SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “station”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS1987

Orbital Spacecraft Consumables Resupply System (OSCRS): Monopropellant application to space station and OMV automatic refueling impacts of an ELV launch, volume 4

The use of orbital spacecraft consumables resupply system (OSCRS) at the Space Station is investigated, its use with the orbital maneuvering vehicle, and launch of the OSCRS on an expendable launch vehicles. A system requirements evaluation was performed initially to identify any unique requirements that would impact the design of OSCRS when used at the Space Station. Space Station documents were reviewed to establish requirements and to identify interfaces between the OSCRS, Shuttle, and Space Station, especially the Servicing Facility. The interfaces between OSCRS and the Shuttle consists of an avionics interface for command and control and a structural interface for launch support and for grappling with the Shuttle Remote Manipulator System. For use of the OSCRS at the Space Station, three configurations were evaluated using the results of the interface definition to increase the efficiency of OSCRS and to decrease the launch weight by Station-basing specific OSCRS subsystems. A modular OSCRS was developed in which the major subsystems were Station-based where possible. The configuration of an OSCRS was defined for transport of water to the Space Station.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1988

The US space station and its electric power system

The United States has embarked on a major development program to have a space station operating in low earth orbit by the mid-1990s. This endeavor draws on the talents of NASA and most of the aerospace firms in the U.S. Plans are being pursued to include the participation of Canada, Japan, and the European Space Agency in the space station. From the start of the program these was a focus on the utilization of the space station for science, technology, and commercial endeavors. These requirements were utilized in the design of the station and manifest themselves in: pressurized volume; crew time; power availability and level of power; external payload accommodations; microgravity levels; servicing facilities; and the ability to grow and evolve the space station to meet future needs. President Reagan directed NASA to develop a permanently manned space station in his 1984 State of the Union message. Since then the definition phase was completed and the development phase initiated. A major subsystem of the space station is its 75 kW electric power system. The electric power system has characteristics similar to those of terrestrial power systems. Routine maintenance and replacement of failed equipment must be accomplished safely and easily and in a minimum time while providing reliable power to users. Because of the very high value placed on crew time it is essential that the power system operate in an autonomous mode to minimize crew time required. The power system design must also easily accommodate growth as the power demands by users are expected to grow. An overview of the U.S. space station is provided with special emphasis on its electrical power system.

Thomas, Ronald L.↗

NASA NTRS1990

The use of PLAID in the Space Station Freedom viewing analysis

The focus early in the Space Station Freedom Program was on identifying viewing requirements for both direct viewing (windows) and indirect viewing (closed-circuit television). Currently, an analysis is being conducted to address the feasibility of viewing for Space Station Freedom. The goal of this analysis is to determine the optimum location for the windows and closed-circuit television cameras in order to meet the established requirements. Additionally all viewing provisions must adequately support Space Station assembly and on-board operations once the Station is operable. PLAID, a three-dimensional graphics system developed at NASA/Johnson Space Center, was selected for use as the primary tool in this analysis. PLAID provides the capability to simulate the assembly of the Space Station Freedom, as well as to examine operations on the Station as it evolves. In addition, it is used as a tool to analyze general out-the-window viewing conditions for all Space Station components, and provides the ability to integrate an anthropometric scale-modeled person (representing a crewmember) with the Station's interior architecture.

Mount, Frances E.↗

NASA NTRS1987

Space station evolution: Planning for the future

The need for permanently manned presence in space has been recognized by the United States and its international partners for many years. The development of this capability was delayed due to the concurrent recognition that reusable earth-to-orbit transportation was also needed and should be developed first. While the decision to go ahead with a permanently manned Space Station was on hold, requirements for the use of the Station were accumulating as ground-based research and the data from unmanned spacecraft sparked the imagination of both scientists and entrepreneurs. Thus, by the time of the Space Station implementation decision in the early 1980's, a variety of disciplines, with a variety of requirements, needed to be accommodated on one Space Station. Additional future requirements could be forecast for advanced missions that were still in the early planning stages. The logical response was the development of a multi-purpose Space Station with the ability to evolve on-orbit to new capabilities as required by user needs and national or international decisions, i.e., to build an evolutionary Space Station. Planning for evolution is conducted in parallel with the design and development of the baseline Space Station. Evolution planning is a strategic management process to facilitate change and protect future decisions. The objective is not to forecast the future, but to understand the future options and the implications of these on today's decisions. The major actions required now are: (1) the incorporation of evolution provisions (hooks and scars) in the baseline Space Station; and (2) the initiation of an evolution advanced development program.

