Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “compressing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,279 records · Page 71
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

The Effects of Off-Axis Loading on the Compression After Impact Strength of Quasi-Isotropic Face Sheet Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure

This study presents experimental results of compression after impact (CAI) testing of aluminum honeycomb core sandwich structure with face sheets made of co-cured T1100/3960 quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy when tested at +22.5⁰ and -22.5⁰ with respect to the 0⁰ fibers. In a previous study examining the CAI strengths of honeycomb sandwich structure, it was found that specimens had different CAI strengths, based on a [-45/90/+45/0]s layup, depending on whether they were tested in the 0⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [-45/90/+45/0]s) or 90⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [+45/0/-45/90]s). The CAI strength results showed that the specimens tested in the 90⁰ direction had a 19% drop in CAI strength compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ direction. This was attributed to the 0⁰ load bearing plies in the 0⁰ direction specimens being “tucked in” at the center of the specimen thus providing more stability against microbuckling. This raised the question as to what CAI strength would specimens tested at +22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [-22.5/- 67.5/+67.6/+22.5]s) and -22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [-67.5/+67.5/+22.5/-22.5]s) have compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ and 90⁰ direction. Results presented in this study show that the specimens loaded at +22.5⁰ and -22.5⁰ have a similar average CAI strength compared to the specimens loaded in the 0⁰ direction. The specimens loaded in the 90⁰ direction exhibit 16% lower average CAI strength. Additional specimens were tested in the +45⁰ direction to put the 0⁰ load bearing fibers on the outside of the specimen to see if this would decrease the strength as has been documented for undamaged strength. These specimens have average CAI strength values between the 0⁰ direction average CAI strength values and the 90⁰ direction average CAI strength values.

Sandwich structure↗
NASA NTRS2023

The Effects of Impactor Shape on the Compression After Impact Strength of Carbon/Epoxy Face Sheet Foam Core Sandwich Structure

This study presents experimental results of compression after impact (CAI) strength testing of foam core sandwich structure with carbon/epoxy face sheets impacted at three different energies with either a blunt or sharp tip impactor. The impact energies used were chosen to span the barely visible impact damage (BVID) thresholds for the sharp (4.1 J) and blunt (12.9 J) impactors with an impact energy approximately halfway between these (8.1 J) also used. While most impact testing on composites utilize a hemispherical (blunt) impactor, actual damage to a part may be due to an object impacting the part that is not blunt, but sharp and the impact response and resulting CAI strength values may be different for a given impact energy level. In this study, with regards to the impact response, the sandwich specimens showed larger transverse displacements (by about a factor of two) during the impact event when impacted by a sharp impactor versus a blunt impactor. The maximum load of impact was larger for the blunt impactor by about a factor of three. The barely visible impact damage (BVID) threshold energy was lower by about a factor of three for the sharp impactor. The absorbed energy of impact was higher for the sharp impactor. The CAI strength results showed that the sharp impactor gave lower average CAI strength values at the lowest impact energy level used, slightly lower average CAI strength values for the medium impact energy used and about the same average CAI strength values for the highest impact energy used.

sandwich structure↗
NASA NTRS2024

The Effects of Impactor Shape on the Compression After Impact Strength of Carbon/Epoxy Face Sheet Aluminum Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure

This study presents experimental results of compression after impact (CAI) strength testing of aluminum core sandwich structure with carbon/epoxy face sheets impacted at three different energies with either a 12.7 mm hemispherical, 24.5 mm hemispherical or sharp tip impactor. This study was undertaken to verify whether design allowables typically generated by blunt (hemispherical) impactors may be valid in ‘real world” applications where an impact may not be by a blunt object of a specific size. Results of practical interest in this study were that the visual damage was much easier to see for the sharp impactor, the damage size as detected by thermography was smaller for the sharp impactor for a given impact energy and dent depth was greater for the sharp impactor. The CAI strength results showed that the sharp impactor gave about the same CAI strength values at all three impact energy levels used. The larger hemispherical impactor gave slightly higher CAI results than the smaller blunt impactor. Overall it was deemed difficult to develop a CAI allowable that would cover all impactor shapes with any fidelity and thus using a lower bound strain allowable is suggested.

compression after impact (CAI)↗