Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Reactors and Fuel”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1987

Uranium nitride fuel fabrication for SP-100 reactors

Fuel pins of uranium mononitride clad in Nb-1 percent Zr were fabricated for irradiation tests in EBR-II. Laboratory scale process parameters to synthesize UN powders and fabricate UN pellets were developed. Uranium mononitride was prepared by converting UO2 to UN. Fuel pellets were prepared by communition of UN briquettes, uniaxial pressing, and high temperature sintering. Techniques for machining, cleaning, and welding Nb-1 percent Zr cladding components were developed. End caps were electron beam welded to the tubing. Helium back-fill holes were sealed with a laser weld.

Mason, Richard E.↗
DOE OSTI2025

Decay heat analysis for advanced reactor spent fuel transportation and storage applications

Accurate characterization of nuclide inventories and decay heat in spent nuclear fuel is critical for ensuring its safe handling, storage, transportation, and disposal. Although extensive research has been conducted on light-water reactor fuel, advanced reactors present unique challenges due to their diverse core configurations, fuel characteristics, neutron energy spectra, and burnup levels. Building upon previous efforts that developed representative reactor core models for various advanced reactor types and fuels, this study evaluates reactor-specific decay heat characteristics. The results highlight significant variations across advanced reactor types as well as across reactor designs within the same reactor type, and they provide comparison to typical commercial light-water reactor fuel. For example, thermal-spectrum reactor fuels were observed to have an approximately 100-fold decrease in decay heat over the first decade of cooling, whereas the reduction was 10-fold for fast-spectrum reactor fuels. Mass-specific decay heat at discharge can differ by three orders of magnitude among the fast and thermal reactor systems considered. Overall, for the analyzed advanced reactor fuel, fewer than 17 nuclides account for over 99% of total decay heat at 0.5 years, and that number drops to fewer than 7 nuclides at 100 years of cooling. By quantifying reactor-specific decay heat trends and nuclide contributions, this work provides a technical basis to support the development of spent fuel management strategies for advanced reactor fuels as well as safety evaluations for storage, transportation, and long-term waste disposal.

Advanced reactors↗
DOE OSTI2020

Drop Analysis of the Advanced Test Reactor Fresh Fuel Shipping Container with Heavier Low-Enriched Uranium Fuel Contents

The Advanced Test Reactor Fresh Fuel Shipping Container (ATR FFSC) is a rectangular stainless steel container used for shipping radioactive material. The container is described in the ATR FFSC Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Per the ATR FFSC SAR, the ATR FFSC is designated a Type AF-96 packaging per the definition of 10 CFR §71.4, and was originally designed to transport high enriched uranium (HEU) reactor fuel elements for the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), the Advanced Test Reactor Critical (ATRC) facility, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR), and the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR). The Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA), Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) is working with the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to develop and qualify new low enriched uranium (LEU) fuels and technologies for use in the ATR, ATRC, MITR, and MURR reactors. The LEU fuel elements will weigh significantly more than the current HEU designs and, combined with their associated Fuel Handling Enclosures for packaging, some configurations will exceed the 50 lbf used in the ATR FFSC qualifying drop tests. There are LEU versions of MITR, MURR, and ATR fuel elements. However, for this evaluation, drop analysis of the ATR FFSC with only the heavier ATR Low Enrichment (LOWE) fuel element is considered in this evaluation because the LOWE fuel element is the heaviest of the considered LEU fuel elements. The ATR HEU fuel element and the ATR LOWE fuel element are identical in every design aspect except for the fuel meat inside the 19 fuel plates. The LEU fuel meats are made using a U-10Mo high-density foil rather than uranium dispersed in aluminum in the HEU fuel elements. The high density of the uranium in the LEU fuel meat increases the LOWE fuel element weight to just under 44 lbf (versus the 22.1 lbf weight of the tested ATR HEU fuel element). ATR fuel elements are placed in a thin-gauge aluminum weldment called a "Fuel Handling Enclosure" during packaging. The Fuel Handling Enclosure is used to cover and protect the element during loading and unloading operations. The ATR Fuel Handling Enclosure weighs about 15 lbf per the drawings in the ATR FFSC SAR and the weight is accounted for in this evaluation. Transporting the heavier LEU fuel elements require evaluation of two issues. The first is the effect of the increased mass of the LEU fuel elements on the survivability of the ATR FFSC package following the requisite drop qualifications. The second is the effect of the increased mass of the fuel plates on the fuel element during the same drops. The ATR FFSC containing an ATR HEU fuel element in an ATR Fuel Handling Enclosure was physically dropped multiple times to qualify the container as a Type AF-96 package. The ATR FFSC SAR describes the drop tests performed with an actual ATR HEU fuel element weighing 22.1 lbf contained in a 14.3 lbf Fuel Handling Enclosure for a total payload of 36.4 lbf. Those drop tests showed that the ATR FFSC maintained containment of the ATR HEU fuel element and the fuel element was not significantly damaged. (Containment herein is not defined as a leak tight but is retention of the radioactive contents.) The purpose of the evaluation is to analytically show that, for a similar set of tests, the ATR FFSC maintains containment of the heavier ATR LOWE fuel element and to assess the damage to the fuel element during the drops. The approach was to create finite element analysis (FEA) models that produce the same results as the physical drops. Those models were then used as the benchmarks for the follow-on analyses using the heavier contents. FEA models of the drops of ATR FFSC using up to a 115 lbf fuel element were run and evaluated. Likewise, drops of a LOWE fuel element weighing 44 lbf in the ATR FFSC were run and evaluated. It is important to note that this report was done at the quality level necessary to be included in a nuclear facility safety basis. However, it is not the intent of this report to conclude the suitability of the ATR FFSC for transporting the heavier payloads. This report only describes the results of the FEA as related to the required drop scenarios. Incorporation of the FEA into the safety basis will be evaluated by the ATR FFSC design authority. The physical drop tests of the HEU fuel element and FEA drop analysis for the LOWE fuel element showed noteworthy damage to the fuel plates. An aluminum protective block was conceived to mitigate the damage. The concept requires the blocks to be placed in the fuel element between the end boxes and fuel plates. Additional FEA drop analyses were performed using the protective block. The addition of the blocks is primarily intended to mitigate the damage to the LOWE fuel element fuel plates. However, FEA drop analyses of the ATR HEU fuel element with the blocks were also performed and included for information.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2025

