Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “workshop”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7

Terrestrial Very-Long-Baseline Atom Interferometry: summary of the second workshop

This summary of the second Terrestrial Very-Long-Baseline Atom Interferometry (TVLBAI) Workshop provides a comprehensive overview of our meeting held in London in April 2024 (Second Terrestrial Very-Long-Baseline Atom Interferometry Workshop, Imperial College, April 2024), building on the initial discussions during the inaugural workshop held at CERN in March 2023 (First Terrestrial Very-Long-Baseline Atom Interferometry Workshop, CERN, March 2023). Like the summary of the first workshop (Abend et al. in AVS Quantum Sci. 6:024701, 2024), this document records a critical milestone for the international atom interferometry community. It documents our concerted efforts to evaluate progress, address emerging challenges, and refine strategic directions for future large-scale atom interferometry projects. Our commitment to collaboration is manifested by the integration of diverse expertise and the coordination of international resources, all aimed at advancing the frontiers of atom interferometry physics and technology, as set out in a Memorandum of Understanding signed by over 50 institutions (Memorandum of Understanding for the Terrestrial Very Long Baseline Atom Interferometer Study).

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

National Postirradiation Examination Workshop Report

A National Post-Irradiation-Examination (PIE) Workshop was held March 29-30, 2011, in Washington D.C., stimulated by the DOE Acting Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy approval on January 31, 2011 of the “Mission Need Statement for Advanced Post-Irradiation Examination Capability”. As stated in the Mission Need, “A better understanding of nuclear fuels and material performance in the nuclear environment, at the nanoscale and lower, is critical to the development of innovative fuels and materials required for tomorrow’s nuclear energy systems.” (2011) Developing an advanced post-irradiation capability is the most important thing we can do to advance nuclear energy as an option to meeting national energy goals. Understanding the behavior of fuels and materials in a nuclear reactor irradiation environment is the limiting factor in nuclear plant safety, longevity, efficiency, and economics. The National PIE Workshop is part of fulfilling or addressing Department of Energy (DOE) missions in safe and publically acceptable nuclear energy. Several presentations were given during the opening of the workshop. Generally speaking, these presentations established that we cannot continue to rely on others in the world to provide the capabilities we need to move forward with nuclear energy technology. These presentations also generally identified the need for increased microstructural understanding of fuels and materials to be coupled with modeling and simulation, and increased accessibility and infrastructure to facilitate the interaction between national laboratories and participating organizations. The overall results of the work of the presenters and panels was distilled into four primary needs 1. Understanding material changes in the extreme nuclear environment at the nanoscale. Nanoscale studies have significant importance due to the mechanisms that cause materials to degrade, which actually occur on the nanoscale. 2. Enabling additional proficiency in experimentation and analysis through robust modeling coupled with advanced characterization. 3. Advancing the infrastructure and accessibility of physical and administrative systems needed to meet the needs of participating organizations that are subject to different time cycles and constraints that make working and collaborating the national laboratories challenging. 4. Pursuing in-situ analysis and instrumentation to support the examination of dynamic changes to materials’ microstructure, deformation, and surface effects as they occur with time scales rather than the static comparison offered by current PIE methods. This Workshop Report responds to the research challenges for advanced/future PIE needs for nuclear materials development outlined by Energy Secretary Chu and the DOE-NE Research and Development Roadmap report, which was delivered to Congress in April 2010, (DOE-NE, 2010) by identifying the technial needs for fuel and material development specifically related to PIE. The information from the panels address these research challenges by identifying specific needs related to each of the topical areas. The focus of the Workshop was to identify gaps in the enabling capabilities for nuclear energy research and to identify high-priority fundamental capabilities to enable research to be completed that would likely have high impact on enabling nuclear energy as a significant contributor to energy production portfolios.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Proposal for DOE HEP funding to support the International Workshop on ’Sterile Neutrinos’ at Virginia Tech

