Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Waste Forms”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,261 records · Page 70
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Development and testing of residential micro-CHP powered by opposed piston engine (CRADA Final Report)

A micro–combined heat and power (mCHP) prototype powered by innovative opposed piston engine technology was developed to simultaneously provide electricity and heat to residential or light commercial buildings. The mCHP prototype targeted at residential applications includes an opposed-piston four-stroke (OP4S) engine, generator, rectifier, inverter, battery energy storage system, 52 gal water tank, and application accessories for hot water supply and space heating. The OP4S engine can use renewable or regular natural gas, as well as hydrogen, to generate mechanical power and waste heat in form of hot coolant and exhaust gas simultaneously. The waste heat is recovered and stored in the water tank and can be used as a regular hot water supply and/or for space heating application. The tests show that the mCHP prototype enabled power outputs in the range of 3.2 –7.4 kW with up to 26.4% of AC electricity efficiency and up to 93.1% of the overall mCHP efficiency under stoichiometric combustion modes λ=~1.0. The mCHP was also run under lean combustion mode conditions at λ=~1.3. The lean mode operation enables more than 30% improvement in electrical energy efficiency. The maximum AC efficiency of the lean combustion mode attained was 35.2%, with the engine efficiency is approaching 40%. The exceptional electrical efficiency breaks the typical upper boundary of 30% for ICE-based mCHP. The engine exhaust temperatures in the lean modes are substantially less than in the stoichiometric modes. Moreover, the lean cases achieve high overall mCHP efficiencies: the overall mCHP efficiencies are all greater than 93%. Considering the mCHP prototype can achieve low-cost, flexible matching of thermal and electrical loads through reducing the complexity of distribution and installation, and high efficiency the novel technology will promote mCHP acceptance in the US residential and light commercial markets.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2016

Pathways for Disposal of Commercially-Generated Tritiated Waste

From a waste disposal standpoint, tritium is a major challenge. Because it behaves like hydrogen, tritium exchanges readily with hydrogen in the ground water and moves easily through the ground. Land disposal sites must control the tritium activity and mobility of incoming wastes to protect human health and the environment. Consequently, disposal of tritiated low-level wastes is highly regulated and disposal options are limited. The United States has had eight operating commercial facilities licensed for low-level radioactive waste disposal, only four of which are currently receiving waste. Each of these is licensed and regulated by its state. Only two of these sites accept waste from states outside of their specified regional compact. For waste streams that cannot be disposed directly at one of the four active commercial low-level waste disposal facilities, processing facilities offer various forms of tritiated low-level waste processing and treatment, and then transport and dispose of the residuals at a disposal facility. These processing facilities may remove and recycle tritium, reduce waste volume, solidify liquid waste, remove hazardous constituents, or perform a number of additional treatments. Waste brokers also offer many low-level and mixed waste management and transportation services. These services can be especially helpful for small-quantity tritiated-waste generators, such as universities, research institutions, medical facilities, and some industries. The information contained in this report covers general capabilities and requirements for the various disposal/processing facilities and brokerage companies, but is not considered exhaustive. Typically, each facility has extensive waste acceptance criteria and will require a generator to thoroughly characterize their wastes. Then a contractual agreement between the waste generator and the disposal/processing/broker entity must be in place before waste is accepted. Costs for tritiated waste transportation, processing and disposal vary based a number of factors. In many cases, wastes with very low radioactivity are priced primarily based on weight or volume. For higher activities, costs are based on both volume and activity, with the activity-based charges usually being much larger than volume-based charges. Other factors affecting cost include location, waste classification and form, other hazards in the waste, etc. Costs may be based on general guidelines used by an individual disposal or processing site, but final costs are established by specific contract with each generator. For this report, seven hypothetical waste streams intended to represent commercially-generated tritiated waste were defined in order to calculate comparative costs. Ballpark costs for disposition of these hypothetical waste streams were calculated. These costs ranged from thousands to millions of dollars. Due to the complexity of the cost-determining factors mentioned above, the costs calculated in this report should be understood to represent very rough cost estimates for the various hypothetical wastes. Actual costs could be higher or could be lower due to quantity discounts or other factors.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Inspection Technologies for Waste Containers at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories - 19429

