Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “radioactive waste”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,315 records · Page 73

A Data Processing Workflow for Fixed-wing Drone Based Radiation Mapping in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ) - 20119

April 2020 marks the 34. anniversary of the high-profile radiological release from the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP). The release of radioactive material from reactor number four began on the 26 April 1986 and continued over a period of about 10 days, releasing approximately 1700 PBq of radioactive material (including 85 PBq of 137-Cs) into the environment. To this day, the accident remains the most significant release of radioactive material since civil nuclear power generation began. In the years since the accident, automated and remote radiation monitoring technologies have advanced significantly in their capabilities. One such example of this is the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in radiation mapping investigations. In April 2019, a team of scientists from the University of Bristol showcased a novel radiation mapping system within the CEZ, specifically aiming to map radiation over a large portion of the area immediately surrounding the ChNPP. Over six days of data collection, the system flew a total distance of 583.8 km, covering an area of 14.6 sq.km with an exceptional spatial resolution (sub 20 m/pixel). The work presented herein outlines and explains the data processing procedure to convert the raw data into 137-Cs activity (kBq/sq.m) and cesium-equivalent dose-rate (CED) at 1 m above ground level (μSv/hr). A demonstration of the validity of the method is demonstrated through the successful reduction of the raw data into a single linear relationship between the measured {sup 137}Cs net peak intensity and the {sup 137}Cs activity. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Nevada National Security Site - Area 5 Waste Received Under Permit SW532

Calendar Year 23 Asbestos Report for Permit SW532 Being resubmitted to address a comment received by NDEP, the weight and volume of two packages on one of the shipments was rounded differently than the quarterly report and we are revising the annual report to match.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Effect of zeolite type, temperature, and pH on Stage III glass alteration behavior for two nuclear waste glasses

We report long-term laboratory scale static alteration tests (up to 1500 d) were conducted on two low-activity waste glasses (LAWA44 and IDF18-A161) at S/V = 2000 m –1 . Tests were seeded with either analcime, clinoptilolite, zeolite P1, or zeolite P2 to induce Stage III glass alteration behavior. The effect of several parameters on glass Stage III behavior was studied with consideration of several variables, including temperature (22 °C – 90 °C) and pH (floating or initially set using KOH at values from 9.5 to 11.5). Temporal solution data and solids characterization at the end of the experiments are reported. Solution data demonstrated the occurrence of a sustained rate acceleration at temperatures down to 40 °C and the activation energy for these Stage III rates was determined for both glasses. Three major secondary phases were identified at the end of the experiments for both glasses: zeolite P1, zeolite P2, and/or analcime (along with minor phases: zeolites, clays, carbonates). The identification of the crystalline phases at the end of the experiment often differed from the zeolite seed phase. In addition, the use of the Avrami equation showed unimpeded zeolite growth (3-dimensional) in certain conditions, suggesting that in certain conditions the glass dissolution rate is controlled by zeolite formation kinetics whereas in other conditions the glass corrosion process impeded zeolite formation kinetics. The morphological evolution of the samples revealed the growth of the zeolites which completely fill the intergranular space in the powder bed. These results are discussed with regards to previous seeded and unseeded Stage III dissolution rate experiments performed on low- and high-activity nuclear waste glasses.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Hanford Site Disposition Baseline for Composite Analysis

An updated version of the Hanford Site Disposition Baseline (HSDB) was prepared to document the evolution of conditions for 637 waste sites within Central Plateau of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford Site. The HSDB provides information that will be used to evaluate post-closure radiological dose in the updated composite analysis (CA).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Modeling Activities Related to Waste Form Degradation: Progress Report

This report represents the milestone deliverable M4SF-21SN010309021 “Modeling Activities Related to Waste Form Degradation: Progress Report” that describes the progress of R&D activities of ongoing modeling investigations specifically on nuclear waste glass degradation, Density Functional Theory (DFT) studies on clarkeite structure and stability, and electrochemical modeling of spent nuclear fuel (SNF). These activities are part of the newly-created Waste form Testing, Modeling, and Performance work package at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). This work package is part of the “Inventory and Waste Form Characteristics and Performance” control account that includes various experimental and modeling activities on nuclear waste degradation conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), SNL, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Regulatory Spike Testing of RPP-WTP LAW and HLW Glasses for Compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions, VSL-03R3760-1, Rev. 1