This report details how the $5,000 DOE grant to support the workshop titled “Sterile Neutrinos at the Crossroads” (or SNAC11) was allocated and spent. The SNAC11 workshop covered three days during which there were 28 talks, multiple discussion sessions, a poster session with 9 posters delivered, and an impromptu public lecture on the OPERA superluminal neutrino result by the former project manager of OPERA (this was the first official OPERA talk on the subject in North America). The workshop scientific agenda can be viewed at http://www.cpe.vt.edu/snac/program.html. Emerging out of the workshop discussions, was the idea to write a comprehensive white paper describing the current state of the light sterile neutrino. This effort soon became an international collaboration. The final document, titled “Light Sterile Neutrinos: A White Paper” has nearly 200 authors, is 267 pages long, and cites 730 unique references. It has been posted the preprint archive as arXiv:1204.5379 [hep-ph]. Workshop local organizing committee co-chairs, Patrick Huber and Jonathan Link, are the white paper’s head editors.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Grand Challenges of Advanced Computing for Energy Innovation Report from the Workshop Held July 31-August 2, 2012

On July 31-August 2 of 2012, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) held a workshop entitled Grand Challenges of Advanced Computing for Energy Innovation. This workshop built on three earlier workshops that clearly identified the potential for the Department and its national laboratories to enable energy innovation. The specific goal of the workshop was to identify the key challenges that the nation must overcome to apply the full benefit of taxpayer-funded advanced computing technologies to U.S. energy innovation in the ways that the country produces, moves, stores, and uses energy. Perhaps more importantly, the workshop also developed a set of recommendations to help the Department overcome those challenges. These recommendations provide an action plan for what the Department can do in the coming years to improve the nation’s energy future.

Larzelere, Alex R.↗

Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Jointed Structures.

The Third International Workshop on Jointed Structures was held from August 16th to 17th, 2012, in Chicago Illinois, following the ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Thirty two researchers from both the United States and international locations convened to discuss the recent progress of mechanical joints related research and associated efforts in addition to developing a roadmap for the challenges to be addressed over the next five to ten years. These proceedings from the workshop include the minutes of the discussions and follow up from the 2009 workshop [1], presentations, and outcomes of the workshop. Specifically, twelve challenges were formulated from the discussions at the workshop, which focus on developing a better understanding of uncertainty and variability in jointed structures, incorporating high fidelity models of joints in simulations that are tractable/efficient, motivating a new generation of researchers and funding agents as to the importance of joint mechanics research, and developing new insights into the physical phenomena that give rise to energy dissipation in jointed structures. The ultimate goal of these research efforts is to develop a predictive model of joint mechanics.

Starr, Michael James↗

Neutron Characterization of Additively Manufactured Components. Workshop Report

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a collection of promising manufacturing methods that industry is beginning to explore and adopt. Macroscopically complicated and near net shape components are being built using AM, but how the material behaves in service is a big question for industry. Consequently, AM components/materials need further research into exactly what is made and how it will behave in service. This one and a half day workshop included a series of invited presentations from academia, industry and national laboratories (see Appendix A for the workshop agenda and list of talks). The workshop was welcomed by Alan Tennant, Chief Scientist, Neutron Sciences Directorate, ORNL, and opened remotely by Rob Ivestor, Deputy Director, Advanced Manufacturing Office-DOE, who declared AM adoptees as titans who will be able to create customized 3-D structures with 1 million to 1 billion micro welds with locally tailored microstructures. Further he stated that characterization with neutrons is key to be able to bring critical insight/information into the AM process/property/behavior relationship. Subsequently, the presentations spanned a slice of the current state of the art AM techniques and many of the most relevant characterization techniques using neutrons. After the talks, a panel discussion was held; workshop participants (see Appendix B for a list of attendees) providing questions and the panel answers. The main purpose of the panel discussion was to build consensus regarding the critical research needs in AM that can be addressed with neutrons. These needs were placed into three categories: modes of access for neutrons, new capabilities needed, new AM material issues and neutrons. Recommendations from the workshop were determined based on the panel discussion.

