Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Fuel”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,261 records · Page 70
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

Nitride Fuel Potential for Power Uprates

This work presents the methodology and current results for design analysis of grid supported pressurized water reactor cores using uranium nitride (UN) fuel in square arrays. Uranium nitride has a higher theoretical density and higher thermal conductivity than uranium oxide, allowing for lower fuel temperatures, longer cycle length and higher power densities with similar enrichment. In order to avoid the UN and high temperature water reaction, silicon carbide cladding has been proposed in place of Zircaloy cladding. The analysis aims at finding the maximum thermal power over a range of bundle geometries (rod diameter and pitch). The same methodology is applied to the design of UO{sub 2} oxide fueled cores to provide a fair comparison of the achievable power rating between the two fuel types. Steady-state limits are considered, including fuel bundle pressure drop, minimum departure from nucleate boiling ratio (MDNBR), fuel temperature, fuel rod vibrations and pin fretting and sliding wear. Transients such as loss of flow and overpower accident will be considered. A steady state analysis was undertaken to determine the maximum achievable power that can be sustained by square array fuel assemblies loaded with nitride and oxide fuels with same or better safety performances as the reference design. Steady-state design limits were applied including MDNBR, fuel bundle pressure drop, fuel temperature, cumulative sliding and fretting wear. The major conclusions of this study are as follows: 1) It is possible to achieve significant power increase for UN and UO{sub 2} compared to the reference core power output of 3400 MWth with smaller but more numerous rods and higher pitch over diameter ratios. A power uprate of 25% can be reached according to the VIPRE-MATLAB interface for full core analysis with the same number of spacer grids, and 32% according to the new MATLAB script for single hot channel analysis, with five more spacer grids. For this latter core, a higher enrichment would be required. 2) The nitride fuel temperature constraint from dissociation doesn't influence steady state performances as other design constraints such as MDNBR and pressure loss are more restrictive. The oxide fuel temperature constraint from fission gas release is reached in part of the study domain, but not in the region that allows for possible uprates. 3) As a result, the thermal hydraulic performance of UN and UO{sub 2} are similar. Differences in possible power uprates will arise from fretting and sliding wear. Wear depends of the time spent by the fuel in the core, which depends on burnup and heavy metal inventory. UN being denser, it can allow for power uprates or increased cycle length. There is a trade off between power uprates and cycle length with regards to fuel pin wear. Reducing fuel pin wear by reducing cycle length can allow for higher thermal power. This affects the plants' economics as well. This work will be completed by a transient analysis using CASMO4E, SIMULATE3 and SIMULATE3k to model the neutronics of a nitride fueled core. The transient performances will be used to determine the maximum power uprates while performing as well or better during transients as the reference design. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Simulation methodology for fuel assembly drop accident during handling

Fresh and irradiated fuel assembly handling is a routine part of Nuclear Power Plant activities. Fuel Assembly handling occurs during fresh fuel receipt, core refueling, spent fuel assemblies transfer from spent fuel pool to the storage containers, etc. Westinghouse, ENUSA and KEPCO-NF have collaborated in the technical area of Fuel Assembly Drop Accident (FADA) Simulation to update the approach for estimating the number of failed fuel rods as a consequence of a fresh or irradiated fuel assembly drop, which might occur during a handling accident in a PWR-type reactor. The proposed FADA simulation methodology starts with an assessment of fuel assembly impact velocity at the final stage of the drop in water or air. The vertical, horizontal or inclined drop directions are considered. This velocity is an input to determine a fuel assembly structural response during impact which defines the loading function for the fuel assembly components including spacer grids. The dynamic load on the fuel rod is calculated from the detailed spacer grid model and the corresponding loading function. Finally, the load from the spacer grid spring and dimples are applied to the fuel rod model to determine the cladding parameters for use in compliance to fuel rod cladding failure criteria. A combination of first principal, finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) methods has been utilized to create a technically sound methodology. A number of specific and traditional tests for the fuel assembly and its components has been used to confirm that the proposed approaches which describe the physical phenomena related to the fuel assembly drop accident are reasonably conservative.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Low Emissions Burner Technology for Metal Processing Industry using Byproducts and Biomass Derived Liquid Fuels (Final Report)