Diaz, Alphonso V.↗

NASA NTRS1992

OSSA Space Station Freedom science utilization plans

Long duration exposure to an essentially zero-gravity environment is a phenomenon exclusive to the Space Station Freedom that cannot be duplicated on Earth. The Freedom Station will offer periods of time on orbit extending to weeks and months rather than hours or days, allowing for in-depth space based research and analysis to a degree never before achieved. OSSA remains committed to exploiting the unique capabilities provided by the Space Station as well as other space-based facilities to study the nature of physical, chemical, and biological processes in a low-gravity environment and to apply these studies to advance science and applications in such fields as biomedical research, plant and animal physiology, exobiology, biotechnology, materials science, fluid physics, and combustion science. The OSSA focus is on progressive science investigations, many requiring hands-on scientist involvement using sophisticated experiment hardware. OSSA science utilization planning for the Freedom Station is firmly established. For this presentation, this planning is discussed in three general areas: OSSA goals and overall approach, the current and on-going program, and plans for space station utilization. In the first area, OSSA addresses its overall approach to space science research, its commitment to transition to Space Station Freedom, and its top-level strategy for the utilization of Freedom. The current and on-going program is next discussed, focusing on the various Spacelab series of missions which are providing the stepping-stones to Space Station Freedom. Selected science results from SLS-1 and USML-1 are cited which underline the value of properly outfitted laboratories in space in which crew-intensive experiment interactions are possible. The presentation is concluded with a discussion of top-level goals and strategies for utilizing the Freedom Station by OSSA's Life Sciences Division and its Microgravity Science and Applications Division.

Cressy, Philip J.↗

NASA NTRS1999

Unpressurized Logistics Carriers for the International Space Station: Lessons Learned

The International Space Station has been in development since 1984, and has recently begun on orbit assembly. Most of the hardware for the Space Station has been manufactured and the rest is well along in design. The major sets of hardware that are still to be developed for Space Station are the pallets and interfacing hardware for resupply of unpressurized spares and scientific payloads. Over the last ten years, there have been numerous starts, stops, difficulties and challenges encountered in this effort. The Space Station program is now entering the beginning of orbital operations. The Program is only now addressing plans to design and build the carriers that will be needed to carry the unpressurized cargo for the Space Station lifetime. Unpressurized carrier development has been stalled due to a broad range of problems that occurred over the years. These problems were not in any single area, but encompassed budgetary, programmatic, and technical difficulties. Some lessons of hindsight can be applied to developing carriers for the Space Station. Space Station teams are now attempting to incorporate the knowledge gained into the current development efforts for external carriers. In some cases, the impacts of these lessons are unrecoverable for Space Station, but can and should be applied to future programs. This paper examines the progress and problems to date with unpressurized carrier development identifies the lessons to be learned, and charts the course for finally accomplishing the delivery of these critical hardware sets.

Robbins, William W., Jr.↗

NASA NTRS2001

Baseline Testing of the Ultracapacitor Enhanced Photovoltaic Power Station

The NASA John H. Glenn Research Center is developing an advanced ultracapacitor enhanced photovoltaic power station. Goals of this effort include maximizing photovoltaic power generation efficiency and extending the life of photovoltaic energy storage systems. Unique aspects of the power station include the use of a solar tracker, and ultracapacitors for energy storage. The photovoltaic power station is seen as a way to provide electric power in remote locations that would otherwise not have electric power, provide independence form utility systems, reduce pollution, reduce fossil fuel consumption, and reduce operating costs. The work was done under the Hybrid Power Management (HPM) Program, which includes the Hybrid Electric Transit Bus (HETB), and the E-Bike. The power station complements the E-Bike extremely well in that it permits the charging of the vehicle batteries in remote locations. Other applications include scientific research and medical power sources in isolated regions. The power station is an inexpensive approach to advance the state of the art in power technology in a practical application. The project transfers space technology to terrestrial use via nontraditional partners, and provides power system data valuable for future space applications. A description of the ultracapacitor enhanced power station, the results of performance testing and future power station development plans is the subject of this report. The report concludes that the ultracapacitor enhanced power station provides excellent performance, and that the implementation of ultracapacitors in the power system can provide significant performance improvements.

