Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “URANIUM NITRIDES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

115 records · Page 7

UZrCN Synthesis via Arc Melting - A Novel Synthesis Study

The next generation of nuclear reactors for both power production and space nuclear propulsion require fuel that is more durable, thermally stable, and more thermally conductive to support rapid heat transfer. High temperature gas reactors (HTGR), advanced gas reactors (AGR), and space-based nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) are advanced reactor concepts that require a fuel type that can withstand high temperatures (1000-2900K) and flow of corrosive gas coolants such as helium, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. One fuel with the potential to meet these demanding requirements is uranium-zirconium-carbonitride (UZrCN). UZrCN has many favorable fuel qualities compared to other eligible fuel forms such as uranium dioxide (UO2) and uranium mononitride (UN) that could support the aforementioned reactor concepts. UZrCN has an exceptionally high operating temperature and thermal conductivity which are highly desirable to improve reactor economics and safety. It far exceeds the properties of UO2 which is the most common fuel form in the United States. UZrCN also surpasses UN in terms of thermal conductivity and operating temperature by eliminating the dissociation problem UN has at 1700K. UZrCN could improve gas reactor performance and enable NTP technologies; however, it is an under-researched fuel that lacks rigorous scientific study. In recent efforts by the Idaho National Laboratory, a variety of novel methods to produce this fuel composition have been explored. One such method is via arc melting of uranium, zirconium, and carbon under a nitrogen atmosphere. Alloy fabrication using arc melting has been utilized for close to 150 years now and is well-understood as a method for rapid alloy prototyping. This process will be used to perform in-situ nitriding to form UZrCN.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

UZrCN Synthesis via Arc Melting

The next generation of nuclear reactors for both power production and space nuclear propulsion require fuel that is more durable, thermally stable, and more thermally conductive to support rapid heat transfer. High temperature gas reactors (HTGR), advanced gas reactors (AGR), and space-based nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) are advanced reactor concepts that require a fuel type that can withstand high temperatures (1000-2900K) and flow of corrosive gas coolants such as helium, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. One fuel with the potential to meet these demanding requirements is uranium-zirconium-carbonitride (UZrCN). UZrCN has many favorable fuel qualities compared to other eligible fuel forms such as uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) and uranium mononitride (UN) that could support the aforementioned reactor concepts. UZrCN has an exceptionally high operating temperature and thermal conductivity which are highly desirable to improve reactor economics and safety. It far exceeds the properties of UO 2 which is the most common fuel form in the United States. UZrCN also surpasses UN in terms of thermal conductivity and operating temperature by eliminating the dissociation problem UN has at 1700K. UZrCN could improve gas reactor performance and enable NTP technologies; however, it is an under-researched fuel that lacks rigorous scientific study. In recent efforts by the Idaho National Laboratory, a variety of novel methods to produce this fuel composition have been explored. One such method is via arc melting of uranium, zirconium, and carbon under a nitrogen atmosphere. Alloy fabrication using arc melting has been utilized for close to 150 years now and is well-understood as a method for rapid alloy prototyping. This process will be used to perform in-situ nitriding to form UZrCN.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

UZrCN Formation via Arc Melting – A Novel Synthesis Study

The next generation of nuclear reactors for both power production and space nuclear propulsion require fuel that is more durable, thermally stable, and more thermally conductive to support rapid heat transfer. High temperature gas reactors (HTGR), advanced gas reactors (AGR), and space-based nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) are advanced reactor concepts that require a fuel type that can withstand high temperatures (1000-2900K) and flow of corrosive gas coolants such as helium, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. One fuel with the potential to meet these demanding requirements is uranium-zirconium-carbonitride (UZrCN). UZrCN has many favorable fuel qualities compared to other eligible fuel forms such as uranium dioxide (UO2) and uranium mononitride (UN) that could support the aforementioned reactor concepts. UZrCN has an exceptionally high operating temperature and thermal conductivity which are highly desirable to improve reactor economics and safety. It far exceeds the properties of UO2 which is the most common fuel form in the United States. UZrCN also surpasses UN in terms of thermal conductivity and operating temperature by eliminating the dissociation problem UN has at 1700K. UZrCN could improve gas reactor performance and enable NTP technologies; however, it is an under-researched fuel that lacks rigorous scientific study. In recent efforts by the Idaho National Laboratory, a variety of novel methods to produce this fuel composition have been explored. One such method is via arc melting of uranium, zirconium, and carbon under a nitrogen atmosphere. Alloy fabrication using arc melting has been utilized for close to 150 years now and is well-understood as a method for rapid alloy prototyping. This process will be used to perform in-situ nitriding to form UZrCN.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Experimental system for studying temperature gradient-driven fracture of oxide nuclear fuel out of reactor

