Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “oxide solid electrolyte”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Water Electrolyzers and Fuel Cells Supply Chain: Supply Chain Deep Dive Assessment

The report “America’s Strategy to Secure the Supply Chain for a Robust Clean Energy Transition” lays out the challenges and opportunities faced by the United States in the energy supply chain as well as the federal government plans to address these challenges and opportunities. It is accompanied by several issue-specific deep dive assessments, including this one, in response to Executive Order 14017 “America’s Supply Chains,” which directs the Secretary of Energy to submit a report on supply chains for the energy sector industrial base. The Executive Order is helping the federal government to build more secure and diverse U.S. supply chains, including energy supply chains. This report is one of a series that supports the analysis of the energy industrial base called for in Executive Order 14017 on America’s supply chains (Exec. Order No. 14017, 2021). Specifically, it provides a review of the supply chain for water electrolyzers and fuel cells with a focus on polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer cells (PEMEC), polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), solid oxide electrolyzer cells (SOEC), and solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC). Water electrolysis and fuel cells are a nascent industry with little prior information related to supply chain needs and constraints. This report provides a preliminary assessment; further industry peer review and revisions are expected.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2024

Life-Cycle Assessment Integration into Scalable Open-Source Numerical Models (LiAISON) for Prospective Impact Analysis of Novel Technologies

Decarbonizing the industrial sector is a significant challenge in achieving a net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions economy by 2050 and the Paris Agreement, i.e., a global climate change mitigation target of achieving a maximum average temperature change potential of 1.5 Degrees Celsius or less by 2100 with respect to pre-industrial levels. In the United States (US), the industrial sector accounts for 23% of total GHG emissions and is home to a number of hard-to-electrify activities. The chemicals subsector has the single largest subsector emissions profile after direct emissions from fossil fuel combustion and leakage from fossil fuel distribution systems. Within the chemicals subsector, many processes depend on hydrogen or ammonia precursors. Decarbonizing these two commodities would contribute significantly to decarbonizing the industrial sector as hydrogen could also be used for low carbon steel production (e.g., hydrogen-based direct reduction of iron) and other industrial applications. Emerging technologies require the application of prospective life cycle assessment (LCA), which can account for technology (foreground) scaling and process improvements via learning-by-doing, among others. In many cases, the future system context (background) in which the technologies are assumed to operate in is equally relevant. Background scenarios generated by integrated assessment models (IAM) can coherently incorporate potential future dynamics of the energy-climate-human-land system. Further, IAM scenarios are harmonized across socioeconomic and climate change mitigation pathways, which facilitates the comparability of prospective LCAs using different IAMs. We introduce an open source prospective LCA framework, the Life-cycle Assessment Integration into Scalable Open-source Numerical models (LiAISON), to analyze the non-linear relationships between technology foreground and the future energy system background across a series of midpoint and resource use metrics. The integration of LCA and IAM data is achieved using prospective environmental Impact assessment (PREMISE). We showcase it by assessing two Power-to-Hydrogen (PtH2) processes, namely Solid Oxide Electrolysis (SOE) and Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Electrolysis (PEME). We compare the technologies to a baseline of hydrogen production via natural gas-based Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) in a US context of multiple energy system and climate change mitigation futures. Besides providing an analysis that specifies the LCA results ranges with temporal and geospatial explicitness across the two technologies, metrics, and impact assessment methods, this research also aims to establish a base framework that can be expanded to use other IAM generated scenarios and US open-source life cycle inventory (LCI) databases. We find that the temporal environmental performance of either technology or their difference to SMR is directly influenced by the underlying background dynamics. Additionally we compare our results by linking two other prospective models with LiAISON - GCAM (Global Change Assessment Model) and ReEDS (Regional Energy Deployment System) to analyze the effect of changing background scenarios using varying predictions in life cycle analysis.

decarbonizing↗
DOE OSTI2024

Life-Cycle Assessment Integration into Scalable Open-Source Numerical Models (LiAISON) for Analyzing Emerging Low-Carbon Technologies