Eichenberg, Dennis J.↗

NASA NTRS1990

Dynamic Characteristics of Space Station Freedom Mars and Lunar Evolution Reference Configurations

One concept for a manned mission to Mars uses an evolutionary version of Space Station Freedom (SSF) as a transportation node. The station is modified by the addition of dual keels, an upper and lower boom, additional laboratory and habitation modules, increased power and an assembly platform. With these modifications the station is called the Mars Evolution Reference Configuration (MERC). The mass of the station is 65 percent greater than the mass of SSF and its moments of inertia through the mass center are greater by approximately a factor of four. Over a period of months, several flights from Earth to low-Earth-orbit carry the components of a manned Mars piloted vehicle (MPV) to the MERC where the vehicle is constructed on the assembly platform. After each flight the station is reboosted to an appropriate altitude, such that the orbit decay due to atmospheric drag forces lowers the spacecraft to the proper altitude at the appropriate time for rendezvous with the next assembly flight. When the assembly process is completed, the MPV, which has a mass of approximately 200,000 lbm, is situated on the evolutionary station. The mass increase of the MERC with MPV system over SSF is 112 percent and the moments of inertia about axes through the mass center increase by up to a factor of 12. When the MPV is assembled, inspected and verified, the mission is ready to proceed and the MPV is moved from the station to a staging area and mated with fueled trans-Mars injection stages for the flight to Mars. This presentation describes a finite element model of the MERC formulated to investigate the expected low frequency modes and its variation with the addition of a large payload. A basic reboost procedure using near-continuous firing of reaction control system jets is proposed with off-modulation of the jets used to control flight attitude. The reboost procedure is described with the closed-loop attitude control dictating jet on/off cycling based on feedback signals which contain both the rigid body rotation information and the elastic rotations local to the attitude sensor. The presentation contains a description of the dynamic response at critical points of the station during the reboost and concludes with results of a brief study of the dynamic characteristics of a Lunar transportation node configuration.

Ayers, J. Kirk↗

NASA NTRS2000

Mechanically Induced g-Jitter from Space Station Rotary Joints

The mission of the International Space Station is to provide a working laboratory in orbit for research in engineering, life sciences, and microgravity. Among the microgravity disciplines that are preparing to utilize this international resource are materials processing, combustion, fluid dynamics, biotechnology, and fundamental physics. The Station promises to enable significant advances in each of these areas by making available a research facility in which gravitational and other accelerations, and their corresponding buoyancy and diffusion effects on various physical processes, are orders of magnitude lower than they are on Earth. In order to fulfill this promise, it is not enough for the Space Station to simply replicate a typical terrestrial scientific laboratory in orbit. Although an orbiting laboratory is free of most of the effects of gravitational acceleration by virtue of its free fall condition, it also produces structural vibration or jitter that can interfere with the processes under study. To ensure the quality of the acceleration environment and enable a successful mission, the Space Station Program has limited potential disturbances in two ways: first, by isolating the most sensitive payloads from the vehicle structure, and second, by quieting major disturbances at their sources. The first area, payload isolation, is implemented inside the pressurized modules at the rack level. Sub-rack level isolators have also been developed. This paper addresses the second area, disturbance source limits, for one of the major sources of mechanical noise on the Space Station: the Solar Alpha Rotary Joints. Due to the potential for large disturbances to the microgravity environment, an initial analytical prediction of rotary joint vibration output was made. Key components were identified and tested to validate the analytical predictions. Based on the component test results, the final vibration output of the joints was verified by a test on each fully assembled flight unit. This paper describes the Space Station microgravity requirements, the rotary joint hardware, and the disturbance producing aspects of joint operation. The test setup, instrumentation, test conditions, and results for the component level and system level measurements are described. An overall forcing function that describes the maximum torque imparted to the Station is created based on the test results, and these disturbances are shown to meet the applicable Space Station microgravity requirements.