Temperature gradients in ceramic light water reactor (LWR) uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) nuclear fuel pellets generate thermal stresses that cause fractures in the fuel beginning early in the life of fresh fuel. The combination of heating due to fission and forced convective cooling on the exterior of LWR fuel rods generates a temperature profile that is difficult to replicate outside the reactor environment. In the present study, a state-of-the-art experimental set-up using electrical heating to replicate fission heating was built and surrogate fuel materials such as ceria (CeO 2 ) were used to validate the system. Cracking experiments were conducted on these surrogates by inducing reactivity-initiated-accident (RIA) like temperature gradients in the pellets via induction and direct resistance heating. Induction heating was done using copper coils and molybdenum susceptors which heated the surrogates to a threshold temperature that is sufficiently high for the fuel material to conduct current. Thereafter, direct resistance heating was used by a D.C. power supply to introduce volumetric heating to replicate LWR operating conditions analogous to fission heating. The pellets were held against nickel electrodes and mounted on a boron nitride test-stand. All the tests were carried out in a stainless-steel vacuum chamber. Simultaneous real-time dual imaging of the surrogate pellet surface has been implemented using an optical and infrared camera system which will be mounted along axial and perpendicular directions to the pellet surface respectively. A beam-splitter was used to split the incoming radiation from the sample into two halves. While one of the beams is transmitted from the splitter through a bandpass filter to obtain optical images, the other beam is reflected from the splitter to the thermal camera to capture full field temperature gradients of the as fabricated pellet surface during crack initiation and propagation. In the current series of tests, a 2-color pyrometer was used for recording and comparing the surface and centerline temperatures of the surrogate pellets in lieu of the thermal camera. A LabVIEW data acquisition system has been set up for collecting useful data during experiments.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

2023 Critical Materials Strategy

The global effort to curb carbon emissions is accelerating demand for clean energy technologies and the materials they rely on. Demand for these materials will only continue to grow, especially as some nations aim to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. While some major materials like steel, copper, and aluminum are already powering the fossil fuel economy, others are more minor materials with potential supply risks. These risks could jeopardize the ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the desirable timeframe to avoid significant climate change. In some cases, it may be necessary to take action to improve the resilience of material supply chains and mitigate supply risks. Understanding the importance of individual materials to clean energy and the supply risks associated with them is necessary to identify which materials may serve as potential roadblocks to a clean energy future. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a series of 13 supply chain deep dive assessment reports on various energy technologies in 2022 in response to President Biden’s Executive Order on America’s Supply Chains (E.O. 14017). These reports emphasized that supply chain bottlenecks can occur at any stage of the value chain from mining and refining to component and even sub-system manufacturing. The bottlenecks are a combination of factors such as material availability, equipment availability, work force availability and quality, logistics, regulatory framework, and market conditions. These bottlenecks were worsened during the global Covid-19 pandemic. Its lingering impacts have hindered capacity expansion for material supply chains and prevented product lead-time recovery. One approach to reduce supply chain risks for the United States is to have a strong domestic manufacturing sector with a diverse set of producers. Boosting responsible domestic production would require leveraging the latest science not only in material extraction but also in developing substitutes, recycling, reuse, and remanufacturing. This report is an updated analysis of previous Critical Materials Strategy (CMS) reports published by the DOE in 2010, 2011, and 2019 based on national and global priorities, technology advancement, and technology adoption trends. Like the CMS reports, this analysis presents the results of a formal material criticality assessment to identify which materials are critical to the continued deployment of clean energy technologies globally. The analysis in this report leveraged the DOE supply chain deep dive assessments to develop the initial list of materials to evaluate. This DOE Critical Materials Assessment (CMA) is conducted independently of criticality assessments performed by other U.S. government agencies, such as that conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). This analysis complements the USGS critical minerals determination in three aspects. First, the DOE assessment is performed from a global perspective, while the USGS analysis focusses on the importance of minerals to the U.S. economy. Second, this report focuses on the importance of materials to clean energy technologies, rather than to the economy in general. Lastly, this study is forward looking to 2035 based on clean energy deployment scenarios, whereas the USGS assessment is retrospective. Materials evaluated in this report that do not appear in the USGS Critical Minerals List include copper, uranium, electrical steel, and SiC. A draft version of this report received ~80 public comments related to supporting data and methodological improvement. Those comments have been incorporated as much as possible where appropriate. Highlights of findings from this 2023 CMA include: Rare earth materials (neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, and terbium) used in magnets in electric vehicle (EV) motors and wind turbine generators continue to be critical. While dysprosium (Dy) and terbium (Tb) are both heavy rare earth elements that serve the same function in magnets, the criticality of Tb is slightly lower than that for Dy in the short term due to the widespread use of Dy in high-grade magnets and Tb’s present role as a substitute. Similarly, praseodymium (Pr) is critical in the medium term but only near critical in the short term because it is more substitutable in magnets than neodymium (Nd); Materials used in batteries for EVs and stationary storage are now considered to be critical. While cobalt (Co) was found to be critical in this and previous reports, lithium (Li) becomes critical in the medium term due to its broader use in various battery chemistries and the rampant growth of the EV industry. Natural graphite is a new addition in this assessment and is also found to be critical; Platinum group metals used in hydrogen electrolyzers, such as platinum (Pr) and iridium (Ir), are critical due to an increased focus on hydrogen technologies to achieve net zero carbon emissions, while those used in catalytic converters, such as rhodium (Rh) and palladium (Pd), were screened out due to the decreased importance of catalytic converters in the medium term; Gallium (Ga) continues to be critical due to its use in light-emitting diodes (LEDs). In addition, the use of Ga has increased in magnet manufacturing and in semiconductor in forms such as gallium arsenide (GaAs) or gallium nitride (GaN); Major materials like Aluminum (Al), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), and silicon (Si) move from noncritical in the short term to near critical in the medium term due to their importance in electrification; Electrical steel is near critical due to its use in transformers for the grid and electric motors in EVs.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Investigation of a U(IV)/U(III) Thermodynamic Reference Electrode for High-Temperature Molten Fluoride Salts