Modeling a Thermal-Spectrum LEU-fueled Molten Salt Reactor Co-fueled with Thorium in SCALE 6.3.1 and Serpent-2

Interest in the development of advanced nuclear fission reactors for commercial electricity production has risen in recent years, with Generation IV reactor designs offering numerous advantages in safety, efficiency, fuel cycle sustainability, and waste management. In particular, thorium-fueled molten salt reactors (MSRs) are considerably promising for enhancing fuel cycle sustainability in their ability to breed fissile 233U fuel from thorium, a presently untapped and widely abundant resource. A novel MSR fuel cycle concept, the ”Sourdough” refueling and waste management strategy, has previously been demonstrated with a traditional uranium-based fuel cycle in a thermal-spectrum MSR operating with low enriched uranium (LEU) fuel with favorable neutronic performance. However, the ability to use this unique fuel cycle approach with thorium-based molten salt fuels has not yet been studied. In this work, the Sourdough fuel cycle was implemented in a small, thermal-spectrum MSR fueled with high assay low enriched uranium (HALEU) and fertile 232Th for breeding 233U fuel. Relevant neutronic data, including fuel and isothermal temperature feedback behavior, was studied using the SCALE 6.3.1 and Serpent-2 code systems, and keff data was measured during simulated depletion at 400 MWth. The Sourdough fuel cycle concept is shown to perform favorably with a thorium-fueled MSR model, thus warranting further study into its use in other MSR designs.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
NASA NTRS1975

Gaseous fuel nuclear reactor research

Gaseous-fuel nuclear reactors are described; their distinguishing feature is the use of fissile fuels in a gaseous or plasma state, thereby breaking the barrier of temperature imposed by solid-fuel elements. This property creates a reactor heat source that may be able to heat the propellant of a rocket engine to 10,000 or 20,000 K. At this temperature level, gas-core reactors would provide the breakthrough in propulsion needed to open the entire solar system to manned and unmanned spacecraft. The possibility of fuel recycling makes possible efficiencies of up to 65% and nuclear safety at reduced cost, as well as high-thrust propulsion capabilities with specific impulse up to 5000 sec.

Schwenk, F. C.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Gaseous-fuel nuclear reactor research for multimegawatt power in space

In the gaseous-fuel reactor concept, the fissile material is contained in a moderator-reflector cavity and exists in the form of a flowing gas or plasma separated from the cavity walls by means of fluid mechanical forces. Temperatures in excess of structural limitations are possible for low-specific-mass power and high-specific-impulse propulsion in space. Experiments have been conducted with a canister filled with enriched UF6 inserted into a beryllium-reflected cavity. A theoretically predicted critical mass of 6 kg was measured. The UF6 was also circulated through this cavity, demonstrating stable reactor operation with the fuel in motion. Because the flowing gaseous fuel can be continuously processed, the radioactive waste in this type of reactor can be kept small. Another potential of fissioning gases is the possibility of converting the kinetic energy of fission fragments directly into coherent electromagnetic radiation, the nuclear pumping of lasers. Numerous nuclear laser experiments indicate the possibility of transmitting power in space directly from fission energy. The estimated specific mass of a multimegawatt gaseous-fuel reactor power system is from 1 to 5 kg/kW while the companion laser-power receiver station would be much lower in specific mass.