This research and development efforts produced low-emission burner technology capable of operating on natural gas as well as crude glycerin and/or fatty acids generated in biodiesel plants. The research was conducted in three stages (1) Concept definition leading to the design and development of a small laboratory scale burner, (2) Scale-up to prototype burner design and development, and (3) Technology demonstration with field vefiication. The burner design relies upon the Flow Blurring (FB) fuel injection based on aerodynamically creating two-phase flow near the injector exit. The fuel tube and discharge orifice both of inside diameter D are separated by gap H. For H < 0.25D, the atomizing air bubbles into liquid fuel to create a two-phase flow near the tip of the fuel tube. Pressurized two-phase fuel-air mixture exits through the discharge orifice, which results in expansion and breakup of air bubbles yielding a spray with fine droplets. First, low-emission combustion of diesel, biodiesel and straight VO (soybean oil) was achieved by utilizing FB injector to yield fine sprays for these fuels with significantly different physical properties. Visual images for these baseline experiments conducted with heat release rate (HRR) of about 8 kW illustrate clean blue flames indicating premixed combustion for all three fuels. Radial profiles of the product gas temperature at the combustor exit overlap each other signifying that the combustion efficiency is independent of the fuel. At the combustor exit, the NOx emissions are within the measurement uncertainties, while CO emissions are slightly higher for straight VO as compared to diesel and biodiesel. Considering the large variations in physical and chemical properties of fuels considered, the small differences observed in CO and NOx emissions show promise for fuel-flexible, clean combustion systems. FB injector has proven to be very effective in atomizing fuels with very different physical properties, and it offers a path forward to utilize both fossil and alternative liquid fuels in the same combustion system. In particular, experiments show that straight VO can be cleanly combusted without the need for chemical processing or preheating steps, which can result in significant economic and environmental benefits. Next, low-emission combustion of glycerol/methane was achieved by utilizing FB injector to yield fine droplets of highly viscous glycerol. Heat released from methane combustion further improves glycerol pre-vaporization and thus its clean combustion. Methane addition results in an intensified reaction zone with locally high temperatures near the injector exit. Reduction in methane flow rate elongates the reaction zone, which leads to higher CO emissions and lower NOx emissions. Similarly, higher air to liquid (ALR) mass ratio improves atomization and fuel pre-vaporization and shifts the flame closer to the injector exit. In spite of these internal variations, all fuel mixes of glycerol with methane produced similar CO and NOx emissions at the combustor exit. Results show that FB concept provides low emissions with the flexibility to utilize gaseous and highly viscous liquid fuels, straight VO and glycerol, without preheating or preprocessing the fuels. Following these initial experiments in quartz combustor, we demonstrated that glycerol combustion can be stably sustained in a metal combustor. Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer (PDPA) measurements in glycerol/methane flames resulted in flow-weighted Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD) of 35 to 40 μm, depending upon the methane percentage. This study verified that lab-scale dual-fuel burner using FB injector can successfully atomize and combust glycerol and presumably other highly viscous liquid fuels at relatively low HRR (<10 kW). For industrial applications, a scaled-up glycerol burner design thus seemed feasible.

03 NATURAL GAS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Fuel performance evaluation of two high burnup PWR core designs during normal operation, control rod withdrawal, and control rod ejection scenarios

There is interest among utilities to extend the current, 18-month operating cycle to 24 months. Economically, this extension would require greater than 5 % enrichment and peak rod average discharge burnup levels above 62 GWd/MTU. A notable challenge of increasing enrichment is the resulting additional excess reactivity encountered during the early stages of fuel life. To accommodate, burnable absorbers beyond soluble boron are introduced into the fuel system. In high burnup fuels, the possibilities of cladding lift-off and fuel melting increase due, in part, to increased rod internal pressures and limited fuel thermal conductivity, respectively. This work collaboratively employs PARCS, RELAP5-3D, and BISON to compare the fuel performance of two high burnup fuel candidates with higher than 5 % enrichment. Here, the fuel performance parameters were compared to current NRC guidance. The results demonstrate an annular fuel design with homogenously blended gadolinium as a burnable absorber operates with greater safety margins during normal operation, allowing for additional operational flexibility. During normal operation, the core design utilizing Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber pins contained fuel pins which reached plenum pressures above 15.5 MPa by the end of the first fuel cycle and fuel pins experienced cladding hoop strains above 1 %. In the Gd core design, only two observed pins experienced plenum pressures above 15.5 MPa and no pins exceeded 1 % cladding hoop strain. During the control rod withdrawal scenario, plenum pressures for pins in both designs marginally exceeded system pressure, however neither experienced excessive hoop strain. The Gd core design experienced a maximum fuel temperature of 2418 K, which is significantly higher than the Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber design at 2157 K, but still within regulatory guidance. We predicted that the fuel in both could return to service after the CRW event. We also predicted that cladding would not fail during the Control Rod Ejection in either core design. Generally, the Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber core design performed with greater safety margin with regards to temperature during normal operation and the transient events. However, the Gd core design performed with greater safety margin regarding plenum pressure and hoop strain limits during normal operation and both transient events.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

An Investigation of Liquefaction in Irradiated TRIGA Fuel Exposed to Relatively High Temperatures