To provide data for aging management programs, containers for different forms of nuclear waste, ranging from low-level waste to irradiated nuclear fuel, should be inspected. At Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, visual, ultrasonic, electromagnetic, and hybrid forms of non-destructive evaluation (NDE) are used for in situ inspection of carbon steel containers having various configurations, access issues, and material thickness. NDE applications tailored to the requirements of the task provide data for condition monitoring and operational assessments. The examples of fuel baskets stacked in concrete canisters and sheet metal containers arrayed in warehouses are illustrated here. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
NASA NTRS2005

Influence of Planetary Protection Guidelines on Waste Management Operations

Newly outlined missions in the Space Exploration Initiative include extended human habitation on Mars. During these missions, large amounts of waste materials will be generated in solid, liquid and gaseous form. Returning these wastes to Earth will be extremely costly, and will therefore likely remain on Mars. Untreated, these wastes are a reservoir of live/dead organisms and molecules considered to be "biomarkers" i.e., indicators of life). If released to the planetary surface, these materials can potentially confound exobiology experiments and disrupt Martian ecology indefinitely (if existent). Waste management systems must therefore be specifically designed to control release of problematic materials both during the active phase of the mission, and for any specified post-mission duration. To effectively develop waste management requirements for Mars missions, planetary protection guidelines must first be established. While previous policies for Apollo lunar missions exist, it is anticipated that the increased probability of finding evidence of life on Mars, as well as the lengthy mission durations will initially lead to more conservative planetary protection measures. To facilitate the development of overall requirements for both waste management and planetary protection for future missions, a workshop was conducted to identify how these two areas interface, and to establish a preliminary set of planetary protection guidelines that address waste management operations. This paper provides background regarding past and current planetary protection and waste management issues, and their interactions. A summary of the recommended planetary protection guidelines, anticipated ramifications and research needs for waste management system design for both forward (Mars) and backward (Earth) contamination is also provided.

Hogan, John A.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Multiple Stream Low-Cost Recycling Method

The global composite industry generates large quantities of waste and which mostly end as landfill due to lack of meaningful end-use applications for the multiple waste streams. In a recent report by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), waste generated by the wind industry could reach 370,000 tons a year of composite wind energy blades being decommissioned and scrapped. Wind energy is just one major industry utilizing composite materials. The waste generated by industry includes End-of-Life (EoL) materials and manufacturing process scrap. GreenTex Solutions has developed a unique and innovative technology to recycle the composite waste streams in a range of forms made from production waste and EoL materials. This includes manufacturing waste materials such as dry chopped fiber tow, loose fibers, shredded fibers from reinforcement fabrics, cured/semi-cured prepregs, and it also includes fully-cured composite structure waste (such as edge trims from cured parts) from manufacturing aircraft, automobiles, wind blades, boats, and composite cylinders (tanks). Current recycling methods involve recovering the structural fiber by removing the matrix resin through methods such as pyrolysis. The resulting fibers are used in injection molding or wet laid nonwoven mats and other usable forms. The GreenTex technology bypasses these intermediate steps to create the lowest possible recycling processing costs and the lowest embodied energy/CO2 emissions. The end-product from the GreenTex technology is a finished industrial composite part/application versus intermediate fibers or fabrics. The GreenTex manufacturing process enables cross-industry reuse of recycled feedstock by taking waste from multiple industries (wind energy, aerospace, marine, etc.) and recycles the waste into a product used in other industries. The initial target market application is structural flooring for intermodal shipping containers and truck bodies. One of the team’s key partners is Wabash National which produced 29,000 truck bodies in 2019. The current flooring system is comprised of solid oak “butcher board” laminated panels. Additionally, Mediterranean Shipping Containers (MSC) transports over 1.8 million twenty-foot equivalent units per year in intermodal shipping containers. The current container floor is laminated hardwood that is harvested from the rain forests of Central and South America. The project is to develop a flooring system made from recycled composites that can be qualified for both companies (Wabash and MSC). Initial prototypes validated that the recycled composites panels are lighter and thinner with much higher mechanical strength. These results suggest a typical truck trailer would have 20% lower tare weight. The GreenTex technology is not limited to flooring and is widely applicable to other transportation elements such as walls, roof elements, cab areas and related structural components. Under this project different composite waste streams were evaluated and then combined to develop a formulation that would meet the targeted performance criteria for a flooring system. Wet compression molding was used to fabricate plaques at different tonnage using various composite waste streams. The plaques were tested for flexure and impact.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2013

