Optical Properties of Nanosatellite Hardware
Over the last decade, a number of very small satellites have been launched into space. These have been called nanosatellites (generally of a weight between 1 and 10 kg) or picosatellites (weight <1 kg). This also includes CubeSats, which are based on 10-cm cube units. With the addition of the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) Small Satellite Orbital Deployer (J-SSOD) to the International Space Station (ISS), CubeSats are easily cycled through the JEM airlock and deployed into space (fig. 1). The number of CubeSats launched since 2003 was approaching 100 at the time of publication, and the authors expect this trend in research to continue, particularly for high school and college flight experiments. Because these spacecraft are so small, there is usually no allowance for shielding or active heating or cooling of the avionics and other hardware. Parts that are usually ignored in the thermal analysis of larger spacecraft may contribute significantly to the heat load of a tiny satellite. In addition, many small satellites have commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) components. To reduce costs, many providers of COTS components do not include the optical and physical parameters necessary for accurate thermal analysis. Marshall Space Flight Center participated in the development and analysis of the Space Missile Defense Command-Operational Nanosatellite Effect (SMDC-ONE) and the Edison Demonstration of Smallsat Networks (EDSN) nanosatellites. These optical property measurements are documented here in hopes that they may benefit future nanosatellite and picosatellite programs and aid thermal analysis to ensure project goals are met, with the understanding that material properties may vary by vendor, batch, manufacturing process, and preflight handling. Where possible, complementary data are provided from ground simulations of the space environment and flight experiments, such as the Materials on International Space Station Experiment (MISSE) series. NASA gives no recommendation, endorsement, or preference, either expressed or implied, concerning materials and vendors used. Solar absorptance was calculated from spectral reflectance measurements made from 250 to 2,800 nm with an AZ Technology Laboratory Portable Spectroreflectometer (LPSR) model 300. ASTM E-903 was the test method used under normal laboratory conditions, and ASTM E-490 was the solar spectral irradiance data used to calculate solar absorptance. Most of the samples were flat, but stray light was minimized as much as possible with either a blackbody or black cloth as sample background. The LPSR has repeatability of approximately +/-1%, where solar absorptance is given as range, that is, from actual measurements taken across the sample. Infrared emittance measurements were made with an AZ Technology TEMP 2000A infrared reflectometer. This instrument measures the total hemispheric reflectance averaged over 3-35 micrometer wavelengths. ASTM E-408 was the test method used under normal laboratory conditions. 3 Stray light was minimized as much as possible. The TEMP 2000A has repeatability of approximately +/-0.5%, where infrared emittance is given as a range, that is, from actual measurements taken across the sample.