Decarbonizing the industrial sector is a significant challenge in achieving a net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions economy by 2050 and the Paris Agreement, i.e., a global climate change mitigation target of achieving a maximum average temperature change potential of 1.5 degrees Celsius or less by 2100 with respect to pre-industrial levels. In the United States (US), the industrial sector accounts for 23% of total GHG emissions and is home to a number of hard-to-electrify activities. The chemicals subsector has the single largest subsector emissions profile after direct emissions from fossil fuel combustion and leakage from fossil fuel distribution systems. Within the chemicals subsector, many processes depend on hydrogen or ammonia precursors. Decarbonizing these two commodities would contribute significantly to decarbonizing the industrial sector as hydrogen could also be used for low carbon steel production (e.g., hydrogen-based direct reduction of iron) and other industrial applications. Emerging technologies require the application of prospective life cycle assessment (LCA), which can account for technology (foreground) scaling and process improvements via learning-by-doing, among others. In many cases, the future system context (background) in which the technologies are assumed to operate in is equally relevant. Background scenarios generated by integrated assessment models (IAM) can coherently incorporate potential future dynamics of the energy-climate-human-land system. Further, IAM scenarios are harmonized across socioeconomic and climate change mitigation pathways, which facilitates the comparability of prospective LCAs using different IAMs. We introduce an open source prospective LCA framework, the Life-cycle Assessment Integration into Scalable Open-source Numerical models (LiAISON), to analyze the non-linear relationships between technology foreground and the future energy system background across a series of midpoint and resource use metrics. The integration of LCA and IAM data is achieved using prospective environmental Impact assessment (PREMISE). We showcase it by assessing two Power-to-Hydrogen (PtH2) processes, namely Solid Oxide Electrolysis (SOE) and Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Electrolysis (PEME). We compare the technologies to a baseline of hydrogen production via natural gas-based Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) in a US context of multiple energy system and climate change mitigation futures. Besides providing an analysis that specifies the LCA results ranges with temporal and geospatial explicitness across the two technologies, metrics, and impact assessment methods, this research also aims to establish a base framework that can be expanded to use other IAM generated scenarios and US open-source life cycle inventory (LCI) databases. We find that the temporal environmental performance of either technology or their difference to SMR is directly influenced by the underlying background dynamics. Under baseline projections (i.e., no decarbonization goals), neither process reaches parity with the incumbent technology across several environmental metrics. Under the decarbonization scenarios, the underlying sectoral shifts result in declining impacts over time, compared to 2020 levels, except for metal depletion levels, which increase. The background shifts postulate a heavily decarbonized economy and energy system, which help technologies reach parity with SMR between 2040-2050 (RCP2.6) and 2030-2040 (RCP1.9) for global warming. Despite declines across several other metrics over time, neither PtH2 technology break even with SMR by 2100 besides for global warming.

decarbonizing↗
DOE OSTI2024

Life-Cycle Assessment Integration into Scalable Open-Source Numerical Models (LiAISON) for Analyzing Emerging Low-Carbon Technologies

Decarbonizing the industrial sector is a significant challenge in achieving a net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions economy by 2050 and the Paris Agreement, i.e., a global climate change mitigation target of achieving a maximum average temperature change potential of 1.5 degrees C or less by 2100 with respect to pre-industrial levels. In the United States (US), the industrial sector accounts for 23% of total GHG emissions and is home to a number of hard-to-electrify activities. The chemicals subsector has the single largest subsector emissions profile after direct emissions from fossil fuel combustion and leakage from fossil fuel distribution systems. Within the chemicals subsector, many processes depend on hydrogen or ammonia precursors. Decarbonizing these two commodities would contribute significantly to decarbonizing the industrial sector as hydrogen could also be used for low carbon steel production (e.g., hydrogen-based direct reduction of iron) and other industrial applications. Emerging technologies require the application of prospective life cycle assessment (LCA), which can account for technology (foreground) scaling and process improvements via learning-by-doing, among others. In many cases, the future system context (background) in which the technologies are assumed to operate in is equally relevant. Background scenarios generated by integrated assessment models (IAM) can coherently incorporate potential future dynamics of the energy-climate-human-land system. Further, IAM scenarios are harmonized across socioeconomic and climate change mitigation pathways, which facilitates the comparability of prospective LCAs using different IAMs. We introduce an open source prospective LCA framework, the Life-cycle Assessment Integration into Scalable Open-source Numerical models (LiAISON), to analyze the non-linear relationships between technology foreground and the future energy system background across a series of midpoint and resource use metrics The integration of LCA and IAM data is achieved using prospective environmental Impact assessment (PREMISE). We showcase it by assessing two Power-to-Hydrogen (PtH2) processes, namely Solid Oxide Electrolysis (SOE) and Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Electrolysis (PEME). We compare the technologies to a baseline of hydrogen production via natural gas-based Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) in a US context of multiple energy system and climate change mitigation futures. Besides providing an analysis that specifies the LCA results ranges with temporal and geospatial explicitness across the two technologies, metrics, and impact assessment methods, this research also aims to establish a base framework that can be expanded to use other IAM generated scenarios and US open-source life cycle inventory (LCI) databases. We find that the temporal environmental performance of either technology or their difference to SMR is directly influenced by the underlying background dynamics. Under baseline projections (i.e., no decarbonization goals), neither process reaches parity with the incumbent technology across several environmental metrics. Under the decarbonization scenarios, the underlying sectoral shifts result in declining impacts over time, compared to 2020 levels, except for metal depletion levels, which increase. The background shifts postulate a heavily decarbonized economy and energy system, which help technologies reach parity with SMR between 2040-2050 (RCP2.6) and 2030-2040 (RCP1.9) for global warming. Despite declines across several other metrics over time, neither PtH2 technology break even with SMR by 2100 besides for global warming.