Wastes associated with recycling spent MOX fuel into fast reactor oxide fuel

A study sponsored by the DOE has been performed by AREVA to estimate the process and secondary wastes produced from an 800 MTIHM/yr (initial metric tons heavy metal a year) recycling plant proposed to be built in the U.S. utilizing the COEX process and utilized some DOE defined assumptions and constraints. In this paper, this plant has been analyzed for a recycling campaign that included 89% UO{sub x} and 11% MOX UNF to estimate process and secondary waste quantities produced while manufacturing 28 MTIHM/yr of SFR fuel. AREVA utilized operational data from its backend facilities in France (La Hague and MELOX), and from recent advances in waste treatment technology to estimate the waste quantities. A table lists the volumes and types of the different final wastes for a recycling plant. For instance concerning general fission products the form of the final wastes is vitrified glass and its volume generation rate is 135 l/MTHM, concerning Iodine 129 waste its final form is synthetic rock and its volume generation rate is 0.625 l/MTIHM.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Destructive testings: dry drilling operations with TruPro system to collect samples in a powder form, from two hulls containing immobilized wastes in a hydraulic binder

The TruPro{sup R} process enables to collect a significant number of samples to characterize radiological materials. This innovative and alternative technique is experimented for the ANDRA quality-control inspection of cemented packages. It proves to be quicker and more prolific than the current methodology. Using classical statistics and geo-statistics approaches, the physical and radiological characteristics of two hulls containing immobilized wastes (sludges or concentrates) in a hydraulic binder are assessed in this paper. The waste homogeneity is also evaluated in comparison to ANDRA criterion. Sensibility to sample size (support effect), presence of extreme values, acceptable deviation rate and minimum number of data are discussed. The final objectives are to check the homogeneity of the two characterized radwaste packages and also to validate and reinforce this alternative characterization methodology. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Addressing the Legacy Waste Challenge - IAEA Activities in Support of Member States - 16304

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) promotes the safe and peaceful uses of nuclear energy including the safe management of radioactive waste. Although safe and effective radioactive waste processing technologies and practices are well established and widespread, the issue of legacy waste remains a challenge for many IAEA member states. The primary source of the world-wide legacy waste inventory has its origins in past nuclear weapons programs and associated research and development activities. Other sources include historical waste in old storage and disposal facilities that were either never intended to be a permanent end-state or are no longer considered adequate from a safety perspective. Additionally, many IAEA member states with less advanced nuclear energy programs, often have small inventories of legacy radioactive waste arising from medical, research and industrial activities but lack the processing capabilities to put these wastes into a safe form for storage and disposal. These wastes have the potential to create a safety and environmental hazard and pose a radioactive waste management challenge for many reasons including lack of characterization data and process knowledge, waste package degradation, or the presence of hazardous or mixed waste components. The Waste Technology Section (WTS) within the Department of Nuclear Energy at the IAEA has an extensive program of activities to support the safe retrieval, processing, storage and disposal of radioactive waste including legacy waste. These include publications, co-ordinated research projects, technical co-operation activities, and information exchange forums including workshops, technical meetings and virtual networks. This paper will present an overview of recent IAEA activities and accomplishments aimed as assisting member states with addressing their legacy waste inventories. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2011

