Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “schedules”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,297 records · Page 72

Sensitivity of Optimal Midcourse Correction Scheduling for Robust Cislunar Trajectory Design

A new approach to optimal trajectory design is the determination of optimal trajectories that are robust to initial trajectory dispersions, navigation errors, maneuver execution errors, and environment modeling errors. This paper investigates the sensitivity of cislunar robust optimal trajectory design to launch date, duration of navigation measurement passes, and navigation measurement frequency. For a given cislunar trajectory from translunar injection (TLI) to lunar orbit insertion (LOI), the optimal locations of midcourse corrections, also known as trajectory correction maneuvers (TCM) are determined by minimizing the final 3-σ ∆v subject to a final 3-σ position dispersion constraint for a given launch date, specified measurement pass duration prior to each maneuver, and measurement frequency. Optical navigation (OpNav) is assumed, and OpNav field-of-view (FOV) and lighting constraints are employed. These constraints turn out to be important elements of the problem. The sensitivity of the optimal TCM locations are then investigated by varying the launch date, duration of OpNav measurement passes, and the OpNav measurement frequency, and then re-optimizing the locations of the TCMs. Given the problem parameters provided herein, results show that while the optimal TCM locations with respect to TLI vary greatly from one launch date to another, their locations with respect to LOI are nearly invariant over a 2-month launch window. Results also show that in all cases the optimal location of the last TCM is found to be at the point where the OpNav lunar FOV constraint is first violated. For all other TCMs, OpNav measurement pass duration and measurement frequency can have a moderate to large affect on the optimal TCM locations.

Linear Covariance Analysis↗

Maneuver Reconstruction, Tracking Scheduling, and Bias Estimation in the Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO)

NASA’s Gateway program will build a crew-tended station in an Earth-Moon Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) to support deep space missions to the lunar surface and heliocentric space. The station in the NRHO will be tracked by the Deep Space Network (DSN) with 2-way radiometric tracking data to produce an estimated state that is utilized to target Orbit Maintenance Maneuvers (OMMs). However, the tracking data is corrupted with measurement noise and range bias, which results in state estimation error and OMM execution error. This paper reports on analysis performed to improve the geometry of the tracking data problem with the inclusion of cross-hemispheric partner sites and explores the performance impact of handovers between partner sites and DSN sites. The OMM execution error is estimated directly using a Batch Least Squares (BLS) process, and the range bias estimation is analyzed among both original DSN sites and a combined DSN + partner sites scenario.

Clark P Newman↗

Multi-Robot Assembly Scheduling for the Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon

The Lunar Crater Radio Telescope (LCRT) is a pro- posed ultra-long-wavelength radio telescope to be constructed on the far side of the moon. The proposed telescope will be constructed by deploying a 1km wire mesh in a 3-5km crater using a team of wall-climbing DuAxel robots. In this work, we consider the problem of generating minimum-time assembly sequences for LCRT, using realistic models of travel speed and lighting. Specifically, we pose the assembly sequencing problem as a mixed-integer linear program (MILP), which we solve to global optimality using commercial solvers. We present methods for modeling time-varying travel and assembly times, based on variable lighting conditions (including crater shadowing), and show how such time-varying parameters can be incorporated into the MILP. Finally, we present numerical studies of our method, showing how makespan varies with the number of assembly robots.

Schwager, Mac↗