This report presents the findings of an investigation into high temperature fuel cladding chemical interactions (FCCI) in Training, Research, Isotopes, General Atomics (TRIGA) fuel rods. A TRIGA fuel-rod core or meat is principally composed of uranium (U) particles dispersed in a zirconium hydride (Zr H) matrix. The fuel is clad in sealed 304SS or Incoloy 800 tubes. At high temperatures, the fuel will interact with the cladding, resulting in FCCI. To investigate the FCCI (in this case, liquefaction), irradiated TRIGA fuel rods were exposed to relatively high temperatures in furnace tests. The tests were performed at different temperatures using segments from an irradiated TRIGA fuel rod at the Hot Fuel Examination Facility located at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The data from this study is important for developing a better understanding of the performance of U-ZrH fuel type during transient events (e.g., a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) event) that may result in high temperatures while operating a TRIGA reactor. Furnace tests were run for 6 hours at 730, 800, 900, 950, and 1,000°C. One test was run for 12 hours at 950°C. Post-test microstructural characterization was performed on the heat-treated samples using optical metallography to look for evidence of liquefaction. Additionally, microstructural characterization was performed using scanning electron microscopy to investigate the microstructure of the as-irradiated fuel before heat treatment and the microstructural changes that occurred after heat treating for the 730 and 950°C heat treatments for 6 hours. Results of the analysis were compared to those produced during diffusion studies performed using unirradiated TRIGA fuel meat and type 304 stainless steel. A gap is typically present in as-irradiated fuel that limits any possibility for chemical interaction between the fuel and cladding. Optical metallography (OM) was used to identify areas in the specimens heat treated at 950 and 1000°C where fuel and cladding contact was satisfactory for the FCCI to transpire. The bulk of the interaction zones that form due to FCCI developed in the fuel meat and not as much in the cladding. Even in the sample tested at 1,000°C, no evidence was found that gross fuel meat or cladding melting had occurred. Only limited porosity was found in the fuel meat that possibly could have been due to melting of a particular precipitate phase or phases that had formed during FCCI. These results agreed with those reported for the unirradiated diffusion couple studies.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Dynamic System Scaling Application to Accelerated Nuclear Fuel Testing

The development of nuclear fuel and materials requires a continuous effort to investigate the acute and prolonged effects of irradiation, thermal-material stress, chemical change, or other conceivable damage mechanics acquired during normal operation or accident scenarios throughout its lifetime. As in-core fuel property measurement techniques advance to support in the real-time, non-invasive, and enhanced accuracy realm, it is the future of fuel development to pursue to higher degrees of control, predictability of integral test behavior via separate effects test (SET), and shorter test time intervals. The fuel development life cycle from initial concept to commercial licensing is approximated to be 20 years and current literature suggests by optimizing fuel performance codes with SETs, the process could possibly be compressed to 5 to 10 years. Recently, a research group in the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is testing reduced scale fuel rods and increased power density to accelerate evolution of fuel phenomena in metallic fuels. In support of nuclear fuel rod development, compressing fuel test process, and accelerating fuel phenomena, it was the purpose of this study to investigate nuclear fuel performance phenomena via literature review and effectively scale the initial conditions, boundary conditions, and geometric properties to describe the time-dependent response including to fuel burnup, thermal and mechanical stress, transmutations and inter-diffusion, and other relevant observed phenomena. The study was based on BISON simulations of historic EBR-II metallic fuel experiments and Dynamical System Scaling (DSS) method are utilized to assess effects of scaling activity including fuel phenomena acceleration and calculations of time-dependent distortions. The research successfully scaled metallic fuel phenomena, accelerated fuel testing, and assessed the distortions for each scaled case derived.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Effect of Reactor Radiation on the Thermal Conductivity of Graphite-based Dispersion Fuel

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in 2011 stimulated materials development efforts to improve the current fuel design for Light Water Reactors (LWRs). From fuel element to fuel cladding, new concepts in advanced nuclear fuel development have been proposed, studied, and tested. The new fuel systems are expected to have better resistance to damage, melting, and chemical reaction during accident scenarios. To test the performance and accident tolerance of the advanced fuel, it is highly preferable to simulate off-normal transients in addition to standard in-core fuel performance tests (available at High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Advanced Test Reactor at Idaho National Laboratory). The Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) is now being prepared to restart its operation, performing transient testing to assist advanced fuel development. TREAT was operated from 1959 to 1994, and was extensively used to generate thousands of reactor transients for different programs. The reactor has not operated since 1994. The original fuel used at TREAT was graphite-based dispersion fuel with highly-enriched uranium (HEU, 93.1% enriched uranium). For nonproliferation purposes, a fuel conversion program, supported by U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA), Office of Material Management and Minimization (NA-23) Reactor Conversion Program, is underway to develop a replacement core in which the UO{sub 2} contains only low-enriched uranium (LEU). The preliminary LEU core design has shown a much lower carbon/uranium atomic ratio and enrichment than in the HEU core design. To achieve performance similar to the HEU core, the prospective LEU core will contain a much higher density of UO{sub 2} particles. As a result, a higher level of radiation damage, particularly from fission fragments emerging from the UO{sub 2} particles, can be expected dependent on the UO{sub 2} particle size within the fuel. To support LEU fuel design, the present study investigates the effect of reactor radiations on the thermal conductivity of graphite-based dispersion fuel. Both neutron- and fission-radiation induced degradations of the fuel are modeled, and validated based on the available experimental data. In this study, the reactor-radiation induced thermal conductivity degradation of graphite-based dispersion fuel was analyzed. A semi-empirical method to model the relative thermal conductivity with reactor radiations was proposed and validated. The proposed method can be further applied to predict the changes in the thermal conductivity of the prospective LEU TREAT fuel during long-term operation. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Advanced Fuels Campaign 2019 Accomplishments