TESTING OF ENHANCED CHEMICAL CLEANING OF SRS ACTUAL WASTE TANK 5F AND TANK 12H SLUDGES

Forty three of the High Level Waste (HLW) tanks at the Savannah River Site (SRS) have internal structures that hinder removal of the last approximately five thousand gallons of waste sludge solely by mechanical means. Chemical cleaning can be utilized to dissolve the sludge heel with oxalic acid (OA) and pump the material to a separate waste tank in preparation for final disposition. This dissolved sludge material is pH adjusted downstream of the dissolution process, precipitating the sludge components along with sodium oxalate solids. The large quantities of sodium oxalate and other metal oxalates formed impact downstream processes by requiring additional washing during sludge batch preparation and increase the amount of material that must be processed in the tank farm evaporator systems and the Saltstone Processing Facility. Enhanced Chemical Cleaning (ECC) was identified as a potential method for greatly reducing the impact of oxalate additions to the SRS Tank Farms without adding additional components to the waste that would extend processing or increase waste form volumes. In support of Savannah River Site (SRS) tank closure efforts, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) conducted Real Waste Testing (RWT) to evaluate an alternative to the baseline 8 wt. % OA chemical cleaning technology for tank sludge heel removal. The baseline OA technology results in the addition of significant volumes of oxalate salts to the SRS tank farm and there is insufficient space to accommodate the neutralized streams resulting from the treatment of the multiple remaining waste tanks requiring closure. ECC is a promising alternative to bulk OA cleaning, which utilizes a more dilute OA (nominally 2 wt. % at a pH of around 2) and an oxalate destruction technology. The technology is being adapted by AREVA from their decontamination technology for Nuclear Power Plant secondary side scale removal. This report contains results from the SRNL small scale testing of the ECC process using SRS sludge tank sample material. A Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP) details the experimental plan as outlined by the Technical Task Request (TTR). The TTR identifies that the data produced by this testing and results included in this report will support the technical baseline with portions having a safety class functional classification. The primary goals for SRNL RWT are as follows: (1) to confirm ECC performance with real tank sludge samples, (2) to determine the impact of ECC on fate of actinides and the other sludge metals, and (3) to determine changes, if any, in solids flow and settling behavior.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Molten Salt Oxidation of Ion Exchange and Oils in Carbonate Salts and Evaporator Residue - 16531

Molten Salt Oxidation is a well-studied and robust technology. Recently, renewed interest in the technology has been seen due to limitations on the use of incineration for hazardous and radioactive waste streams. The nuclear research center at Rez, near Prague, has been investigating a bench scale molten salt oxidation system to provide insight for the design of a pilot scale system to condition spent ion exchange resin and scintillator oils. The use of both an eutectic K/Na/Li carbonate salt and a simulated residue salt for liquid waste obtained from evaporated primary coolant of nuclear reactors was examined. In these studies the usable capacity of the salts were examined. Materials doped with surrogate radioisotopes were processed and the capture efficiency was measured. Corrosion of the reactor vessel is of significant engineering concern. Corrosion coupon tests were performed for Inconel HX and stainless steel. These tests provided corrosion rates to assist in design of pilot scale systems. While the bench scale reactor's detention time was too short to provide complete combustion, the values of emissions were tracked and showed an increase in the combustion efficiency at temperatures greater than 750 deg. C. A two part reactor has been designed and work is planned to continue to optimize the system. Additionally, further work has examined the final conditioning of salt which has been saturated with radionuclides after processing organic waste streams A conceptual pilot plant has been designed to solidify radionuclide saturated salt into a form acceptable for repositories according to EU directives. Saturated salt is milled to a powder and immobilized in a matrix with a high percentage of waste loading. Both geo-polymer and polysiloxane matrices have been methods for low temperature immobilization. Conditioning in this manner decreases operating and capital costs when compared to current conditioning technologies and procedures utilized for high volume reduction factors of final waste forms. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Evaporation Of Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Direct Feed Low Activity Waste Effluent Management Facility Core Simulant