Watkins, Thomas R.↗

Materials Innovation for Next-Generation T&D Grid Components. Workshop Summary Report

The Materials Innovations for Next-Generation T&D Grid Components Workshop was co-sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and held on August 26 27, 2015, at the ORNL campus in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The workshop was planned and executed under the direction of workshop co-chair Dr. Kerry Cheung (DOE) and co-chair Dr. Dominic Lee (ORNL). The information contained herein is based on the results of the workshop, which was attended by nearly 50 experts from government, industry, and academia. The research needs and pathways described in this report reflect the expert opinions of workshop participants, but they are not intended to represent the views of the entire electric power community.

Grid Components↗

High-foot Implosion Workshop (March 22-24, 2016) Report

From March 22-24, 2016 at Workshop was held at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory bringing together international experts in inertial confinement fusion research for the purpose of discussing the results from the ‘high-foot implosion campaign.’ The Workshop topics covered a retrospective of the first two years of experiments, a discussion of our best present understanding of what the data and our models imply, a discussion about remaining mysteries that are not understood at this time, and a discussion of our strategy moving forward. The material herein contains information from published and unpublished sources and is distributed solely for the purposes of this Workshop. Key assessments and conclusions resulting from the Workshop are: “The high foot campaign is extremely well documented and the interested reader is urged to go directly to the peer-reviewed journal literature for details.” – D. Haynes (LANL) “Overall progress in understanding of fuel and hot-spot properties near peak burn is excellent.” – V. Goncharov (LLE) “I would say that given the constraints of using the same hohlraum and similar capsule designs to the National Ignition Campaign, the High Foot Campaign achieved as much as could be expected. Indeed the demonstration of significant alpha particle heating remains a landmark achievement.” – J. Chittenden (Imperial College) “One of the principal points of discussion at the meeting was the importance of the roll over in inferred pressure that occurs with reducing coast time for different ablator thicknesses and the idea of repeating shot N140819 to confirm this. I would be very interested to see a return to the High Foot platform as a way to exercise the improved radiographic capabilities such as the curved crystal imaging system and as a way to examine the hypothesis of ‘burn truncation by aneurism.’ ” – J. Chittenden (Imperial College) “It is clear from the quality of the data presented during this workshop that the High-Foot experimental series has been a success. It has fulfilled the original goal of being an implosion platform that could separate the low-mode effects from the high-mode effects. Just because we now know when the High-Foot implosions break, it does not mean that they have served their purpose. This will be a very useful platform to study hohlraum coupling, to determine if controlling shape reduces residual kinetic energy, and testing hypotheses of how the hot-spot assembles.” – J. Knauer (LLE) “The LLNL "base camp" strategy for hohlraums was finally presented. Goals are to understand the safe operating space for the hohlraum and to find designs with good enough symmetry inside NIF's envelope, varying the CCR, pulse length and capsule designs. LLNL has a draft set of drive asymmetry requirements.” – P. Gauthier (CEA)

42 ENGINEERING↗

2016 FACET-II Science Workshop Summary Report

The second in a series of FACET-II Science Workshops was held at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory on October 17-19, 2016 [1]. The workshop drew thirty-five participants from eighteen different institutions including CERN, DESY, Ecole Polytechnique, FNAL, JAI, LBNL, LLNL, Radiabeam, Radiasoft, SLAC, Stony Brook, Strathclyde, Tech-X, Tsinghua, UC Boulder, UCLA and UT Austin. The 2015 workshop [2, 3] helped prioritize research directions for FACET-II. The 2016 workshop was focused on understanding what improvements are needed at the facility to support the next generation of experiments. All presentations are linked to the workshop website as a permanent record.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Advanced Manufacturing Office Clean Water Processing Technologies: Workshop Series Summary Report