decarbonizing↗
DOE OSTI2024

Towards Prospective LCA Using Life-Cycle Assessment Integration into Scalable Open-Source Numerical Models (LiAISON) Framework for Analyzing Emerging Low-Carbon Technologies

Decarbonizing the industrial sector is a significant challenge in achieving a net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions economy by 2050 and the Paris Agreement, i.e., a global climate change mitigation target of achieving a maximum average temperature change potential of 1.5 Degrees Celsius or less by 2100 with respect to pre-industrial levels. In the United States (US), the industrial sector accounts for 23% of total GHG emissions and is home to a number of hard-to-electrify activities. The chemicals subsector has the single largest subsector emissions profile after direct emissions from fossil fuel combustion and leakage from fossil fuel distribution systems. Within the chemicals subsector, many processes depend on hydrogen or ammonia precursors. Decarbonizing these two commodities would contribute significantly to decarbonizing the industrial sector as hydrogen could also be used for low carbon steel production (e.g., hydrogen-based direct reduction of iron) and other industrial applications. Emerging technologies require the application of prospective life cycle assessment (LCA), which can account for technology (foreground) scaling and process improvements via learning-by-doing, among others. In many cases, the future system context (background) in which the technologies are assumed to operate in is equally relevant. Background scenarios generated by integrated assessment models (IAM) can coherently incorporate potential future dynamics of the energy-climate-human-land system. Further, IAM scenarios are harmonized across socioeconomic and climate change mitigation pathways, which facilitates the comparability of prospective LCAs using different IAMs. We introduce an open source prospective LCA framework, the Life-cycle Assessment Integration into Scalable Open-source Numerical models (LiAISON), to analyze the non-linear relationships between technology foreground and the future energy system background across a series of midpoint and resource use metrics The integration of LCA and IAM data is achieved using prospective environmental Impact assessment (PREMISE). We showcase it by assessing two Power-to-Hydrogen (PtH2) processes, namely Solid Oxide Electrolysis (SOE) and Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Electrolysis (PEME). We compare the technologies to a baseline of hydrogen production via natural gas-based Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) in a US context of multiple energy system and climate change mitigation futures. Besides providing an analysis that specifies the LCA results ranges with temporal and geospatial explicitness across the two technologies, metrics, and impact assessment methods, this research also aims to establish a base framework that can be expanded to use other IAM generated scenarios and US open-source life cycle inventory (LCI) databases. We find that the temporal environmental performance of either technology or their difference to SMR is directly influenced by the underlying background dynamics. Additionally we compare our results by linking two other prospective models with LiAISON - GCAM(Global Change Assessment Model) and ReEDS (Regional Energy Deployment System) to analyze the effect of changing background scenarios using varying predictions in life cycle analysis.

emissions↗
DOE OSTI2022

Identification of efficient and stable solid-solid electrochemical interfaces for Li-S batteries. Final Report