The mission of the Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) is to perform or support research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) activities to identify and mature innovative fuels and cladding materials and associated technologies with the potential to improve the performance and safety of current and future reactors; increase the efficient utilization of nuclear energy resources; contribute to enhancing proliferation resistance of the nuclear fuel cycle; and address challenges related to waste management and ultimate disposal. AFC pursues its mission objectives using a goal-oriented, science-based approach that seeks to establish a fundamental understanding of fuel and cladding behaviors under conditions that arise during fabrication, normal steady-state irradiation, off-normal transient scenarios, and storage/disposal. This approach includes advancing the theoretical understanding of fuel behavior, conducting fundamental and integral experiments, and supporting the mechanistic, multi-scale modeling of nuclear fuels to inform and guide fuel development projects, advance the technological readiness of promising fuel candidates, and ultimately support fuel qualification and licensing initiatives. In the area of advanced tools for the modeling and simulation of nuclear fuels, the AFC works in close partnership with the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program, participating with NEAMS in developing mechanistic fuel behavior models and providing experimental data to inform and validate its most advanced tools. Specifically, AFC objectives in thecoming five year horizon include: 1. support the industry-led development of Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) technologies with improved reliability and performance under normal operations and enhanced tolerance during hypothetical accident scenarios, with implementation of lead test rods/assemblies of one or more ATF concepts in commercial reactor(s) by or before 2022 and batch reloads of near-term concept(s) in the 2023-2026 timeframe; 2. lead research and development on innovative fuel and cladding technologies for applications to future advanced reactors, especially fast-spectrum reactors, including reactors that utilize both once-through and recycle scenarios; 3. continue the development and demonstration of a multi-scale,science-based approach to fuel development and testing, andcontribute to the establishment of a state-of-the-art R&D infrastructure necessary to accelerate the development of new fuel concepts; and collaborate with NEAMS on the development and validation of multi-scale, multi-physics, and increasingly predictive fuel performance models and codes. 4. collaborate with NEAMS on the development and validation of multi-scale, multi-physics, and increasingly predictive fuel performance models and codes.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Microstructural Characteristics of U-Zr Ingot Slug and Atomized Powder for SFR metal Fuel

Rod-type fuel slugs and spherical powder of U- 10wt.%Zr alloy was also fabricated and characterized in microstructure by injection casting, gravity casting and centrifugal atomization process. U grains became finer from ∼30μm in conventionally ingot rod to ∼2μm in atomized powder. Laminar structure became so fine from ∼0.2μm in conventionally cast ingot rod to 0.05∼0.1μm in atomized powder. Metallic fuels such as U-Zr and U-Pu-Zr alloys have been considered as a nuclear fuel for a sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR), related to the closed fuel cycle for managing minor actinides and reducing a high radioactivity levels since the 1980's. Metallic fuel slugs of U-Pu-Zr alloys for SFR have conventionally been fabricated by an injection casting method. U-Pu-Zr alloy melts are injected and cast into quartz tube molds during injection casting. Metallic fuel slugs are collected by fracturing quartz tubes from the molds. Demolded quartz tubes are treated with radioactive wastes. Recently, management of minor actinides (MA) became an important issue because direct disposal of the long-lived MA can be a long-term burden for a tentative repository up to several hundreds of thousand years. The metallic fuel for SFR should be remotely fabricated under a radiation shielded environment such as a hot cell, because it contains highly radioactive MA such as Np, Am and Cm. The addition of MA in the fuel composition introduces new challenges in the manufacturing of a metallic fuel slug. Am has a high vapor pressure under a vacuum atmosphere at above a melting temperature of U-Zr or U-Pu-Zr. Used graphite crucibles and quartz molds cannot be recycled easily because of difficult decontamination of radioactive residues on their surfaces. It is necessary to minimize the vaporization of Am and volume of radioactive wastes. Atomized metallic fuel does not need these quartz molds during fabrication, as uranium alloys are prepared as a particle form. It is possible to reduce the formation of radioactive wastes by applying the fabrication process of a particulate metallic fuel. Metallic fuel having a fine microstructure, which originates from a rapid solidification effect during atomization process, results in a higher FG release rate during irradiation. In the case of applying a new forming method such as vibrocompaction in Zr sheath, the sheath can act as a reliable FCCI (fuel/cladding chemical interaction) barrier and a re-constraint for external elongation. In addition, atomized fuel powder, dispersed in a Na liquid metal having a high thermal conductivity, may have a lower temperature distribution during irradiation. In order to develop an efficient fabrication process of metallic fuel for SFR, U-Zr ingot rods were fabricated in a lab-scale with various casting methods. Rod-type U-Zr fuel slugs were fabricated by gravity casting and injection casting. Spherical powder of U-Zr alloy was also fabricated by centrifugal atomization. And then, the microstructural characteristics were investigated by using electron microscopes and energy-dispersive electron X-ray spectroscopy. Atomized U-10Zr powder generally showed spherical morphology of below 200 μm in particle size. U grains became finer from ∼30 μm in conventionally ingot rod to ∼2 μm in atomized powder. Laminar structure became so fine from ∼0.2 μm in conventionally cast ingot rod to 0.05∼0.1 μm in atomized powder. Atomized particulate metallic fuel for SFR has a fine microstructure, resulting in a higher fission gas release rate during irradiation. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Potential State Regulatory Pathways to Facilitate Low-Carbon Fuels