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) held a series of three clean water processing technologies workshops focusing on technical challenges and opportunities. The first workshop focused on energy optimized desalination technology development and was held in San Francisco on Nov. 5th and 6th, 2015 at the Hilton San Francisco Union Square. The next two occurred in summer 2017 starting with a workshop held in Dallas, Texas at the Hilton Dallas Lincoln Centre on July 10th and 11th, 2017 followed by the third workshop in Cleveland, Ohio at the Wyndham Cleveland at Playhouse Square on August 23rd and 24th, 2017. Below is a high level summary of scope and outcomes from each workshop.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Creating Pathways to Success for Supersized Wind Turbine Blades: 2018 Workshop Summary Report

A workshop on Pathways to Success for Supersized Wind Turbine Blades was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) at the Kimpton Hotel Palomar in Washington D.C., on March 6-7, 2018. Approximately 40-50 experts and industry stakeholders came together for the event, including manufacturers, transportation specialists, project developers, operators, engineering firms, consultants, and university researchers. Technical experts from the national laboratories and WETO were also present to engage in discussions about solving the challenges faced by supersized wind turbine blades. The workshop attendees participated in evaluating the current status of wind turbine blade design, manufacture, transportation, erection and operation, identifying constraints to cost-effective application of current technologies and methods for blades of increasing size, and discussing needs and opportunities for research, development and deployment of materials, manufacturing, structural configuration, and transportation. The workshop was one step within a larger initiative to identify specific R&D opportunities DOE could pursue to address technical barriers or implementation challenges faced by the U.S. wind energy industry to achieve continued decreases in LCOE. Following a plenary session, the 2-day workshop featured three group discussion sessions, with each session focusing on a specific “pathway” to enabling LCOE reductions for rotor blades of increasing size. The three pathways considered were “on-site manufacture,” “transport,” and “hybrid and alternative,” which included various options involving central manufacturing of sub-elements following on-site assembly. Each of the pathway group discussions was opened with a short presentation from one or more invited speakers, followed by an open discussion with balanced input from stakeholder groups and individuals. Participation among the workshop attendees was considered highly productive. Experts and stakeholders were engaged throughout the sessions and offered significant insights into the challenges and potential enabling technologies for supersized blades. Discussion highlights and take-aways for the three pathways are described.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

Community Modeling and Long-Term Predictions of the Integrated Water Cycle. Report from the September 2012 Workshop

Water is a key component of the earth and human systems due to its strong interactions with the energy cycle and its vital roles in the energy-water-land system. Uncertainties in predicting the integrated water cycle can limit our abilities to address the energy and environmental challenges today and in the future. Modeling the integrated water cycle contributes to the Department of Energy’s (DOE) core competencies in integrative modeling, drawing from unique and highly relevant research on cloud, aerosol, terrestrial ecosystem, carbon cycle, and subsurface processes, as well as climate and earth system modeling and integrated assessment modeling. Synthesizing new process knowledge and innovative computational methods in integrated models of the human-earth system can advance predictive capabilities relevant to DOE missions. This report describes the DOE workshop on Community Modeling and Long-Term Predictions of the Integrated Water Cycle, held September 2012 in Washington DC. The workshop serves as a launching point and major organizing event to identify challenges and plan the development of next-generation human-earth system models for improving long-term predictions of the regional-scale integrated water cycle. More specifically, the workshop aims to: identify core modeling capabilities while identifying key research gaps, with an emphasis on improving model fidelity; reveal relevant and critical capabilities and needs for observations, analytical frameworks, and data management that underpin the development, testing, and validation of our main models and model components; engage the research community in strategies for improving synthesis and integration; elucidate opportunities for collaborations within DOE and with other agencies and institutions that have complementary and essential expertise in specific aspects of the water cycle; and improve understanding of the nature and characteristics of long-term scientific information requirements for DOE’s energy and environmental missions and, as appropriate, for mission needs of other partner agencies. The workshop benefited from substantial inputs provided by the broad scientific community and interagency participation. The topical and crosscutting research challenges identified at the workshop have been synthesized into three overarching Science Grand Challenges and three Integrative Modeling Experiments summarized in this report. These challenges represent remarkable opportunities for interagency collaborations to improve predictions of the integrated water cycle for significant scientific and user impacts.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