The objective of this work is to develop a better understanding of the interactions between battery components that drive the observed battery performance. Using computational tools at the atomistic level, we elucidate molecular, crystal, and amorphous structures, interfacial structures and reactions, and electrochemical behavior. We focus on Li metal anodes, liquid electrolytes, solid electrolytes, S cathodes, and metal-oxide cathodes, and their corresponding interfaces. Within liquid electrolytes, we study their bulk structure and dynamics, as a function of salt concentration. The analysis allows to understand the formation of localized high concentrated regions as the solvent is substituted by a weakly interacting diluent species. Analysis of the electron distribution yields the reactive behavior at interfaces. Moreover, we employ tools that allow the characterization of ion and electron transport at interfaces, during the processes of solvation and desolvation occurring while cycling. For Sulfur cathodes we elucidate synthesis processes and the role of carbon-sulfur and nitrogen-sulfur interactions not only to provide electronic conductivity but also to define alternative reaction pathways during discharge of Li-S batteries. Full-cell simulations offer new insights regarding the integration of all the battery components. Our studies also include solid electrolytes and their interfaces with Li metal, S-C, and metal-oxide electrodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Semiconducting Small Molecules as Active Materials for p-Type Accumulation Mode Organic Electrochemical Transistors

A series of semiconducting small molecules with bithiophene or bis-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene cores are designed and synthesized. The molecules display stable reversible oxidation in solution and can be reversibly oxidized in the solid state with aqueous electrolyte when functionalized with polar triethylene glycol side chains. Evidence of promising ion injection properties observed with cyclic voltammetry is complemented by strong electrochromism probed by spectroelectrochemistry. Blending these molecules with high molecular weight polyethylene oxide (PEO) is found to improve both ion injection and thin film stability. The molecules and their corresponding PEO blends are investigated as active layers in organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs). For the most promising molecule:polymer blend (P4E4:PEO), p-type accumulation mode OECTs with µA drain currents, μS peak transconductances, and a µC* figure-of-merit value of 0.81 F V -1 cm -1 s -1 are obtained.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Chemical Bond Covalency in Superionic Halide Solid‐State Electrolytes

Abstract Halide solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) are promising superionic conductors with high oxidative stability and ionic conductivity, making them attractive for all‐solid‐state lithium‐ion batteries. However, most studies have focused on ion‐stacking structures, overlooking the role of bond characteristics in ionic transport. Here, we investigate bond dynamics and the superionic transition (SIT) in bromide electrolyte, Li 3 InBr 6 , using synchrotron X‐ray techniques and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations. We demonstrate that the SIT in halide SSEs is driven by a thermally induced transition in bonding character (ionic to covalent) rather than a change in crystal phase. AIMD simulations further reveal enhanced Li⁺ diffusion and collective anion motion at elevated temperatures. Expanding our study to Li 3 LnBr 6 (Ln = Gd, Tb, Ho, Tm, and Lu), we confirm the widespread occurrence of SIT in this material class, with Li 3 GdBr 6 exhibiting the highest ionic conductivity (5.2 mS cm −1 at 298 K). More importantly, the ionic‐covalent transition is highly tunable through electrolyte modifications, such as cation/anion substitution and synthesis methods. Our findings provide a new perspective on ionic transport, highlighting the critical role of chemical bond characteristics in halide SSEs.