Boucher, Robert L.↗

NASA NTRS2020

A Robotically Assembled and Serviced Science Station for Earth Observations

In this paper we present the overall architecture of a ”Science Station”, a robotically assembled and serviced persistent platform that can host multiple payloads for Earth observations. Recent decadal survey findings motivate the need to have spatial and temporal concurrency in measurements from multiple instruments. We have architected the science station to simultaneously host up to twelve Earth Venture class instruments at a time. These instruments can be replaced by newer instruments periodically to take advantage of evolving science needs and technology capabilities. The Science Station can also concurrently host science, commercial, defense and other national interest payloads. The Science Station may provide a cost-effective paradigm by mitigating some of the risks and costs associated with multiple free-flyers that may otherwise be needed for the various instruments. It leverages emergent and existent technologies in robotic assembly and servicing, lower cost commercial launch vehicles, secondary launch vehicles, and rendezvous and proximity operations. In this paper, we report the findings of a survey we conducted on the desired performance of the Science Station from various instrument hosting perspectives. We report the various trade studies that we conducted to developed a feasible architecture that meets the goals of the Science Station while also meeting the constraints of a space system. We also report the various considerations in the configuration, thermal system, pointing system, overall concept of operations, and the robotic system of the Science Station architecture. The paper then describes a testbed activity we are undertaking to evaluate the supervised autonomy robotics needed for the Science Station as well as to conduct a riskreduction demonstration of the end-to-end robotics behaviors.

Mukherjee, Rudranarayan↗

DOE OSTI2022

Providing Levelized Cost and Waiting Time Inputs for HDV Hydrogen Refueling Station Planning: A Case Study of U.S. I-75 Corridor

Widespread use of diesel fuels in freight transportation leads to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that play an important role in air pollution. The air pollution, as well as the energy crisis, drives the transition from diesel fuel to cleaner and more energy-efficient fuels such as hydrogen fuels. With such a transition, the strategic planning and optimization of supporting refueling infrastructure along the national highway for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) become a necessity. Cost and service level are two essential factors to be considered in hydrogen refueling station location and capacity optimization. The service level in this study is assessed by the delay (waiting time) at fueling stations as well as the fueling demand fulfilled. To this end, this study presents a methodology to provide waiting time (delay) and levelized hydrogen fuel cost inputs under different station configurations (number of dispensers and fill rates) for hydrogen refueling station planning. Determining the station configurations based on the trade-off between the two inputs is further discussed. Particularly, this study points out that the levelized cost and waiting time are affected by hourly demand patterns and estimates the two inputs under different peak hour fueling demand scenarios. The results suggest that, with the same daily demand, the cost, as well as the waiting time, increases obviously with the peak hour demand. In the case study, the cost grows at least 30% when the peak hour visit frequency of the daily total visits increases from 5% (evenly distributed pattern) to 10% (the most common pattern for existing diesel fueling stations along I-75). Accounting for this peak hour effect in hydrogen refueling station planning is recommended. Overall, the waiting time model and cost analysis provide key inputs for optimizing hydrogen refueling station location and configurations based on anticipated refueling demand patterns. The paper is the second in a series that aims to build a comprehensive modeling plan and optimize hydrogen refueling infrastructure along the Interstate 75 (I-75) corridor for HDVs.