Thom, K.↗
DOE OSTI2020

The NAC LWT for Research Reactor Spent Fuel Shipments - 20126

The NAC Legal Weight Truck (LWT) Cask is a Type B(U)F-96 transportation package originally designed for shipment of PWR and BWR spent fuel assemblies. Its versatile design provides maximum flexibility and cost-efficiency to support shipment of a wide range of spent fuel. This cask has been used for research reactor fuel shipments in over a dozen countries and counting. It has supported multiple domestic research reactor spent fuel shipments. These contents are licensed by the U.S. NRC and have been validated for use around the world. These shipments need the capability to be loaded and unloaded in a pool, in a dry facility or in a parking lot. In this paper, the analysis, design changes and operations to meet these specific content challenges will be presented. The paper provides a technical overview of the NAC LWT and identifies the design features and technology advancements making the NAC LWT readily adaptable and flexible solution for packaging research reactor spent fuel. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Enhancing the Chemical Energy Flux in a High-Temperature Tubular Counterflow Solid Fuel Synthesis Reactor Using a Bypass

Redox reactions of metal oxides offer a path towards using intermittent renewable resources for high-density thermochemical energy storage. Thermochemical energy storage often involves the flow of a particulate media. We describe a novel method to increase the throughput in a gravity-driven high-temperature thermochemical storage reactor flowing pelletized MgMnO. The moving bed reactor operates under counter-flow conditions and encounters particle flowability problems at temperatures of 1500 °C leading to sintering of the bed. Inertial forces of a counter-flowing gas can overcome the gravitational forces on the particles and limit the chemical energy storage rate of the reactor. We found that the insertion of a gas bypass (a slotted tube) into the reactor results in a 100% increase of the flow rates and achieved a 50% higher chemical energy storage flux compared to the operation without a bypass tube while mitigating the effects of sintering on the particles. As a result, the higher solid flow rates require a longer heated zone to reach a comparable residence time and extent of reduction compared to the lower flow rates.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2021

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Conceptual Design – Hydraulic Reactor Design Parameters

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR-II, also referred to as MITR) is one of six U.S. high performance research reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, that is actively collaborating with the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Material Management and Minimization (M 3 ) Reactor Conversion Program to convert to the use of low-enriched uranium (LEU, < 20 wt% 235 U) fuel. The MIT Nuclear Reactor Laboratory has been working with the USHPRR Reactor Conversion (RC) Pillar at Argonne National Laboratory to perform fuel element design and fuel cycle performance analyses, steady-state thermal hydraulics safety analyses, and accident safety analyses in preparation for the conversion of MITR and support a preliminary Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for conversion to LEU fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Reactors Spent Fuel and Waste Streams Disposition Strategies

This report describes research and development (R&D) activities conducted during Fiscal Year 2023 (FY23) in the Advanced Fuels and Advanced Reactor Waste Streams Strategies work package in the Spent Fuel Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) Campaign supported by the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE). This report is focused on evaluating and cataloguing Advanced Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel (AR SNF) and Advanced Reactor Waste Streams (ARWS) and creating Back-end Nuclear Fuel Cycle (BENFC) strategies for their disposition. The R&D team for this report is comprised of researchers from Sandia National Laboratories and Enviro Nuclear Services, LLC.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced reactors spent fuel and waste streams disposition strategies

This report describes research and development (R&D) activities conducted during Fiscal Year 2023 (FY23) in the Advanced Fuels and Advanced Reactor Waste Streams Strategies work package in the Spent Fuel Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) Campaign supported by the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE). This report is focused on evaluating and cataloguing Advanced Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel (AR SNF) and Advanced Reactor Waste Streams (ARWS) and creating Back-end Nuclear Fuel Cycle (BENFC) strategies for their disposition. The R&D team for this report is comprised of researchers from Sandia National Laboratories and Enviro Nuclear Services, LLC.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

University of Missouri Research Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Conceptual Design—Hydraulic Reactor Design Parameters

