Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “CCSDS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2011

CCSDS Advanced Orbiting Systems Virtual Channel Access Service for QoS MACHETE Model

To support various communications requirements imposed by different missions, interplanetary communication protocols need to be designed, validated, and evaluated carefully. Multimission Advanced Communications Hybrid Environment for Test and Evaluation (MACHETE), described in "Simulator of Space Communication Networks" (NPO-41373), NASA Tech Briefs, Vol. 29, No. 8 (August 2005), p. 44, combines various tools for simulation and performance analysis of space networks. The MACHETE environment supports orbital analysis, link budget analysis, communications network simulations, and hardware-in-the-loop testing. By building abstract behavioral models of network protocols, one can validate performance after identifying the appropriate metrics of interest. The innovators have extended the MACHETE model library to include a generic link-layer Virtual Channel (VC) model supporting quality-of-service (QoS) controls based on IP streams. The main purpose of this generic Virtual Channel model addition was to interface fine-grain flow-based QoS (quality of service) between the network and MAC layers of the QualNet simulator, a commercial component of MACHETE. This software model adds the capability of mapping IP streams, based on header fields, to virtual channel numbers, allowing extended QoS handling at link layer. This feature further refines the QoS v existing at the network layer. QoS at the network layer (e.g. diffserv) supports few QoS classes, so data from one class will be aggregated together; differentiating between flows internal to a class/priority is not supported. By adding QoS classification capability between network and MAC layers through VC, one maps multiple VCs onto the same physical link. Users then specify different VC weights, and different queuing and scheduling policies at the link layer. This VC model supports system performance analysis of various virtual channel link-layer QoS queuing schemes independent of the network-layer QoS systems.

Jennings, Esther H.↗
NASA NTRS2017

NASA GSFC Report on CCSDS Recommendations 2.1.8A B Minimum Earth Station Transmitter Frequency Resolution for Spacecraft Receiver Acquisition

In Fall 2016, ESA presented paper SLS-RFM 16-10 documenting a possible issue with the frequency lock-in range specification in Recommendation 2.1.8A of typically 267 to 1067 Hz in considerings (b) from considerings (a) for loop bandwidths [2B(sub LO)] in the range of 200 to 800 Hz with a recommendation of 100 Hz step size for frequency sweeping. The paper calculated the lock-in range to be (+/-)266 to (+/-)1064 rad/s or (+/-)42 to (+/-)168 Hz. Also, Recommendation 2.1.8B has the same issue for considering (a) and (b), i.e. for 2B(sub LO) =10 Hz, a lock-in range of 13 Hz was specified and a recommendation of 5 Hz step size for frequency sweeping. ESA also provided test results from the Rosetta and Exomars transponders. The results were somewhat inconsistent since the tests to verify lock-in and pull-in range did not include acquisition time, which is vital to the definition of these performance measures. This paper will address these test results below. However, we first examine the rationale for Recommendation 2.1.8A/B and its consistency with the theory of 2nd order phase lock loop operations. Our approach is to design a digital phase locked loop (DPLL) from phase locked loop (PLL) requirements. All analysis will be performed with a DPLL.

digital phase locked loop↗