Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “mathematical physics methods”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

KENO-VI Primer: Performing Calculations using SCALE’s Criticality Safety Analysis Sequence (CSAS6) with Fulcrum

The SCALE code system developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is widely used and accepted around the world for criticality safety analysis. The well-known KENO-VI three-dimensional Monte Carlo criticality computer code is one of the primary criticality safety analysis tools in SCALE. The KENO-VI primer is designed to help a new user understand and use the SCALE/KENO-VI Monte Carlo code for nuclear criticality safety analysis. It assumes that the user has a college education in a technical field. There is no assumption of familiarity with Monte Carlo codes in general or with SCALE/KENO-VI in particular. The primer is designed to teach by example, with each example illustrating two or three features of SCALE/KENO-VI that are useful in criticality analysis. The primer is based on SCALE 6.2 and 6.3, which includes the Fulcrum graphical user interface. Each example uses Fulcrum to provide the framework for preparing input data and viewing output results. Starting with a Quickstart section, the primer gives an overview of the basic requirements for SCALE/KENO-VI input and allows the user to quickly run a simple criticality problem with SCALE/KENO-VI. Each following section begins with a list of basic objectives identifying the goal of the section and the individual SCALE/KENO-VI features covered in detail in the section’s sample problems. Upon completion of the primer, a new user should be comfortable using Fulcrum to set up criticality problems in SCALE/KENO-VI. The primer provides a starting point for the criticality safety analyst who uses SCALE/KENO-VI. Complete descriptions are provided in the SCALE/KENO-VI manual. Although the primer is self-contained, it is intended as a companion volume to the SCALE/KENO-VI training and documentation. The SCALE manual and training schedule are available at https://scale.ornl.gov. The primer provides specific examples of using SCALE/KENO-VI for criticality analysis; the SCALE/KENO-VI manual provides information on the use of SCALE/KENO-VI and all its modules. The primer also contains an appendix with sample input files. In addition, this primer, its errata, and sample inputs are also available at https://code.ornl.gov/scale/primers/kenovi/.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Upcoming MCNP6.3 ® Release: New Features and Improvements [Slides]

The latest version of the MCNP6.3 code will be done and released this year. Many new features, substantial improvements, and bugfixes have made their way into the code. Improved documentation, testing, and peripheral tools will also be delivered.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

LABS: Los Alamos Benchmark Suite - Current status and planning [Slides]

The LABS repository now has over 500 verified and revised input files with about 600 input files left to get up to speed with what we currently use. After that there are many, many more to go. We're in the process of building code infrastructure, moving to template output files, automating input file generation, outputting file data mining for calculation results, and benchmarking selection on sensitivity and other benchmark characteristics. We intend to open source LABS. We'll most likely release the input files sooner rather than later. The associated tool will probably be open sourced later.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Recent MCNP6 ® Code Developments and Improvements for Nuclear Engineering Applications [Slides]

The Los Alamos MCNP Monte Carlo radiation transport code has been the international gold standard for particle transport applications for over three decades. Many developments to the code have taken place with several significant new feature additions, major improvements, and enhancements to existing features. With significant institutional and programmatic investment in the code since the time of the last public release in 2018, important code development and infrastructure modernization has taken place and remains a high priority for all ongoing efforts across the code development team.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Thermal Neutron Scattering Improvements and Fixes for MCNP6.3 [Slides]

Major error (10,000+ pcm) discovered when using uranium-dioxide or uranium-nitride included in ENDF80SaB2 release. Improvements are being made towards preparing the code for ENDF/B-VIII.1 (ACE) format updates. A minor error (0-10’s pcm) was discovered while working on new capability development for Lab Directed Research & Development (LDRD) project. Previously, only a single coherent or incoherent elastic channel (along with an inelastic channel) was allowed in a thermal neutron scattering evaluation and subsequent processed ACE file. Based on what is planned in ENDF/B-VIII.1 release, there will be (a) new thermal scattering evaluation(s) which uses this mixed-mode coherent and incoherent elastic scattering blocks. MCNP6.3 has been modified to be able to handle such data in the future. Some reorganization has been made in the cross section calculation (acetot, sabcol, colidn) in the presence of TSL data.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Thermal Neutron Scattering Law (TNSL) Implementation and Testing in FUDGE

Thermal neutron scattering law processing capabilities have been recently implemented in the LLNL code FUDGE (For Updating Data and Generating Evaluations). FUDGE is now capable of producing processed TNSL data for use in Monte Carlo or deterministic transport. To test this new capability, LLNL scientists performed an extensive intercomparison between the Mercury, Ardra, COG and MCNP transport codes. This intercomparison helped probe differences between how TNSL data are handled by the transport codes and by two different processing codes (LLNL’s FUDGE and LANL’s NJOY). This report summarizes recent improvements in FUDGE TNSL capabilities as well as results from the code intercomparison.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