The University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor (MURR®) is one of five U.S. high performance research reactors (USHPRR), plus one critical facility, that actively collaborates with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Material Management and Minimization(M 3 ) Reactor Conversion Program to convert to the use of low-enriched uranium (LEU, < 20 wt.% U-235) fuel. A new type of LEU fuel with very high density, based on an alloy of uranium and 10 weight percent molybdenum (U-10Mo), is expected to allow the conversion to LEU of USHPRR that have been found unable to be converted with previously qualified uranium silicide-aluminum (U 3 Si 2 -Al) dispersion fuel. MURR has been working with the USHPRR Reactor Conversion (RC) Pillar at Argonne National Laboratory to perform fuel element design and fuel cycle performance analyses, steady-state thermal hydraulics safety analyses, and accident safety analyses in preparation for the conversion of MURR and to support a preliminary Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for conversion to LEU fuel. This work is performed in preparation for the flow test campaign that will be conducted by the USHPRR RC Pillar. The purpose of the hydraulic performance evaluation of the MURR LEU fuel element designed by the RC Pillar is to test a prototypic commercially fabricated LEU fuel element to determine whether any failure modes are observed or predicted in the fuel element, including significant deformations such as plate bending, twisting, or plate detachment from the side plate under selected safety-basis limits for reactor hydraulic conditions. To support the design of the flow test for MURR LEU fuel element hydraulic performance evaluation, design parameters for hydraulic testing of the LEU fuel element are laid out in this report.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Irradiation performance of nonfertile (Pu-MA-Zr) fast reactor metal fuels

This work was part of a program begun in 2001 to develop advanced nuclear fuels, originally as carriers for plutonium and minor actinides (neptunium, curium, and americium) taken from spent commercial light-water reactors (LWR) so that the plutonium and minor actinides could be ‘burned’ or transmuted in an accelerator or a fast nuclear reactor. A central part of these experiment programs has been the development of advanced fast reactor fuels, because a fast reactor was considered the most efficient vehicle to transmute the actinide waste products, and metallic fuels is a central focus of these tests. An experiment design was developed in which a thermal test reactor, the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), was used to test small fuel pin prototypes, by creating areas in the core shielded by cadmium filters to produce a largely epithermal and fast neutron spectrum environment in which the pins could be irradiated. The results of non-fertile metallic fuel (no uranium) tests are presented here. Pu-Am-Np-Zr fuels were irradiated to fission densities up to 33 × 10 20 fission/cm 3 and Pu-239 depletions of up to 39%. The depletions were created by roughly 2/3 by fission and 1/3 by transmutation neutron capture. Up to five fuel ‘rodlets’ were irradiated in three sealed capsules stacked axially in the core, and the peak cladding temperatures ranged from 300°C to 500°C, depending on axial location as those near the core centerline are operating hotter and to higher fission densities. Several post-irradiation examinations (precision gamma scanning and fission gas release) were similar to other historical metal fuel experiments in fast reactors. However, optical metallography indicated that two of the rodlets had breached. The exact reasons are unclear. Due to the design of this irradiation experiment a rodlet breach could have increased the temperature in others in the same capsule by contaminating the thermal gap helium with heavier and less conductive fission product gases. Finally, some of those rodlets showed high amounts of fuel/cladding chemical interaction (FCCI).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

An Evaluation of a Neutron Time Correlated Interrogation Method for Measurement of Fissile Content in Research Reactor Spent Fuel Assemblies

There are many research reactors worldwide that have been, or are being converted from the use of high enrichment uranium (HEU) to low enrichment uranium (LEU, < 20% enriched). The verification of fissile content and initial enrichment of the spent fuel is needed for the effective safeguards of the fuel. The advanced experimental fuel counter (AEFC) was developed for the measurement of spent fuel rods and assemblies from research reactors for safeguards verification. This measurement system contains components for active neutron interrogation, passive neutron totals counting, neutron coincidence counting, and gross gamma-ray counting. This report presents the first application of the time correlated interrogation technique for the measurement of the 235 U content in research reactor spent fuel assemblies. The technique, called time correlated induced fission (TCIF), uses a 252 Cf neutron source to irradiate the fuel assembly, and the subsequent induced fission events in the fissile material are measured by coincidence counting. The doubles rates are enhanced by having the neutron trigger events from both the 252 Cf source and the induced fission neutrons in the same time gate in the coincidence analysis. The average neutrons per fission of the 252 Cf source is 3.76 and the induced fission neutrons for 235 U is 2.44, so the number of neutrons that are produced is higher than for random neutron interrogation. This high effective neutron number increases the multiplicity counting rates and reduces the statistical error. The background coincidence counts from the 252 Cf are reduced by the water in the sample cavity and the polyethylene surrounding the 3 He detector tubes. This method of active neutron interrogation has been applied to the measurement of spent research reactor (IRT) fuel assemblies. The advanced experimental fuel counter (AEFC) was used to compare the TCIF method with the typically used AmLi neutron interrogation source that emits neutrons that are random in time. The statistical uncertainty for the use of the random neutron source (AmLi) and the time correlated source ( 252 Cf) for spent fuel interrogations was evaluated.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