Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “updates”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,261 records · Page 70

INTERFUEL: FAST - Fueling Center / EVSE Inventory Reporting Update [Slides]

This presentation presents an overview of coming changes to how federal agencies with motor vehicles will submit required information about fueling centers and electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) inventory through the Federal Automotive Statistical Tool (FAST). The presentation provides background on the process, a re-cap of how the information is currently submitted, and describes the new approach for organizations to submit the required information this year. This presentation is intended for delivery via WebEx/GoToMeeting at the August 11, 2021 meeting of the DOE-sponsored INTERFUEL working group. FAST is a web-based information management tool developed by INL and funded by GSA's Office of Government-wide Policy and DOE's Federal Energy Management Program.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Evaluating Corrosion Effects on the Stainless Steel Components of the SAVY-4000/Hagan Nuclear Material Storage Containers: FY2022 Update

This report summarizes the work completed and underway for the Corrosion Working Group (CWG) for FY2022 in support of evaluating a greater than a 15 year design life for the SAVY4000. The CWG meets on an as needed basis to review new work, results or information regarding the corrosion of SAVY-4000 and Hagan nuclear material storage containers. The goal when analyzing corrosion is to develop a design life appropriate for the containers and to identify when a container should be removed from service. There are many parallel efforts associated with identifying and extending the service life of nuclear material storage containers. This report includes information from research and development efforts to address the lifetime. The CWG is closely related to surveillance activities and continues to play a role in identification of issues and paths forward for analysis of surveillance containers. This work summarizes the completed tasks for FY22 of the CWG while keeping in mind that some efforts continue into future years. Brief summaries of identified new avenues of work have been identified for FY23.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Guide to Determining Climate Zone by County: Building America and IECC 2021 Updates

This report describes the climate zone designations used by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Building America Program. The report aims to help residential building stakeholders identify the appropriate climate zone designation for each county in the United States, including Hawaii and Alaska. Identifying the correct climate zone is important for many activities including residential construction projects, code compliance, energy analysis and modeling, and other analytical activities where climate zones impact the energy and moisture performance of residential buildings. This report supersedes the previous Building America publication: Guide to Determining Climate Regions by County, published in 2010. This report reflects climate designations used by the International Code Council (ICC) in the 2021 versions of the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), the International Residential Code (IRC), and other codes produced by ICC. The information provided here and associated data should be used for the most up-to-date information regarding climate zone designations in the United States.

2021 IECC↗

Photoemission Induced Plasma Breakdown (Update)

Laser-induced photoemission of electrons offers opportunities to trigger and control plasmas and discharges. However, the underlying mechanisms are not sufficiently characterized to be fully utilized. Photoemission is highly nonlinear, achieved through multiphoton absorption, above threshold ionization, photo-assisted tunneling, etc., where the dominant process depends on the work function of the material, photon energy and associated fields, surface heating, background fields, etc. To characterize the effects of photoemission on breakdown, breakdown experiments were performed and interpreted using a 0D plasma discharge circuit model and quantum model of photoemission.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Analysis of Loss-of-Offsite-Power Events: Update

Loss-of-offsite power (LOOP) can have a negative impact on a nuclear power plant’s ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown conditions. LOOP event frequencies and times required for subsequent restoration of offsite power are important inputs to plant probabilistic risk assessments. This report presents a statistical and engineering analysis of LOOP frequencies and durations at U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. The data used in this study were based on the operating experience during calendar years 1987–2020, while the most recent 15-year data (i.e., from 2006–2020) were used for most analyses in this report. LOOP events during critical operation that did not result in a reactor trip are not included. Frequencies and durations were determined for four LOOP event categories: plant-centered, switchyard-centered, grid-related, and weather related. Highly significant decreasing trends in the LOOP occurrence rates were identified for All-LOOPs during critical operation (p-value = 0.001) and switchyard-centered LOOPs during critical operation (p-value = 0.002) for the most recent 10-year period (2011–2020). Adverse trends in LOOP durations continue for switchyard-centered LOOPs (p-value = 0.005), All-LOOPs (p-value = 0.019), as well as All-LOOPs during shutdown operation (p-value = 0.003). Statistical tests show the LOOP counts are not uniformly distributed across the 12 months, and variation among the months exists for plant-centered LOOPs (p-value = 0.028), grid-related LOOPs (p-value = 0.021), All-LOOPs (p-value = 0.003), and All-LOOPs during critical operation (p-value = 0.008). The engineering analysis of LOOP data showed for the period of 2006–2020, the equipment failure events were dominated by failures of circuits and relay; human errors have been less frequent and occurred primarily in maintenance; and weather events were dominated by tornadoes and lightning.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Analysis of Loss-of-Offsite-Power Events: 2021 Update

Loss-of-offsite power (LOOP) can have a negative impact on a nuclear power plant’s ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown conditions. LOOP event frequencies and times required for subsequent restoration of offsite power are important inputs to plant probabilistic risk assessments. This report presents a statistical and engineering analysis of LOOP frequencies and durations at U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. The data used in this study were based on the operating experience during calendar years 1987–2021, while the most recent 15-year data (i.e., from 2007–2021) were used for most analyses in this report. LOOP events during critical operation that did not result in a reactor trip are not included. Frequencies and durations were determined for four LOOP event categories: plant-centered, switchyard-centered, grid-related, and weather-related. These categories (and the All-LOOPs group which contains all LOOPs without regarding of the four categories) could be further grouped by whether a LOOP event occurred during critical operation, during shutdown operation, or during all operations. The following decreasing trends in the LOOP occurrence rates were identified for the most recent 10-year period (2012–2021): All-LOOPs during critical operation, switchyard-centered LOOPs during critical operation, and grid-related LOOPs during critical operation. Adverse trends in LOOP durations continue for switchyard-centered LOOPs during all operations, All-LOOPs during all operations, and All-LOOPs during shutdown operation for the 1997–2021 period. Statistical tests show the LOOP counts for the period of 2007–2021 are not uniformly distributed across the 12 months, and variation among the months exists for grid-related LOOPs during all operations, All-LOOPs during all operations, and All-LOOPs during critical operation. The engineering analysis of LOOP data showed for the period of 2007–2021, the equipment failure events were dominated by failures of relay and other; human errors have been less frequent and occurred primarily in maintenance and switching; and weather were dominated by tornadoes then by lightning and hurricane. Weather was the cause for 45% of LOOPs for the last fifteen years (2007– 2021) but only for 20% of LOOPs for the previous 20 years (1987–2006) .

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Aging and Lifetimes Program Annual Report - Part I: Update to BDNPA-BDNPF phase diagram (FY2022)

The eutectic mixture nitroplasticizer (NP) contains water, without exception, on the order of hundreds to thousands of parts per million depending on the exposure conditions. Therefore, to evaluate the properties of NP, one must consider that NP is not simply comprised of two constituents. Here we supplement previous work on the physical properties of NP (Edgar et al., 2020) by expanding on the experimental work therein and addressing inaccuracies detailed in a subsequent comment article (Brown, 2021). Specifically, the purpose of this work is to clarify and modify the phase diagram of the bis(2,2-dinitropropyl) acetal with bis(2,2-dinitropropyl) formal eutectic mixture by considering the effect of water concentrations on the nucleation process.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