ASCR Workshop on In Situ Data Management: Enabling Scientific Discovery from Diverse Data Sources

In January 2019, the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science program in Advanced Scientific Computing Research, convened a workshop to identify priority research directions for in situ data management (ISDM). The workshop defined ISDM as the practices, capabilities, and procedures to control the organization of data and enable the coordination and communication among heterogeneous tasks, executing simultaneously in a high-performance computing system, cooperating toward a common objective. The workshop revealed two primary, interdependent motivations for processing and managing data in situ. The first motivation is that the in situ methodology enables scientific discovery from a broad range of data sources over a wide scale of computing platforms: leadership-class systems, clusters, clouds, workstations, and embedded devices at the edge. The successful development of ISDM capabilities will benefit real-time decision-making, design optimization, and data-driven scientific discovery. The second motivation is the need to decrease data volumes. ISDM can make critical contributions to managing large data volumes from computations and experiments to minimize data movement, save storage space, and boost resource efficiency, often while simultaneously increasing scientific precision. A fundamental finding of this workshop is that the methodologies used to manage data among a variety of tasks in situ can be used to facilitate scientific discovery from many different data sources—simulation, experiment, and sensors, for example—and that being able to do so at numerous computing scales will benefit real-time decision-making, design optimization, and data-driven scientific discovery across the Office of Science mission space. Applications wanting to use the in situ capabilities include those where data analysis feeds back to the simulation, decisions are made autonomously, big data or machine learning is among the tasks to be coordinated, and computations need to be completed in real time. The workshop identified six priority research directions that highlight the components and capabilities needed for ISDM to be successful for the wide variety of applications discussed: making ISDM capabilities more pervasive, controllable, composable, and transparent, with a focus on greater coordination with the software stack and a diversity of fundamentally new data algorithms.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

High Energy Theory and Cosmology Workshops at the Leinweber Center for Theoretical Physics at the University of Michigan

The workshop “Modeling Dark Energy Observations in the Nonlinear Regime”, informally called the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-3 workshop, took place on Oct 15-19, 2018 at the University of Michigan. It included about 50 cosmologists - all DES members - from three continents. The goal of the workshop was to make concrete, quantifiable progress on the data analysis that will be a core component for the DES Year-3 release. The DES Y3 results, when completed, will produce world?s best constraints on dark matter and dark energy from a galaxy survey, and will also pave way for similar analyses from LSST, WFIRST and other major surveys in the 1-2 decades to come. The workshop, true to its name, primarily consisted of a number of parallel working sessions and hack-a-thons where progress was made on concrete tasks. Also of note were several comprehensive reviews of the status of different parts of the modeling/analysis pipeline. The workshop also served an important purpose of getting collaborators together to clarify and prioritize upcoming efforts, tasks and scientific goals. The primary local organizer was Dragan Huterer; Yuanyuan Zhang (Fermilab) and Michael Troxel (Ohio State) served as external organizers.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

Human Factors Engineering Insights and Guidance for Implementing Innovative Technologies from the Nuclear Innovation Workshop: A Summary Report

The Nuclear Innovation Workshop was sponsored by the United States Department of Energy Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program and held at Idaho National Laboratory on June 26-28, 2019. The objectives of this workshop were to [1] promote an innovation ecosystem that reduces cost and risk through early evaluations, [2] provide hands-on activities that demonstrate the value of using advanced tools, methods, and capabilities offered by the Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program, [3] provide a platform to enable broad innovation in the nuclear industry, [4] enable industry leaders the opportunity for networking and sharing of their experiences, and [5] take inspiration from other industries to push the envelope for transformation in the nuclear industry. These objectives were supported through the facilitation of detailed discussions and industry presentations that were presented within the context of a four-phased approach to nuclear innovation. Open conversation about key challenges and considerations for innovation in the nuclear industry was collected at each of facilitated discussions, which were focused on one of the four phases (see Section 3). Further, a survey was administered to attendees at the close of workshop to collect feedback on the quality of the workshop and their impressions of future initiatives for promoting an innovation ecosystem such as with developing an Innovation Portal or establishing an Innovation Working Group (see Section 4). Key recommendations that came from the workshop broadly included the development of an Innovation Portal, establishment of an Innovation Working Group, and subsequent meetings with industry partners including utilities, vendors, and research organizations to exchange lessons learned in innovation, progress of the Innovation Portal, and other related matters specific to nuclear innovation.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Radiofrequency Accelerator R&D Strategy Report: DOE HEP General Accelerator R&D RF Research Roadmap Workshop, March 8-9, 2017