TNSL improvements in FUDGE [Slides]

FUDGE TNSL processing capabilities are improving. New development focuses on reading and writing GNDS, but FUDGE also supports writing to ACE and ENDL. Work provides a chance to compare in-depth with other codes. TNSL processing is mostly complete, but MCGIDI sampling has room for improvement. There are plans to revisit interpolation and to improve strategies for sampling coherent/incoherent elastic.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Investigating Fission Reaction Rate Ratio Sensitivities [Slides]

One EUCLID project goal is to create a NEW capability in the MCNP6 code. This is being tested on reaction rate sensitivities and compared with SENSMG results. Reaction rate ratio sensitivities were added to EUCLID sensitivity library and investigated to determine value toward designing optimized experiments aimed at reducing compensating errors in nuclear data. The use of adjustment using multiple responses (and underlying/required capabilities) may benefit many applications. These include a tool for adjustment using multiple integral responses (ND adjustment and validation community); sensitivities of additional responses (ND adjustment and validation community); sensitivity capabilities (users in many application areas including safeguards/nonproliferation, criticality safety, etc.); and experiment optimization capability (applications which can benefit from integral experiments). Team is working to build and test future tools and to understand compensating errors

235U↗
DOE OSTI2022

Verification of MCNP Critical Benchmark Model of U233-COMP-THERM-004 [Slides]

The verification of U233-COMP-THERM-004 contributed to the LANL centralized repository that’s currently under development. Revisions made to the MCNP model were statistically significant. Magnitude of bias is relatively small in comparison to other uranium benchmark biases and thus will likely have not a significant effect on the USL.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Sensitivity/Uncertainty Analysis for Nuclear Criticality Safety Validation [Slides]

Sensitivity coefficients predict the expected change in a response ($\kappa$) due to a change in some input parameter ($\Sigma$). These responses can be k eff (or ratios of reaction rates). These input parameters are typically nuclear data. The coefficients are dimensionless ratios. What would happen to the system k eff if some piece of data were changed by some amount? The coefficient is calculated without making the change.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Calculation of Spent Fuel Pool Time-to-Boil using Polaris/ORIGAMI [Slides]

The goal of this experiment was to calculate time-to-boil (TTB) for a Spent Fuel Pool (SFP). TTB is important for SFP management that represents the amount of time available to address loss of forced cooling. Researchers calculated and compared TTB for two cases using SCALE: SFP containing representative LEU fuel (≤ 5 wt %) and SFP containing representative LEU+ fuel (5 – 8 wt %). There were approximately 2300 fuel assemblies in the SFP for each case. Researchers concluded that the impact of LEU+ core on time-to-boil is very small. At such low cooling times, the impact of increased decay heat is not significant. Decay heat of SFP assemblies is small compared to discharge core decay heat.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Illustration of Neutronic Decoupling in Fresh Fuel Storage Environments [Slides]

Operations beyond static storage of fuel assemblies occur in SFPs (moving around the pool, inspection, etc.). These assemblies are assumed suitably distanced at 30 cm. When assemblies are separated by enough water, the neutrons from one cannot cause fission in another, which results in neutronic decoupling. This assumption was investigated for PWR and BWR assemblies as part of ORNL-TM/2021/2330.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Criticality and Radiation Shielding Impacts of ENDF/B-VIII.0 [Slides]

Several impacts of ENDF/B-VIII.0 on Radiation Shielding Applications were observed by researchers. Most reaction rates, attenuation ratios, and dose rates are similar for ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VIII.0. A significant reduction in reactor dosimetry results was noted. Investigation continues to reveal underlying data for discrepancies.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

SCALE Sensitivity Tutorial [Slides]

In sensitivity analysis, we seek to quantify the degree to which fundamental data (i.e., nuclear data) influence a system’s response. In uncertainty analysis, we seek to quantify the degree to which uncertainty in fundamental data contributes to uncertainty in a system’s response. In SCALE, the TSUNAMI suite provides tools for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, similarity analysis, and nuclear data and covariance adjustment.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Cumulative χ 2 Metric for VALID for ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VIII.0 in SCALE 6.3b9 [Slides]

Quantifying the performance of a new evaluation is difficult and doing so for a new library is significantly more challenging. Cumulative χ 2 metric is an established approach to comparing distributions. In this case, C/E results from different libraries. Andrei Trkov and Roberto Capote have published cumulative χ 2 results for ENDF/B-VIII.0. Cumulative χ 2 metric was recently calculated for VALID library maintained at ORNL.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