Liu, Yuandong↗

DOE OSTI2021

Powering the Blue Economy: A Survey of Station-Keeping Methods for Mooringless Platforms

The term “ocean platform” is used to reference everything from stationary, typically moored, buoys to mobile water vehicles, whether they operate on the ocean’s surface or underwater. For certain applications for which relatively stationary station-keeping conditions are desired, the use of mooring systems is not always a viable alternative either for economic, environmental, regulatory, or otherwise practical reasons, or a combination thereof, (e.g., short deployments, sensitive ecosystems, very deep project sites). Maintaining a platform at a single waypoint or reference location without being moored would require additional control systems and a power source to counteract the drift forces that would naturally displace it. Mobile platforms, which are usually untethered except for remotely operated vehicles, typically require energy input to power their station-keeping capabilities so that they hold or control their location in the ocean. Currently, most of these platforms use combustion engines or batteries for this purpose, which, depending on the specific systems, may be costly, pollute the environment, or create limitations on the length of the deployment. However, powering this kind of platforms with surrounding renewable resources (waves, currents, winds, or sun) has been identified as a promising solution to expand their application. The intent of this report is to investigate station-keeping methods for various ocean platforms that are not moored or otherwise anchored to the ocean floor, or another platform or vessel, paying particular interest to technologies that use marine renewable resources to power their operation, because that is of particular interest to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Powering the Blue Economy (PBE) initiative. As a first step, 72 articles and technical reports related to mooringless station-keeping methods were collected for review. The preliminary literature review provided a broad overview of common themes across the literature from which a descriptive methodology for analyzing various platforms was developed. That is, station-keeping methods were categorized based on their predominant energy source and consumption (renewable, nonrenewable, or hybrid if the platform uses renewable and nonrenewable resources equally), and their localization strategy (drift reduction, “path-planning or “waypoint-holding”). In addition, platform types were segregated into the following groups: buoys, surface drifters, and unoccupied surface vehicles (USVs); offshore renewable energy systems; and unoccupied underwater vehicles (UUVs). The main types of station-keeping methods encountered in this report achieve their intended localization strategy by means of drift mitigation, steering, and/or propulsion. Drift mitigation is commonly accomplished via drogues and sea anchors. Stand-along steering subsystems use control surfaces (e.g., ship rudder, wing sail, etc.) that react to ocean currents, waves, or winds to provide varying-degrees of course adjustments. Combined steering and propulsion subsystems include differential thrusters, directional thrusters separate from a primary thruster that cause the platform to pitch up/down or yaw clockwise/counterclockwise, or vectored thrusters that direct the propulsion in a range of directions relative to the platform’s local coordinate system. Propulsion is often achieved by running a motor and applying active control strategies but can also involve buoyancy shifts and using sails to generate lifting forces that propel a platform in a desired direction. Future research is primarily expected to take place in the form of a technoeconomic analysis that would aim to determine the technological viability, cost, and added value of mooringless station-keeping use cases identified through this research, including docking for UUV recharging or for georeferencing drifter buoys, deep-sea floating wind farms, U.S. Navy sonar arrays, and a Pacific Ocean wave buoy network.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

DOE OSTI2022

Public electric vehicle charging station utilization in the United States

The utilization of electric vehicle (EV) charging equipment is a key driver of charging station economics, but current trends and factors related to the utilization of public charging infrastructure in the United States are not well understood. This study analyzes EV charging data from 3,705 nationwide public Level 2 (L2) and direct current fast charging (DCFC) stations over 2.5 years (2019-2022), observing utilization patterns over time. Regression analysis is used to assess the relationships between station utilization and several contextual and environmental factors. We conclude that local EV adoption is a strong indicator of utilization; L2 station utilization decreases with the size of the local charging network, while DCFC stations are less affected; and increased charging power has a greater effect on utilization for DCFC stations than L2. This study fills a critical research gap by reporting updated public charging station utilization statistics and analysis for the U.S. market.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Analytic Framework for Optimal Sizing of Hydrogen Fueling Stations for Heavy Duty Vehicles at Ports (CRADA 512)