Over a two-day period, March 8-9, 2017 the Office of High Energy Physics convened a workshop in Gaithersburg, MD to seek community input on development of a radiofrequency (RF) research ten-year roadmap to guide the General Accelerator Research and Development Program (GARD). As described in the charge, the roadmap should reflect the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel strategy and the subsequent HEPAP Accelerator Subpanel recommendations. The charge for the workshop can be found in Appendix A. At the workshop, proponents of superconducting radiofrequency technology (SRF) and normal conducting radiofrequency technology (NCRF), along with invited university and laboratory experts, critically discussed opportunities, gaps, and requirements relevant to the development of a roadmap. The roadmap workshop was preceded by preparatory workshops at SLAC on NCRF and Fermilab on SRF.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Cyberspace, Information Strategy and International Security (Workshop Summary)

In recent years, the Center for Global Security Research has hosted a number of events to inform strategic thought on key areas of concern to national security and laboratory planning. This was the first dedicated workshop that CGSR has hosted seeking to convene a community of experts around issues of cybersecurity and Internet governance as they pertain to national security. The goal of this work was to bridge policy, academic, military, technical and other expert communities that often have limited contact with each other’s concerns and specialized knowledge. This workshop brought together over 80 experts from government, military, national labs, academic institutions, think tanks, the private sector, and civil society and hailing from 10 countries. While focusing on the national security challenges and military strategy emerging in and through cyberspace, the workshop aimed to address the cross-cutting interests and concerns of different stakeholders in the development and future governance of cyberspace, including those of the private sector, and civilian publics. To this end, the first day of the workshop focused particularly on issues directly relevant to military strategy in the cyber domain, while the second day addressed questions bridging national security and military concerns and their connections to the domestic and international politics of Internet governance. Topics discussed included the evolving cyber strategies of the U.S., U.S. allies and potential adversaries, as well as the complex characteristics of the cyber domain, the potential for deterrence in or through cyberspace, the domain’s escalation risks, and the ways in which the “dual use” nature of much of the underlying technology of cyberspace connects actions in the domain with broader questions of global Internet governance. Issues of online disinformation and information warfare and the unique conceptual tensions and governance challenges posed by these forms of conflict were addressed. The workshop also examined the roles and interests of different stakeholders in addressing cybersecurity challenges, as well as the possibility of norms, international law, and other potential mechanisms of constraint.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

2019 Quantum Materials Young Investigators Workshop Report

The fourth edition of the workshop “Quantum Materials Young Investigators” was held June 6-7, 2019 at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). This workshop followed up on previous meetings that took place at ORNL starting in 2016. This important series of annual workshops, organized by Adam Aczel and Stuart Calder, ensures continuous engagement with the early career principal investigators (PIs) of the quantum materials neutron scattering community. Through a series of short scientific talks presented by the external PIs, members of the Neutron Scattering Division (NSD) learn about their scientific interests and needs. Presentations from ORNL staff members also help to inform the external PIs about the current state of ORNL’s quantum materials neutron scattering program. Topics covered include the current instrument suites, sample environment, data reduction, visualization, and analysis, and future neutron scattering and complementary capabilities. Feedback is solicited from the external PIs in all these key areas and communicated to NSD management in the form of a workshop report. This workshop series also helps to foster collaborations between NSD scientists and the research groups of the external PIs and plays an important role in attracting new neutron scattering users.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