The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low Activity Waste (LAW) vitrification facility will generate an aqueous condensate recycle stream (LAW Melter Off-Gas Condensate, LMOGC) from the off-gas system. The baseline plan for disposition of this stream during full WTP operations is to send it to the WTP Pretreatment Facility, where it will be blended with LAW, concentrated by evaporation, and recycled to the LAW vitrification facility. However, during the Direct Feed LAW (DFLAW) scenario, planned disposition of this stream is to evaporate it in a new evaporator, in the Effluent Management Facility (EMF), and then return it to the LAW melter. It is important to understand the composition of the effluents from the melter and new evaporator, so that the disposition of these streams can be accurately planned and accommodated. Furthermore, alternate disposition of the LMOGC stream would eliminate recycling of problematic components, and would reduce the need for closely integrated operation of the LAW melter and the Pretreatment Facilities. Long-term implementation of this option after WTP start-up would decrease the LAW vitrification mission duration and quantity of glass waste, amongst the other operational complexities such a recycle stream presents. In order to accurately plan for the disposition path, it is key to experimentally determine the fate of contaminants. To do this, testing is needed to accurately account for the buffering chemistry of the components, determine the achievable evaporation end point, identify insoluble solids that form, and determine the distribution of key regulatory-impacting constituents. The LAW Melter Off-Gas Condensate stream will contain components that are volatile at melter temperatures, have limited solubility in the glass waste form, and represent a materials corrosion concern, such as halides and sulfate. Because this stream will recycle within WTP, these components will accumulate in the Melter Condensate stream, exacerbating their impact on the number of LAW glass containers that must be produced. Diverting the stream reduces the halides and sulfates in the recycled Condensate and is a key outcome of this work. This overall program examines the potential treatment and immobilization of this stream to enable alternative disposal. The objective of this task was to demonstrate evaporation of a simulant of the LAW Melter Off-gas Condensate expected during DFLAW operations, in order to predict the composition of the effluents from the EMF evaporator to aid in planning for their disposition. This document describes the results of that test using the core simulant. This simulant formulation is designated as the “core simulant”; other additives will be included for specific testing, such as volatiles for evaporation or hazardous metals for measuring leaching properties of waste forms. The results indicate that the simulant can easily be concentrated via evaporation. During that the pH adjustment step in simulant preparation, ammonium is quickly converted to ammonia, and most of the ammonia was stripped from the simulated waste and partitioned to the condensate. Additionally, it was found that after concentrating (>12x) and cooling that a small amount of LiF and Na 3 (SO 4 )F precipitate out of solution. With the exception of ammonia, analysis of the condensate indicated very low to below detectable levels of many of the constituents in the simulant, yielding very high decontamination factors (DF).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

A History of Hanford Tank Waste, Implications for Waste Treatment and Disposal

More than 40 years of plutonium processing have left almost 56 million gallons of mixed radioactive waste sequestered in 177 underground tanks on the Hanford Site. Three different processing technologies were employed for plutonium purification in addition to uranium scavenging and fission product removal from the tank waste. All of these chemical processes have contributed to a complex waste stream that varies from tank to tank that presents downstream processing challenges to render the waste into a safe form for long-term storage. The current disposition pathway for Hanford tank waste is vitrification. To maximize waste loading and minimize the number of high-level waste canisters stored in a geologic repository, pretreatment of the waste is required. Both pretreatment and vitrification operations are impacted by the waste composition.

Separations, filtration, ion exchange↗
DOE OSTI2024

New Tank Mapping Method Improves Waste Removal Process

Savannah River Mission Completion is the Liquid Waste (LW) contractor at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The LW mission is tasked with treating and disposing of legacy nuclear waste. There are multiple facilities involved in this work, including the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF), the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), and the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). The CSTF includes 43 underground waste tanks used to store and support processing of radioactive liquid waste. Waste removal activities, such as salt dissolution campaigns and sludge agitation, are conducted within the CSTF waste tanks to convert the waste into a form that allows for downstream processing at other LW facilities. While performing these waste removal campaigns, camera inspections are performed to assess the quantity and distribution of the remaining waste within the waste tank (i.e. saltcake or sludge). Understanding the quantity and distribution of the salt/sludge within the waste tanks allows for improved waste removal strategies (e.g. mixing pump operation) and refined safety controls. Typically, several camera inspections are performed during a waste removal transfer to verify the elevation of the visible salt/sludge mounds against the known elevation of the liquid surface. The camera inspection footage must then be interpreted by a trained engineer who will develop a 2-D map that depicts the waste distribution at various elevations within the waste tank. This tank mapping is then used in conjunction with conservative assumptions to evaluate the volume of saltcake or sludge that is present within the waste tank.