Chemistry↗
DOE OSTI2023

SPUTTERED THIN FILMS FOR VERY HIGH POWER, EFFICIENT, AND LOW-COST COMMERCIAL SOFCS

The aim of this project was to leverage the low area specific resistance (ASR) of Redox’s GDC electrolyte-based cell architecture and increase solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) efficiency (i.e., open circuit voltage, or OCV) without significantly increasing cell resistance. The key to achieving the increased SOFC efficiency is the introduction of a thin sputtered yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) electron-blocking layer and a thin sputtered gadolinia doped ceria (GDC) barrier layer on top of the half-cell substrate (i.e., anode and GDC electrolyte). A key initial effort of the project was to improve the quality of the half-cell substrate surface so that any remaining defects were significantly smaller than the desired film thickness. During lab-scale trials, we had to overcome challenges with film cracking during post-sputtering treatments (e.g., thermal anneals) as well as damage to the sputtering targets. After the initial lab-scale trials, the focus shifted toward the use of commercial scale sputtering equipment with a sputtering equipment manufacturer in the microelectronics industry. Using the commercial sputtering equipment, we deposited films with different variations of power, PO2, sputtering time, platen speed, etc. We then determined the combinations of sputtering conditions and post-sputtering treatments that yielded high-quality films without cracks or other significant defects. While thin films were deposited on cells as large as 10 cm by 10 cm, the processing was optimized using 4 cm by 4 cm cells. Cell performance was evaluated in stainless-steel test fixtures between 500 °C and 700 °C with hydrogen fuel fed to the anode and air fed to the cathode. Extensive studies allowed us to determine that modified cathode and cathode contact firing processes were required to achieve theoretical OCV. Moreover, use of the new firing processes resulted in the need for a modified cathode contact to achieve a low ASR. In summary, the project demonstrated the performance of high OCV (1.13 V at 650 °C) from sputtered layers and a low ASR (~0.25 Ohms-cm2 at 650 °C) resulting from a modification of cathode/contact processing and the introduction of alternative contact layers that are sufficient to yield a Gen-1 cell with a maximum power density of approximately 1.2 W/cm2. At an operating voltage of 0.74 V, this would yield a cell power density of ~1.1 W/cm2. While not utilized in this project, a Redox Gen-2 cell has a catalyst-infiltrated porous anode that reduces the ASR by more than 50% from that of the Gen-1 cells used in this project. Therefore, if the sputtered YSZ electron-blocking layer and GDC barrier layer are added to a Gen-2 half cell with a similar increase in OCV to the theoretical value of ~1.13 V at 650 °C, and if the same improvement in ASR (from that demonstrated in this project) is achieved when using the Gen-2 half-cell architecture as a sputtered cell substrate, then the power density at 0.74 Vop could be as high as ~2.6 W/cm2. The impact of such power density gains, while still maintaining high cell efficiency, and thus high system efficiency, is a dramatic decrease in system cost because the stack represents ~30-40% of the SOFC system cost.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2021

Lithium Oxide Superionic Conductors Inspired by Garnet and NASICON Structures

Abstract The key component in lithium solid‐state batteries (SSBs) is the solid electrolyte composed of lithium superionic conductors (SICs). Lithium oxide SICs offer improved electrochemical and chemical stability compared with sulfides, and their recent advancements have largely been achieved using materials in the garnet‐ and NASICON (sodium superionic conductor)‐ structured families. In this work, using the ion‐conduction mechanisms in garnet and NASICON as inspiration, a common pattern of an “activated diffusion network” and three structural features that are beneficial for superionic conduction: a 3D percolation Li diffusion network, short distances between occupied Li sites, and the “homogeneity” of the transport path are identified. A high‐throughput computational screening is performed to search for new lithium oxide SICs that share these features. From this search, seven candidates are proposed exhibiting high room‐temperature ionic conductivity evaluated using ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Their structural frameworks including spinel, oxy‐argyrodite, sodalite, and LiM(SeO 3 ) 2 present new opportunities for enriching the structural families of lithium oxide SICs.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Polycarbonate‐Based Solid‐Polymer Electrolytes for Solid‐State Sodium Batteries

Solid-polymer electrolytes comprised of polypropylene carbonate (PPC) and varied sodium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (NaFSI) salt concentrations are investigated for implementation as a conductive solid polymer electrolyte into solid-state cathode composites utilizing a sodium-layered oxide active material. The ionic conductivity generally increases with NaFSI salt content, reaching ≈1 mS cm −1 at 80 °C at the highest salt concentration (PPC:NaFSI = 0.5:1). Through an all-in-one slurry casting method, Na 2/3 Ni 1/3 Mn 2/3 O 2 cathode composites are fabricated in which the dispersed PPC electrolyte acts as the primary binder. Enabled by a bilayer polymer electrolyte system, cycling performance with the PPC cathode electrolyte is optimized with respect to salt concentration and anode material. The best cyclability is achieved with a moderate salt concentration electrolyte (PPC:NaFSI = 5:1), showcasing an initial capacity of 83 mA h g −1 with a remarkable 80% capacity retention after 150 cycles at C/5 rate and 60 °C. The superior performance of the lower salt concentration electrolyte is attributed to better electrochemical stability, as confirmed by linear sweep voltammetry and online electrochemical mass spectrometry measurements. In conclusion, these results underscore the potential of carbonate-based polymer electrolytes and the importance of balancing electrolyte conductivity and stability in cell design.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Rational Design of Weakly‐Solvating Molecules for Salt‐In‐Pre‐Ionic‐Liquid Electrolytes for Li Metal Batteries

Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) promise step‐changes in energy densities but suffer from poor cycle life due to unstable electrolyte‐lithium interfaces. Conventional carbonate electrolytes exhibit excessive lithium‐ion solvation and low oxidative stability, leading to rapid capacity loss. Herein, we report a rationally designed weakly‐solvating cyclic sulfonamide, 1‐trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide pyrrolidine (TFMSPyr), which integrates an electron‐withdrawing trifluoromethanesulfonyl functional group at pyrrolidinic‐N. TFMSPyr acts as a pre‐ionic‐liquid solvent that forms intrinsically localized, anion‐dominated solvation, coupling molecular architecture, solvation topology, and transport dynamics. As a result, LiFSI based salt‐in‐pre‐ionic‐liquid (SIPIL) electrolytes exhibit high lithium‐ion transference number, oxidative stability > 5 V versus Li/Li + and anion‐derived solid electrolyte interphases (SEI). Li||Cu cells with SIPIL deliver a first cycle Coulombic efficiency (CE) of ≈ 99% with average CE of 99.2% for 100 cycles, and lithium half‐cells with lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cathode exhibit 82% capacity retention after 400 cycles with CE of 99.98%. In anode‐free full cells, 95% of initial capacity is retained after 63 cycles with an average CE of 99.5%. These results demonstrate that molecular engineering of solvents offers a powerful pathway to stabilize lithium metal interfaces and enable practical Anodeless LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Incorporating the Nanoscale Encapsulation Concept from Liquid Electrolytes into Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Solid-state Li–S batteries are attractive due to their high energy density and safety. However, it is unclear whether the concepts from liquid electrolytes are applicable in the solid state to improve battery performance. Here, we demonstrate that the nanoscale encapsulation concept based on Li 2 S@TiS 2 core–shell particles, originally developed in liquid electrolytes, is effective in solid polymer electrolytes. Using in situ optical cell and sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption, we find that polysulfides form and are well-trapped inside individual particles by the nanoscale TiS 2 encapsulation. We see that this TiS 2 encapsulation layer also functions to catalyze the oxidation reaction of Li 2 S to sulfur, even in solid-state electrolytes, proven by both experiments and density functional theory calculations. A high cell-level specific energy of 427 W·h·kg –1 is achieved by integrating the Li 2 S@TiS 2 cathode with a poly(ethylene oxide)-based electrolyte and a lithium metal anode. This study points to the fruitful direction of borrowing concepts from liquid electrolytes into solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Interphase Stabilization of LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 Cathode for 5 V–Class All–Solid–State Batteries

Employing high voltage cobalt-free spinel LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO) as a cathode is promising for high energy density and cost-effectiveness, but it has challenges in all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). Here, it is revealed that the limitation of lithium argyrodite sulfide solid electrolyte (Li 6 PS 5 Cl) with the LNMO cathode is due to the intrinsic chemical incompatibility and poor oxidative stability. Through a careful analysis of the interphase of LNMO, it is elucidated that even the halide solid electrolyte (Li 3 InCl 6 ) with high oxidative stability can be decomposed to form resistive interphase layers with LNMO in ASSBs. Interestingly, with Fe-doping and a Li 3 PO 4 protective layer coating, LNMO with Li 3 InCl 6 displays stable cycle performance with a stabilized interphase at a high voltage (≈4.7 V) in ASSBs. The enhanced interfacial stability with the extended electrochemical stability window through doping and coating enables high electrochemical stability with LNMO in ASSBs. Furthermore, this work provides guidance for employing high-voltage cathodes in ASSBs and highlights the importance of stable interphases to enable stable cycling in ASSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Fluorine-Substituted Lithium Chloride Solid Electrolytes for High-Voltage All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries

Lithium ternary halides are promising solid electrolytes, owing to their high ionic conductivity and reasonably high oxidative and chemical stability. Recently, fluorine substitution in Li 3 MCl 6 has been suggested as a promising approach for further enhancing oxidation stability. Accordingly, this study outlines a material design strategy for F-substituted Li 3 MCl 6 through systematic theoretical analyses. Calculations reveal that the mixing limit of F in Li 3 MCl 6–x F x is in the range of 0.5–1.5, and the resulting Li 3 MCl 6–x F x phases can retain ionic conductivity above 1 mS/cm up to x = 1.0. Additionally, the calculations also predict that the formation of F-containing passivating phases could increase the oxidation potential for Li3MCl5F to ~6.3 V. The proposed material design strategy is validated through the synthesis of Li 3 YCl 5 F, which is confirmed to show both high ionic conductivity and enhanced oxidation stability. The design guidelines presented herein can accelerate the potential use of halide-based electrolyte chemistries in high-voltage all-solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Promising performance of sulfide catholytes compared to halide alternatives in NMC811 cathodes for sheet-type sulfide solid-state batteries

