to an accident the DOE National TRU Program has re-developed a plan for the disposal of existing and future TRU wastes. The National TRU Waste Management Plan (NTWMP) is an integrated plan to address the needs of DOE sites across the DOE Weapons Complex that create and store TRU waste, and is centered on the capability of WIPP to receive and dispose of TRU waste. The WIPP capability is planned as a weekly shipping rate and is defined by emplacement and receipt rate capabilities since WIPP is not permitted for long-term storage. And, shipping rates may be constrained by new WIPP Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) and future plans for repository configurations and disposal package capabilities over the next 30 years. Since WIPP is the only disposal system available to the DOE for TRU waste disposal, DOE has a newly projected life-cycle need for WIPP to remain open and available up to 2050. It is projected that the need for WIPP will continue up to the year 2050 for the disposition of the remaining legacy TRU inventories and for the disposal of TRU waste continuing to be generated at DOE's National Laboratories. In addition, there are several other potential new waste streams in which WIPP is being considered an alternative solution for their disposition. The NTWMP has been updated to reflect the short-term and long-term plans for TRU waste disposal at WIPP. The short-term plan is used by DOE for budget projection and integration purposes to facilitate and inform budget planning, both in DOE's Environmental Management (EM) and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) organizations. Most legacy TRU waste (generated in the past and stored at DOE sites today) is owned and managed by EM. And, EM submits integrated budget requests for DOE sites, including the integration of resources for TRU waste management. NNSA and DOE's Office of Science (OS) funds TRU waste management as part of their mission funding and NNSA should eventually be the primary user of the WIPP resources as EM's legacy TRU waste is cleaned-up. Prior to the unexpected shutdown of WIPP in 2014, there was a small back-log of waste certified for WIPP disposal and shipments of TRU waste to WIPP were 'just-in-time' as waste was certified. After three years of WIPP being down, DOE sites have built significant back-logs of TRU waste to be certified for WIPP. That back-log built up to over 25,000 containers of TRU waste during that three-year period (Table 1). The backlog included both Contact-Handled (CH) TRU waste and Remote-Handled (RH) TRU waste, and even though WIPP re-opened in April of 2017, it is only open for TRU waste containers that can be stacked on disposal room floors. Plans for changing RH waste disposal packages and methods are in-the-works, but are not yet mature enough for significant planning. In addition, the WIPP underground facilities are now partially contaminated with radioactive particulate, which significantly reduces the WIPP operational efficiencies as compared to 2014. With a large back-log of waste ready for WIPP disposal and limited throughput for WIPP disposal rates, the focus of the NTWMP is to prioritize the selection of TRU wastes from the various sites based on WIPP waste emplacement rates and shipping rates to WIPP. Some TRU waste sites have a significant need to be top priority for shipments to WIPP, and that must be balanced with the need for all TRU waste sites to have some shipments to deplete their back-log of TRU wastes. Storage and management of TRU waste is very costly for DOE and many of those resources could be used to optimize the overall disposition of TRU waste and save DOE significant funding. In addition, the plan will show the possible transition of TRU Waste Management from primarily being an EM function to being an NNSA function in the coming years. As legacy TRU waste inventories are removed, and as NNSA mission-related TRU waste inventories are produced, DOE will be faced with deciding where the primary responsibility for TRU waste management should reside. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Design of a Commercial Scale Accelerator Driven Subcritical Aqueous Assembly

SHINE Medical Technologies is working towards producing a reliable, domestic supply of medical isotopes, including molybdenum-99 (Mo-99), xenon-133, and iodine 131, without using highly enriched uranium. Approximately 88% of Mo-99 decays to technetium-99m, which is the most widely used medical isotope in the world, accounting for approximately 80% of all nuclear medicine procedures. A novel aqueous, subcritical nuclear assembly has been designed by SHINE Medical Technologies. The assembly can produce medical radioisotopes in significant quantities for U.S. and foreign needs. The assembly produces isotopes without using a reactor, instead using a fusion-based neutron source coupled to a fission-based aqueous assembly. The subcritical nature of the aqueous assembly has safety and licensing benefits, including the elimination of the reactor control system and elimination of high level waste. SHINE plans to construct eight subcritical assemblies with a plant capacity of greater than 3000 6-day Curies, which is more than one-quarter of the world's Mo-99 requirements. From a nuclear design standpoint, the aqueous subcritical assembly needs to be able to generate sufficient fission power to meet the production capacity requirements while remaining subcritical at all times with an acceptable margin. To address these conflicting design goals, a simple nuclear design and reactivity control philosophy has been developed that allows for high power operation with a high degree of safety. A fusion-driven subcritical fission assembly has been designed by SHINE Medical Technologies to provide a reliable, domestic supply of medical isotopes. Nuclear models have been created and show that the assembly can be started up, operated, and shutdown in a safe manner without active reactivity control systems. A unique reactivity control strategy allows SHINE to operate the aqueous subcritical assembly at much higher power levels than would otherwise be practical, while still retaining the benefits of subcritical operation and avoiding the need for complex subcritical measurement techniques. Based on the current design, the subcritical target is capable of generating significant fission power (on the order of 100 kW) when being driven by a simple, low-cost deuterium-tritium accelerator, enabling the SHINE facility to supply over one-fourth of the worldwide demand of Mo- 99. SHINE has recently been issued a construction permit by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to build the commercial facility in Janesville, WI, with eight subcritical assemblies and the associated production equipment. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Execution Strategy Analysis (ESA) Origin Sites Readiness Model - 19073

This is a technical paper that does not take into account the contractual limitations under the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (Standard Contract) (10 CFR Part 961). Under the provisions of the Standard Contract, DOE does not consider spent nuclear fuel in multi-assembly canisters to be an acceptable waste form, absent a mutually agreed to contract amendment. To the extent discussions or recommendations in this paper conflict with the provisions of the Standard Contract, the Standard Contract provisions prevail. The DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition (SFWD) Integrated Waste Management System (IWMS) program is developing an Execution Strategy Analysis (ESA) Origin Sites Readiness Model using the Goldsim{sup TM} software application to provide information on potential future approaches for removing SNF and HLW from origin sites such as commercial nuclear power plant sites. The purpose of this ESA model is to apply integrated waste management system analysis, system engineering, and decision analysis principles to inform future decisions regarding potential future nuclear waste management system architectures. The ESA Origin Sites Readiness Model is a dynamic simulation modeling capability. It is developed for use in the analysis and comparison of potential future implementation strategies associated with an integrated nuclear waste management program. The model is designed to be independent of the destination of the SNF or HLW so the results from the Origin Sites Readiness Model are equally applicable to a wide range of scenarios involving shipments to generic destinations in an integrated waste management system. The model explicitly takes significant assumptions, uncertainties, and risks into account. Currently, the ESA Origin Sites Readiness Model includes 14 shutdown sites (Maine Yankee, Yankee Rowe, Connecticut Yankee, Vermont Yankee, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Zion, Kewaunee, Fort Calhoun, Trojan, Rancho Seco, Humboldt Bay, San Onofre, and Crystal River) and is designed to be modular so that other sites can be added in the future. The model also includes multiple transportation modes (heavy haul truck, rail, and barge), activities related to the acquisition of transportation assets such as railcars and transportation casks, and site-specific considerations of on-site and near-site transportation infrastructure. The model was developed using the ESA process with Subject Matter Experts (SME); it incorporates uncertainty and risks and provides a structured, systematic methodology for evaluating potential SNF campaign scenarios. The model also complements other system-level logistics tools being developed by SFWD. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