The United States Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford site is the current location of storage of about 50 million gallons of mixed waste. This waste is stored in underground tanks at the Hanford site and is both a listed and characteristic waste, as defined in 40 CFR Part 261, and a dangerous waste according to Chapter 173-303 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). The waste is also subject to the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) (40 CFR Part 268 and WAC 173-303-140). The River Protection Project - Waste Treatment Plant (RPP-WTP) will provide DOE with a means for treating this waste by vitrification (for subsequent disposal). The tank waste will be partitioned into low and high activity fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High Level Waste (IHLW) products. The ILAW product will be disposed of in an engineered facility on the Hanford site while the IHLW product will be directed to the national deep geological disposal facility for high level nuclear waste. The ILAW and IHLW products must meet a variety of requirements with respect to protection of the environment.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Nuclear Energy Critical Material Waste Minimization Enabled by AM Techniques

This project provides evidence of the successful recycling of solid waste offcuts resulting from conventional manufacturing processes from three relevant alloys to next-generation nuclear reactor developers, providing a potentially upscalable circular process where no critical elements will be lost. Furthermore, iMOF-based adsorbents were successfully designed for CM extraction from aqueous solution, thereby providing a pathway for future upscaling for salvaging dissolved Ni ions. This research has achieved its goal of showing the impact of novel applications of recycling technologies for solid and liquid wastes that can be upscaled for application.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Iodine Speciation Basis and Gap Analysis for Hanford Tank Farm Inventory and during Processing

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is providing baseline technical support to Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) for the One System River Protection Project (RPP) Integrated Flowsheet team. This report documents the evaluation of the technical bases available to support iodine speciation and distribution within Hanford wastes and subsequent waste streams generated during direct feed low-activity waste (DFLAW) pretreatment operations (specifically, waste retrievals and staging, and particle filtration and cesium decontamination using crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange [in the tank side cesium removal (TSCR) system]. The task performed a literature survey of information related to iodine species in environments analogous to Hanford tank waste and the subsequent waste streams to define a technical basis for the possible iodine speciation in Hanford waste. In doing so it can be determined how likely laboratory studies on iodine speciation in tank waste are to be universally relevant across the Hanford tanks. The task evaluated iodide and iodate as the primary species of interest with a focus on organo-iodine where appropriate.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

AX Farm and A Farm Third Retrieval Technology Chemical Dissolution Options Evaluation

In response to DOE-ORP direction to prepare a Practicability Evaluation for Waste Tank AX-102, and to address the Washington State Department of Ecology recommendation to evaluate the use of acid reagents for chemical dissolution, an Integrated Project Team (IPT) consisting of retrieval, process chemistry, corrosion, closure and laboratory subject matter experts was assembled to evaluate chemical dissolution options. This document provides a summary of these efforts and is intended to aid in the evaluation and third retrieval technology decision process not only for AX-102, but for all the AX and A Farm tanks, since the tanks contain similar waste and are flat-bottomed with uneven bottom plates.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

TWF Waste Container Receipt, Inspection and Transfer to Storage

This procedure provides instructions for the receipt, inspection, and transfer to storage of Transuranic (TRU) Waste Containers and Pipe Overpack Containers (POC) within the Transuranic Waste Facility (TWF) (Waste Storage Buildings [WSBs] and Characterization and Waste Storage Building [CWSB]). Performance of this procedure meets the requirements of AC 5.8.9, AC 5.8.13 2nd Bullet, SAC 5.9.1, SAC 5.9.3, SR 4.2.1.1, 4.2.1.2, 4.2.1.5, 4.2.1.6, 4.2.2.1, 4.2.2.2, 4.2.2.3, 4.2.2.4, 4.2.3.1, 4.2.3.2, 4.2.3.3, 4.3.4.1, 4.4.1.1, 4.4.1.2 and 4.4.1.3.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Ultra-High-Performance Grout for Encapsulation of HEPA Filters

Ultra-high-performance grout (UHPG) grout appears to be good candidate for solidification and encapsulation of waste containing 99 Tc and 129 I that benefits from low Dobs. The properties that make UHPG a good candidate for encapsulating HEPA filters would make it a good option for microencapsulating other solid secondary waste (SSW) such as granular activated carbon, silver mordenite, and ion exchange resins. Containers made of UHPG would also be good candidates for dry disposal of SSW due to its very low diffusivity which prevents contaminant migration.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Comparison of 200-IA-1 Operable Unit Soil Concentrations to Preliminary Remediation Goals Protective of Groundwater