Sulfide-based solid-state batteries (SSBs) show promise in achieving energy densities over 350 Wh/kg, yet challenges persist with their incorporation of high-voltage, nickel-rich layered oxide cathodes, such as LiNi₀.₈Mn₀.₁Co₀.₁O₂ (NMC811), due to the poor oxidation stability of sulfide solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) like Li₆PS₅Cl (LPSCl). Although halide SSEs such as Li₃InCl₆ (LIC) and Li₃YCl₆ (LYC) have previously shown promise in stabilizing high-voltage NMC cathodes, our research reveals that sulfide SSE catholytes, particularly when combined with surface-coated NMC cathodes, deliver superior performance. Here, this investigation assesses the cycling stability of various catholytes—LPSCl, LIC, Li₁₀GeP₂S₁₂ (LGPS), combined LIC-LPSCl, and LYC-LPSCl—in SSBs with LiNbO₃-coated NMC811 cathodes against sheet-type LPSCl separators. Findings indicate that while LGPS-based cathodes maintain higher capacity retention, they yield lower deliverable capacity, and LIC cathodes experience significant electrochemical degradation. Importantly, our results underscore that sulfide SSE catholytes, in conjunction with LiNbO₃-coated cathodes, optimize the cathode-electrolyte interphase (CEI), enhancing both kinetics and mass transport. These insights provide a strategic direction for optimizing catholyte composition in the development of sheet-type sulfide-based SSBs.

Catholyte↗
DOE OSTI2020

Unveiling the critical role of interfacial ionic conductivity in all-solid-state lithium batteries

Advancement of all-solid-state lithium-ion (Li + ) batteries (ASSLIBs) has been hindered by the large interfacial resistance mainly originating from interfacial reactions between oxide cathodes and solid-state sulfide electrolytes (SEs). To suppress the interfacial reactions, an interfacial coating layer between cathodes and SEs is indispensable. However, the kinetics of interfacial Li + transport across the coating layer has not been well understood yet. Herein, we tune the interfacial ionic conductivity of the coating layer LiNb 0.5 Ta 0.5 O 3 (LNTO) by manipulating post-annealing temperature. It is found that the interfacial ionic conductivity determines interfacial Li + transport kinetics and enhancing the interfacial ionic conductivity can significantly boost the electrochemical performance of SE-based ASSLIBs. A representative cathode LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 coated by LNTO with the highest interfacial ionic conductivity exhibits a high initial capacity of 152 mAh.g -1 at 0.1 C and 107.5 mAh.g -1 at 1C. This work highlights the importance of increasing interfacial ionic conductivity for high-performance SE-based ASSLIBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Kinetic versus Thermodynamic Stability of LLZO in Contact with Lithium Metal

Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) garnet-based oxides are a promising class of solid electrolytes used as the separator in all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). While LLZO is considered to have a wide electrochemical stability window, its intrinsic stability in contact with lithium metal is not sufficiently well understood, and there is still a debate on the key question of whether LLZO does or does not form passivation layers before and during cycling. Utilizing both in situ and operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy techniques, in this work we reveal the presence of a kinetic barrier to the reduction of LLZO by Li metal, with the extent of oxygen-deficient interphase (ODI) formation depending sensitively on the energetics of Li metal arriving at the Li vertical bar LLZO interface. Despite the clear presence of a kinetic barrier to reduction, the electrochemical response of the Li vertical bar LLZO interface is unchanged by the presence of the ODI, indicating that ODI formation during electrochemical cycling does not hinder charge transfer across the Li vertical bar LLZO interface. Overall, these results reveal that the reactivity of LLZO with Li metal depends not only on the material properties of the adjoining phases (i.e., surface purity and active contact) and their resulting thermodynamic stability but also on the energy input at the interface and the resulting reaction kinetics. Furthermore, the presence of a kinetic barrier to reduction highlights the additional complexities governing the reactivity of solid-state interfaces in ASSBs and underscores the importance of operando characterization of interfacial stability to design more robust, high-performance protection strategies for solid electrolytes in contact with reactive electrodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