Mini, Melany↗
DOE OSTI2018

The Retrieval project Asse II - Lessons Learned in Radiological Protection - 18263

From 1967 to 1978 in total 125,787 drums and packages with low- and intermediate level waste were emplaced in the Asse II mine. The disposal operation ended in 1978 due to a revision of the Atomic Energy Act. For the disposal of radioactive waste, a plan approval procedure would have been mandatory due to the Atomic Energy Act, but the mining law was the legal basis for operating the Asse II mine, further on. A concept for a closure of the mine was not existing at that time. On January 1, 2009, the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz BfS) became the new license-holder and operator of the Asse II mine under the Atomic Energy Act. The Act on the Organizational Restructuring in the Field of Disposal in Germany became effective on July 30, 2016. The act provides that a federally owned company, the Bundesgesellschaft fuer Endlagerung (BGE mbH, Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal) is formed to carry out the operative tasks of searching for a High Level Waste (HLW) repository, the construction and operation of repositories (Konrad, Morsleben) and of the Asse II mine. Since April 25, 2017 BGE is in charge of the operative tasks that have so far been carried out by BfS. Up to now, the long-term safety of the Asse II mine has not been demonstrated in the case that all the waste will remain inside the mine. Further problems arise from a lack of host rock stability, the incomplete backfilling of the mining areas that have not been used for the emplacement of radioactive waste, and a continuous brine inflow into the mine of approx.12 m{sup 3} per day. For these reasons, according to chap. 57b of the Atomic Energy Act, the Asse II mine is to be closed without delay after retrieving the emplaced nuclear waste. Besides the recent organizational changes in Germany and the special problems giving rise to retrieve the waste, in this paper the operational experiences since 2009 on the way from mining law to atomic law will be described. This applies to the radiation protection regime, the release and clearance procedure, and some measures to boost efficiency. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Oxidation of Organics in the Defense Waste Processing Facility Condensate

Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF): The state of South Carolina currently holds 35 million gallons of radioactive waste in 51 underground tanks. DWPF was built in an effort to convert the waste into a more stable form. It turns the sludge waste from the tanks into glass, which will keep the waste stable for 10,000 years. Currently, DWPF uses formic acid in its flowsheet and there is one major problem associated with its use: it decomposes into hydrogen, a flammable gas. Glycolic acid, however, has been found as a possible alternative that performs similarly to formic acid but does not directly form hydrogen. One of the main issues with the glycolic acid flowsheet is the potential for there to be glycolate and other organics in DWPF's Recycle Collection Tank (RCT). These organics could lead to hydrogen generation later in the downstream evaporators and must be destroyed in the RCT in order for glycolic acid to be a suitable replacement for formic acid. Oxidants can be added to the RCT to destroy the organics. Two oxidizers, permanganate and Fenton's reagent (iron catalyzed hydrogen peroxide), are possible candidates. Find optimum processing conditions for the oxidation of organic species in a typical RCT simulant. A reactor served as a small-scale version of the RCT. During each run, an RCT simulant with 8 added organics, including glycolate, was created in the reactor. Either permanganate or peroxide was slowly added for each run through a syringe pump. Each experiment lasts 6 hours and a total of 23 runs are scheduled. Variables of Interest: Oxidizer (Permanganate or Peroxide); Temperature (15 deg. C to 50 deg. C); Oxidant addition time (10 mins to 2 hours); Amount of oxidant (1 x to 1.5 x stoichiometric requirements); Solution pH (3 to 13); Glycolate concentration (125 to 250 mg/kg). Offgas Analyzers: Mass spectrometer and FTIR spectrometer. Samples: pulled at 7 different times throughout the run to determine the amount of organic and inorganic carbon and concentrations of various organics through ion chromatography (IC). Only 3 of the runs have been completed at this point, all with permanganate. Based on the first 3 runs, permanganate seems to oxide the majority of the organics and the run at pH 8 and 32.5 deg. C had the most effective oxidation. The rest of the runs will need to be performed to determine the best oxidant and optimum values of the other variables of interest. Once the experiment is completed, DWPF will select one of the oxidants. Testing will continue to determine its performance during foam-over and other non-ideal conditions. Finally, the oxidant will be tested with actual radioactive waste to confirm its effectiveness.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Coal-Waste-Enhanced Filaments for Additive Manufacturing of High-Temperature Plastics and Ceramic Composites