This CRADA presents the strategy that PNNL and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) will take to support Seattle City Light (SCL) in properly sizing a hydrogen station for class 8 drayage trucks at the Port of Seattle (Port), as part of a coordinated plan of mixed uses for hydrogen. The proper sizing for the fueling station is unique from past experiences because it will be part of a coordinated plan for a multi-use scheme for the hydrogen, and not a stand-alone fueling station. The multiple use-streams, and their relative values, will impact all facets of station sizing and design, including fueling rates, storage technology and size, equipment selection, and safety considerations. The future deployment of this fueling station, and its proper sizing, is seen as a critical first step in the larger vision of utilizing hydrogen to address a range of issues for SCL and the Port. These include, but are not limited to, large scale fueling of medium duty (MD) and heavy duty (HD) vehicles to reduce emissions, support of adjacent light duty (LD) vehicles, support of critical port operation during extreme events (e.g. resiliency), mitigation of capital intensive electrical distribution system upgrades to support evolving port operations, a market resource that can be used by SCL to generate revenue, and support of planned future maritime operations that currently require heavy use of shipboard hydrogen. While the broader use of hydrogen by SCL and the Port is not the focus of this CRADA, how its use impacts the design of the initial vehicle fueling station, and the modular approach, are the central work. As such, this project will develop the framework and process for developing a modular station design that considers the broader range of coordinate uses of hydrogen as an energy resource.

08 HYDROGEN↗

NASA NTRS1971

NASA directory of observation station locations, volume 2

The directory documents geodetic information for NASA tracking stations and observation stations in the NASA Geodetic Satellites Program, including stations participating in the National Geodetic Satellite Program. Station positions of these facilities are given on local or preferred major datums, and on the Modified Mercury Datum 1968. A geodetic data sheet is provided for each station, giving the position of the station and describing briefly how it was established. Geodetic positions and geocentric coordinates of these stations are tabulated on local or major geodetic datums, and on selected world geodetic systems when available information permits.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1972

The effects of tracking station coordinate uncertainties on GEOS-2 orbital accuracy

Laser and minitrack observational data from GEOS-2 collected during the period April 23, 1971 to May 1971, have been used for the purpose of assessing the influence of tracking station location on the accuracy of orbit determination. These data were processed using a unified set of coordinates for the tracking station locations. Concurrently, these data were processed using nonunified station locations referred to a variety of geodetic datums. The resultant orbits based on the two different sets of station locations were compared and relative differences in the position of the satellite were determined. Differences between the two groups of orbits fitted over four-day data spans ranged from 250 meters to 500 meters for orbits derived from laser data only. For orbits observed from Minitrack data alone the relative differences in GEOS-2 spacecraft position ranged from 50 meters to 190 meters. Utilizing the laser data alone in each arc, definitive orbits were computed using the unified and nonunified station location coordinates. The differences in the satellite position in the overlap region when using the unified laser station coordinates ranged from 25 meters to 150 meters, whereas when using the nonunified laser station coordinates the differences in position ranges from 180 to 650 meters.

Glazer, J.↗

NASA NTRS1973

Station Data Acquisition and Control System.

The Station Data Acquisition and Control System (STADAC), a multicomputer data handling and control system, is expected to be installed in six network stations, the first station to be established at Goddard Space Flight Center. Network control data, in the form of schedules and acquisition pointing data, flow from the Network Control Center to the stations, while station status data flow in the other direction. The system will format spacecraft telemetry data for real-time transmission of control and status data to the project operations control centers and for transmission of experiment data to the data processing facilities. The system will also schedule station equipment resources, perform prepass tests to assure data quality, and automatically set up selected station equipment.

Kiebler, J. W.↗

NASA NTRS1973

NASA directory of observation station locations, volume 1

Geodetic information for NASA tracking stations and for observation stations cooperating in NASA geodetic satellite programs is presented. A Geodetic Data Sheet is provided for each station, giving the position of the station and describing briefly how it was established. Geodetic positions and geocentric coordinates of these stations are tabulated on local or major geodetic datums and on selected world geodetic systems. The principal tracking facilities used by NASA, including the Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network, the Deep Space Network, and several large radio telescopes are discussed. Positions of these facilities are tabulated on their local or national datums, the Mercury Spheroid 1960, the Modified Mercury Datum 1968, and the Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network System. Observation stations in the NASA Geodetic Satellites Program are included along with stations participating in the National Geodetic Satellite Program. Positions of these facilities are given on local or preferred major datums, and on the Modified Mercury Datum 1968.

Source record↗