States and the federal government are increasingly engaged in the challenges around decarbonizing the electric grid. In particular, regulators, consumers, stakeholders, and utilities recognize the need to carefully consider the role natural gas will play in a decarbonized future. A variety of technology and policy options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with natural gas use are available, including energy efficiency programs, demand reduction tools, strategic electrification, and strategies to reduce emissions from natural gas production, transportation, and consumption. Low-carbon fuels – mainly renewable natural gas (RNG) and clean hydrogen – are being considered an important component of decarbonization goals. RNG and hydrogen may be able to meaningfully reduce emissions from processes independent of geologic natural gas, displacing emissions of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas. Although RNG and hydrogen are not cost-competitive today with geologic natural gas and are smaller in scale and potential than other decarbonization options, they can be explored as potential critical tools to decarbonize sectors that are difficult to electrify or shift off of natural gas entirely, such as air travel, industrial processes, maritime transport, long-distance trucking, space heating on cold days, and railroads (Nadel, 2022). The role of this report is to provide informational context for state utility regulators to understand the impacts of and challenges associated with broader integration of low-carbon fuels, followed by examples of state regulatory actions taken to date to facilitate the development of low-carbon fuels. Setting clear guidance to calculate the environmental benefits of low-carbon fuels and continuing federal and state investments in research and development to reduce costs relative to fossil fuels will be important steps to take to signal the desire to grow the market for these fuels. State public utility commissions may play a key role in setting regulatory frameworks for low-carbon fuels and ensuring that ratepayer funds, if utilized, are done so to further the public interest. This report is intended to summarize decisions that states have made to date on low-carbon fuels. In the spirit of understanding the current market and sharing information, this report provides success stories, and lessons learned across states as regulators implement varying strategies to achieve decarbonization objectives while maintaining their focus on affordability, safety, and reliability of the energy system. The report begins with an introduction of the role of natural gas in the U.S. economy (Section I) and background information on natural gas use, decarbonization, and low-carbon fuels (Section II). Next, the report describes the current market by discussing the scale of current production, emissions intensity, resource potential, and costs of low-carbon fuels compared to geologic natural gas (Section III). Following these sections, the report describes four strategies states have employed to facilitate low-carbon fuels: opening exploratory dockets, approving voluntary tariffs for customers, approving interconnection tariffs for producers, and considering portfolio-wide procurement targets (Section IV). This section lists states that have taken actions in each category, citing utility filings, commission decisions, stakeholder comments, and other relevant sources. Finally, the report concludes with suggested questions regulators may wish to consider regarding low-carbon fuels, in the interest of preparing to make decisions in the future (Section V). These questions include: Are there existing regulatory or technical barriers to voluntary purchases of low-carbon fuels? Can customers work with utilities to procure low-carbon fuels; are producers able to interconnect projects without significant barriers to entry? Should the infrastructure and/or commodity costs of low-carbon fuels be socialized among all ratepayers, or borne solely by the large commercial and industrial (C&I) customers currently driving the market? Should regulated natural gas and/or electric utilities own and operate low-carbon fuel production? How should regulators consider the unique decarbonization potential of low-carbon fuels, particularly for hard-to-abate sectors, in decision-making? Is additional direction or clarity from state policymakers needed? What no-regrets approaches can help facilitate both near-term RNG development and long-term development of hydrogen and other zero-carbon fuels? We collectively wish to express our gratitude to the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, for supporting this report and other technical assistance resources for state regulators on natural gas topics. State regulators operate under a variety of policy environments, and states have vastly different types of energy resources, infrastructure, and customers. While there is no optimal regulatory, policy, or technological solution that will be successful in every state, state regulators can benefit by exchanging lessons learned with their peers across the country. We look forward to continued engagement with our fellow commissioners, commission staff, NARUC, the U.S. Department of Energy, and other stakeholders to develop sound regulation in the public interest.