In the United States, coal waste from over a century of mining and burning coal for heat and electricity has accumulated as mountains of coal fly ash and bottom ash and acre-size ponds, coal fines and gob. These materials can be a problem for local communities and water systems. A cost-effective process to utilize high volumes of these coal wastes in a high-value product would be beneficial to those communities by reducing the amount of waste and providing jobs, manufacturing components, and materials from the waste. Many coal-to-products technologies (e.g., carbon fibers, graphene, carbon foam) rely on carefully choosing the starting material and then altering it chemically or thermally to make the products work. Due to the wide variability of composition and coal content in typical coal waste streams, many high-volume coal waste streams are likely to be unsuitable for use in those technologies. Semplastics’ technology has been shown to utilize most types of coal waste successfully without any pre-selection or pre-processing requirements other than a nominal particle-size reduction for wastes like bottom ash. This characteristic of Semplastics’ solution may enable the use of much larger volumes of a wider range of coal wastes than other coal-to-products technologies. In this project, Semplastics leveraged its unique experience with both coal waste (fly ash or coal combustion residuals), resin materials, and 3D printing to develop 3D printer filaments using common coal wastes – bituminous coal fines and fly ash – and researched the feasibility of using other forms of coal waste as fillers. Simple 3D-printed parts were successfully produced from the coal waste enhanced filaments, which were found to have improved strength and stiffness.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2016

Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Viscosity Model: Revisions for Processing High TiO 2 Containing Glasses

Radioactive high-level waste (HLW) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) has successfully been vitrified into borosilicate glass in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) since 1996. Vitrification requires stringent product/process (P/P) constraints since the glass cannot be reworked once it is poured into ten foot tall by two foot diameter canisters. A unique “feed forward” statistical process control (SPC) was developed for this control rather than statistical quality control (SQC). In SPC, the feed composition to the DWPF melter is controlled prior to vitrification. In SQC, the glass product would be sampled after it is vitrified. Individual glass property-composition models form the basis for the “feed forward” SPC. The models transform constraints on the melt and glass properties into constraints on the feed composition going to the melter in order to guarantee, at the 95% confidence level, that the feed will be processable and that the durability of the resulting waste form will be acceptable to a geologic repository. The DWPF SPC system is known as the Product Composition Control System (PCCS). The DWPF will soon be receiving wastes from the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) containing increased concentrations of TiO 2 , Na 2 O, and Cs 2 O . The SWPF is being built to pretreat the high-curie fraction of the salt waste to be removed from the HLW tanks in the F- and H-Area Tank Farms at the SRS. In order to process TiO 2 concentrations >2.0 wt% in the DWPF, new viscosity data were developed over the range of 1.90 to 6.09 wt% TiO 2 and evaluated against the 2005 viscosity model. An alternate viscosity model is also derived for potential future use, should the DWPF ever need to process other titanate-containing ion exchange materials. The ultimate limit on the amount of TiO 2 that can be accommodated from SWPF will be determined by the three PCCS models, the waste composition of a given sludge batch, the waste loading of the sludge batch, and the frit used for vitrification.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