This environmental calculation file (ECF) documents the methodology used to determine if current site conditions for the representative waste sites assigned to the 200-IA-1 Operable Unit (OU) based on available sample results are greater than the 200 East or 200 West unit-length preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) for the protection of groundwater.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Integrating the Safety Evaluation for a Molten Salt Reactor Operation and Fuel Cycle Facility Application

Molten salt reactor (MSR) sites may include additional elements of the nuclear fuel cycle beyond those of the existing fleet. In the existing fleet, the individual elements of the fuel cycle typically have been located on different sites and licensed separately. Providing robust separation between hazards remains a useful safety practice for MSRs. Although the different elements of the fuel cycle at a nuclear site that includes MSRs may transfer material between processes more frequently than prior practices, providing adequate separation between distinct facilities avoids the potential for adverse interactions. Additionally, some elements of the MSR fuel cycle, such as fuel salt preparation or waste stabilization, may be more efficient to share among multiple nearby reactors, and nuclear sites that include MSRs may also include other reactor classes. Hence, discrete MSR fuel cycle facilities located at a common site could be physically separated with robust barriers—albeit potentially connected by piping—and licensed individually. This report describes the hazards of individual elements of representative MSR fuel cycle facilities, including their relationship to overall site level hazards. The report maps the regulatory compliance aspects of the individual MSR fuel cycle elements (e.g., fuel salt preparation, reactor, waste stabilization) to existing and developing regulations, as well as describes current and developing site-level regulations from an MSR perspective.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Compliance of NNSS Activities with P322-4 Issues Management and NNSSWAC Requirements

The Institutional Quality and Performance Assurance Division's Quality Support Services Group conducted a surveillance of the compliance of Waste Management Program activities to Issues Management/Corrective Action requirements communicated in P322-4 and the Nevada National Security Site Waste Acceptance criteria (NNSSWAC). All corrective actions reviewed and records examined were found to be compliant with appropriate and relevant procedures. There were no Findings or Opportunities for Improvement noted.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Formation of Zeolites Responsible for Waste Glass Rate Acceleration: An Experimental and Computational Study for Understanding Thermodynamic and Kinetic Processes

This report summarizes work on the NEUP Project 18-15496, DE-NE0008774 (Formation of Zeolites Responsible for Waste Glass Rate Acceleration: An Experimental and Computational Study for Understanding Thermodynamic and Kinetic Processes). The content of the report is from four journal articles that resulted from work on the project.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Tank 50H Mixing Pump Run Time Reassessment

Tank 50H is required to operate a single rotating standard slurry pump for 4.5 hours prior to transfers to the Salt Solution Receipt Tanks (SSRTs) in the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). This mixing time is required to adequately mix miscible and immiscible liquids within Tank 50H and meet the Saltstone Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). The miscible liquids are aqueous solutions of dissolved salts, while the immiscible liquids include organic droplets such as Isopar® L. To support the accelerated salt processing rates from the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), a desire to reduce the transfer time of Decontaminated Salt Solution (DSS) downstream of SWPF was identified. This document describes the analysis performed to reassess the technical basis for the 4.5 hour mixing requirement for Tank 50H.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

On-Line Waste Library Supporting Information

The On - Line Waste Library is a website that contains information regarding United States Department of Energy-managed high-level waste, spent nuclear fuel, and other wastes that are likely candidates for deep geologic disposal, with links to supporting documents for the data. This report provides supporting information for the data for which an already published source was not available.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Results for the First Quarter Calendar Year 2021 Tank 50 Salt Solution Sample

Tank 50 aqueous waste is analyzed on a quarterly basis and the results are compared to the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) of the Z-Area Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). The information from this characterization will be used by Savannah River Remediation (SRR) for the transfer of aqueous waste from Tank 50 to SPF, where the waste will be treated and disposed in the Saltstone Disposal Facility. This Technical Report compares results, where applicable, to SPF WAC Limits and Targets. A memorandum reporting the average Cs-137 value and comparison to WAC Limits has been previously issued.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