03 NATURAL GAS↗
NASA NTRS2004

Aircraft Fuel Cell Power Systems

In recent years, fuel cells have been explored for use in aircraft. While the weight and size of fuel cells allows only the smallest of aircraft to use fuel cells for their primary engines, fuel cells have showed promise for use as auxiliary power units (APUs), which power aircraft accessories and serve as an electrical backup in case of an engine failure. Fuel cell MUS are both more efficient and emit fewer pollutants. However, sea-level fuel cells need modifications to be properly used in aircraft applications. At high altitudes, the ambient air has a much lower pressure than at sea level, which makes it much more difficult to get air into the fuel cell to react and produce electricity. Compressors can be used to pressurize the air, but this leads to added weight, volume, and power usage, all of which are undesirable things. Another problem is that fuel cells require hydrogen to create electricity, and ever since the Hindenburg burst into flames, aircraft carrying large quantities of hydrogen have not been in high demand. However, jet fuel is a hydrocarbon, so it is possible to reform it into hydrogen. Since jet fuel is already used to power conventional APUs, it is very convenient to use this to generate the hydrogen for fuel-cell-based APUs. Fuel cells also tend to get large and heavy when used for applications that require a large amount of power. Reducing the size and weight becomes especially beneficial when it comes to fuel cells for aircraft. My goal this summer is to work on several aspects of Aircraft Fuel Cell Power System project. My first goal is to perform checks on a newly built injector rig designed to test different catalysts to determine the best setup for reforming Jet-A fuel into hydrogen. These checks include testing various thermocouples, transmitters, and transducers, as well making sure that the rig was actually built to the design specifications. These checks will help to ensure that the rig will operate properly and give correct results when it is finally ready for testing. Another of my goals is to test new membranes for use in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells, in the hope that these membranes can increase the electricity that is produced by he1 cells. Producing more electricity means that fewer fuel cells are needed, thus reducing the weight and volume of an APU based on fuel cells, making such an APU much more viable.

Needham, Robert↗
NASA NTRS2012

Alternate-Fueled Combustion-Sector Emissions

In order to meet rapidly growing demand for fuel, as well as address environmental concerns, the aviation industry has been testing alternate fuels for performance and technical usability in commercial and military aircraft. Currently, alternate aviation fuels must satisfy MIL-DTL- 83133F(2008) (military) or ASTM D 7566- Annex(2011) (commercial) standards and are termed drop-in fuel replacements. Fuel blends of up to 50% alternative fuel blended with petroleum (JP-8), which have become a practical alternative, are individually certified on the market. In order to make alternate fuels (and blends) a viable option for aviation, the fuel must be able to perform at a similar or higher level than traditional petroleum fuel. They also attempt to curb harmful emissions, and therefore a truly effective alternate fuel would emit at or under the level of currently used fuel. This paper analyzes data from gaseous and particulate emissions of an aircraft combustor sector. The data were evaluated at various inlet conditions, including variation in pressure and temperature, fuel-to-air ratios, and percent composition of alternate fuel. Traditional JP-8+100 data were taken as a baseline, and blends of JP- 8+100 with synthetic-paraffinic-kerosene (SPK) fuel (Fischer-Tropsch (FT)) were used for comparison. Gaseous and particulate emissions, as well as flame luminosity, were assessed for differences between FT composition of 0%, 50%, and 100%. The data showed that SPK fuel (a FT-derived fuel) had slightly lower harmful gaseous emissions, and smoke number information corroborated the hypothesis that SPK-FT fuels are cleaner burning fuels.

Saxena, Nikita T.↗
DOE OSTI2016

Analysis of Transportation Options for Commercial Spent Fuel in the U.S.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) highand associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) highand associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) highand associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and highand associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) highand associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) high and associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) highand associated transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF)...

Kalinina, Elena↗
DOE OSTI2025

Fuel reid vapor pressure level and ethanol content on stochastic preignition, effects at steady and unsteady engine operation

The present work investigates relations between fuel Reid vapor pressure (RVP) and biofuel (ethanol) content on stochastic preignition (SPI) at both sustained steady-state engine operation and following load transients. This work stems from in-field observations that automotive original equipment manufacturers have observed consistent seasonal increases in United States customer drivability complaints and warranty claims during September and October where SPI is suspected to be responsible. The seasonal timing of these events coincides with the United States seasonal fuel property changeover initiating on September 15 each year, where fuel RVP increases. To explore potential linkage between fuel RVP and SPI the present study employs engine SPI experiments coupled with laboratory spray measurements of fuels with RVPs of 8, 12, and 16 psi in both E10 (10% ethanol) and E25 (25% ethanol) fuels. Engine results are partitioned into fuel RVP and ethanol content effects on SPI in steady-state, sustained high-load engine operation and unsteady-state low- to high-load transitions, where off-engine spray vessel patternation and tip penetration results help to elucidate the observed fuel effects on SPI. A boosted direct-injected, spark-ignition engine was fueled with three market relevant E10 and E25 fuels with RVPs of 8, 12, and 16 to characterize the interplay between winter fuels and abnormal combustion behavior. The steady-state work shows that for high-load, steady-state engine operation, SPI is directly linked to fuel retention, which was found to be dependent on fuel distillation. The unsteady-state engine operation work shows that following low-to high-load transitions, SPI can occur from a memory of fuel property effects at low-load operation. Specifically, the fuel RVP effect on fuel spray collapse at low loads was found to correlate with SPI with a more than 95% confidence interval following low- to high-engine-load transitions. Results suggest that fuel-wall impingement at low-load operation could carry over into high-load transitions and generate SPI events following low- to high-load transitions.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Diesel Fuel Property Effects on In-Cylinder Liquid Penetration Length: Impact on Smoke Emissions and Equivalence Ratio Estimates at the Flame Lift-Off Length