While thermodynamic reference electrodes with known and stable potentials are common in traditional aqueous systems, the high temperature and corrosive environment of a molten fluoride salt makes achieving long term stability with a thermodynamic reference electrode challenging, especially at temperatures of 600°C or higher. In this work, a thermodynamic reference electrode consisting of U(IV)/U(III) in a boron nitride compartment was evaluated for use in FLiBe at temperatures ≥ 600°C. FLiBe used in the study was purified by AlphaTech's proprietary process and characterized by ICP-MS and square wave voltammetry. The free oxide concentration was <2 ppm. Using the purified FLiBe, the U(IV)/U(III) thermodynamic reference electrode was shown to provide a stable, well-defined, and reproducible potential for more than 600+ hours of use in different tests. Moreover, the thermodynamic reference electrode showed a consistent potential with no signs of failure, even after being cooled between tests and then reheated for reuse. Thus, the U(IV)/U(III) reference electrode is suitable for use in rigorous electrochemical studies in molten fluoride salts. As a result, it may be useful as a common standard, facilitating the advancement of nuclear applications such as isotope separation or online monitoring of reactor systems through improved certainty in the measurement of thermodynamic potentials.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Crystal structure, compressibility, and thermal expansion of uranium mononitride

The behavior of the uranium mononitride (UN) crystal structure at nonambient conditions is disputed, with studies proposing various mutually exclusive distortions and transformations of the conventional face-centered-cubic structure at extreme temperatures and pressures. Here, in this study, we investigated the UN lattice with diamond anvil cell x-ray diffraction experiments at pressures up to 92 GPa and with density functional theory calculations at temperatures up to 1000 K and pressures up to 90 GPa. We determined that while the UN structure is nearly cubic at ambient conditions, its lattice angle (𝛼) varies as a function of pressure and temperature, meaning its structure can be more precisely described as face-centered-rhombohedral with 𝛼 ≈ 90∘. Over the range of conditions we investigated, UN exhibits a single, isostructural phase transition at ≈ 35 GPa, where 𝛼 collapses to ≈ 86°. Measurements and calculations agree that the compressibility of UN increases significantly beyond this transition, with the bulk modulus falling from ≈ 200 GPa in the low-pressure phase to 121 ± 3 GPa (according to calculations) or 58 ± 4 GPa (according to measurements) in the high-pressure phase. Our measurements also allowed us to constrain the bulk modulus of 𝛼−U 2 ⁢N 3 to 240 ± 10 GPa.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