Here in this study, elastic scattering was employed to investigate diesel fuel property effects on the liquid length (i.e., the maximum extent of in-cylinder liquid-phase fuel penetration) using select research fuels: an ultralow-sulfur #2 diesel emissions-certification fuel (CF) and four of the Coordinating Research Council (CRC) Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines (FACE) diesel fuels (F1, F2, F6, and F8). The experiments were performed in a single-cylinder heavy-duty optical compression-ignition engine under time-varying, noncombusting conditions to minimize the influence of chemical heat release on the liquid-length measurement. The FACE diesel fuel and CF liquid lengths under combusting conditions were also predicted using Siebers’ scaling law and pressure data from previous work using the same fuels at similar in-cylinder conditions. The objective was to observe if the liquid length under noncombusting or combusting conditions provides additional insights into the relationships among the main fuel properties (i.e., cetane number (CN), the 90 vol % distillation recovery temperature (T90), and aromatic content) and smoke emissions. Results suggest that liquid-length values are best correlated to fuel distillation characteristics measured with ASTM D2887 (simulated distillation method). This work also studied the relationship between liquid length and lift-off length, H (i.e., distance from the fuel-injector orifice exit to the position where the standing premixed autoignition zone stabilizes during mixing-controlled combustion). Two possible cases were identified based on the relative magnitudes of liquid length under combusting conditions (Lc) and H. The low-CN fuels are representative of the first case, L c < H, in which the fuel is always fully vaporized at H. The high-CN fuels are mostly representative of the second case, L c ≥ H, in which there is still liquid fuel at H. Lc ≥ H would suggest higher smoke emissions, but there is not enough evidence in this work to support a compounding effect of a longer liquid length on top of the aromatic-content effect on smoke emissions for fuels with similar CN, supporting previous findings in the literature that lift-off length plays a more important role than liquid-length on diesel combustion. At the same time, the experimental results suggest a decrease in the fuel-jet spreading angle, i.e., a decrease in the entrainment rate into the jet at and downstream of H, under combusting conditions, that is not accounted for in the model used to predict the values of $\phi$(H). Lastly, as a result, L c may be of interest for accurate predictions of $\phi$(H), especially for combustion strategies designed to lower in-cylinder soot by operating near or below the nonsooting $\phi$(H)-value (i.e., $\phi$(H) ≈ 2).

02 PETROLEUM↗
DOE OSTI2016

Supply Chain-Based Solution to Prevent Fuel Tax Evasion: Final Report

The primary source of funding for the United States transportation system is derived from motor fuel and other highway use taxes. Loss of revenue attributed to fuel-tax evasion has been assessed to be somewhere between 1 billion and 3 billion per year. Any solution that addresses this problem needs to include not only the tax-collection agencies and auditors, but also the carriers transporting oil products and the carriers customers. This report presents a system developed by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for the Federal Highway Administration which has the potential to reduce or eliminate many fuel-tax evasion schemes. The solution balances the needs of tax-auditors and those of the fuel-hauling companies and their customers. The system has three main components. The on-board subsystem combined sensors, tracking and communication devices, and software (the on-board Evidential Reasoning System, or obERS) to detect, monitor, and geo-locate the transfer of fuel among different locations. The back office sub-system (boERS) used self-learning algorithms to determine the legitimacy of the fuel loading and offloading (important for tax auditors) and detect potential illicit operations such as fuel theft (important for carriers and their customers, and may justify the deployment costs). The third sub-system, the Fuel Distribution and Auditing System or FDAS, is a centralized database, which together with a user interface allows tax auditors to query the data submitted by the fuel-hauling companies and correlate different parameters to quickly identify any anomalies. Industry partners included Barger Transport of Weber City, Virginia (fleet); Air-Weigh, of Eugene, Oregon (and their wires and harnesses); Liquid Bulk Tank (LBT) of Omaha, Nebraska (three five-compartment trailers); and Innovative Software Engineering (ISE) of Coralville, Iowa(on-board telematics device and back-office system). ORNL conducted a pilot test with the three instrumented vehicles collecting real-world data during an eight-month period (October 2014 to June 2015). The vehicles logged a total of 375,000 miles and transported more than 7.5 million gallons of fuel. The drivers entered information on the telematics device about 77% of the time, with about 15% (10%) of the data showing at least one compartment with loading (offloading) valve activity, but not driver information entry for that compartment. Seven events (or about 0.7% of the trips) were identified by the boERS as having a missing fuel diversion number. The solution developed and tested in the pilot test had federal- and state-level tax auditors as its main audience. Nonetheless, the technology has to be adopted by the fuel carriers and therefore the solution had to address the needs of fuel-hauling companies and their customers (i.e., fuel theft and cocktailing). Sensors in the hatches allowed the obERS recognize when one of those were opened (always a suspicious activity, unless it happens at locations where maintenance is performed on the vehicle). The fuel-theft issue was addressed by a self-learning algorithm deployed on the boERS that continuously processed the data from the field to construct probability distributions of measures such as elapsed time of fuel loading and offloading by driver, vehicle, and compartment, valve actuation sequence, elapsed time between the first two valve actuations (by driver, compartment, and location), and other parameters. Probability thresholds, which can be set up by the carrier, determined how to classify the observed events. The boERS also kept track of valve sequencing at a given location and analyzed these actuations to help identify any suspicious activities. Technical and economic recommendations include: a) simplification of the driver data-entry task; b) reduction of system deployment cost; c) addition of capabilities that make the system more appealing to industry (i.e., identify and avoid fuel misdelivery); and d) incorporation of additional capabilities to the FDAS. Path to commercialization recommendations include: a) identify a company willing to further develop, test, and certify a hardened system with a price point the market will bear; b).transfer ERS to licensee; c) establish a fleet or fleets who want this technology for carrier benefits or trailer manufacturer who wants to offer it as optional technology; and d) identify a location for the deployment of FDAS.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Advanced Engine and Fuel Technologies Annual Progress Report (FY2019)

On behalf of the Vehicle Technologies Office of the U.S. Department of Energy, we are pleased to introduce the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 Annual Progress Report for the Advanced Engine and Fuel Technologies Program. In support of the Vehicle Technology Office’s goal for future U.S. economic growth, the Program focuses on early-stage research and development to improve understanding of combustion processes, fuel properties, and emissions control technologies, generating knowledge and insight necessary for industry to cost-effectively develop the next generation of engines and fuels. One of the most promising and cost-effective approaches to improving the fuel economy of the U.S. vehicle fleet is to introduce the next generation of higher-efficiency, very-low-emission combustion engines that meet future federal emissions regulations into the passenger and commercial vehicle markets. Advanced fuel formulations that can incorporate non-petroleum-based blending agents could further enhance engine efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide fuel diversification. Also, innovations in combustion, fuels, emissions control, air control, turbomachinery, and energy recovery could potentially increase fuel economy considerably compared to today’s vehicles. The expected national economic, environmental, and energy security benefits from these next-generation engines and fuels would be significant inasmuch as the majority of vehicles sold over the next several decades will still include an engine. The Program has set the following goals for passenger and commercial vehicle fuel economy improvements. By 2030, increase light-duty engine efficiency to demonstrate 35% improvement in passenger vehicle fuel economy (25% improvement from engine efficiency and 10% from fuel co-optimization) relative to a 2015 baseline vehicle, while meeting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tier 3 Emission and Fuel Standards. By 2030, improve heavy-duty engine efficiency by 35% relative to a 2009 baseline vehicle and identify cost-effective high-performance fuels that can further increase efficiency up to an additional 4%, while meeting prevailing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency emissions standards. The Program utilized advanced combustion processes to increase engine efficiency, resulting in a modeled passenger vehicle fuel economy improvement of 19.4% (over a Model Year 2015 baseline) in FY 2019. This report highlights progress achieved by the Advanced Engine and Fuel Technologies Program during FY 2019. The nature, current focus, and recent progress of the Program are described together with summaries of National Laboratory, industry, and university projects that provide an overview of the exciting work being conducted to address critical technical barriers and challenges to commercializing the next generation of higher-efficiency engine, emissions control, and fuel technologies for passenger and commercial vehicles.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Impacts of LEU+ and ATF on Fresh Fuel Storage Criticality Safety

The use of increased fuel enrichment, which is still in the realm of low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel, has been of interest to commercial light water reactor operators as part of the next iteration in fuel cycle technological advances and research and development. Using increased enrichment fuel, or high-assay LEU (HALEU), in power plants has clear benefits for being able to load cores with additional power-producing fuel. Although HALEU enrichments can range up to 20%, the more guarded approach of investigating enrichments above current fuels within 10% enrichment is referred to as LEU plus (LEU+) to reflect the less drastic change in operating conditions and requirements and similarity to current fuel cycles. Of additional interest and increasing maturity is the incorporation of accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) concepts, which are also applicable to the current fleet. This class of technologies involves changes such as cladding (e.g., chromium coating or FeCrAl) and fuel composition (e.g., chromia dopant) alterations to demonstrate improved fuel performance under accident scenarios. The ability to properly store fuel before and after residence time in the reactor is crucial to plant operation. Typically, this is done in either a new fuel vault (NFV) or spent fuel pool (SFP). Storing, loading, and unloading dozens of fuel assemblies within the same general area provides opportunities for obvious criticality concerns. These concerns are addressed with regulations to the subcriticality margin that the NFV and SFP must maintain in certain conditions. Adopting LEU+ fuel results in inherent reactivity increases, which are extremely relevant for safe fuel storage. Therefore, a clear understanding of the effects of LEU+ fuel and ATF on criticality safety margins to regulatory limits is required, as well as an understanding of the degree of absorber crediting under normal and accident conditions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